大连市2018—2020年学生肢体暴力伤害监测病例特征分析

周毅恒; 张瑜; 林红

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024108

大连市2018—2020年学生肢体暴力伤害监测病例特征分析

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024108

辽宁省大连市疾病预防控制中心慢性非传染性疾病防制科，116037

基金项目:

大连市医学科学研究计划项目 1722013

详细信息

作者简介:
周毅恒(1981-)，男，辽宁大连人，硕士，主任医师，主要从事慢性病防控方面工作

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: R179 G444 B845.67 R181.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 13
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-09-26
- 修回日期: 2023-12-26
- 网络出版日期: 2024-04-25
- 刊出日期: 2024-04-25

Analysis of case characteristics of physical assault injuries surveillance among students in Dalian, 2018-2020

Dalian Center for Disease Control and Prevention Chronic Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Control Department, Dalian (116037), Liaoning Province, China

摘要

摘要: 目的了解大连市学生肢体暴力伤害流行特征，为制定学生群体肢体暴力伤害防控策略提供依据。方法分析2018—2022年大连市医院伤害监测系统收集的学生肢体暴力伤害数据，采用描述性流行病学方法分析其特征并计算构成比，采用χ²检验进行组间比较。结果共报告在校生肢体暴力伤害病例1 413例，男女性别比为4.12∶1。各年度在校学生肢体暴力伤害报告数由2018年的414例下降到2022年的209例；高中/中专阶段病例占比最高(40.13%)；各月份均有伤害发生，6，10和11月报告病例最多，共占33.97%；伤害原因主要为钝器伤和跌倒/坠落，分别占70.06%和23.35%，其中男生钝器伤占比(71.24%)高于女生(65.22%)，差异有统计学意义(χ²=3.84，P < 0.05)；伤害发生时的活动以休闲活动为主，占75.58%；伤害发生地点主要集中在学校和公路/街道，分别占51.52%和23.35%；伤害性质主要为挫伤/擦伤和锐器开放伤，分别占67.16%和22.29%；伤害部位主要集中在头部，占59.52%；伤害严重程度以轻度和中度为主，分别占72.26%和27.60%。结论学校是学生肢体暴力伤害主要发生地点，男生和中学生是重点防控人群。应开展有针对性的干预措施，有效降低学生肢体暴力伤害的发生。
- 暴力 /
- 创伤和损伤 /
- 人群监测 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To understand the epidemiological characteristics of physical assault injuries among students in Dalian, so as to provide evidence for the prevention and control of physical assault injuries among students. Methods Data of student physical assault injuries came from the Dalian Hospital Injury Monitoring System from 2018 to 2022, descriptive epidemiological methods and Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 1 413 cases of physical assault injuries among students were reported, and the sex ratio between male and female was 4.12∶1. The number of reported physical assault injuries dropped from 414 cases in 2018 to 209 cases in 2022. The group of senior middle school/secondary vocational school had the highest proportion of cases (40.13%). Injuries occurred in all months, with the highest number of reported cases in June, October, and November, accounting for 33.97%. The main causes of injuries were blunt instrument injuries and falls, accounting for 70.06% and 23.35% respectively. The proportion of male (71.24%) was significantly higher than female (65.22%) in blunt instrument injuries (χ²=3.84, P < 0.05). Nearly 75.58% of injuries occurred during leisure time. The main locations of injuries took place in schools and roads, accounting for 51.52% and 23.35% respectively. Contusions and sharp instrument injuries were one of the most common types of injuries, accounting for 67.16% and 22.29% respectively. The main area of injury was concentrated in the head, accounting for 59.52%. Most of injuries were mild and moderate, accounting for 72.26% and 27.60%, respectively. Conclusions Schools are the main location for physical assault injuries among students, with boys and middle school students being the most vulnerable populations. Targeted intervention measures should be implemented to effectively reduce the occurrence of physical assault injuries among students.
- Violence /
- Wounds and injuries /
- Population surveillance /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 大连市2018—2022年学生肢体暴力伤害病例性别和学段分布

Table 1. Distribution of physical assault injuries among students in different genders and academic stages in Dalian from 2018 to 2022

年份	人数	性别		学段
年份	人数	男	女	小学	初中	高中/中专	大学及以上
2018	414	343(82.85)	71(17.15)	44(10.63)	55(13.29)	207(50.00)	108(26.09)
2019	385	320(83.12)	65(16.88)	84(21.82)	63(16.36)	135(35.06)	103(26.75)
2020	175	146(83.43)	29(16.57)	29(16.57)	33(18.86)	65(37.14)	48(27.43)
2021	230	174(75.65)	56(24.35)	52(22.61)	51(22.17)	78(33.91)	49(21.30)
2022	209	154(73.68)	55(26.32)	38(18.18)	61(29.19)	82(39.23)	28(13.40)
合计	1 413	1 137(80.47)	276(19.53)	247(17.48)	263(18.61)	567(40.13)	336(23.78)
注：()内数字为构成比/%。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 大连市2018—2022年不同性别学生肢体暴力伤害月份分布

