蚌埠市中学生攻击行为与情绪管理的关系

金秋; 韩慧; 程耀慧

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.09.015

蚌埠市中学生攻击行为与情绪管理的关系

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.09.015

蚌埠医学院公共卫生学院，安徽 233000

基金项目:

安徽省哲学社会科学规划一般项目 AHSKY2018D53

详细信息

作者简介:
金秋(2000-)，女，安徽阜阳人，在读本科

通讯作者:
韩慧，E-mail：714853296@qq.com

中图分类号: G 444 B 844.2 G 478
计量
- 文章访问数: 777
- HTML全文浏览量: 309
- PDF下载量: 56
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-04-29
- 修回日期: 2021-07-15
- 网络出版日期: 2021-09-24
- 刊出日期: 2021-09-24

Relationship between aggressive behavior and emotion management of middle school students in Bengbu

School of Public Health, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu(233000), Anhui Province, China

摘要

摘要: 目的了解蚌埠市中学生攻击性行为与情绪管理的现状及其关系，为减少和预防中学生攻击性行为的发生提供依据。方法 2019年4—5月采用随机整群抽样方式，随机抽取蚌埠市1 046名中学生，使用悲伤情绪管理量表、愤怒情绪管理量表和攻击行为量表以及相关人口学因素共同编制的问卷进行调查。结果男生悲伤情绪管理与愤怒情绪管理得分均高于女生(t值分别为4.06，4.29，P值均 < 0.01)，初二学生愤怒情绪管理得分低于初三、高一和高二学生(F=3.53，P < 0.01)；男生攻击行为总分高于女生(t=2.55，P < 0.01)，而女生愤怒维度得分高于男生(t=6.27，P < 0.01)；初二学生攻击行为总分高于初三、高一和高二学生(H=25.16，P < 0.01)。相关分析结果显示，中学生悲伤情绪管理与躯体攻击、愤怒、敌意以及攻击行为均呈负相关(r值分别为-0.10，-0.18，-0.08，-0.12，P值均 < 0.01)，愤怒情绪管理与躯体攻击、言语攻击、愤怒、敌意以及攻击行为均呈负相关(r值分别为-0.25，-0.09，-0.36，-0.15，-0.29，P值均 < 0.01)。线性回归分析结果显示，愤怒情绪管理对男生(B=-2.48，95%CI=-3.17~-1.79)和女生(B=-2.93，95%CI=-3.67~-2.20)的攻击行为均有预测作用，悲伤情绪管理对女生的敌意有负向预测作用(B=-0.26，95%CI=-0.54~0.01)(P值均 < 0.01)。结论中学生对自身情绪的管理能力越强，攻击性行为相对越少。提高中学生的情绪管理能力可以减少攻击行为的发生。
- 攻击 /
- 行为 /
- 情绪 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 回归分析 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship between aggressive behavior and emotional management of middle school students. Methods A total of 1 046 middle and high school students in Bengbu were randomly selected by cluster sampling. Information was collected through the Children's Emotion Management Scales and Buss & Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Results The scores of emotional management of male students (11.74±2.25, 9.29±1.98) were higher than that of female students(11.19±2.11, 8.76±1.95)(t=4.06, 4.29, P < 0.01), and the scores of anger management of grade 8 students (8.55±2.13) were lower than that of grade 9, grade 10 and grade 11 students(9.21±2.06, 9.14±1.73, 9.16±1.85)(F=3.53, P < 0.01). The score on anger (18.42±5.71) was high among male students (16.32±5.06) (t=6.27, P < 0.01) and the total score (78.48±16.39) was high among female students(75.78±17.79)(t=-2.55, P < 0.01). The aggression level in grade 8 students (82.09±19.21) was significantly higher than grade 9, grade 10 and grade 11 students(76.57±16.83, 75.05±15.34, 74.42±13.09)(H=25.16, P < 0.01). The results of correlation analysis showed that sadness management was negatively correlated with physical aggression, angry behavior, hostility and aggressive behavior(r=-0.10, -0.18, -0.08, -0.12, P < 0.01), anger management was negatively correlated with physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, hostility, and aggressive behavior(r=-0.25, -0.09, -0.36, -0.15, -0.29, P < 0.05). Regression analysis showed, anger management was negatively associated with aggressive behaviors in both boys(B=-2.48, 95%CI=-3.17-1.79) and girls(B=-2.93, 95%CI=-3.67-2.20), sadness management was negatively associated with girl's hostility(B=-0.26, 95%CI=-0.54-0.01)(P < 0.01). Conclusion Higher level of emotional management, less aggressive behavior. Emotional management improvement among middle school students can effectively prevent and reduce the occurrence of aggressive behavior.
- Aggression /
- Behavior /
- Emotions /
- Mental health /
- Regression analysis /
- Students

