QIN Ran, ZHAO Jinhui, LI Ting, ZHANG Jingshu, WANG Yifan, GUO Xin. Auxiliary screening for myopia in kindergarten and primary school students in Beijing, 2023[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2024, 45(7): 945-949. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024205
Citation: QIN Ran, ZHAO Jinhui, LI Ting, ZHANG Jingshu, WANG Yifan, GUO Xin. Auxiliary screening for myopia in kindergarten and primary school students in Beijing, 2023[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2024, 45(7): 945-949. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024205

Auxiliary screening for myopia in kindergarten and primary school students in Beijing, 2023

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024205
  • Received Date: 2024-05-15
  • Rev Recd Date: 2024-05-28
  • Available Online: 2024-07-27
  • Publish Date: 2024-07-25
  •   Objective  To analyze cycloplegic refraction data of kindergarten and primary school students in Beijing in 2023, so as to provide scientific reference for selecting auxiliary methods for students myopia screening.  Methods  In the spring semester of 2023, a multi-stage cluster sampling method was used to select kindergartens and primary schools in one urban and one suburban district of Beijing. Two kindergartens and two primary schools were selected in the urban district, with 1 191 students undergoing cycloplegic refraction examination. And the suburban district included 66 kindergartens and 6 primary schools, with 3 555 students undergoing cycloplegic refraction examination. The examination items included pre- and post- cycloplegia optometry, axial length (AL), corneal curvature and height.  Results  In each academic stage, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the axial length/corneal radius of curvature (AL/CR) (Kindergarten: AUC=0.89, Lower primary school students: AUC=0.91, Upper primary school students: AUC=0.89) were higher than that of screening myopia, but the difference were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The AUC for axial length was the lowest (0.74, 0.82, 0.83) and lower than that for AL/CR with statistically significant difference (χ2=22.43, 59.04, 20.13, P < 0.05). After combining naked eye vision and AL/CR, kindergarten students showed an increased AUC from 0.83 (95%CI=0.78-0.88) to 0.93 (95%CI=0.89-0.97), and lower primary school students exhibited an increase from 0.89 (95%CI=0.86-0.91) to 0.96 (95%CI=0.95-0.97). In higher primary school students, AUC increased from 0.91 (95%CI=0.89-0.92) to 0.96 (95%CI=0.95-0.97). There was no overlap in the confidence intervals before and after combinations, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).  Conclusion  AL/CR plays a significant role in assisting with myopia screening among kindergarten and primary school students. Attention should be paid to the application of AL/CR in assisting myopia screening in kindergarten and primary school students.
  • [1]
    JIANG F, WANG D, YIN Q, et al. Longitudinal changes in axial length and spherical equivalent in children and adolescents with high myopia[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2023, 64(12): 6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.64.12.6
    [2]
    SCHUSTER A K, KRAUSE L, KUCHENBÄCKER C, et al. Prevalence and time trends in myopia among children and adolescents[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2020, 117(50): 855-860.
    [3]
    PELED A, NITZAN I, MEGRELI J, et al. Myopia and BMI: a nationwide study of 1.3 million adolescents[J]. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2022, 30(8): 1691-1698. doi: 10.1002/oby.23482
    [4]
    中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委办公厅关于开展第二批儿童青少年近视防控适宜技术试点工作的通知[EB/OL]. (2021-10-09)[2023-02-10]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s7934td/202110/0fc8a001d42345d9ac9b38842b295fe7.shtml.

