初中生反刍思维与生活事件和学习价值怀疑的关系

许静; 樊春雷; 王利刚; 陶婷; 高文斌

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024081

初中生反刍思维与生活事件和学习价值怀疑的关系

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024081

许静^{1, 2},
樊春雷¹,
王利刚¹,
陶婷¹,
高文斌^1, ,

1.
中国科学院心理研究所，北京 100101
2.
中国科学院大学心理学系

基金项目:

中国科学院心理研究所自主部署项目 H21090

详细信息

作者简介:
许静(1978-)，女，江苏南京人，在读硕士，高级工程师，主要研究方向为心理健康与发展

通讯作者:
高文斌，E-mail：gaowb@psych.ac.cn

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: R179 G444 R193
计量
- 文章访问数: 65
- HTML全文浏览量: 41
- PDF下载量: 21
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-07-26
- 修回日期: 2024-01-08
- 网络出版日期: 2024-03-29
- 刊出日期: 2024-03-25

Relationship between ruminative thinking, life events and learning value doubt among junior high school students

XU Jing^{1, 2},
FAN Chunlei¹,
WANG Ligang¹,
TAO Ting¹,
GAO Wenbin^{1
, ,}

1.
Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (100101), China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨反刍思维在生活事件与初中生学习价值怀疑间的中介作用，为对初中生开展心理健康教育提供参考依据。方法 2023年3—7月，采用方便抽样方法抽取来自广东、江苏及河北的930名初中生，使用学习价值怀疑量表、反刍思维量表以及青少年生活事件量表进行问卷调查。采用t检验和方差分析进行组间比较，采用Pearson相关分析法进行相关性分析，采用Bootstrap方法进行中介效应检验。结果初中生生活事件与学习价值怀疑(r=0.18)、反刍思维(r=0.65)以及3个维度(强迫思考、反省深思、症状反刍)(r值分别为0.60，0.59，0.66)均呈正相关；学习价值怀疑与反刍思维(r=0.15)以及3个维度(强迫思考、反省深思、症状反刍)(r值分别为0.07，0.13，0.19)均呈正相关(P值均＜0.05)。反刍思维的症状反刍维度在生活事件与学习价值怀疑之间起部分中介作用(效应值为0.09，95%CI=0.06~0.11)；反刍思维的强迫思考维度在生活事件与学习价值怀疑间起部分中介作用(效应值为-0.07，95%CI=-0.09~-0.04)；在2条影响路径中，症状反刍的影响力更强，2条影响路径差异有统计学意义(效应值为0.15，95%CI=0.11~0.20，不包含0)(P值均＜0.05)。结论初中生生活事件既可以通过症状反刍正向预测学习价值怀疑，又可以通过强迫思考负向预测学习价值怀疑。应积极关注初中生的心理健康状态，在初中生经历生活事件时及时介入、减少基于症状的反刍，提高学习积极性。
- 反刍思维 /
- 生活变动事件 /
- 学习 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To explore the mediating effect of rumination between life events and learning value doubt among junior high school students, so as to provide reference for the psychological health education of junior high school students. Methods From March to July 2023, a total of 930 junior high school students from Guangdong, Jiangsu and Hebei were selected by a combination of convenient sampling methods. Participants completed the Scales of Value of Learning (SVL), Ruminative Response scale (RRS) and Adolescent Self-rating Life Events Checklist (ASLEC). The t-test and ANOVA were used for inter-group comparisons and Pearson correlation analysis was used for correlation analysis and bootstrap method was used for mediating effect test. Results The life events of junior middle school students were positively correlated with learning value doubt (r=0.18), rumination (r=0.65) and its three dimensions (brooding, reflective pondering, and symptom-focused rumination) (r=0.60, 0.59, 0.66). Learning value doubt was positively correlated with rumination (r=0.15) and its three dimensions (r=0.07, 0.13, 0.19) (P < 0.05).The symptom-focused rumination (effect size=0.09, 95%CI=0.06-0.11) and brooding (effect size=-0.07, 95%CI=-0.09--0.04) dimensions partially mediated the relationship between life events and learning value doubt. In the two influential pathways, symptom-focused rumination exerts a stronger impact, and the difference was statistically significant (effect size=0.15, 95%CI=0.11-0.20, excluding 0) (P < 0.05). Conclusions Life events experienced by junior high school students can positively predict learning value doubt through symptom-focused rumination, and negatively predict learning value doubt through brooding. Active attention should be paid to the mental health status of junior high school students, intervene promptly when they experience life events, reduce symptom-based rumination, and improve their learning enthusiasm.
- Rumination thinking /
- Life change events /
- Learning /
- Mental health /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

