女大学生宿舍人际关系小组工作干预效果分析

王青; 吴杨

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.015

女大学生宿舍人际关系小组工作干预效果分析

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.015

王青,
吴杨^,

江西财经大学人文学院，南昌 330013

基金项目:

教育部人文社会科学研究专项基金项目 20JDSZ3103

详细信息

通讯作者:
吴杨，E-mail：79848291@qq.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G444 G647.8 B844.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 271
- HTML全文浏览量: 129
- PDF下载量: 42
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-05-16
- 修回日期: 2022-10-10
- 网络出版日期: 2022-12-30
- 刊出日期: 2022-12-25

Group-based interpersonal relationship intervention in female college students' dormitory

WANG Qing,
WU Yang^,

College of Humanities, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang(330013), China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨基于沟通理论的小组工作对女大学生宿舍人际关系的介入效果，为改善大学人际关系提供借鉴。方法 2020年10月，采取随机对照实验，将江西财经大学4个新生班的女生随机分为干预组(38名)和控制组(36名)。以沟通理论为基础，对干预组进行3次、每次80 min的小组干预，干预主题包括公共秩序、宿命包容度、沟通状况，控制组不做任何处理。用大学生宿舍人际关系量表在干预前和干预完成3个月后分别测量两组成员的宿舍人际关系质量，并进行比较分析。结果干预前，两组的人际关系质量较高且差异无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。干预结束3个月后，控制组成员在人际关系质量、亲融度、满意度上的得分(39.78±3.38，17.59±2.94，11.94±1.87)与前测(44.07±5.47，18.95±1.86，13.14±2.04)相比降低(t值分别为2.68，2.49，2.71，P值均＜0.05)。干预组成员在宿舍人际关系质量非紧张度、亲融度、满意度上的分值与前测相比差异均无统计学意义(P值均＞0.05)。干预组在人际关系质量、亲融度及满意度上的后测结果得分(44.58±5.95，12.58±2.45，13.26±2.01)均高于控制组(39.78±3.38，10.94±2.30，11.94±1.87)(t值分别为2.72，3.09，2.92，P值均＜0.05)。结论基于沟通理论的小组干预能使大学女生宿舍保持相处之初时的高质量人际关系，可有效预防宿舍人际矛盾出现及关系恶化。
- 人际关系 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 干预性研究 /
- 学生 /
- 女(雌)性
Abstract: Objective This study explores the intervention effects of communication theories on college female dormitory relationship, so as to provide a reference for improving interpersonal relationship. Methods In October 2020, a randomized controlled experiment was conducted to randomly assign female students from four freshman classes in a university in Jiangxi Province to the intervention group (n=38) and the control group (n=36). Participants in the intervention group received a group intervention of three sessions, with 80 minutes for each session. Their dormitory relationships (including overall dormitory relationship, non interpersonan tension, affinity, and satisfaction) were measured before and three months after the intervention. Results Before the intervention, quality of interpersonal relationship between the two groups was higher and there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). Three months after the intervention, the scores of the members in the control group on interpersonal relationship quality, affinity and satisfaction(39.78±3.38, 17.59±2.94, 11.94±1.87) were significantly lower than those in the pre-test(44.07±5.47, 18.95±1.86, 13.14±2.04) (t=2.68, 2.49, 2.71, P < 0.05). However, the scores of the intervention group on the interpersonal relationship in the dormitory and the three dimensions contained therein did not change significantly (P>0.05) compared with the pre-test. In addition, the post-test results showed that the scores of the intervention group on dormitory interpersonal relationship quality and its two dimensions (affinity and satisfaction)(44.58±5.95, 12.58±2.45, 13.26±2.01) were higher than those of the control group(39.78±3.38, 10.94±2.30, 11.94±1.87) (t=2.72, 3.09, 2.92, P < 0.05). Conclusion Group intervention based on communication theory can improve interpersonal relationship in the dormitory of college female students at first acquaintance, and can effectively prevent interpersonal contradictions and relationship deterioration in the dormitory.
- Interpersonal relations /
- Mental health /
- Intervention studies /
- Students /
- Female
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 基于沟通理论的小组工作干预措施