Table 2. Months distribution of student physical assault injuries in different genders in Dalian from 2018 to 2022

性别	人数	1月	2月	3月	4月	5月	6月	7月	8月	9月	10月	11月	12月
男	1 137	55(4.84)	20(1.76)	127(11.17)	93(8.18)	110(9.67)	125(10.99)	94(8.27)	72(6.33)	86(7.56)	138(12.14)	129(11.35)	88(7.74)
女	276	13(4.71)	11(3.99)	25(9.06)	23(8.33)	26(9.42)	31(11.23)	27(9.78)	17(6.16)	25(9.06)	32(11.59)	25(9.06)	21(7.61)
合计	1 413	68(4.81)	31(2.19)	152(10.76)	116(8.21)	136(9.62)	156(11.04)	121(8.56)	89(6.30)	111(7.86)	170(12.03)	154(10.90)	109(7.71)
注：()内数字为构成比/%。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 大连市2018—2022年不同性别学生肢体暴力伤害原因分布

Table 3. Causes distribution of student physical assault injuries in different genders in Dalian from 2018 to 2022

性别	人数	钝器伤	跌倒/坠落	刀/锐器伤	其他
男	1 137	810(71.24)	263(23.13)	44(3.87)	20(1.76)
女	276	180(65.22)	67(24.28)	11(3.99)	18(6.52)
合计	1 413	990(70.06)	330(23.35)	55(3.89)	38(2.69)
注：()内数字为构成比/%。

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 大连市2018—2022年不同性别学生肢体暴力伤害发生时活动分布

Table 4. Activities distribution of student physical assault injuries in different genders in Dalian from 2018 to 2022

性别	人数	学习	体育活动	休闲活动	步行	其他
男	1 137	56(4.93)	69(6.07)	843(74.14)	89(7.83)	80(7.04)
女	276	9(3.26)	6(2.17)	225(81.52)	14(5.07)	22(7.97)
合计	1 413	65(4.60)	75(5.31)	1 068(75.58)	103(7.29)	102(7.22)
注：()内数字为构成比/%。

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 大连市2018—2022年不同性别和学段学生肢体暴力伤害发生地点分布

Table 5. Locations distribution of student physical assault injuries in different genders and academic stages in Dalian from 2018 to 2022

性别与学段		人数	学校	公路/街道	公共居住场所	家中	服务场所	运动场所	其他
性别	男	1 137	604(53.12)	261(22.96)	111(9.76)	77(6.77)	49(4.31)	31(2.73)	4(0.35)
	女	276	124(44.93)	69(25.00)	22(7.97)	42(15.22)	12(4.35)	6(2.17)	1(0.36)
学段	小学	247	148(59.92)	54(21.86)	10(4.05)	29(11.74)	4(1.62)	2(0.81)	0
	初中	263	138(52.47)	72(27.38)	12(4.56)	29(11.03)	6(2.28)	4(1.52)	2(0.76)
	高中/中专	567	277(48.85)	135(23.81)	70(12.35)	41(7.23)	26(4.59)	16(2.82)	2(0.35)
	大学及以上	336	165(49.11)	69(20.54)	41(12.20)	20(5.95)	25(7.44)	15(4.46)	1(0.30)
合计		1 413	728(51.52)	330(23.35)	133(9.41)	119(8.42)	61(4.32)	37(2.62)	5(0.35)
注：()内数字为构成比/%。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(17)

