高校传染病防控能力评价指标体系构建

乔婷鞠; 白钢; 刘丹; 刘薇; 朱宇华; 王筱婉; 孙雪松; 张倩; 赵作天; 李建云; 王文瑞; 王琪; 刘铮然

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025081

高校传染病防控能力评价指标体系构建

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025081

乔婷鞠¹,
白钢¹,
刘丹¹,
刘薇¹,
朱宇华¹,
王筱婉¹,
孙雪松¹,
张倩¹,
赵作天¹,
李建云²,
王文瑞²,
王琪^1, ,,
刘铮然^1, ,

1.
包头医学院公共卫生学院, 内蒙古 014040
2.
内蒙古自治区疾病预防控制中心鼠疫与布病预防控制所

基金项目:

内蒙古自治区教育厅自然科学重点项目 NJZZ21047

内蒙古自治区科技重大专项项目 2021ZD0006

内蒙古自治区哲学社会科学规划项目 2022ZZA040

详细信息

作者简介:
乔婷鞠(1996-)，女，内蒙古巴彦淖尔市人，硕士，初级医师，主要研究方向为流行病与卫生统计学

通讯作者:
王琪，E-mail：13081569099@163.com

刘铮然，E-mail：lzr13039570839@sina.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: R478 R183 R181.3⁺²
计量
- 文章访问数: 48
- HTML全文浏览量: 29
- PDF下载量: 9
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-08-27
- 修回日期: 2025-01-08
- 网络出版日期: 2025-04-03
- 刊出日期: 2025-03-25

Construction of evaluation index system of infectious disease prevention and control ability in colleges and universities

1.
School of Public Health, Baotou Medical College, Baotou(014040), Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China

摘要

摘要: 目的构建科学、完善的高校传染病防控能力评价指标体系，为高校有效应对传染病提供参考工具。方法采用文献分析法构建高校传染病防控能力评价指标体系初始框架，选择熟悉传染病防控或者学校卫生工作的专家(分别有16，18位)进行2轮德尔菲专家咨询确定评价指标体系，采用层次分析法计算指标权重及组合权重。再方便抽取内蒙古3所高校传染病防控人员198名，运用模糊综合评价法对评价指标进行综合评价。结果 2轮德尔菲咨询问卷有效回收率分别为80.0%, 90.0%，专家权威程度分别为0.89和0.86，专家和谐系数Kendall W分别为0.166, 0.310，各指标变异系数均＜0.25，最终构建的高校传染病防控能力评价指标体系包括4项一级指标、14项二级指标和75项三级指标。一级指标预防与监测预警、组织制度保障、应急管理、善后恢复与总结的权重数值分别为0.176, 0.476, 0.268, 0.080；二级指标前3位权重数值分别为传染病监测预警0.623、损失评估0.595、应急处置0.370。高校传染病防控能力评价指标体系模糊综合评价得分为79.148，等级水平较高。结论构建的高校传染病防控能力评价指标体系具有科学性和合理性，可为评估高校传染病防控能力提供工具参考。
- 传染病 /
- 综合预防 /
- 德尔菲技术 /
- 学生保健服务
Abstract: Objective To construct a scientific and perfect evaluation index system of infectious disease prevention and control ability in colleges and universities, so as to provide reference tools for colleges and universities to effectively respond to infectious disease. Methods The initial framework of the evaluation index system of infectious disease prevention and control ability in colleges and universities was constructed by using literature analysis method. Experts familiar with infectious disease prevention and control or school health work were selected to conduct two rounds(n=16, 18) of Delphi expert consultation for determining the evaluation index system. Analytical hierarchy process was used to calculate the index weights and combined weights. About 198 prevention and control personnel were conveniently selected from 3 universities in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region to comprehensively evaluate the evaluation indicators by using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Results After two rounds of Delphi consultation questionnaire, the effective recovery rates were 80.0% and 90.0%, the expert authority levels were 0.89 and 0.86, the expert harmony coefficients for Kendall W were 0.166 and 0.310, and the variation coefficient of each index was < 0.25. Finally, the evaluation index system of infectious disease prevention and control ability of colleges and universities included 4 first-level indicators, 14 second-level indicators and 75 third-level indicators. The weights of prevention and monitoring and early warning, organizational system guarantee, emergency management, rehabilitation and summary were 0.176, 0.476, 0.268 and 0.080, respectively. The top 3 weights of the secondary indexes were 0.623 for infectious disease surveillance and early warning, 0.595 for loss assessment and 0.370 for emergency response. The score of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of the index system of infectious disease prevention and control ability in colleges and universities was 79.148, suggesting a high level. Conclusion The established evaluation index system of infectious disease prevention and control ability in colleges and universities is scientific and reasonable, which is conducive to provide tool reference for the evaluation of infectious disease prevention and control ability in colleges and universities.
- Communicable diseases /
- Universal precautions /
- Delphi technique /
- Student health services
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 高校传染病防控能力评价指标体系一二级指标权重及一致性检验结果

