Effectiveness of comprehensive cognitive behavioral intervention on juvenile violent behavior

LI Yawei; ZHU Jingmin

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.07.011

Volume 42 Issue 7

Jul. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH > 2021 > 42(7): 1005-1008

LI Yawei, ZHU Jingmin. Effectiveness of comprehensive cognitive behavioral intervention on juvenile violent behavior[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2021, 42(7): 1005-1008. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.07.011

Citation:

LI Yawei, ZHU Jingmin. Effectiveness of comprehensive cognitive behavioral intervention on juvenile violent behavior[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2021, 42(7): 1005-1008. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.07.011

Citation:

PDF( 938 KB)

Effectiveness of comprehensive cognitive behavioral intervention on juvenile violent behavior

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.07.011

LI Yawei,
ZHU Jingmin^,

Huaxin College, Hebei Geosciences University, Shijiazhuang(050000), China

Received Date: 2021-01-30
Rev Recd Date: 2021-03-17

Available Online: 2021-07-23

Publish Date: 2021-07-25

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To explore the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy on adolescent violent behaviors. Methods A total of 120 middle school students with violence or violence tendency were selected from Lianbei Middle School in Shijiazhuang and divided into intervention and control group(n=60). The intervention group received comprehensive cognitive behavioral intervention while the control group did not. The changes of violence, violent risk, impulsive behavior and explicit aggressive behavior before and after intervention were compared between the two groups. Results The scores of personality insult, relational aggression, self-abuse, suicide ideation, severe violence dimension and total violence in the intervention group decreased significantly compared to before intervention(t=6.32, 7.88, 10.05, 7.05, 9.27, 8.01, P < 0.05). No similar changes were observed in the control group(t=0.35, 0.24, 1.01, 0.78, 0.49, 0.53, P>0.05). The scores of personality insult, relational aggression, self-abuse, suicide ideation, severe violence and total violence in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P < 0.05). In the intervention group, the VRS-YV score after intervention was significantly lower than that before intervention, and the proportion of individuals with VRS-YV score≥27 after intervention decreased significantly compared to before intervention (P < 0.05) and the control group(P < 0.05). Conclusion The comprehensive cognitive behavior intervention shows effectiveness in improving the empathy ability and reduce the level of violent risk.
- Cognition,
- Behavior,
- Violence,
- Intervention studies,
- Health promotion,
- Adolescent

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	高见, 王鹏翀, 李占江. 认知行为治疗的生物学机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 146-156. GAO J, WANG P C, LI Z J. The biological mechanism of cognitive behavioral therapy[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2019, 27(3): 146-156.
[2]	袁兆康, 文小桐. 中国青少年健康危险行为研究设计与流行现状[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2019, 40(4): 638-640. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.04.046 YUAN Z K, WEN X T. The research design and prevalence status of adolescent health risk behaviors in China[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2019, 40(4): 638-640. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.04.046
[3]	STOLTZ S, LONDEN M V, DEKOVIC M, et al. Effectiveness of an individual school-based intervention for children with aggressive behaviour: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Behav Cogn Psychother, 2013, 41(5): 525-548. doi: 10.1017/S1352465812000525
[4]	常进锋. 时空社会学: 青少年犯罪成因的新视角[J]. 中国青年政治学院学报, 2020, 39(1): 134-140. CHANG J F. Sociology of time and space: a new perspective on the causes of juvenile delinquency[J]. J Chin Youth Coll Polit Sci, 2020, 39(1): 134-140.
[5]	肖玉琴, 张卓, 赵辉, 等. 青少年暴力风险评估量表在未成年暴力犯的信效度检验[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2017, 25(11): 1715-1720. XIAO Y Q, ZHANG Z, ZHAO H, et al. The validity and reliability of the violence risk scale-youth version in juvenile offenders of China[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2017, 25(11): 1715-1720.
[6]	刘丹福, 张璐, 宗焱. 暴力型罪犯元认知特征研究: 以四川为例[J]. 法制与社会, 2018, 27(16): 224-225. LIU D F, ZHANG L, ZONG Y. Metacognitive characteristics of violent criminals: a case study of Sichuan Province[J]. Legal System Soc, 2018, 27(16): 224-225.
[7]	郑春玲, 刘丽, 张海燕, 等. 中学生暴力行为量表的编制[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2013, 27(4): 285-291. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2013.04.011 ZHENG C L, LIU L, ZHANG H Y, et al. Development of the middle school students violent behavior scale[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2013, 27(4): 285-291. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2013.04.011
[8]	刘小宁, 肖永成, 曲灵心, 等. 中学生校园暴力中施暴行为及影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(8): 1129-1133. LIU X N, XIAO Y C, QU L X, et al. Prevalence and impact factors of school violent perpetrator behaviors among middle school students[J]. Chin J Public Health, 2018, 34(8): 1129-1133.
[9]	刘邦惠. 违法犯罪青少年心理矫治探析[J]. 预防青少年犯罪研究, 2018, 37(1): 18-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3356.2018.01.002 LIU B H. Psychological correction of juvenile delinquents[J]. Juven Delinq Prev Res, 2018, 37(1): 18-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3356.2018.01.002
[10]	肖玉琴, 赵辉, 文凤, 等. 认知行为团体矫正对未成年犯暴力风险水平的影响[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2019, 27(1): 201-205. XIAO Y Q, ZHAO H, WEN F, et al. Effects of cognitive behavior therapy group intervention on violence risk level of juvenile offenders[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2019, 27(1): 201-205.
[11]	侯璐璐, 江琦, 王焕贞, 等. 特质愤怒对攻击行为的影响: 基于综合认知模型的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(12): 1548-1558. HOU L L, JIANG Q, WANG H Z, et al. The relationship between trait anger and aggressive behavior: based on the perspective of the integrative cognitive model[J]. Acta Psychol Sinica, 2017, 49(12): 1548-1558.
[12]	PILECKI B, MCKAY D. The theory-practice gap in cognitive-behavior therapy[J]. Behav Ther, 2013, 44(4): 541-547. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.03.004
[13]	FOSSATI A, BARRATT E S, ACQUZRINI E, et al. Psychometric properties of an adolescent version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 for a sample of Italian high school students[J]. Percept Mot Skills, 2002, 95(2): 621-635. doi: 10.2466/pms.2002.95.2.621
[14]	黄先娥. 认知行为疗法对武汉市某社区精神分裂症患者社会功能及暴力行为的影响[J]. 医学与社会, 2016, 29(7): 84-86. HUANG X E. Effect of CBT on social function and violent behavior of schizophrenia patients in a community in Wuhan[J]. Med Soc, 2016, 29(7): 84-86.
[15]	陈珊, 冉宇鹤, 彭萱. 认知行为治疗降低社区矫正对象再犯率有效性的质性系统评价[J]. 宜宾学院学报, 2019, 19(7): 60-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5365.2019.07.008 CHEN S, RAN Y H, PENG X. Evaluation of cognitive-behavioural therapy programmes in reducing criminal recidivism rate of community correction objects: a systemic review[J]. J Yibin Univ, 2019, 19(7): 60-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5365.2019.07.008
[16]	张岩, 曹江, 徐伟杰, 等. 团体认知行为干预对儿童青少年情绪障碍的效果观察[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2018, 27(5): 450-454. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2018.05.014 ZHANG Y, CAO J, XU W J, et al. Effect of group cognitive-behavior therapy intervention on dysthymic disorders in children and adolescents[J]. Chin J Behav Med Brain Sci, 2018, 27(5): 450-454. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2018.05.014