    Notice of the General Office of the National Health Commission of the PRC on carrying out the pilot work of the second batch of appropriate techniques for myopia prevention and control in children and adolescents[EB/OL]. (2021-10-09)[2023-02-10]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s7934td/202110/0fc8a001d42345d9ac9b38842b295fe7.shtml. (in Chinese)
    [5]
    LIU S, CHEN J, WANG J, et al. Cutoff values of axial length/corneal radius ratio for determining myopia vary with age among 3-18 years old children and adolescents[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2024, 262(2): 651-661. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06176-0
    [6]
    GUAN J, ZHU Y, HU Q, et al. Prevalence patterns and onset prediction of high myopia for children and adolescents in southern China via real-world screening data: retrospective school-based study[J]. J Med Int Res, 2023;25: e39507.
    [7]
    TIDEMAN J W L, POLLING J R, VINGERLING J R, et al. Axial len-gth growth and the risk of developing myopia in European children[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2018, 96(3): 301-309. doi: 10.1111/aos.13603
    [8]
    HE X, SANKARIDURG P, NADUVILATH T, et al. Normative data and percentile curves for axial length and axial length/corneal curvature in Chinese children and adolescents aged 4-18 years[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2023, 107(2): 167-175. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319431
    [9]
    中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委办公厅, 中华人民共和国教育部办公厅, 中华人民共和国财政部办公厅, 等. 关于开展2018年儿童青少年近视调查工作的通知[EB/OL]. (2018-10-26)[2023-11-15]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s5898bm/201810/08e2b45092d346a8a8c960d3e3d98b62.shtml.

    General Office of the National Health Commission of the PRC, General Office of the Ministry of Education of the PRC, General Office of the Ministry of Finance of the PRC, et al. Notice of launching the myopia survey of children and adolescents in 2018[EB/OL]. (2018-10-26)[2023-11-15]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s5898bm/201810/08e2b45092d346a8a8c960d3e3d98b62.shtml. (in Chinese)
    [10]
    LI Y, XING Y, JIA C, et al. Beijing Pinggu childhood eye study: the baseline refractive characteristics in 6- to 12-year-old Chinese primary school students[J]. Front Public Health, 2022, 10: 890261. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.890261
    [11]
    中华人民共和国卫生部. 学生健康检查技术规范: GB/T 26343—2010[S]. 2011-01-14.

    National Health Ministry of the PRC. Technical standard for physical examination for students: GB/T 26343-2010[S]. 2011-01-14. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 7岁以下儿童生长标准: WS/T 423—2022[S]. 2022-09-19.

    National Health Commission of the PRC. Growth standard for children under 7 years of age: WS/T 423-2022[S]. 2022-09-19. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 7岁~18岁儿童青少年身高发育等级评价: WS/T 612—2018[S]. 2018-06-15.

    National Health Commission of the PRC. Standard for height level classification among children and adolescents aged 7-18 years: WS/T 612-2018[S]. 2018-06-15. (in Chinese)
    [14]
    张凤云, 张锡彦, 杨婕, 等. 儿童青少年近视筛查3种方案比较[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2019, 40(10): 1542-1544. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.10.029

    ZHANG F Y, ZHANG X Y, YANG J, et al. A comparative study of 3 types of myopia screening methods among children and adolescents[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2019, 40(10): 1542-1544. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.10.029
    [15]
    陈军, 何鲜桂, 王菁菁, 等. 2021至2030年我国6~18岁学生近视眼患病率预测分析[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2021, 57(4): 261-267.

    CHEN J, HE X G, WANG J J, et al. Forecasting the prevalence of myopia among students aged 6-18 years in China from 2021 to 2030[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 2021, 57(4): 261-267. (in Chinese)
    [16]
    《眼轴长度在近视防控管理中的应用专家共识(2023)》专家组. 眼轴长度在近视防控管理中的应用专家共识(2023)[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志, 2024, 42(1): 1-11.

    Expert Workgroup of Expert Consensus on the Application of Axial Length in Myopia Prevention and Control Management (2023). Expert consensus on the application of axial length in myopia prevention and control management (2023)[J]. Chin J Exp Ophthalmol, 2024, 42(1): 1-11. (in Chinese)
    [17]
    中华预防医学会公共卫生眼科分会. 中国学龄儿童眼球远视储备、眼轴长度、角膜曲率参考区间及相关遗传因素专家共识(2022年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2022, 58(2): 96-102.