图 1 初中生生活事件、学习价值怀疑与反刍思维各维度的中介效应模型

Figure 1. Mediation effect model of life events, learning value doubt and the dimensions of rumination among junior high school students

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 初中生生活事件、学习价值怀疑与反刍思维及其各维度的相关性分析(n=930，r值)

Table 1. Correlation analysis of life events, learning value doubt and rumination and its dimensions among junior high school students(n=930, r)

变量	生活事件	症状反刍	强迫思考	反省深思	反刍思维
症状反刍	0.66^**
强迫思考	0.60^**	0.88^**
反省深思	0.59^**	0.87^**	0.84^**
反刍思维	0.65^**	0.98^**	0.94	0.93^**
学习价值怀疑	0.18^**	0.19^**	0.07^*	0.13^**	0.15^**
注： P＜0.05，*P＜0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	王凤巧, 陈光辉, 李一涵, 等. 初中生负性生活事件与学校疏离感的关系: 心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 青少年学刊, 2021, 144(4): 50-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8950.2021.04.009 WANG F Q, CHEN G H, LI Y H, et al. The relationship between negative life events and school alienation in junior middle school students: the mediating role of psychological resilience[J]. Youth Adolesc Stud, 2021, 144(4): 50-55. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8950.2021.04.009
[2]	陈南. 教育生活中的身体呈现: 中小学教师的身体社会学考察[D]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2021. CHEN N. The presentation of the body in educational life: a study on the sociology of the body of primary and secondary school teachers[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University, 2021. (in Chinese)
[3]	井军弟. 西部地方高校大学生学习价值怀疑感调查研究: 以陕西理工学院为例[J]. 学理论, 2013, 55(20): 251-252. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LBYT201320116.htm JING J D. Investigation and research on the doubt of learning value of local university students in western China: a case study of Shaanxi University of Technology[J]. Theory Res, 2013, 55(20): 251-252. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LBYT201320116.htm
[4]	章湉. 关心教育视角下高中生学习情感投入研究[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2022. ZHANG T. A study on high school students' learning emotional engagement from the perspective of caring education[D]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2022. (in Chinese)
[5]	JOHNSTON C A, STEELE R G, HERRERA E A, et al. Parent and child reporting of negative life events: discrepancy and agreement across pediatric samples[J]. J Pediatr Psychol, 2023, 28(8): 579-588.
[6]	刘贤臣, 刘连启, 李传琦, 等. 青少年应激性生活事件和应对方式研究[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1998, 12(1): 47-49, 64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS801.020.htm LIU X C, LIU L Q, LI C Q, et al. Study on stressful life events and coping styles of adolescents[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 1998, 12(1): 47-49, 64. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS801.020.htm
[7]	来水木, 韩秀, 杨宏飞. 国外反刍思维研究综述[J]. 应用心理学, 2009, 15(1): 90-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXNX200901014.htm LAI S M, HAN X, YANG H F. A review of rumination research abroad[J]. Chin J Appl Psychol, 2009, 15(1): 90-96. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXNX200901014.htm
[8]	齐琪. 认知重评与表达性写作对初中生积极反刍思维干预的对比研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古师范大学, 2021. QI Q. The comparative study on the intervention of positive ruminant thinking between cognitive re-evaluation and expression writing in junior high school students[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Normal University, 2021. (in Chinese)
[9]	布倩仪, 宋莉莉, 王詠, 等. 青少年宽恕与非自杀性自我伤害: 反刍思维的中介作用及同伴接纳的调节作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2022, 30(22): 1882-1887. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL202212024.htm BU Q Y, SONG L L, WANG Y, et al. Effect of adolescents' forgiveness on non-suicidal self-injury: the mediating role of rumination and moderating role of peer acceptance[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2022, 30(22): 1882-1887. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL202212024.htm
[10]	林琳, 刘俊岐, 杨洋, 等. 负性生活事件对大学生自杀意念的影响: 反刍思维的中介作用和气质性乐观的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 569-576. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CLXW201904017.htm LIN L, LIU J Q, YANG Y, et al. The impact of negative life events in college students' suicidal ideation: mediating role of rumination and moderating role of dispositional optimism[J]. Stud Psychol Behav, 2019, 17(4): 569-576. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CLXW201904017.htm