Table 1. Contents of communication theory-based group work intervention

次数	主题	理论基础	具体内容	操作方法
1	公共秩序	施拉姆沟通理论	通过集体沟通建立宿舍公共秩序：识别宿舍中扰他行为，减少扰他行为；增加利他行为；达成宿舍集体契约。	启发式对话、知识讲解、情景模拟、故事分享
2	宿舍包容度	萨提亚沟通三要素	通过沟通调整自身的认知：了解舍友与自己的差异；正确认识他人与自己的差异；包容他人的差异。	游戏互动、情景模拟、启发式对话
3	沟通状况	萨提亚沟通三要素/非暴力沟通	通过学习提升沟通能力：识别自身习得沟通姿态；避免三角化的沟通；学会使用非暴力沟通的沟通方式。	游戏互动、知识分享、现场演练

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 两组女大学生干预前后大学生宿舍人际关系量表得分比较(x±s)

Table 2. Comparison of the scores of the interpersonal relationship quality table of college students' dormitories between two groups before and after intervention(x±s)

组别	干预前后	人数	统计值	公共秩序	宿舍包容度	沟通状况	宿舍人际关系质量	非紧张度	亲融度	满意度
控制组	干预前	42		44.45±4.80	36.69±4.72	34.45±5.78	44.07±5.47	18.95±1.86	11.97±2.32	13.14±2.04
	干预后	36		39.78±5.28	33.08±4.66	32.00±4.90	39.78±3.38	17.59±2.94	10.94±2.30	11.94±1.87
			t值	4.09	3.38	2.00	2.68	2.49	1.96	2.71
			P值	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.05	0.01	0.02	0.05	0.01
干预组	干预前	52		44.27±4.66	36.08±4.74	33.56±5.29	44.35±5.19	18.96±1.90	12.48±2.01	12.90±2.04
	干预后	38		44.58±4.72^**	36.84±5.05^**	35.21±5.91^*	44.58±5.95^**	18.81±4.41	12.58±2.45^**	13.26±2.01^**
			t值	-0.31	-0.74	-1.39	-0.02	0.99	-0.22	-0.83
			P值	0.76	0.77	0.17	0.98	0.32	0.83	0.41
注：干预后组间比较，P < 0.05，*P < 0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(19)