    Public Health Ophthalmology Branch of Chinese Preventive Medicine Association. Chinese expert consensus on the reference interval of ocular hyperopia reserve, axial length, corneal curvature and genetic factors in school-age children (2022)[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 2022, 58(2): 96-102. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    徐梓航, 胡媛媛, 温莹, 等. 3种方法界定儿童青少年近视检出率及其一致性评价[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2023, 44(5): 747-750, 755. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.05.024

    XU Z H, HU Y Y, WEN Y, et al. Prevalence of myopia and consistency evaluation of three myopia assessment methods among children and adolescents[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2023, 44(5): 747-750, 755. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.05.024
    [19]
    YIP V C, PAN C W, LIN X Y, et al. The relationship between growth spurts and myopia in Singapore children[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2012, 53(13): 7961-7966. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10402
    [20]
    CHEN J, CHEN Z, LIN S, et al. Correlation analysis for school-age children's height and refractive errors[J]. Adv Clin Exp Med, 2018, 27(8): 1125-1130. doi: 10.17219/acem/78773
    [21]
    TAO L, WANG C, PENG Y, et al. Correlation between increase of axial length and height growth in Chinese school-age children[J]. Front Public Health, 2022, 9: 817882. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.817882
  • Relative Articles

    [1]QUAN Xiaoshan, YANG Jimei, CHAI Jieyu, QIU Tianlong, SUN Ji. Role of class relationship in the influence of perceived discrimination on pro-social behavior of left-behind junior middle school students[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2024, 45(11): 1625-1628. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024344
    [2]QI Zhiyuan, QI Zhenghao, HAN Wengeng, HAN Mei, HAN Hui. Relationship of parental control and peer relationship with pro-social behavior among junior high school students[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2024, 45(11): 1614-1618. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024326
    [3]WANG Xiaowan, GUO Lingfeng, LIU Wenli. Participation and attitude towards online public opinion on gender issues among college students in Shaanxi Province[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2022, 43(12): 1771-1774. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.003
    [4]YUAN Mengyuan, SU Puyu. Research progress for the interaction of child abuse and monoamine oxidase A gene on antisocial behavior among adolescents[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2021, 42(5): 792-795, 800. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.05.036
    [5]XIE Qili, ZHANG Hongyi. A longitudinal study on the influence of students' relationships with teachers, peers students and school attitude on externalizing behaviors among migrant children[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2021, 42(9): 1348-1350, 1355. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.09.017
    [8]DU Guoping, YU Qingzhou, WANG Yaqing, ZHANG Jun, LYU Yumei, ZHANG Suqin, GAO Rong. AIDS-related knowledge among college freshmen and its influence on sexual attitudes and behaviors in Jiangsu Province[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2020, 41(11): 1661-1663,1667. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.11.017
    [9]HAN Xue, ZHANG Ye, ZHANG Shanshan. Multiple mediating effects of antisocial traits in the relation between self-control and campus bullying among middle school girls[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2018, 39(3): 372-375. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.03.015
    [10]XIE Xiaolian, LI Juan, LIU Shanghong, SUN Lijiao, ZHAO Haiping. Association of obesity-related knowledge attitude and behaviors of parents with children's overweight and obesity[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2018, 39(12): 1779-1782,1786. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.12.005
