中等职业院校学生心理弹性与注意偏向的关联

刘雅; 郑洪宇; 许凤麟; 钟慧

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025091

中等职业院校学生心理弹性与注意偏向的关联

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025091

刘雅^{1, 2},
郑洪宇³,
许凤麟²,
钟慧^1, ,

1.
安徽医科大学精神卫生与心理科学学院，合肥 230032
2.
安徽城市管理职业学院
3.
安徽医科大学附属心理医院儿童青少年心理科

基金项目:

安徽省临床医学研究转化专项项目 202204295107020005

合肥市卫生健康应用医学科研项目 Hwk2024zd017

合肥市第七周期临床重点专科建设项目 zdxk2024018

详细信息

作者简介:
刘雅(1990-)，女，安徽亳州人，在读硕士，主要研究方向为青少年心理健康

通讯作者:
钟慧，E-mail: 313956777@qq.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: R179 G444 G479
计量
- 文章访问数: 64
- HTML全文浏览量: 31
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-12-23
- 修回日期: 2025-02-15
- 网络出版日期: 2025-04-03
- 刊出日期: 2025-03-25

Relationship between psychological resilience and attention bias among secondary vocational school students

LIU Ya^{1, 2},
ZHENG Hongyu³,
XU Fenglin²,
ZHONG Hui^{1
, ,}

1.
School of Mental Health and Psychological Science, Anhui Medical University, Hefei (230032), Anhui Province, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨中等职业院校学生(以下简称“中职生”)心理弹性与负性信息注意偏向之间的关系，为提高中职生心理健康水平提供参考。方法 2024年5月在某高职院校中专部采用方便抽样方法选取177名中职生。采用2(组别：高心理弹性组、低心理弹性组)×2(刺激类型：负性刺激、中性刺激)混合试验设计，根据青少年心理弹性量表得分选取63名被试分为高心理弹性组(n=32)和低心理弹性组(n=31)。两组被试均完成点探测式任务，以任务中的正确率、反应时和注意偏向值作为关键指标评估被试的注意偏向。采用重复测量方差分析对两组被试注意偏向任务的反应时和正确率进行比较；对心理弹性的5个分维度和注意偏向值进行Pearson相关分析。结果在反应时和正确率上，低心理弹性组中职生对负性刺激的反应速度相较于中性刺激更快[(579.11±85.44，586.13±78.92)ms，F(1, 61)=5.93，P < 0.05]，低心理弹性组中职生对负性刺激的正确率低于中性刺激[(0.93±0.12，0.95±0.09)，F(1, 61)=12.81，P < 0.01]。低心理弹性组中职生的注意偏向值(7.03±18.43)大于高心理弹性组(-2.54±13.39)(t=2.36，P < 0.05)。Pearson相关分析发现，心理弹性量表的人际协助维度得分(2.85±0.77)与注意偏向值(2.20±16.65)存在负相关(r=-0.25，P＜0.05)。结论心理弹性较低的中职生对负面情绪刺激有着明显的注意偏向，且低心理弹性可能会使中职生对负性情绪刺激更加敏感。
- 精神卫生 /
- 注意力 /
- 方差分析 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship between psychological resilience and attention bias towards negative information in secondary vocational school students, so as to provide reference for developing their mental health work. Methods In May, 2024, 177 secondary vocational students were selected from the technical secondary vocational school by convenient sampling method. The experiment utilized a mixed experimental design of 2 (group: high psychological resilience group, low psychological resilience group) ×2 (type of stimulus: negative stimulus, neutral stimulus). Adolescents were divided into the high psychological resilience group (n=32) and the low psychological resilience group (n=31) based on their scores from the Adolescent Psychological Resilience Scale. Both groups completed the classical dot-probing task, with correct rate, reaction time serving and attention biasvalues as primary indicators to assess attention bias. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare the reaction time and accuracy of attention bias tasks between two groups of participants, and Pearson correlation analysis was performed on the five dimensions of psychological resilience and attention bias values. Results The low resilience group exhibited significantly faster response time to negative stimuli compared to neutral stimuli [(579.11±85.44, 586.13±78.92)ms, F(1, 61)=5.93, P < 0.05]. Additionally, the accuracy of responses to negative stimuli in the low resilience group was significantly lower than that of neutral stimuli [(0.93±0.12, 0.95±0.09), F(1, 61)=12.81, P < 0.01]. Attention bias values were significantly higher in the low resilience group (7.03±18.43) compared to the high resilience group (-2.54±13.39) (t=2.36, P < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis revealed a marginally significant negative correlation between the interpersonal assistance (2.85±0.77) and attention bias values (2.20±16.65) (r=-0.25, P < 0.05). Conclusion Secondary vocational school students with low psychological resilience showed a significant attention bias towards negative emotional stimuli, which may render them more susceptible to such stimuli.
- Mental health /
- Attention /
- Analysis of variance /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 高低心理弹性组中职生反应时和正确率比较(x±s)

Table 1. Comparison of reaction time and correct rate between high and low resilience groups of secondary vocational students(x±s)

组别	人数	反应时/ms		正确率
组别	人数	负性刺激	中性刺激	负性刺激	中性刺激
低心理弹性组	31	579.11±85.44	586.13±78.92	0.93±0.12	0.95±0.09
高心理弹性组	32	606.08±78.10	603.55±75.61	0.95±0.06	0.95±0.07
F_组别		1.24		0.37
F_刺激类型		1.23		8.65^**
F_{组别×刺激类型}		5.58^*		4.67^*
注： ^P < 0.05，^*P < 0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(24)

