父母控制同伴关系与初中生攻击行为的关系

韩文耕; 戚志远; 赵继利; 倪虹; 程耀慧; 韩慧

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024112

父母控制同伴关系与初中生攻击行为的关系

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024112

蚌埠医科大学公共卫生学院，安徽 233030

基金项目:

安徽省高校人文社会科学重点项目 SK2021A0428

详细信息

作者简介:
韩文耕(1998-)，男，吉林长春人，在读硕士，主要研究方向为儿童青少年生长发育与心理发展

通讯作者:
韩慧，E-mail：714853296@qq.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: R179C913.5B844.2G78
计量
- 文章访问数: 14
- HTML全文浏览量: 7
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-01-04
- 修回日期: 2024-01-23
- 网络出版日期: 2024-04-25
- 刊出日期: 2024-04-25

Association between parental control, peer relationship and aggressive behavior in junior high school students

School of Public Health, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu (233030), Anhui Province, China

摘要

摘要: 目的了解父母控制水平、同伴关系和初中生攻击行为的关系，为预防青少年攻击行为的发生提供理论依据。方法于2022年6—7月，采用方便整群随机抽样方法，选取安徽省宿州市、宣城市6所初中学校中初一至初三的2 564名学生为研究对象，采用父母控制问卷、Buss和Perry攻击问卷中文版和初中生同伴关系量表进行问卷调查。结果男生在父母控制、父亲心理控制、母亲心理控制、父亲行为控制、母亲行为控制中得分(185.31±27.49，21.65±7.43，21.77±8.18，69.50±11.41，72.39±11.53)均高于女生(178.21±25.13，20.08±7.09，20.61±7.62，66.56±11.14，70.95±11.84)(t值分别为8.63，5.47，3.70，6.60，3.12)，女生的同伴关系得分(48.41±11.26)高于男生(47.13±10.84)(t=2.95)；初一年级学生在父母控制、父亲心理控制、母亲心理控制、父亲行为控制、同伴关系和攻击行为维度的得分(184.67±27.18，21.83±7.29，22.15±8.07，68.81±10.95，50.21±9.57，80.23±17.66)均高于初二(180.98±25.46，20.16±7.82，20.21±7.55，68.29±11.69，45.47±11.67，74.08±17.70)和初三(179.21±26.79，20.53±7.22，21.17±8.06，66.81±11.39，47.54±11.43，75.75±16.29)年级(F值分别为9.44，12.87，13.61，6.84，42.85，30.40)(P值均 < 0.01)。父母控制、同伴关系得分均与攻击行为得分呈正相关(r值分别为0.22，0.47，P值均 < 0.01)。同伴关系在父母控制和攻击行为之间起部分中介作用，中介效应值为0.04，占父母控制对攻击行为总效应的26.39%。结论父母控制高及同伴关系差与攻击行为水平均呈正相关。应通过建立良好的家庭教养模式，抵制校园暴力、维护良好社会准则等方式改善初中生的同伴关系，以减少攻击行为的发生。
- 人际关系 /
- 攻击 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 法定监护人 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To understand the interrelationships of parental control, peer relationship, and aggressive behavior in junior high school students, in order to provide a theoretical basis for preventing the occurrence of adolescent aggressive behavior. Methods During June to July, 2022, 2 564 students of grade one to grade three were selected from 6 junior high schools from each of Suzhou and Xuancheng cities in Anhui Province by using convenient cluster random sampling method, and then the questionnaire survey was administered, including the Chinese version of Parent Control Questionnaire, Chinese version of Buss & Perry Aggression Questionnaire and Adolescent Peer Relationship Questionnaire. Results Boys scored (185.31±27.49, 21.65±7.43, 21.77±8.18, 69.50±11.41, 72.39±11.53) higher than girls (178.21±25.13, 20.08±7.09, 20.61±7.62, 66.56±11.14, 70.95±11.84) in parental control, father's psychological control, mother's psychological control, father's behavioral control, and mother's behavioral control (t=8.63, 5.47, 3.70, 6.60, 3.12), while girls scored (48.41±11.26) higher in peer relationship than boys (47.13±10.84) (t=-2.95) (P < 0.01). The scores of first-grade-students in parental control, father's psychological control, mother's psychological control, father's behavior control, peer relationship, and aggressive behavior (184.67±27.18, 21.83±7.29, 22.15±8.07, 68.81±10.95, 50.21±9.57, 80.23±17.66) were higher than those of second-grade-students (180.98±25.46, 20.16±7.82, 20.21±7.55, 68.29±11.69, 45.47±11.67, 74.08±17.70) and third-grade-students (179.21±26.79, 20.53±7.22, 21.17±8.06, 66.81±11.39, 47.54±11.43, 75.75±16.29) (F=9.44, 12.87, 13.61, 6.84, 42.85, 30.40, P < 0.01). The scores of parental control and peer relationship were positively correlated with the scores of aggressive behavior (r=0.22, 0.47, P < 0.01). Peer relationship partially mediate the relationship between parental control and aggressive behavior, with a partial mediation effect value of 0.04, accounting for 26.39% of the total effect of parental control on aggressive behavior. Conclusions High parental control and poor peer relationship are both positively correlated with the level of aggressive behavior. The peer relationship of teenagers should be improved by establishing appropriate parenting style, tackling campus violence, and maintaining good social norms, in order to reduce the occurrence of aggressive behavior among adolescents.
- Interpersonal relations /
- Aggression /
- Mental health /
- Legal guardians /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 不同组别初中生父母控制和同伴关系与攻击行为得分比较(x ± s)