    [11]ZHENG Ya-nan, HU Wen, LAI Yue-yue. Relationships among psychological help-seeking attitudes, mental disease stigma and social supports of college students[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2016, 37(1): 78-81. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2016.01.023
    [12]ZHENG Qing-you, LU Ning. Self-esteem as mediator between parental company and pro-social behavior of 5 to 6 years old children[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2016, 37(1): 71-73,77. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2016.01.021
    [13]WANG Kai-yang, HU He-he, SU Yan-ping. Sexual knowledge and attitude to premarital sexual behavior among medical school students[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2016, 37(1): 33-35,39. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2016.01.010
    [14]Investigation on the knowledge, attitude and behavior of tuberculosis prevention and control among high school students in western areas of China[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2015, 36(11): 1648-1652.
    [15]Drinking-related knowledge attitude and behavior among parents of middle school students in Shanghai[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2015, 36(5): 686-688,692.
    [18]Analysis of drinking knowledge, attitude and practice of secondary school students in Shanghai[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2015, 36(7): 1000-1003.
    [19]Survey on sexual behavior and AIDS knowledge and attitude among high school students[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2013, 34(4): 397-399.
    [20]Breakfast quality and eating behavior of rural primary school students in Dongguan[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2013, 34(8): 900-902,905.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 李妍,梁丽婵,周欣然,边玉芳. 家师关系与小学生学校态度:师生关系的中介作用及父母差异. 心理发展与教育. 2024(01): 74-82 .
    2. 谢其利,张鸿翼. 师生同学关系和学校态度对流动儿童外化问题行为影响的追踪研究. 中国学校卫生. 2021(09): 1348-1350+1355 . 本站查看
    3. 沈秋斐. 社会问题对初中学校管理的影响研究. 课程教育研究. 2019(43): 217-218 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-050204060
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 29.5 %FULLTEXT: 29.5 %META: 60.9 %META: 60.9 %PDF: 9.6 %PDF: 9.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 16.2 %其他: 16.2 %其他: 2.5 %其他: 2.5 %Central District: 0.2 %Central District: 0.2 %China: 0.5 %China: 0.5 %万鸦老: 0.5 %万鸦老: 0.5 %上海: 2.2 %上海: 2.2 %中卫: 0.5 %中卫: 0.5 %丽水: 0.5 %丽水: 0.5 %伦敦: 3.2 %伦敦: 3.2 %保亭: 0.2 %保亭: 0.2 %六安: 0.5 %六安: 0.5 %北京: 5.2 %北京: 5.2 %南京: 0.2 %南京: 0.2 %南宁: 1.2 %南宁: 1.2 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %合肥: 7.6 %合肥: 7.6 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %天津: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %宿州: 0.5 %宿州: 0.5 %巴黎: 0.7 %巴黎: 0.7 %布拉德福德: 0.2 %布拉德福德: 0.2 %广州: 1.0 %广州: 1.0 %张家口: 7.4 %张家口: 7.4 %德阳: 0.5 %德阳: 0.5 %成都: 0.7 %成都: 0.7 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %新加坡: 0.2 %新加坡: 0.2 %昆明: 0.7 %昆明: 0.7 %杭州: 0.2 %杭州: 0.2 %武汉: 1.0 %武汉: 1.0 %沃思堡: 0.7 %沃思堡: 0.7 %泰安: 0.2 %泰安: 0.2 %海得拉巴: 0.7 %海得拉巴: 0.7 %淮南: 0.5 %淮南: 0.5 %深圳: 1.0 %深圳: 1.0 %漯河: 0.2 %漯河: 0.2 %珠海: 0.5 %珠海: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.7 %石家庄: 0.7 %绍兴: 0.5 %绍兴: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 27.5 %芒廷维尤: 27.5 %芝加哥: 0.7 %芝加哥: 0.7 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %莱比锡: 0.7 %莱比锡: 0.7 %菏泽: 0.2 %菏泽: 0.2 %蚌埠: 0.7 %蚌埠: 0.7 %西宁: 2.2 %西宁: 2.2 %西安: 0.7 %西安: 0.7 %赣州: 0.5 %赣州: 0.5 %赤峰: 0.5 %赤峰: 0.5 %运城: 0.5 %运城: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %重庆: 1.0 %重庆: 1.0 %镇江: 0.5 %镇江: 0.5 %长沙: 1.2 %长沙: 1.2 %雅加达: 0.7 %雅加达: 0.7 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %其他其他Central DistrictChina万鸦老上海中卫丽水伦敦保亭六安北京南京南宁厦门合肥呼和浩特天津宿州巴黎布拉德福德广州张家口德阳成都扬州新加坡昆明杭州武汉沃思堡泰安海得拉巴淮南深圳漯河珠海石家庄绍兴芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莱比锡菏泽蚌埠西宁西安赣州赤峰运城邯郸郑州重庆镇江长沙雅加达青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (248) PDF downloads(39) Cited by(6)
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return