Table 1. The weight and consistency test results of the primary and secondary indexes in the evaluation index system of infectious disease prevention and control ability in colleges and universities

一级指标	二级指标	权重值	最大特征根	CR值
预防与监测预警		0.176	3.018	0.016
	传染病监测预警	0.623
	卫生监测	0.240
	健康促进	0.137
组织制度保障		0.476	4.021	0.001
	日常防控方案	0.326
	应急预案	0.362
	应急专班	0.163
	资源保障	0.149
应急管理		0.268	4.010	0.004
	应急指挥	0.345
	应急处置	0.370
	疫情研判	0.185
	舆情处理	0.100
善后恢复与总结		0.080	3.001	0.005
	损失评估	0.595
	恢复重建	0.277
	疫情防控管理总结	0.129

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 高校传染病防控能力评价指标体系三级指标权重结果

Table 2. Three-level index weight results of the index evaluation system of infectious disease prevention and control ability in colleges and universities

二级指标	三级指标	权重	总权重	二级指标	三级指标	权重	总权重
传染病监测预警	C1新生入学体检	0.081	0.009		C39应急接种管理专班建设	0.019	0.001
	C2开学返校疫情防控重点要求	0.050	0.005	资源保障	C40设施与场所情况	0.433	0.031
	C3师生健康信息上报制度	0.146	0.016		C41防疫物资	0.239	0.017
	C4第三方服务人员健康监测	0.142	0.016		C42医疗药品	0.239	0.017
	C5因病缺课(勤)病因追查与登记制度	0.264	0.029		C43资金预算保障	0.089	0.006
	C6免疫接种情况调查	0.032	0.004	应急指挥	C44启动应急预案	0.587	0.054
	C7传染病症状监测	0.142	0.016		C45综合指挥与协调	0.089	0.008
	C8传染病信息库	0.142	0.016		C46执纪督导	0.324	0.030
卫生监测	C9食品卫生监测	0.359	0.015	应急处置	C47疫情信息收集、报告与发布制度	0.194	0.019
	C10饮用水卫生监测	0.359	0.015		C48校外部门联防联控体系	0.184	0.018
	C11校园清洁消毒与环境卫生检查	0.200	0.008		C49校园封闭管控	0.107	0.011
	C12生物实验室安全管理	0.082	0.003		C50流调溯源	0.042	0.004
健康促进	C13传染病常识与预防知识宣传教育	0.443	0.011		C51隔离转运工作	0.041	0.004
	C14传染病防控应急管理相关培训	0.387	0.009		C52心理健康数据异常学生重点排查工作	0.041	0.004
	C15常态心理健康保障队伍建设	0.170	0.004		C53心理疏导与干预	0.040	0.004
日常防控方案	C16日常防控方案制定	1.000	0.155		C54物资配给	0.064	0.006
应急预案	C17应急预案制定	0.383	0.066		C55餐饮配给	0.062	0.006
	C18应急预案内容全面性	0.126	0.022		C56校园消毒消杀与垃圾清运	0.046	0.005
	C19应急预案修订	0.068	0.012		C57疫苗接种与预防性服药组织	0.029	0.003
	C20应急预案专业性及科学性	0.135	0.023		C58师生志愿服务	0.023	0.002
	C21应急预案可操作性	0.228	0.039		C59线上教学	0.028	0.003
	C22传染病防控应急演练	0.059	0.010		C60救治绿色通道	0.100	0.010
应急专班	C23应急指挥系统建设	0.160	0.012	疫情研判	C61学生生源地疫情风险研判	0.152	0.008
	C24综合协调专班建设	0.160	0.012		C62属地周边旗县疫情风险研判	0.078	0.004
	C25校园管控专班建设	0.085	0.007		C63属地疫情风险研判	0.263	0.013
	C26疫情研判专班建设	0.040	0.003		C64校内疫情风险研判	0.507	0.025
	C27流调溯源专班建设	0.028	0.002	舆情处理	C65舆情信息发现与收集	0.667	0.018
	C28消毒消杀和垃圾清运专班建设	0.056	0.004		C66舆情回应与引导	0.333	0.009
	C29隔离转运专班建设	0.090	0.007	损失评估	C67人员队伍损失评估	0.164	0.008
	C30数据收集报送专班建设	0.056	0.004		C68设施设备损失评估	0.279	0.014
	C31物资保障专班建设	0.056	0.004		C69预算、应急资金消耗评估	0.539	0.026
	C32教学保障专班建设	0.026	0.002	恢复重建	C70人员队伍恢复重建	0.170	0.004
	C33餐饮保障专班建设	0.091	0.007		C71设施设备恢复重建	0.443	0.010
	C34应急医疗急救专班建设	0.031	0.002		C72预算、应急资金补充	0.387	0.009
	C35学生管理教育与心理疏导专班建设	0.031	0.002	疫情防控管理总结	C73疫情防控工作总结	0.633	0.007
	C36志愿者服务专班建设	0.023	0.002		C74完善疫情防控体系	0.192	0.002
	C37宣传教育舆论专班建设	0.026	0.002		C75奖惩情况	0.175	0.002
	C38执纪监督专班建设	0.023	0.002
注：权重是在层次分析法中某一因素相对于上一层因素的相对重要性程度；总权重是指多个因素综合起来对最终目标的影响程度。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(17)

