Evaluation of reliability and validity, and application on the Simplified Rating Questionnaire of Social Ecological Risks in Adolescents

WANG Jiaojiao; ZHANG Yi; XIE Yang; ZHANG Xinyu; ZHANG Xianglin; WAN Yuhui; TAO Fangbiao

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.11.019

Volume 44 Issue 11

Nov. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH > 2023 > 44(11): 1679-1682

WANG Jiaojiao, ZHANG Yi, XIE Yang, ZHANG Xinyu, ZHANG Xianglin, WAN Yuhui, TAO Fangbiao. Evaluation of reliability and validity, and application on the Simplified Rating Questionnaire of Social Ecological Risks in Adolescents[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2023, 44(11): 1679-1682. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.11.019

Citation:

WANG Jiaojiao, ZHANG Yi, XIE Yang, ZHANG Xinyu, ZHANG Xianglin, WAN Yuhui, TAO Fangbiao. Evaluation of reliability and validity, and application on the Simplified Rating Questionnaire of Social Ecological Risks in Adolescents[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2023, 44(11): 1679-1682. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.11.019

Citation:

WANG Jiaojiao, ZHANG Yi, XIE Yang, ZHANG Xinyu, ZHANG Xianglin, WAN Yuhui, TAO Fangbiao. Evaluation of reliability and validity, and application on the Simplified Rating Questionnaire of Social Ecological Risks in Adolescents[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2023, 44(11): 1679-1682. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.11.019

PDF( 408 KB)

Evaluation of reliability and validity, and application on the Simplified Rating Questionnaire of Social Ecological Risks in Adolescents

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.11.019

1.
Department of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei (230032), Anhui Province, China

Received Date: 2023-05-29
Rev Recd Date: 2023-08-02

Available Online: 2023-11-27

Publish Date: 2023-11-25

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To develop a simplified Rating Questionnaire of Social Ecological Risks in Adolescents and to evaluate the reliability and predictive validity of the brief questionnaire, so as to provide data and evidence support for building the evaluation system of cumulative social-ecological risk exposure. Methods A large cross-sectional was conducted in eight areas, including Shenzhen, Zhengzhou, Xuzhou, Nanchang, Shenyang, Taiyuan, Kunming and Chongqing, from October to December 2021. A total of 22 868 adolescents were included in the analysis. Data on healthy behaviors from 10 838 adolescents from Shenyang, Taiyuan, Kunming, Chongqing were used for item selection, based on factor analysis, validity and reliability evaluation. The data from Shenzhen, Zhengzhou, Xuzhou, Nanchang, including 12 030 adolescents, were used to define the partition values of the brief questionnaire, and evaluate the predictive validity. Results The brief questionnaire containing 25-item were developed by analyzing and choosing all items of original questionnaire, and covered seven dimensions including individual, family, school, community, policy, time and culture. The cumulative contribution rate of variance was 54.95%, the Cronbach coefficient was 0.79, and the split-half coefficient was 0.70. Participants in the higher risk group had significantly higher risk of smoking (OR=4.05, 95%CI=2.78-5.92), drinking (OR=3.47, 95%CI=2.86-4.19), suicidal ideation (OR=8.85, 95%CI=7.68-10.21), suicidal plans (OR=8.85, 95%CI=7.27-10.78), suicidal attempt (OR=8.86, 95%CI=6.67-11.78) than individual in the lower risk group (P < 0.05). After stratified by gender, the above positive correlations still remained significant(P < 0.05). Conclusion The brief questionnaire, with good reliability and predictive validity, could be widely applicated in the further researches on social ecological risk factors.
- Cumulative ecological risk,
- Mental health,
- Questionnaires,
- Adolescent