[1]	儿童伤害与暴力: 来自全球范围内的挑战[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2009, 17(6): 620. Child injury and violence: challenges from a global perspective[J]. Chin J Prev Contr Chron Dis, 2009, 17(6): 620. (in Chinese)
[2]	吕永富, 胡麟, 宗瑞锦, 等. 暴力性伤害研究概述[J]. 疾病控制杂志, 2006, 10(6): 600-603. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBKZ200706040.htm LYU Y F, HU L, ZONG R J, et al. The outline of assaultive injuries research[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2006, 10(6): 600-603. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBKZ200706040.htm
[3]	俞敏. 重视和推进伤害与暴力预防控制工作[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(8): 757-759, 764. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYFX201908001.htm YU M. Attach importance to and promote the prevention and control of injury and violence[J]. Chin Prev Med J, 2019, 31(8): 757-759, 764. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYFX201908001.htm
[4]	中国疾病预防控制中心慢性非传染性疾病预防控制中心. 全国伤害医院监测数据集(2015)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2016. China Center for Disease Control and Prevention Chronic Non communicable Disease Control and Prevention Center. National Injury Hospital Monitoring Data Set (2015)[M]. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House, 2016. (in Chinese)
[5]	徐雯艳, 袁兆康, 姜小庆, 等. 江西省高中生肢体暴力行为影响因素分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2018, 39(11): 1664-1666. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.11.017 XU W Y, YUAN Z K, JIANG X Q, et al. Comparative analysis of risk factors related to physical violence in high school students in Jiangxi[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2018, 39(11): 1664-1666. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.11.017
[6]	顾伟玲, 李雪琴, 马骏, 等. 嘉兴市故意伤害病例流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(2): 128-131. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYFX201902005.htm GU W L, LI X Q, MA J, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of intentional injury in Jiaxing[J]. Chin Prev Med J, 2019, 31(2): 128-131. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYFX201902005.htm
[7]	赵鸣, 俞敏, 王浩, 等. 2010—2014年浙江省儿童暴力伤害监测数据分析[J]. 伤害医学(电子版), 2017, 6(2): 15-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYD201702005.htm ZHAO M, YU M, WANG H, et al. Analysis on the violence related injuries in children during 2010-2014 in Zhejiang Province[J]. Inj Med (Elect Edit), 2017, 6(2): 15-20. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYD201702005.htm
[8]	汪媛, 叶鹏鹏, 段蕾蕾. 2006—2014年我国门急诊儿童非故意和故意伤害病例分析[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2016, 20(7): 670-674, 743. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBKZ201607007.htm WANG Y, YE P P, DUAN L L. Characteristics of unintentional and intentional injuries among children from emergency and outpatient rooms in China 2006-2014[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2016, 20(7): 670-674, 743. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBKZ201607007.htm
[9]	周毅恒, 关磊, 姜杰, 等. 2006—2014年大连市伤害监测点暴力伤害监测结果分析[J]. 中国健康教育, 2017, 33(5): 434-438. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJK201705013.htm ZHOU Y H, GUAN L, JIANG J, et al. Analysis on violence injury by using injury surveillance data in Dalian, 2006-2014[J]. Chin J Health Educ, 2017, 33(5): 434-438. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJK201705013.htm
[10]	杨紫丹, 李燕妮, 彭晓琳, 等. COVID-19疫情前后深圳市南山区伤害监测数据变化分析[J]. 伤害医学(电子版), 2023, 12(2): 46-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYD202302007.htm YANG Z D, LI Y N, PENG X L, et al. Changes in injury surveillance data in the Nanshan District of Shenzhen City during the COVID-19 Pandemic[J]. Inj Med (Elect Edit), 2023, 12(2): 46-52. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYD202302007.htm
[11]	索朗曲珍, 耳玉亮, 黄倩, 等. 西藏山南市小学生伤害干预及效果评估[J]. 中国健康教育, 2021, 37(5): 456-458. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJK202105018.htm SUOLANG Q Z, ER Y L, HUANG Q, et al. Effect evaluation on injury intervention among primary school students in Shannan Country of Tibet[J]. Chin J Health Educ, 2021, 37(5): 456-458. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJK202105018.htm
[12]	高景全. 2018—2022年天津市宁河区儿童青少年意外伤害发生特征及影响因素分析[J]. 中国初级卫生保健, 2023, 37(10): 61-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGCW202310016.htm GAO J Q. Analysis of the characteristics and influencing factors of youth accidental injury occurrence in Ninghe District of Tianjin from 2018 to 2022[J]. Chin Prim Health Care, 2023, 37(10): 61-64. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGCW202310016.htm
[13]	王荣, 杜文聪, 苏健, 等. 2006—2021年江苏省0~14岁儿童伤害流行特征及趋势[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2023, 31(8): 627-631. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZMXB202308013.htm WANG R, DU W C, SU J, et al. Epidemic characteristics and trends of injuries among children aged 0-14 in Jiangsu Province from 2006 to 2021[J]. Chin J Prev Contr Chron Dis, 2023, 31(8): 627-631. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZMXB202308013.htm
[14]	李欣宇, 杨亚明, 周义夕, 等. 教育干预措施的沟通手段在青少年伤害预防中的作用[J]. 伤害医学(电子版), 2019, 8(3): 36-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYD201903007.htm LI X Y, YANG Y M, ZHOU Y X, et al. The role of communication strategies in educational interventions in the prevention of adolescent injury[J]. Inj Med (Elect Edit), 2019, 8(3): 36-40. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYD201903007.htm
[15]	王荣科, 吕书红, 向虎, 等. 中国五省初中生伤害发生及其与健康相关行为的关联[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2023, 44(5): 769-772. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.05.029 WANG R K, LYU S H, XIANG H, et al. Association between incidence of injuries and health-related behavior among middle school students in five provinces in China[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2023, 44(5): 769-772. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.05.029
[16]	邬天凤, 柏品清, 任亚萍, 等. 上海市浦东新区一~三年级小学生伤害健康教育干预效果评价[J]. 伤害医学(电子版), 2023, 12(1): 44-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYD202301009.htm WU T F, BAI P Q, REN Y P, et al. Evaluation of intervention based on health education for injury among primary school students: grades one to three in Pudong, Shanghai[J]. Inj Med (Elect Edit), 2023, 12(1): 44-52. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYD202301009.htm
[17]	WICHMANN M L, PAWILS S, RICHTERS J, et al. School-based interventions for child and adolescent victims of interpersonal violence[J]. Trauma Viol Abuse, 2023, 24(3): 1743-1762. doi: 10.1177/15248380221078892