HTML全文

表 1 蚌埠市不同性别年级中学生情绪管理得分比较(x±s)

Table 1. Analysis of gender and grade differences in emotional management of middle school students in Bengbu(x±s)

性别与年级	选项	人数	统计值	悲伤情绪管理	愤怒情绪管理
性别	男	515		11.74±2.25	9.29±1.98
	女	531		11.19±2.11	8.76±1.95
			t值	4.06	4.29
			P值	< 0.01	< 0.01
年级	初一	203		11.30±2.19	8.93±2.12
	初二	170		11.22±2.40	8.55±2.13
	初三	227		11.69±2.19	9.21±2.08
	高一	247		11.63±2.16	9.14±1.73
	高二	199		11.34±2.08	9.16±1.85
			F值	1.86	3.53
			P值	0.12	< 0.01

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 蚌埠市不同性别年级中学生攻击行为得分比较(x±s)

Table 2. Analysis of gender and grade differences in aggression behavior of middle school students in Bengbu(x±s)

性别与年级	选项	人数	统计值	躯体攻击	言语攻击	愤怒	敌意	总分
性别	男	515		22.07±6.25	13.88±3.64	16.32±5.06	22.86±6.22	78.48±16.39
	女	531		21.40±6.66	14.22±3.40	18.42±5.71	23.58±6.75	75.78±17.79
			t值	1.67	-1.55	-6.27	-1.79	-2.55
			P值	0.10	0.12	< 0.01	0.07	< 0.01
年级	初一	203		22.67±7.15	13.71±3.98	17.98±5.89	23.79±7.44	78.91±19.63
	初二	170		23.41±7.23	14.66±3.72	18.68±6.03	24.54±7.01	82.09±19.21
	初三	227		21.75±6.19	13.65±3.46	17.13±5.26	23.48±6.59	76.57±16.83
	高一	247		20.68±6.03	14.53±3.22	16.86±5.27	22.10±5.60	75.05±15.34
	高二	199		20.60±5.39	13.73±3.15	16.62±4.93	22.64±5.69	74.42±13.90
			F/H值	27.19	4.09	4.63	18.94	25.16
			P值	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 蚌埠市中学生情绪管理与攻击行为及各维度的相关系数(r值，n=1 046)

Table 3. Correlation analysis of emotional management and aggression behavior and its dimensions among middle school students in Bengbu(r, n=1 046)

变量	悲伤情绪管理	愤怒情绪管理	攻击行为	躯体攻击	言语攻击	愤怒
愤怒情绪管理	0.54^**
攻击行为	-0.12^**	-0.29^**
躯体攻击	-0.10^**	-0.25^**	0.81^**
言语攻击	0.03	-0.09^**	0.63^**	0.41^**
愤怒	-0.18^**	-0.36^**	0.82^**	0.61^**	0.42^**
敌意	-0.08^**	-0.15^**	0.81^**	0.55^**	0.44^**	0.52^**
注：**P < 0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 蚌埠市不同性别中学生情绪管理各维度与攻击性的线性回归分析[B值(B值95%CI)]

Table 4. Regression analysis of emotional management and aggression behavior among middle school students in Bengbu[B(B 95%CI)]