[11]	MARIA S A, REICHERT F, HUMMEL B S, et al. Effects of rumination on intrusive memories: does processing mode matter?[J]. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 2012, 43(3): 901-909. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.01.004
[12]	MATTHEWS G, ZEIDNER M, ROBERTS R D. Models of personality and affect for education: a review and synthesis[M]. NK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2006: 163-186.
[13]	MIDGLEY C, MAEHR M L, HRUDA L Z, et al. Manual for the patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales[M]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2000: 734-763.
[14]	梁九清, 王淑敏. 中学生学习价值怀疑自我效能和学业自我妨碍关系[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2010, 31(10): 1183-1184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XIWS201010017.htm LIANG J Q, WANG S M. Relationship among learning value suspicion self-efficacy and academ self-handicapping of middle school students[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2010, 31(10): 1183-1184. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XIWS201010017.htm
[15]	冉苒, 戴玲玲. 内地藏族初中生学业求助的特点及相关因素研究[J]. 贵州民族研究, 2011, 32(4): 173-178. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZNY201104035.htm RAN R, DAI L L. A study on help-seeking features in lerning and other related factors of Tibetan students in junior middle schools[J]. Guizhou Ethn Stud, 2011, 32(4): 173-178. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZNY201104035.htm
[16]	韩秀, 杨宏飞. Nolen-Hoeksema反刍思维量表在中国的试用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(5): 550-551. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY200905010.htm HAN X, YANG H F. Trial of Nolen-Hoeksema Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) used in China[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2009, 17(5): 550-551. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY200905010.htm
[17]	刘贤臣, 刘连启, 杨杰, 等. 青少年生活事件量表的信度效度检验[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 1997, 5(1): 39-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY701.010.htm LIU X C, LIU L Q, YANG J, et al. Reliability and validity test of Adolescent Life Events Scale[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 1997, 5(1): 39-41. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY701.010.htm
[18]	辛秀红, 姚树桥. 青少年生活事件量表效度与信度的再评价及常模更新[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2015, 29(5): 355-360. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2015.05.010 XIN Q H, YAO S Q. Validity and reliability of the Adolescent Self-rating Life Events Checklist in middle school students[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2015, 29(5): 355-360. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2015.05.010
[19]	王湃, 李文博. 负性生活事件与反刍思维的关系研究[J]. 通化师范学院学报, 2020, 41(9): 112-117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-THSF202009019.htm WANG P, LI W B. Relationship between negative life events and ruminant thinking[J]. J Tonghua Norm Univ, 2020, 41(9): 112-117. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-THSF202009019.htm
[20]	孙晓杰. 大学生负性生活事件、信任与孤独感关系研究[J]. 沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 35(3): 57-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSS201103017.htm SUN X J. A study on the relationship between negative life events, trust and loneliness in College students[J]. J Shenyang Norm Univ (Soc Sci Edit), 2011, 35(3): 57-59. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSS201103017.htm
[21]	郭素然, 伍新春. 反刍思维与心理健康(综述)[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25(4): 314-318. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS201104020.htm GUO S R, WU X C. Rumination and mental health(review)[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2011, 25(4): 314-318. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS201104020.htm
[22]	FRITZ H L. Rumination and adjustment to a first coronary event[J]. Psychosom Med, 1999, 61(1): 105.
[23]	安蕾, 赵国祥. 高中生强迫思考倾向与抑郁状态: 压力知觉的中介作用及不反应的调节作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(1): 41-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX202201005.htm AN L, ZHAO G X. High school students' brooding and depression: the mediating role of perceived stress and the moderation role of nonreactivity[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2022, 45(1): 41-46. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX202201005.htm