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	HARPER C R, STEINER R J, BROOKMEYER K A. Using the social-ecological model to improve access to care for adolescents and young adults[J]. J Adolesc Health, 2018, 62(6): 641-642. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.03.010
[2]	BRONFENBRENNER U, MORRIS P. The ecology of developmental processes[C]//DAMON W. Handbook of child psychology: theoretical models of human development. 5th ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1998: 993-1028.
[3]	WRIGHT M O D, MASTEN A S. Resilience processes in development: fostering positive adaptation in the context of adversity[C]//GOLDSTEIN S, BROOKS R B. Handbook of resilience in children. New York: Springer, 2005: 17-37.
[4]	ASFOUR L, HUANG S, OCASIO M A, et al. Association between socio-ecological risk factor clustering and mental, emotional, and behavioral problems in Hispanic adolescents[J]. J Child Fam Stud, 2017, 26(5): 1266-1273. doi: 10.1007/s10826-016-0641-0
[5]	JESSOR R, TURBIN M S, COSTA F M, et al. Adolescent problem behavior in China and the United States: a cross-national study of psychosocial protective factors[J]. J Res Adolesc, 2003, 13(3): 329-360. doi: 10.1111/1532-7795.1303004
[6]	张一. 社会生态学风险因素与多基因风险评分的交互作用对青少年健康危害行为聚集的影响[D]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2022. ZHANG Y. The effect of interaction between social ecological risk factors and polygenic risk score on clustering of health risk behaviors in adolescents[D]. Hefei: Anhui Medical University, 2022. (in Chinese)
[7]	HU J, SONG X, LI D, et al. Interaction of smoking and being bullied on suicidal behaviors: a school-based cross-sectional survey in China[J]. Environ Health Prev Med, 2021, 26(1): 79. doi: 10.1186/s12199-021-00999-1
[8]	BRENER N D, BILLY J O, GRADY W R. Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature[J]. J Adolesc Health, 2003, 33(6): 436-457. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00052-1
[9]	Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), BRENER N D, KANN L, et al. Methodology of the youth risk behavior surveillance system-2013[J]. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2013, 62(RR-1): 1-20.
[10]	EATON D K, KANN L, KINCHEN S, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance-United States, 2011[J]. MMWR Surveill Summ, 2012, 61(4): 1-162.
[11]	陶舒曼, 万宇辉, 伍晓艳, 等. 《青少年心理健康评定简明问卷》的心理学评价及应用[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2020, 41(9): 1331-1334, 1338. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.09.014 TAO S M, WAN Y H, WU X Y, et al. Evaluation and application of Brief Instrument on Psychological Health of Youths[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2020, 41(9): 1331-1334, 1338. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.09.014
[12]	MALCOLM S, HUANG S, CORDOVA D, et al. Predicting condom use attitudes, norms, and control beliefs in Hispanic problem behavior youth: the effects of family functioning and parent-adolescent communication about sex on condom use[J]. Health Educ Behav, 2013, 40(4): 384-391. doi: 10.1177/1090198112440010
[13]	PRADO G, HUANG S, MALDONADO-MOLINA M, et al. An empirical test of ecodevelopmental theory in predicting HIV risk behaviors among Hispanic youth[J]. Health Educ Behav, 2010, 37(1): 97-114. doi: 10.1177/1090198109349218
[14]	GÉCZY I, SAEWYC E M, POON C S, et al. Health-risk behaviors and protective factors among adolescents in rural British Columbia[J]. J Rural Health, 2020, 36(1): 65-76. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12389
[15]	YANG R, LI D, HU J, et al. Association between health literacy and subgroups of health risk behaviors among Chinese adolescents in six cities: a study using regression mixture modeling[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019, 16(19): 3680. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193680
[16]	DEUTSCH A R. Selection and socialization influences on adolescent alcohol use: the individual and joint contexts of neighborhood disadvantage and population density[J]. Subst Use Misuse, 2019, 54(10): 1663-1678. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1608247
[17]	GIBBONS F X, REIMER R A, GERRARD M, et al. Rural-urban differences in substance use among African-American adolescents[J]. J Rural Health, 2007, 23(Suppl): 22-28.
[18]	熊俊梅, 海曼, 黄飞, 等. 家庭累积风险与青少年心理健康的关系: 心理资本的补偿效应和调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 94-102. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ202001011.htm XIONG J M, HAI M, HUANG F, et al. Family cumulative risk and mental health in Chinese adolescents: the compensatory and moderating effects of psychological capital[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2020, 36(1): 94-102. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ202001011.htm
[19]	WARREN C M, KECHTER A, CHRISTODOULOU G, et al. Psychosocial factors and multiple health risk behaviors among early adolescents: a latent profile analysis[J]. J Behav Med, 2020, 43(6): 1002-1013. doi: 10.1007/s10865-020-00154-1
[20]	鲍振宙, 李董平, 张卫, 等. 累积生态风险与青少年的学业和社交能力: 子女责任感的风险补偿与调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 482-495. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201405005.htm BAO Z Z, LI D P, ZHANG W, et al. Cumulative ecological risk and adolescents' academic and social competence: the compensatory and moderating effects of sense of responsibility to parents[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2014, 30(5): 482-495. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201405005.htm
[21]	EVANS G W, LI D, WHIPPLE S S. Cumulative risk and child development[J]. Psychol Bull, 2013, 139(6): 1342-1396. doi: 10.1037/a0031808