Volume 44 Issue 6
Jun.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Li, HU Jinfeng, WANG Dahui. Awereness and beliefs on sedentary behavior among university students in Hangzhou City[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2023, 44(6): 832-835. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.06.008
Citation: ZHANG Li, HU Jinfeng, WANG Dahui. Awereness and beliefs on sedentary behavior among university students in Hangzhou City[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2023, 44(6): 832-835. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.06.008

Awereness and beliefs on sedentary behavior among university students in Hangzhou City

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.06.008
  • Received Date: 2022-12-30
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-03-21
  • Available Online: 2023-06-28
  • Publish Date: 2023-06-25
  •   Objective  To analyze the awereness and beliefs on sedentary behavior among college students and associated factors, so as to provide a reference for improving sedentary behavior.  Methods  A total of 1 261 students from six universities in Hangzhou City, were selected using a convenience sampling method. Sedentary behavior and its influencing factors were analyzed using the Chi-square test and binary Logistic regression, respectively.  Results  The pass rate of the knowledge and belief scores were 33.2% and 55.5%, respectively. The average duration of sedentary behavior on weekdays and weedends were (6.73±3.03) and (6.22±3.41)h/d, respectively. The results of the binary Logistic regression analysis showed that the influencing factors of health-related sedentary behavior included gender, grade, subject major, sports performance and belief score (P < 0.01). Female students were 2.18 times more likely to exhibit unhealthy sedentary behaviors than male students (95%CI=1.58-3.01); senior college students were less likely to exhibit unhealthy static behaviors than freshmen (OR=0.38, 95%CI=0.23-0.61); and sports majors were less likely to exhibit unhealthy sedentary behaviors than medical majors (OR=0.10, 95%CI=0.03-0.34). Students with high sports performance were less likely to exhibit unhealthy sedentary behavior (OR=0.63, 95%CI=0.48-0.83). In terms of belief scores, students who obtained a pass rate were less likely to exhibit unhealthy static behavior (OR=0.67, 95%CI=0.52-0.87).  Conclusion  Sedentary behavior is common among college students, and is influenced by several factors influencing factors. Colleges and universities should pay attention to improving the knowledge and belief level of students' sedentary behavior, promote healthy exercise habits, reduce the duration of static behavior, and maintain the health level of college students.
  • loading
  • [1]
    TREMBLAY M S, AUBERT S, BARNES J D, et al. Sedentary behavior research network (SBRN)-terminology consensus project process and outcome[J]. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2017, 14(1): 75. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8
    [2]
    NOWAK P F, BOZEK A, BLUKACZ M. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and quality of life among university students[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2019, 2019: 9791281.
    [3]
    MCLAUGHLIN M, ATKIN A J, STARR L, et al. Worldwide surveillance of self-reported sitting time: a scoping review[J]. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2020, 17(1): 111. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01008-4
    [4]
    EZEUGW V I, GARGA N, MANNS P J. Reducing sedentary behaviour after stroke: perspectives of ambulatory individuals with stroke[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2017, 39(25): 2551-2558. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1239764
    [5]
    YU L, LIANG Q, ZHOU W, et al. Sedentary behavior and the risk of cardiac-cerebral vascular diseases in southern China[J]. Medicine, 2018, 97(44): e12838. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012838
    [6]
    GE Y, XIN S, LUAN D, et al. Association of physical activity, sedentary time, and sleep duration on the health-related quality of life of college students in Northeast China[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2019, 17(1): 124. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1194-x
    [7]
    刘红云. 高级心理统计[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2019: 133.

    LIU H Y. Advanced psychological statistics[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2019: 133. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    郭清. 健康管理学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015.

    GUO Q. Health management[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2015. (in Chinese)
    [9]
    何梅, 刘景裕, 孟露. 大学生身体活动与久坐行为的现状及对策研究: 以武汉商学院为例[J]. 福建体育科技, 2019, 38(1): 43-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FUJI201901012.htm

    HE M, LIU J Y, MENG L. Physical activity and sedentary behavior of college students: a case study of Wuhan college of commerce[J]. Fujian Sports Sci Technol, 2019, 38(1): 43-46. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FUJI201901012.htm
    [10]
    李友. 大学生屏幕时间、体力活动与非特异性疼痛的特征及相关性研究[D]. 成都: 四川师范大学, 2020.

    LI Y. Study on the characteristics and correlation of screen time, physical activity and non-specific pain in college students[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan Normal University, 2020. (in Chinese)
    [11]
    汪海伟, 李占宇, 张晓丹. 天津市部分大学生体力活动水平与身体成分的相关性[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2018, 39(8): 1195-1198. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.08.023

    WANG H W, LI Z Y, ZHANG X D. Correlation between physical activity level and body composition of some college students in Tianjin[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2018, 39(8): 1195-1198. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.08.023
    [12]
    郑珊. 体育专业和非体育专业大学生日常体力活动水平和能量消耗的比较研究[D]. 北京: 首都体育学院, 2014.

    ZHENG S. A comparative study on daily physical activity level and energy consumption of college students majoring in physical education and non-physical education[D]. Beijing: Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, 2014. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    JOHN K, ANN C. Health promotion: theory and practice[M]. London: Macmillans Press, 1995.
    [14]
    李维瑜, 刘静, 余桂林, 等. 知信行理论模式在护理工作中的应用现状与展望[J]. 护理学杂志, 2015, 30(6): 107-110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ201506043.htm

    LI W Y, LIU J, YU G L, et al. Application status and prospect of knowledge and action theory model in nursing work[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2015, 30(6): 107-110. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ201506043.htm
    [15]
    吴铭, 杨剑, 王国祥, 等. 基于ICF-CY影响青少年久坐行为相关环境因素Scoping综述[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2020, 26(6): 621-630. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZKLS202006002.htm

    WU M, YANG J, WANG G X, et al. An overview of the effects of ICF-CY on sedentary behavior in adolescents[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2020, 26(6): 621-630. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZKLS202006002.htm
    [16]
    张宝. 成年人静态行为评估与干预对策研究[D]. 上海: 海军军医大学, 2018.

    ZHANG B. Study on adult static behavior assessment and intervention strategies[D]. Shanghai: Navy Medical University, 2018. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (279) PDF downloads(61) Cited by()
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return