[1]	李巧梅. 我国突发公共卫生事件应急能力评价指标体系构建[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2023. LI Q M. Construction of the evaluation index system of public health emergency response capability in China[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2023. (in Chinese)
[2]	陈玉保, 李婉若. 新时代高校公共卫生安全管理策略研究[J]. 才智, 2024(33): 107-110. CHEN Y B, LI W R. Research on management strategy of university public health safety in new era[J]. Intelligence, 2024(33): 107-110. (in Chinese)
[3]	王丽丽, 李娟, 葛丽娜, 等. 某高校学生呼吸道传染病流行病学特征分析[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2024, 19(11): 1327-1330, 1335. WANG L L, LI J, GE L N, et al. Analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of res-piratory infectious diseases among students in a certain university[J]. Chin J Path Biol, 2024, 19(11): 1327-1330, 1335. (in Chinese)
[4]	李忠友, 董柏青, 尤剑鹏, 等. 广西某高校新冠肺炎疫情防控策略的创新及实践[J]. 海南医学, 2022, 33(4): 530-534. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2022.04.033 LI Z Y, DONG B Q, YOU J P, et al. Practice of the COVID-19 prevention and control in a university in Guangxi[J]. Hainan Med, 2022, 33(4): 530-534. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2022.04.033
[5]	任中业, 徐梦云, 陈洁, 等. 基于德尔菲法的临床医生对突发呼吸道传染病应对能力指标体系构建[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2024, 23(8): 1023-1030. REN Z Y, XU M Y, CHEN J, et al. Construction of the index system of clinicians' ability to cope with outburst respiratory infectious diseases based on Delphi method[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2024, 23(8): 1023-1030. (in Chinese)
[6]	张婷瑜, 刘艳慧, 鲁影, 等. 传染病多点触发监测预警指标体系构建[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2024, 40(4): 489-495. ZHANG T Y, LIU Y H, LU Y, et al. Development of an indicator system for multi-point trigger surveillance and early warning of infectious diseases: a Delphi study[J]. Chin J Public Health, 2024, 40(4): 489-495. (in Chinese)
[7]	罗渝. 结合层次分析法和熵权法构建公共卫生重点专科(学科)评价指标体系[D]. 重庆: 重庆医科大学, 2024. LUO Y. Combining hierarchical analysis and entropy weight method to construct evaluation indicator system for key specialties(disciplines) in public health[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Medical University, 2024. (in Chinese)
[8]	吴彦霖, 李开明, 郭玉清, 等. 医防传染病信息互联互通成熟度评估指标体系研究[J]. 疾病监测, 2025, 40 (1): 23-29. WU Y L, LI K M, GUO Y Q, et al. Study on the maturity assessment indicator of medical and prevention infectious disease information and interoperability[J]. Dis Surveill, 2025, 40(1): 23-29. (in Chinese)