Table 1. Comparison of parental control, peer relationship and aggressive behavior scores among junior high school students of different genders(x ± s)

组别	选项	人数	统计值	父母控制	父亲心理控制	母亲心理控制	父亲行为控制	母亲行为控制	同伴关系	攻击行为
性别	男	1 281		185.31±27.49	21.65±7.43	21.77±8.18	69.50±11.41	72.39±11.53	47.13±10.84	76.32±17.40
	女	1 283		178.21±25.13	20.08±7.09	20.61±7.62	66.56±11.14	70.95±11.84	48.41±11.26	77.20±17.54
			t值	8.63	5.47	3.70	6.60	3.12	-2.95	-1.28
			P值	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	0.20
年级	初一	910		184.67±27.18	21.83±7.29	22.15±8.07	68.81±10.95	71.88±10.78	50.21±9.57^△	80.23±17.66
	初二	886		180.98±25.46^*	20.16±7.82^*	20.21±7.55^*	68.29±11.69	72.31±12.08	45.47±11.67	74.08±17.70^*
	初三	768		179.21±26.79^*	20.53±7.22^*	21.17±8.06^*	66.81±11.39^*△	70.70±12.26^*△	47.54±11.43^△	75.75±16.29^*
			F值	9.44	12.87	13.61	6.84	4.12	42.85	30.40
			P值	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	0.02	< 0.01	< 0.01
注：与初一相比*P < 0.05，与初二相比△P < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 父母控制和同伴关系与初中生攻击行为的相关性(n=2 564，r值)

Table 2. Correlation between parental control, peer relationship, and aggressive behavior among junior high school students(n=2 564, r)

变量	父亲心理控制	母亲心理控制	父亲行为控制	母亲行为控制	父母控制	同伴关系
母亲心理控制	0.64^*
父亲行为控制	0.22^*	0.11^*
母亲行为控制	0.09^*	0.18^*	0.54^*
父母控制	0.60^*	0.60^*	0.76^*	0.75^*
同伴关系	0.34^*	0.34^*	-0.07^*	-0.08^*	0.13^*
攻击行为	0.39^*	0.38^*	0.01	-0.01	0.22^*	0.47^*
注：*P < 0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(31)

