Volume 45 Issue 2
Feb.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
MA Zhengyu, SU Zhiqiang, YANG Yuanyuan. Bullying bystanders' behaviors among pupils and the correlation with family function[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2024, 45(2): 236-239. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024009
Citation: MA Zhengyu, SU Zhiqiang, YANG Yuanyuan. Bullying bystanders' behaviors among pupils and the correlation with family function[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2024, 45(2): 236-239. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024009

Bullying bystanders' behaviors among pupils and the correlation with family function

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024009
  • Received Date: 2023-08-14
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-11-10
  • Available Online: 2024-03-02
  • Publish Date: 2024-02-25
  •   Objective  To analyze the status of childhood bullying bystander's behaviors among pupils and the correlation with family function, so as to provide empirical support for educational intervention in campus bullying.  Methods  A questionnaire survey using the cluster random sampling method was administered to 1 145 pupils from a primary school in Wushan County within Chongqing City in November 2019, including Pupil Bullying Bystander Behavior Scale and Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale(FACES). The χ2 test, Spearman related analysis and binary Logistic regression were used to determine the detection rate of different bullying bystander behaviors among pupils and the association with family function.  Results  The proportion of bullying promoters, bullying protectors, and bystanders were 4.7%, 92.1%, and 42.1%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in the three types of bullying bystander's behaviors among the different grades pupils(χ2=21.45, 7.98, 27.48, P < 0.05). There were significant correlation between family function and its dimensions with different types of bullying bystander behavior (|r|=0.07-0.20, P < 0.05). Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that pupils' family function and grade had statistically significant impact on promoting bullying behavior, protecting victim behavior, and bystander behavior (OR=0.98, 3.33; 1.02, 1.95; 0.99, 0.58, 0.41, 0.61, P < 0.05).  Conclusions  The bullying bystander's behaviors of pupils are related to grade in school and family function. Schools should implement educational interventions for pupils of different grades and focus on improving pupils' family function to effectively promote the occurrence of positive bystanders' behaviors in pupils.
  • loading
  • [1]
    EYUBOGLU M, EYUBOGLU D, PALA S C, et al. Traditional school bullying and cyberbullying: prevalence, the effect on mental health problems and self-harm behavior[J]. Psychiatry Res, 2021, 297: 1-10.
    [2]
    李缘, 苏普玉. 校园欺凌事件旁观者不作为行为研究进展[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(10): 1591-1595. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.10.035

    LI Y, SU P Y. Research progress of bystander ignorance in school bullying[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(10): 1591-1595. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.10.035
    [3]
    ARMITAGE R. Bullying in children: impact on child health[J]. BMJ Paediatr Open, 2021, 5(1): 1-8.
    [4]
    MOORE S E, NORMAN R E, SUETANI S, et al. Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. World J Psychiatry, 2017, 7(1): 60-76. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v7.i1.60
    [5]
    WAASDORP T E, FU R, CLARY L K, et al. School climate and bullying bystander responses in middle and high school[J]. J Appl Dev Psychol, 2022, 80: 1-15.
    [6]
    PLODGE J, FRYDENBERG E. The role of peer bystanders in school bullying: positive steps toward promoting peaceful schools[J]. Theor Pract, 2005, 44(4): 329-336. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4404_6
    [7]
    王庆林, 武晨阳, 宫火良, 等. 初中生校园欺凌旁观者行为及其与共情和自我效能的关系[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2021, 35(12): 1013-1018. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS202112006.htm

    WANG Q L, WU C Y, GONG H L, et al. Relationships among behavior of bystanders in school bullying, empathy and self-efficacy in junior middle school students[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2021, 35(12): 1013-1018. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS202112006.htm
    [8]
    张文娟, 马晓春. 青少年早期欺负参与角色的基本特点及其与同伴网络的关系[J]. 教育科学研究, 2016(2): 38-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYKY201602010.htm