[1]	周春芬, 高猛, 史晓婷. 大学生宿舍人际关系对自杀风险的影响: 孤独感的中介作用[J]. 临床精神医学杂志, 2020, 30(3): 201-204. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3220.2020.03.018 ZHOU C F, GAO M, SHI X T. Influence of roommate relationship on suicide risk: the mediating effect of loneliness[J]. J Clin Psychiatry, 2020, 30(3): 201-204. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3220.2020.03.018
[2]	赵冬梅, 王婷, 吴坤英, 等. 大学生宿舍人际关系与抑郁的关系: 宿舍冲突应对方式的中介作用和性别调节的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 597-603. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201905011.htm ZHAO D M, WANG T, WU K Y, et al. The relation between college students' dormitory interpersonal relationship and depression: the mediating effect of dormitory interpersonal conflict copingstyle and the moderating effect of gender[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2019, 35(5): 597-603. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201905011.htm
[3]	窦芬, 王曼, 王明辉. 大学生同伴依恋与抑郁: 自我认同感和宿舍人际关系的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2018, 26(4): 772-775. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201804030.htm DOU F, WANG M, WANG M H. Peer attachment and depression: mediating of self-identity and dormitory interpersonal relationship[J]. Chin J Clinl Psychol, 2018, 26(4): 772-775. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201804030.htm
[4]	杨苗苗. 大学生宿舍人际关系、学校归属感与大学适应的关系研究[J]. 高教论坛, 2020, 7(7): 112-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJY202007027.htm YANG M M. A study on the relationship between college students' dormitory interpersonal relationship, school belonging and university adaptation[J]. Higher Educ Forum, 2020, 7 (7): 112-114. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJY202007027.htm
[5]	吴连海. 大学生宿舍人际关系适应问题的实证研究: 以厦门地区部分高校为例[D]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2007. WU L H. The empirical study of college students dormtitory interpersonal adaptation: taking Xiamen Area segmental universities as an example[D]. Xiamen: Xiamen University, 2007. (in Chinese)
[6]	杨艳茹, 石晶. 施拉姆沟通模型下思想政治教育沟通的有效性研究[J]. 吉林省教育学院学报, 2011, 27(7): 22-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLJB201107008.htm YANG Y R, SHI J. Study on the effectiveness of communication in ideologicaland political education with Schramm's communication model[J]. J Educ Inst Jilin, 2011, 27(7): 22-24. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLJB201107008.htm
[7]	刘希丹, 罗文素, 张炜, 等. 贵阳市烟草公司高管团队有效沟通现状及其模型构建[J]. 企业改革与管理, 2020(2): 90-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QYGG202002043.htm LIU X D, LUO W S, ZHANG W, et al. The current situation and model construction of effective communication among senior management teams of Guiyang tobacco companies[J]. Enterpr Reform Manag, 2020(2): 90-91. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QYGG202002043.htm
[8]	马歇尔·卢森堡. 非暴力沟通[M]. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2021: 9. MARSHALL R. Nonviolent communication: a language of life[M]. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House, 2021: 9. (in Chinese)
[9]	李添红, 马灵亚, 郦丽华. 萨提亚模式护理干预对精神分裂症患者的影响探讨[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2020(10): 140-141. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZOGU202010079.htm LI T H, MA L Y, LI L H. Influence of Satir model nursing intervention on patients with schizophrenia[J]. China Higher Med Educ, 2020(10): 140-141. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZOGU202010079.htm
[10]	连艳丽. 非暴力沟通培训在提升产科护士应对护患冲突能力中的应用[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2020, 1(4): 376-379. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLZH202004023.htm LIAN Y L. Application of nonviolent communication training in improving obstetric nurses' ability to deal with nurse-patient conflict[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs, 2020, 1(4): 376-379. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLZH202004023.htm
[11]	郝雨, 朱媛媛. 冲突与协商: 私人空间兼公共空间的大学生宿舍[J]. 南通大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 32(5): 98-103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NTSX201605017.htm HAO Y, ZHU Y Y. Conflict and negotiation: private space and public space in university students' dormitories[J]. J Nantong Univ(Soc Sci Edit), 2016, 32(5): 98-103. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NTSX201605017.htm
[12]	蒋丹. 大学生自我认同与宿舍人际关系的研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳师范大学, 2011. JIANG D. Study on college students' ego-identity and its relationship with dormitory interpersonal relationship[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Normal University, 2011. (in Chinese)
[13]	吴垠. 大学生宿舍关系和谐度问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 长治医学院学报, 2010, 24(2): 97-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CZYX201002008.htm WU Y. The testing of reliability and validity and the formation about the Questionnaire of College Students Dormitory Interpersonal Harmony[J]. J Changzhi Med Coll, 2010, 24(2): 97-100. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CZYX201002008.htm
[14]	牛腾雀. 女大学生宿舍人际关系问卷的编制及应用研究[D]. 忻州: 山西师范大学, 2014. NIU T Q. Female college students' dormitory interpersonal relationship questionnaire compiled and applied research[D]. Xinzhou: Shanxi Normal University, 2014. (in Chinese)
[15]	杨海燕. 当代中国大学生宿舍人际关系的问题及对策研究[D]. 武汉: 湖北大学, 2017. YANG H Y. Research on the problems and countermeasures of interpersonal relationships in contemporary Chinese college students' dormitories[D]. Wuhan: Hubei University, 2017. (in Chinese)
[16]	周明. 大学生沟通姿态自尊以及人际关系之关系研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2013. ZHOU M. A study on the relationship between college students' communication posture, self-esteem and interpersonal relationships[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2013. (in Chinese)
[17]	赵小红, 朱楠. 大学生宿舍人际关系调查研究[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2019(4): 90-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDTJ201904014.htm ZHAO X H, ZHU N. Investigation and research on interpersonal relationships in college dormitories[J]. Chin J Spec Educ, 2019(4): 90-95. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDTJ201904014.htm
[18]	岑宁. 萨提亚沟通模式改善大学生校园人际困扰新路径[J]. 宁波教育学院学报, 2021(8): 60-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LBJX202104015.htm CEN N. Satir's communication model to improve the new way of college students' interpersonal troubles on campus[J]. J Ningbo Inst Educ, 2021(8): 60-64. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LBJX202104015.htm
[19]	钟琴. 萨提亚治疗模式对改善高职院校学生人际关系有效性的探究[J]. 中国多媒体与网络教学学报, 2020(4): 237-239. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DMWJ202004097.htm ZHONG Q. Research on the effectiveness of Satir's treatment model in improving interpersonal relationships among students in higher vocational colleges[J]. Chin J Multimed Network Teach, 2020(4): 237-239. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DMWJ202004097.htm