[9]	王晓欢, 汪晓军, 张山鹰. 层次分析法在建立德尔菲法评价指标体系中的应用[J]. 海峡预防医学杂志, 2015, 21(4): 85-88. WANG X H, WANG X J, ZHANG S Y. Application of analytic hierarchy process in establishing Delphi method evaluation index system[J]. Straits J Prev Med, 2015, 21(4): 85-88. (in Chinese)
[10]	魏吉利, 邢焕民, 付丽英, 等. 三级综合医院公共卫生事件应急准备能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2023, 41(4): 489-494. WEI J L, XING H M, FU L Y, et al. Construction of an evaluation index system for public health emergency preparedness ability in tertiary general hospitals[J]. Occup Health Emerg Res, 2023, 41(4): 489-494. (in Chinese)
[11]	王雷超, 黄伟, 张洁欣, 等. 医疗机构应急预案评价指标体系研究[J]. 中国社会医学杂志, 2023, 40(3): 346-349. WANG L C, HUANG W, ZHANG J X, et al. Study on evaluation index system of emergency plan in medical institutions[J]. Chin J Soc Med, 2023, 40(3): 346-349. (in Chinese)
[12]	汪婧, 刘武兵. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的公共卫生事件网络舆情风险评估[J]. 北京化工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(1): 23-29. WANG J, LIU W B. Risk assessment of online public opinion of public health events based on AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. J Beijing Univ Chem Technol (Soc Sci), 2021(1): 23-29. (in Chinese)
[13]	张金福, 刘雪. 我国地方创新策源能力的模糊综合评价研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(9): 8-14. ZHANG J F, LIU X. Research on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of local innovation policy source capacity in China[J]. Sci Technol Manage Res, 2021, 41(9): 8-14. (in Chinese)
[14]	韩佳禹, 杨淑娟, 裴容, 等. 凉山州艾滋病传播风险的健康社会决定因素评价指标体系构建[J]. 现代预防医学, 2019, 46(7): 1224-1228. HAN J Y, YANG S J, PEI R, et al. Establishment of an AIDS risk assessment index system based on social determinants of health, Liangshan Prefecture[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2019, 46(7): 1224-1228. (in Chinese)
[15]	顾仁君, 熊季霞, 陈浩, 等. 中医针刺适宜技术评价指标体系构建与应用[J]. 中国社会医学杂志, 2022, 39(3): 348-351. GU R J, XIONG J X, CHEN H, et al. Construction and application of assessment system for appropriate technologies of acupuncture in traditional Chinese medicine[J]. Chin J Soc Med, 2022, 39(3): 348-351. (in Chinese)
[16]	吴建, 汤艳雨, 王成增, 等. 基于健康老龄化的河南省老龄事业高质量发展评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 医学与社会, 2023, 36(7): 68-73, 91. WU J, TANG Y Y, WANG C Z, et al. Research on construction of evaluation index system of high quality development of Henan Province's aging cause based on healthy aging[J]. Med Soc, 2023, 36(7): 68-73, 91. (in Chinese)
[17]	中华人民共和国国务院办公厅.关于推动疾病预防控制事业高质量发展的指导意见[EB/OL].(2023-12-25)[2024-08-19].https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202312/content_6922513.htm .