    ZHANG W J, MA X C. The basic characteristics of the bullying roles in early adolescents and its relationship with peer networks[J]. Educ Sci Res, 2016(2): 38-43. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYKY201602010.htm
    [9]
    李孟儒, 肖迪, 彭涛. 欺凌态度、共情和学校生活满意度与旁观者行为反应的相关性[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2020, 28(8): 1257-1262. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL202008031.htm

    LI M R, XIAO D, PENG T. Research on bystander behavior related to bullying attitude, empathy and life satisfaction in school[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2020, 28(8): 1257-1262. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL202008031.htm
    [10]
    洪芳, 刘泓妤, 俞伟杰, 等. 中小学生欺凌参与行为与旁观者积极干预的关系[J]. 校园心理, 2022, 20(3): 209-214. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXXL202203010.htm

    HONG F, LIU H Y, YU W J, et al. Relationship between bullying participant behaviors and bystander intervention of students in primary and middle school[J]. J Campus life Ment Health, 2022, 20(3): 209-214. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXXL202203010.htm
    [11]
    段文婷, 江光荣. 计划行为理论述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2008, 16(2): 315-320. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD200802019.htm

    DUAN W T, JIANG G R. A review of the theory of planned behavior[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2008, 16(2): 315-320. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD200802019.htm
    [12]
    LEEMAN J, CRANDELL J L, LEE A, et al. Family functioning and the well-being of children with chronic conditions: a Meta-analysis[J]. Res Nurs Health, 2016, 39(4): 229-243. doi: 10.1002/nur.21725
    [13]
    CHOI H J, LIM E S, YOO J H. A study on the relationship among family functioning, empathy, and aggression by high school students[J]. J Korean Acady Nurs, 2013, 24(4): 480-487.
    [14]
    CHILDS K K, BRADY C M, CAMERON A L, et al. The role of family structure and family processes on adolescent problem behavior[J]. Deviant Behav, 2022, 43(1): 1-16. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2020.1771128
    [15]
    YOO H, FENG X, DAY R D. Adolescents' empathy and prosocial behavior in the family context: a longitudinal study[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 2013, 42(12): 1858-1872. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9900-6
    [16]
    JENKINS L N, FREDRICK S S. Social capital and bystander behavior in bullying: internalizing problems as a barrier to prosocial intervention[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 2017, 46(4): 757-771. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0637-0
    [17]
    马境. 小学生校园欺凌旁观者的行为与共情、亲社会行为的关系研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆师范大学, 2018.

    MA J. Research on the relationship between bullying bystanders' behavior and empathy and prosocial behavior in school pupils[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Normal university, 2018. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    费立鹏, 沈其杰, 郑延平, 等. "家庭亲密度和适应性量表"和"家庭环境量表"的初步评价[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1991, 5(5): 198-202. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS199105001.htm

    FEI L P, SHEN Q P, ZHENG Y P, et al. Preliminary evaluation of Chinese version of FACES Ⅱ and FES[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 1999, 5(5): 198-202. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS199105001.htm
    [19]
    RIEFFE C, CAMODECA M. Empathy in adolescence: relations with emotion awareness and social roles[J]. Brit J Dev Psychol, 2016, 34(3): 340-353. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12133
    [20]
    KAUFMAN M. How families facilitate the development of empathy in children: a family systems theory perspective[D]. Manhattan: Kansas State University, 2011.
    [21]
    POZZOLI T, GINI G, THORNBERG R. Getting angry matters: going beyond perspective taking and empathic concern to understand bystanders' behavior in bullying[J]. J Adolesc, 2017, 61: 87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.09.011
    [22]
    NICKERSON A B, MELE D, PRINCIOTTA D. Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions[J]. J Sch Psychol, 2008, 46(6): 687-703.
    [23]
    JAMBON M, MADIGAN S, PLAMONDON A, et al. Developmental trajectories of physical aggression and prosocial behavior in early childhood: family antecedents and psychological correlates[J]. Dev Psychol, 2019, 55(6): 1211-1225. doi: 10.1037/dev0000714
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (137) PDF downloads(29) Cited by()
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return