[1]	张帆. 祖辈教养方式、同伴关系对青少年亲社会行为和攻击行为的影响[D]. 太原: 山西大学, 2020. ZHANG F. Effects of grandparents' parenting style and peer relationships on adolescents' prosocial and aggressive behaviors[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[2]	朱海东, 窦晓晨, 周雪梅, 等. 父母控制对大学生亲社会行为的影响: 自尊的中介作用[J]. 兵团教育学院学报, 2021, 31(6): 25-31, 64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BTJX202106005.htm ZHU H D, DOU X C, ZHOU X M, et al. Influence of parental control on pro-social behavior of college students: mediating role of self-esteem[J]. Bingtuan Educ Inst, 2021, 31(6): 25-31, 64. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BTJX202106005.htm
[3]	周宗奎, 孙晓军, 赵冬梅, 等. 同伴关系的发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(1): 62-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201501009.htm ZHOU Z K, SUN X J, ZHAO D M, et al. Research on the development of peer relations[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2015, 31(1): 62-70. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201501009.htm
[4]	胡琳. 同伴关系与儿童攻击行为研究综述[J]. 西部学刊, 2018(8): 59-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBXK201808016.htm HU L. A review of research on peer relations and children's aggressive behavior[J]. Western J, 2018(8): 59-62. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBXK201808016.htm
[5]	韩慧, 缪鹏程, 王元明, 等. 中学生攻击行为与父母心理行为控制的相关性[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2020, 41(9): 1346-1349. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.09.018 HAN H, MIAO P C, WANG Y M, et al. Relationship between parental control and aggressive behavior of middle school students[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2020, 41(9): 1346-1349. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.09.018
[6]	方永慈. 中学生父母控制、应对方式与攻击行为的关系[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2019, 27(12): 1875-1879. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201912030.htm FANG Y C. The relationship between parental control, coping styles, and aggressive behavior in middle school students[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2019, 27(12): 1875-1879. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201912030.htm
[7]	纪林芹, 魏星, 陈亮, 等. 童年晚期同伴关系不利与儿童的攻击行为: 自我概念与同伴信念的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(11): 1479-1489. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB201211009.htm JI L Q, WEI X, CHEN L, et al. Adverse peer relationships in late childhood and aggressive behavior in children: the mediating role of self-concept and peer beliefs[J]. Acta Psychol Sinca, 2012, 44(11): 1479-1489. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB201211009.htm
[8]	侯雁. 初中生学校道德氛围、道德推脱与攻击行为的关系[D]. 天津: 天津师范大学, 2014. HOU Y. Middle school students' relationships among school moral atmosphere, moral disengagement and aggressive behavior[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin Normal University, 2014. (in Chinese)
[9]	HE Y, YUAN K, SUN L, et al. A cross-lagged model of the link between parental psychological control and adolescent aggression[J]. J Adolesc, 2019, 74(1): 103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.05.007
[10]	WANG Q, POMERANTZ E M, CHEN H. The role of parents' control in early adolescents' psychological functioning: a longitudinal investigation in the United States and China[J]. Child Dev, 2007, 78(5): 1592-1610. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01085.x
[11]	SHEK D T L. Assessment of perceived parental psychological control in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong[J]. Res Soc Work Pract, 2006, 16(4): 382-391. doi: 10.1177/1049731506286231
[12]	SHEK D T L. Perceived parental control and parent-child relational qualities in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong[J]. Sex Roles, 2005, 53(9/10): 635-646.
[13]	陈珂. 家庭教养方式对儿童攻击性行为的影响: 同伴关系的中介作用[D]. 西宁: 青海师范大学, 2019. CHEN K. The impact of family rearing style on children's aggressive behavior: the mediating role of peer relations[D]. Xining: Qinghai Normal University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[14]	李献云, 费立鹏, 张亚利, 等. Buss和Perry攻击问卷中文版的修订和信效度[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2011, 37(10): 607-613. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSJJ201110011.htm LI X Y, FEI L P, ZHANG Y L, et al. Development, reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Buss & Perry Aggression Questionnaire[J]. Chin J Nerv Ment Dis, 2011, 37(10): 607-613. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSJJ201110011.htm
[15]	刘俊升, 周颖, 顾文瑜. Buss-Perry攻击性量表在青少年中的初步修订[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(4): 449-451. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY200904021.htm LIU J S, ZHOU Y, GU W Y. Reliability and validity of Chinese Version of Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire in adolescents[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2009, 17(4): 449-451. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY200904021.htm
[16]	温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 731-745. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201405001.htm WEN Z L, YE B J. Analyses of mediating effects: the development of methods and models[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2014, 22(5): 731-745. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201405001.htm