性别	自变量	攻击行为	躯体攻击	言语攻击	愤怒	敌意
男	情绪管理	-1.03(-1.40~-0.65)^**	-0.33(-0.47~-0.18)^**	-0.05(-0.13~0.04)	-0.40(-0.52~-0.29)^**	-0.22(-0.36~-0.07)^*
(n=515)	悲伤情绪管理	-0.89(-1.52~-0.26)	-0.28(-0.52~-0.04)	-0.04(-0.10~0.18)	-0.38(-0.57~-0.18)^**	-0.25(-0.49~-0.01)
	愤怒情绪管理	-2.48(-3.17~-1.79)^**	-0.81(-1.08~-0.54)^**	-0.22(-0.38~-0.06)	-0.94(-1.15~-0.74)^**	-0.43(-0.70~-0.16)^*
女	情绪管理	-1.27(-1.69~-0.86)^**	-0.44(-0.60~-0.29)^**	-0.06(-0.14~0.02)	-0.50(-0.63~-0.37)^**	-0.29(-0.45~-0.13)^**
(n=531)	悲伤情绪管理	-1.09(-1.81~-0.37)^*	-0.38(-0.64~-0.12)	-0.00(-0.13~0.14)	-0.46(-0.69~-0.23)^**	-0.26(-0.54~0.01)^**
	愤怒情绪管理	-2.93(-3.67~-2.20)^**	-1.02(-1.29~-0.74)^**	-0.19(-0.34~-0.04)	-1.11(-1.34~-0.88)^**	-0.67(-0.95~-0.38)^**
注：P < 0.05，*P < 0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(21)

