Revision of the Chinese version of Multidimensional Bullying Victimization Scale

HE Zhuang; YUAN Shuli; ZHAO Fuguo

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.04.020

Volume 43 Issue 4

Apr. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH > 2022 > 43(4): 566-569

HE Zhuang, YUAN Shuli, ZHAO Fuguo. Revision of the Chinese version of Multidimensional Bullying Victimization Scale[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2022, 43(4): 566-569. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.04.020

Citation:

HE Zhuang, YUAN Shuli, ZHAO Fuguo. Revision of the Chinese version of Multidimensional Bullying Victimization Scale[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2022, 43(4): 566-569. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.04.020

Citation:

PDF( 362 KB)

Revision of the Chinese version of Multidimensional Bullying Victimization Scale

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.04.020

College of Education Science, Guiyang University, Guiyang (550005), China

Received Date: 2021-10-31
Rev Recd Date: 2022-02-26

Available Online: 2022-04-25

Publish Date: 2022-04-25

Abstract

Abstract

Objective The Chinese version of the Multidimensional Bullying Victimization Scale (MBVS) was revised, and its reliability, validity and cross-gender equivalence were tested in Chinese adolescents. Methods A total of 2 279 adolescents were investigated by using convenient cluster sampling method from April to May 2021, 1 500 adolescents were followed to complete the retest of Chinese version of MBVS after 4-6 weeks. Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire-Victim (OBVQ-V) and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) were used as the criterion-related validity instrument. Results Exploratory factor analysis extracted 4 factors with a cumulative variance interpretation rate of 58.34%. Results of CFA supports the hypothesis of 4-factor model(χ²/df=8.64, CFI=0.93, TLI=0.92, RMSEA=0.06), and the 4 dimensions included direct bullying, indirect bullying, evaluative bullying and relationship bullying. The correlation coefficient between MBVS and OBVQ-V was 0.59, between MBVS and CES-D was 0.32. The internal consistency reliability was 0.92 and the test-retest reliability was 0.72. The cross-gender equivalence hypothesis of the scale was valid. Conclusion The Chinese version of MBVS has good reliability and validity, as well as gender equivalence and could be recommended for adolescent bullying screening.
- Violence,
- Mental health,
- Questionnaires,
- Students

FullText(HTML)

References(15)

References

[1]	赵福菓, 何壮, 袁淑莉, 等. 校园霸凌行为问卷的编制[J]. 心理学探新, 2021, 41(1): 64-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXT202101010.htm ZHAO F G, HE Z, YUAN S L, et al. Constructing the School Bullying Victims Questionnaire[J]. Psychol Explor, 2021, 41(1): 64-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXT202101010.htm
[2]	AWIRIA O, DAN O, BYRNE B. Bullying at school-what we know and what we can do[J]. Brit J Educ Stud, 1994, 42(4): 403. doi: 10.2307/3121681
[3]	谢家树, 魏宇民, BEAR G. 特拉华欺凌受害量表(学生卷)中文版再修订及初步应用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2018, 26(2): 259-263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201802011.htm XIE J S, WEI Y M, BEAR G. Revision of Chinese version of Delaware Bullying Victimization Scale-student in adolescents[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2018, 26(2): 259-263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201802011.htm
[4]	赵福菓, 何壮, 袁淑莉, 等. 奥尔维斯欺负量表的Rasch模型分析[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 46(5): 115-121. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBSW202005012.htm ZHAO F G, HE Z, YUAN S L, et al. Rasch analysis of Olweus Bully/victim Questionnaire[J]. J Southwest Univ(Soc Sci Edit), 2020, 46(5): 115-121. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBSW202005012.htm
[5]	RENSHAW T L, COOK R W. Initial development and validation of the youth internalizing problems screener[J]. J Psychoeduc Assess, 2018, 36(4): 366-378. doi: 10.1177/0734282916679757
[6]	HARBIN S M, KELLEY M L, PISCITELLO J, et al. Multidimensional Bullying Victimization Scale: development and validation[J]. J Sch Violen, 2019, 18(1): 146-161. doi: 10.1080/15388220.2017.1423491
[7]	张文新, 武建芬. Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1999(2): 8-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ902.001.htm ZHANG W X, WU J F. Revision of Olweus Bully/victim Questionnaire Chinese version[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 1999(2): 8-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ902.001.htm
[8]	汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M]. 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999. WANG X D, WANG X L, MA H. Handbook of mental health rating scale(Updated Edition)[M]. Beijing: Chinese Mental Health Journal Publisher, 1999.
[9]	吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务: SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010. WU M L. Practice of questionnaire statistical analysis: SPSS operation and application[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Publisher, 2010.
[10]	温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 马什赫伯特. 结构方程模型检验: 拟合指数与卡方准则[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(2): 186-194. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB200402009.htm WEN Z L, HAU K T, MARSH H W. Structural equation model testing: cutoff criteria for goodness of fit indices and chi-square test[J]. Acta Phychol Sinica, 2004, 36(2): 186-194. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB200402009.htm
[11]	吴明隆. 结构方程模型: Amos实务进阶[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2013. WU M L. Structural equation model: Amos advanced practice[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Publisher, 2013.
[12]	张兴慧, 李放, 项紫霓, 等. 儿童青少年校园受欺负潜在类别及与焦虑的关系[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(4): 631-634. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201404014.htm ZHANG X H, LI F, XIANG Z N, et al. Latent classes of campus victimization and anxiety among children and adolescents[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2014, 22(4): 631-634. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201404014.htm
[13]	黎亚军. 儿童青少年欺负/受欺负行为的发生模式研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2021, 29(3): 489-495. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY202103009.htm LI Y J. The Co-occurring patterns of bullying/victimization behaviors in adolescents[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2021, 29(3): 489-495. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY202103009.htm
[14]	黎亚军. 青少年网络受欺负与传统受欺负的共发性[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23(2): 346-349. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201502036.htm LI Y J. Co-occurrence of cyber victimization and traditional victimization in adolescents[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2015, 23(2): 346-349. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201502036.htm
[15]	谢家树, 覃凤荣, BEAR G, 等. 特拉华学生卷入度量表(学生卷)中文版修订[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2019, 27(2): 277-281. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201902014.htm XIE J S, QIN F R, BEAR G, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Delaware Student Engagement Scale-student[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2019, 27(2): 277-281. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201902014.htm