[1]	LUTHAR S S, CICCHETTI D, BECKER B. The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work[J]. Child Dev, 2000, 71(3): 543-562.
[2]	LIN S H, HUANG T Y, LIAO Y C, et al. Depressive status moderates the association between cognitive ability and psychological resilience in young adults[J]. Curr Psychol, 2024, 43: 20264-20274. doi: 10.1007/s12144-024-05832-w
[3]	TUGADE M M, FREDRICKSON B L. Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2004, 86(2): 320-333. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320
[4]	王玉龙, 姚明, 易明. 不同心理弹性个体在挫折情境下的注意偏向: 积极音乐的作用[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2015, 29(6): 470-475. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2015.06.013 WANG Y L, YAO M, YI M. Effects of frustration situation, resilience and positive music on attentional bias[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2015, 29(6): 470-475. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2015.06.013
[5]	BAR-HAIM Y, LAMY D, PERGAMIN L, et al. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a Meta-analytic study[J]. Psychol Bull, 2007, 133(1): 1-24. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1
[6]	LUCION MK, OLIVEIRA V, BIZARRO L, et al. Attentional bias toward infant faces: review of the adaptive and clinical relevance[J]. Int J Psychophysiol, 2017, 114: 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.01.008
[7]	曾庆巍, 刘爱书. 情绪对注意选择性的影响: 注意偏向和注意瞬脱[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23(3): 448-452. ZENG Q W, LIU A S. The effect of emotion on selective attention: attentional bias and attentional blink[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2015, 23(3): 448-452. (in Chinese)
[8]	马苏娟. 大学生心理弹性的相关因素及其注意偏向特点[D]. 新乡: 新乡医学院, 2016. MA S J. Influencing factors of resilience and the character of attentional bias of college students[D]. Xinxiang: Xinxiang Medical University, 2016. (in Chinese)
[9]	WANG M, LI J, YAN G, et al. The relationship between psychological resilience, neuroticism, attentional bias, and depressive symptoms in college Chinese students[J]. Front Psychol, 2022, 13: 884016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.884016
[10]	李奕慧, 刘小珍, 邱玥, 等. 大学生受挫情境下心理弹性对认知偏向的影响[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2017, 38(2): 208-211. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2017.02.015 LI Y H, LIU X Z, QIU Y, et al. Impact of resilience to college students' cognitive bias when suffering frustration[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2017, 38(2): 208-211. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2017.02.015
[11]	LICHTENSTEIN-VIDNE L, OKON-SINGER H, COHEN N, et al. Attentional bias in clinical depression and anxiety: the impact of emotional and non-emotional distracting information[J]. Biol Psychol, 2017, 122: 4-12.
[12]	ROSARIO-WILLIAMS B, AKTER S, KAUR S, et al. Suicide-related construct accessibility and attention disengagement bias in suicide ideation[J]. J Psychopathol Clin Sci, 2023, 132(2): 173-184.
[13]	何志昌. 中职生心理健康现状及教育对策探索[J]. 教育研究与实验, 2017(5): 91-94. HE Z C. Research on the present situation and countermeasures of mental health for secondary vocational school students[J]. Educ Res Exp, 2017(5): 91-94. (in Chinese)
[14]	胡月琴, 甘怡群. 青少年心理韧性量表的编制和效度验证[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(8): 902-912. HU Y Q, GAN Y Q. Development and psychometric validity of the Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescents[J]. Acta Psychol Sinca, 2008, 40(8): 902-912. (in Chinese)
[15]	吕创, 牛青云, 张学民. 焦虑个体对负性刺激的注意偏向特点[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2014, 28(3): 208-214. LV C, NIU Q Y, ZHANG X M. Attentional bias to negative stimulus in anxiety individuals[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2014, 28(3): 208-214. (in Chinese)
[16]	王妍, 罗跃嘉. 大学生面孔表情材料的标准化及其评定[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2005, 13(4): 21-23. WANG Y, LUO Y J. Standardization and assessment of college student' facial expression of emotion[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2005, 13(4): 21-23. (in Chinese)
[17]	李欣. 青少年焦虑障碍患者注意偏向特点及干预[D]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2020. LIN X. The characteristics and intervention of attentional bias in adolescents with anxiety disorder[D]. Hefei: Anhui Medical University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[18]	郭玉寒, 郑洪宇, 莫大明, 等. 医院专业技术人员的心理弹性水平与注意偏向的关系[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2024, 38(11): 1016-1020. GUO Y H, ZHENG H Y, MO D M, et al. Relationship between level of resilience and attentional bias in professional technicians in hospital[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2024, 38(11): 1016-1020. (in Chinese)
[19]	王思爽. 不同心理弹性水平康复科患儿家长的注意偏向特征及其与积极情绪启动的关系[D]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2020. WANG S S. The attentional bias characteristics in parents of rehabilitation department with different resilience and the effect of positive emotion priming[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[20]	YI F, LI X, SONG X, et al. The underlying mechanisms of psychological resilience on emotional experience: attention-bias or emotion disengagement[J]. Front Psychol, 2020, 11: 1993.
[21]	PENG L, CAO H W, YU Y, et al. Resilience and cognitive bias in Chinese male medical freshmen[J]. Front Psychiatry, 2017(8): 158.
[22]	KALISCH R, MULLER M B, TUSCHER O. A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience[J]. Behav Brain Sci, 2015, 38: e92.
[23]	GULLA B, GOLONKA K. Exploring protective factors in wellbeing: how sensory processing sensitivity and attention awareness interact with resilience[J]. Front Psychol, 2021(12): 751679.
[24]	WATERSCHOOT J, VAN DER KAAP-DEEDER J, VANSTEENKISTE M. The role of competence-related attentional bias and resilience in restoring thwarted feelings of competence[J]. Motiv Emot, 2020, 44(1): 82-98.