[17]	杨益文. 高中生青春期心理健康现状及干预措施[C]//华教创新(北京)文化传媒有限公司, 中国环球文化出版社. 2023教育理论与管理第二届"高效课堂和有效教学模式研究论坛"论文集(二). 长沙, 2023: 390-392. YANG Y W. Current status and intervention measures of adolescent psychological health among high school students[C]//Huajiao Innovation (Beijing) Culture Media Co., Ltd., China Global Culture Publishing House. Collection of Papers on the 2nd "Efficient Classroom and Effective Teaching Models Research Forum" on Education Theory and Management (2023). Changsha, 2023: 390-392. (in Chinese)
[18]	陈璇. 青少年校园欺凌行为的影响因素及干预模式研究: 基于中介效应依次检验模型的构建[J]. 预防青少年犯罪研究, 2019(3): 34-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YFQS201903005.htm CHEN X. A study on the influencing factors and intervention models of adolescent campus bullying behavior: construction of a model based on intermediary effect sequential test[J]. Juv Delinq Prev Res, 2019(3): 34-42. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YFQS201903005.htm
[19]	LIU H, DOU K, YU C, et al. The relationship between peer attachment and aggressive behavior among Chinese adolescents: the mediating effect of regulatory emotional self-efficacy[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(13): 7123.
[20]	WANG M. Harsh parenting and adolescent aggression: adolescents' effortful control as the mediator and parental warmth as the moderator[J]. Child Abuse Negl, 2019, 94: 104021.
[21]	李丹黎, 张卫, 李董平, 等. 父母行为控制、心理控制与青少年早期攻击和社会退缩的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(2): 201-209. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201202015.htm LI D L, ZHANG W, LI D P, et al. Parental behavioral control, psychological control, and aggression and social withdrawal in early adolescents[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2012, 28(2) : 201-209. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201202015.htm
[22]	CULOTTA C M, GOLDSTEIN S E. Adolescents' aggressive and prosocial behavior: associations with jealousy and social anxiety[J]. J Genet Psychol, 2008, 169(1): 21-33.
[23]	程耀慧, 韩慧. 父母控制与青少年攻击行为的研究进展[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2021, 42(7): 1106-1109. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.07.034 CHENG Y H, HAN H. Research progress on parental control and adolescent aggressive behavior[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2021, 42(7): 1106-1109. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.07.034
[24]	李姝静, 路晓华, 李易珍, 等. 初中生父母心理控制亲子冲突与初中生攻击行为的关系研究[J]. 校园心理, 2021, 19(6): 506-510. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXXL202106012.htm LI S J, LU X H, LI Y Z, et al. A study on the relationship between parental psychological control, parent-child conflict, and aggressive behavior in middle school students[J]. J Camp Life, 2021, 19(6): 506-510. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXXL202106012.htm
[25]	LAGERSPETZ K M, BJÖRKQVIST K, PELTONEN T. Is indirect aggression typical of females?Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11- to 12-year-old children[J]. Aggress Behav, 1988, 14(6): 403-414.
[26]	周佳. 进城务工人员随迁子女"有效就学"的社会环境支持[J]. 教育评论, 2008(6): 71-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYPL200806020.htm ZHOU J. Social environment support for Effective Education for children of migrant workers in cities[J]. Educ Rev, 2008(6): 71-73. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYPL200806020.htm
[27]	DUGGINS D S, KUPERMINC P G, HENRICH C C, et al. Aggression among adolescent victims of school bullying: protective roles of family and school connectedness[J]. Psychol Viol, 2016, 6(2): 205-212.
[28]	张杉, 金灿灿. 父母消极控制与反馈对青少年社会适应的影响: 黑暗人格与同伴关系的链式中介作用[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2021(2): 83-89. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDTJ202102012.htm ZHANG S, JIN C C. The effects of negative parental control and feedback on social adaptation of adolescents: the chain mediating role of dark triad and peer relationship[J]. Chin J Spec Educ, 2021(2): 83-89. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDTJ202102012.htm
[29]	郭佩文. 父母教养方式与青少年攻击性的关系: 同伴关系的中介作用[C]//中国心理学会. 第二十二届全国心理学学术会议摘要集. 武汉, 2019: 1655-1656. GUO P W. The relationship between parental parenting styles and adolescent aggression: the mediating role of peer relationships[C]//Chinese Psychological Society. 22nd National Psychological Academic Conference Abstract. Wuhan, 2019: 1655-1656. (in Chinese)
[30]	姜文斌. 父母教养方式、同伴关系对青少年亲社会行为的影响[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(4): 50-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZSF202004007.htm JIANG W B. The influence of parenting pattern and peer relationship on the adolescents' prosocial behavior[J]. J Guizhou Norm Univ (Soc Sci Edit), 2020(4): 50-58. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZSF202004007.htm
[31]	郭海平. 初中生不良同伴关系干预的案例分析[D]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2011. GUO H P. The case analysis of junior high school students' dad peer relationship intervention[D]. Jinan: Shandong Normal University, 2011. (in Chinese)