[1]	YANG P, SCHLOMER G L, LIPPOLD M A, et al. Longitudinal discrepancy in adolescent aggressive behavior problems: differences by reporter and contextual factors[J]. Youth Adolesc, 2021, 50(8): 1564-1581. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01431-1
[2]	艾瑞雪. 儿童攻击行为的焦虑根源及其化解[J]. 教学与管理, 2021(5): 1-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXGL202105001.htm AI R X. Causes of anxiety in children's aggression and its solution[J]. J Teach Manag, 2021(5): 1-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXGL202105001.htm
[3]	姚荣英, 陈军, 张勤, 等. 情绪管理能力对4~6年级小学生交往焦虑与攻击行为的影响[J]. 卫生研究, 2015, 44(2): 211-215. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSYJ201502008.htm YAO R Y, CHEN J, ZHANG Q, et al. Effect of the capacity of emotion management on the social anxiety and aggressive behavior among 4-6 grade pupils[J]. J Hyg Res, 2015, 44(2): 211-215. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSYJ201502008.htm
[4]	唐丹丹, 刘安艳, 王燕. 师范生自我效能感与情绪管理能力的相关研究[J]. 遵义师范学院学报, 2021, 23(2): 156-159, 172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3583.2021.02.038 TANG D D, LIU A Y, WANG Y. Research on the relationship between self-efficacy and emotional management ability of normal students[J]. J Zunyi Normal Univ, 2021, 23(2): 156-159, 172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3583.2021.02.038
[5]	马静, 王美璇, 尹兆梦. 小学中年级学生情绪管理能力现状及影响因素[J]. 中小学心理健康教育, 2020(17): 7-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2684.2020.17.003 MA J, WANG M X, YIN Z M. Current situation and influencing factors of emotional management ability of middle grade students in primary school[J]. Ment Health Educ Prim Secondary Sch, 2020(17): 7-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2684.2020.17.003
[6]	闫新, 刘娜. 父母教养方式对五年级小学生攻击行为的影响: 情绪管理能力的中介作用[J]. 价值工程, 2017, 36(28): 177-180. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZGC201728072.htm YAN X, LIU N. Influence of parental rearing style on aggression of grade five pupils: mediating effect of emotional management ability[J]. Value Engin, 2017, 36(28): 177-180. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZGC201728072.htm
[7]	宋琳琳. 父母教养方式对初中生攻击行为的影响: 一般自我效能感和情绪调节策略的中介作用[D]. 石家庄: 河北大学, 2020. SONG L L. The influence of parental rearing styles on the aggressive behavior of junior high school students: the mediating role of general self-efficacy and emotion regulation strategies[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei University, 2020.
[8]	李献云, 费立鹏, 张亚利, 等. Buss和Perry攻击问卷中文版的修订和信效度[C]//中华医学会精神病学分会. 中华医学会精神病学分会第九次全国学术会议论文集, 2011: 1. LI X Y, FEI L P, ZHANG Y L, et al. The revision and reliability and validity of Chinese version of buss & perry aggression questionnaire[C]//Chinese medical association psychiatric branch. Papers of the ninth national academic conference of the psychiatric society of the Chinese medical association, 2011: 1.
[9]	陈亚琴. 高中生的父母心理控制感、情绪管理与攻击行为的关系研究[D]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2016. CHEN Y Q. A study on the relationship between parental psychological control, emotional management and aggressive behavior in high school students[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University, 2016.
[10]	刘成伟. 高中生情绪智力与生活适应的关系[J]. 当代教育理论与实践, 2011, 3(4): 5-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5884.2011.04.002 LIU C W. Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Life Adaptation in Senior High School Students[J]. Theory Pract Contemp Educ, 2011, 3(4): 5-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5884.2011.04.002
[11]	吴佳钰. 3~6岁儿童情绪管理能力的现状研究[D]. 广州: 广州大学, 2013. WU J Y. The study on the 3 to 6 years old children's emotional management ability[D]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University, 2013.
[12]	付美容. 提升青少年的情绪管理能探析[J]. 教师博览, 2021(6): 26-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSBK202106011.htm FU M R. Improving the emotional management ability of teenagers[J]. Teacher Exp, 2021(6): 26-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSBK202106011.htm
[13]	荚翠英. 家庭因素与儿童青少年攻击行为关系分析[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2021, 12(7): 27-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2021.07.009 JIA C Y. Relationship between family factors and aggression among children and adolescents[J]. Chin Health Standard Manag, 2021, 12(7): 27-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2021.07.009
[14]	刘君妍, 杨春柳, 屈泽悦, 等. 小学生共情与攻击的关系[J]. 中小学心理健康教育, 2021(10): 7-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXXK202110004.htm LIU J Y, YANG C L, QU Z Y, et al. Relationship between empathy and aggression in primary school students[J]. Ment Health Educ Prim Second Sch, 2021(10): 7-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXXK202110004.htm
[15]	CLIFFORD M E, NGUYEN A J, BRADSHAW C P. Emotion processing associated with aggression in early adolescents: a focus on affective theory of mind[J]. Aggress Behav, 2020, 47(2): 173-182. doi: 10.1002/ab.21936
[16]	张曼, 陈雁如, 郭宏达, 等. 情绪管理在农村中学生攻击行为与自伤行为间的中介作用[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2019, 40(7): 980-983. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.07.006 ZHANG M, CHEN Y R, GUO H D, et al. Mediating effect of emotional management on aggression and self-injury behavior of rural middle school students[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2019, 40(7): 980-983. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.07.006
[17]	郑姮, 廖超平, 余毅震. 我国中学生攻击行为与情绪管理的关系探讨[J]. 医学与社会, 2013, 26(8): 65-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXSH201308023.htm ZHENG H, LIAO C P, YU Y Z. Discussion on the relationship between aggressive behavior and emotional management of middle school students in China[J]. Med Soc, 2013, 26(8): 65-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXSH201308023.htm
[18]	李宗迪. 小学高年级儿童情绪调节能力对攻击性行为的影响[D]. 天津: 天津师范大学, 2018. LI Z D. The effect of emotional regulation on aggressive behavior in primary school children[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin Normal University, 2018.
[19]	HERTS K L, MCLAUGHLIN K A, HATZENBUEHLER M L. Emotion dysregulation as a mechanism linking stress exposure to adolescent aggressive behavior[J]. J Abn Child Psychol, 2012, 40(7): 1111-1122. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22466516
[20]	张建明, 姚荣英, 李爽, 等. 皖北地区初中生情绪管理能力与人际归因倾向状况及其关系分析[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2019, 44(10): 1401-1406. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BANG201910031.htm ZHANG J M, YAO R Y, LI S, et al. Relationship between emotional management ability and interpersonal attribution tendency of junior middle school students in northern Anhui[J]. J Bengbu Med Coll, 2019, 44(10): 1401-1406. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BANG201910031.htm
[21]	HSIEH I J, CHEN Y Y. Determinants of aggressive behavior: interactive effects of emotional regulation and inhibitory control[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(4): e0175651. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28399150