家庭累积风险对大学生内化问题的影响

鲁帆; 翟宏堃; 霍晴晴; 黄碧娟

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025243

家庭累积风险对大学生内化问题的影响

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025243

1.
天津工业大学学生心理健康教育中心, 天津 300387
2.
天津师范大学教育学院
3.
天津滨海汽车工程职业学院
4.
济南大学教育与心理科学学院

基金项目:

天津市教委2023年度科研计划专项任务项目(心理健康教育) 2023YBGX44

详细信息

作者简介:
鲁帆(1991-), 女, 山东滨州人, 硕士, 讲师, 主要研究方向为心理健康教育与咨询辅导

通讯作者:
黄碧娟, E-mail: huang_bijuan0916@163.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G78 B844.2 R179
计量
- 文章访问数: 10
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2025-01-16
- 修回日期: 2025-04-17
- 网络出版日期: 2025-08-30
- 刊出日期: 2025-08-25

Effects of cumulative family risk on internalizing problems in university students

1.
Student Mental Health Education Center, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨家庭累积风险影响大学生内化问题的模式以及领悟社会支持和自尊在二者中的作用机制, 为促进大学生心理健康提供参考。方法采用纵向研究设计, 对天津市某高校随机抽取的1 207名大一年级学生分别于2023年11月(T1)和2024年11月(T2)进行2次追踪调查。使用家庭累积风险量表、领悟社会支持量表、自尊量表和大学生心理健康筛查量表对大学生进行问卷调查。构建结构方程模型, 采用Bootstrap检验变量间中介效应, 并比较性别差异。结果大学生T1家庭累积风险与T1内化问题(r=0.30)、T2内化问题(r=0.32)均呈正相关(P值均 < 0.01)。中介效应检验结果表明, T1领悟社会支持在T1家庭累积风险和T2内化问题间的独立中介效应值为0.03(95%CI=0.02~0.05), T1自尊在两者间的独立中介效应值为0.08(95%CI=0.06~0.10), T1领悟社会支持和T1自尊的链式中介效应值为0.02(95%CI=0.02~0.03);路径"家庭累积风险→自尊"(β_男=-0.24, β_女=-0.35)和"领悟社会支持→自尊"(β_男=0.41, β_女=0.25)的性别差异均有统计学意义(P值均 < 0.05)。结论家庭累积风险通过内外发展资源显著降低了大学生一年后的内化问题行为, 作用机制存在性别差异。
- 家庭 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 生态风险 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To explore effects of cumulative family risk in university students on individuals' internalizing problems, to elucidate the mediating roles of perceived social support and self-esteem in the relationship, so as to provide a basis for promoting university student's mental health. Methods Using longitudinal design, 1 207 freshmen from a university in Tianjin were randomly selected and surveyed in November 2023 (T1) and November 2024 (T2). The instruments included the Cumulative Family Risk Scale, the Perceived Social Support Scale, the Self-esteem Scale, and the College Student Mental Health Screening Scale. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was constructed, with Bootstrap method used to test mediating effects and to examine gender differences. Results The results showed that cumulative family risk at T1 with internalizing problems at T1(r=0.30) and internalizing problems at T2 (r=0.32) were significantly positively correlated (both P < 0.01). Mediation analysis indicated that the independent mediating effect of perceived social support at T1, cumulative family risk at T1 and internalizing problems at T2 was 0.03 (95%CI=0.02-0.05), and the independent mediating effect of self-esteem at T1 was 0.08 (95%CI=0.06-0.10) (both P < 0.05). The chain mediating effect of perceived social support and self-esteem at T1 was 0.02 (95%CI=0.02-0.03) (P < 0.05). Significant gender differences were observed in the path from cumulative family risk to self-esteem (β_male=-0.24, β_female=-0.35) and in the path from perceived social support to self-esteem (β_male=0.41, β_female=0.25) (all P < 0.05). Conclusion Cumulative family risk reduces internalizing behaviors in university students via internal and external development resources, with gender-specific mechanisms.
- Family /
- Mental health /
- Ecological risk /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

图 1 大学生领悟社会支持和自尊在家庭累积风险和内化问题间的中介效应

注：虚线表示系数无统计学意义。

Figure 1. The mediating effect of perceived social support and self-esteem among university students between cumulative family risk and internalizing problems

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 不同性别大学生领悟社会支持和自尊的中介效应

注：虚线表示系数无统计学意义。

Figure 2. The mediating effects of perceived social support and self-esteen among different sex university students between cumulative family risk and internalizing problems

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 大学生领悟社会支持及自尊在家庭累积风险和内化问题间的中介效应检验(n=1 207)

Table 1. Testing the mediating effects of perceived social support and self-esteem among university students between cumulative family risk and internalizing problems(n=1 207)

效应	路径	标准化效应值(95%CI)	效果量/%
直接效应	T1家庭累积风险→T2内化问题	0.03(-0.02~0.08)	17.09
中介效应	T1家庭累积风险→T1领悟社会支持→T2内化问题	0.03(0.02~0.05)^*	19.62
	T1家庭累积风险→T1自尊→T2内化问题	0.08(0.06~0.10)^*	48.73
	T1家庭累积风险→T1领悟社会支持→T1自尊→T2内化问题	0.02(0.02~0.03)^*	14.56
总效应	T1家庭累积风险→T2内化问题	0.16(0.11~0.21)^*	100.00
注：^*P＜0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	ACHENBACH, THOMAS M, EDELBROCK, et al. Behavioral problems and competencies reported by parents of normal and disturbed children aged four through sixteen[J]. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev, 1981, 46(1): 1-82. doi: 10.2307/1165983
[2]	POLANCZYK G V, SALUM G A, SUGAYA L S, et al. Annual re-search review: a Meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents[J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2015, 56(3): 345-365. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12381
[3]	JESSOR R, RICHARD. Reflections on six decades of research on adolescent behavior and development[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 2018, 47(3): 473-476. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0811-z
[4]	熊俊梅, 海曼, 黄飞, 等. 家庭累积风险与青少年心理健康的关系: 心理资本的补偿效应和调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 94-102. XIONG J M, HAI M, HUANG F, et al. Family cumulative risk and mental health in Chinese adolescents: the compensatory and moderating effects of psychological capital[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2020, 36(1): 94-102. (in Chinese)
[5]	BUEHLER C, GERARD J M. Cumulative family risk predicts increases in adjustment difficulties across early adolescence[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 2013, 42(6): 905-920. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9806-3
[6]	中华人民共和国教育部等十七部门联合印发《家校社协同育人"教联体"工作方案》的通知[EB/OL]. (2024-11-01)[2024-12-31]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202411/t20241101_1160204.html.
[7]	EVANS G W, LI D, WHIPPLE S S. Cumulative risk and child development[J]. Psychol Bull, 2013, 139(6): 1342-1396. doi: 10.1037/a0031808
[8]	鲍振宙, 李董平, 张卫, 等. 累积生态风险与青少年的学业和社交能力: 子女责任感的风险补偿与调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 482-495. BAO Z Z, LI D P, ZHANG W, et al. Cumulative ecological risk and adolescents' academic and social competence: the compensatory and moderating effects of sense of responsibility to parents[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2014, 30(5): 482-495. (in Chinese)
[9]	王建平, 李董平, 张卫. 家庭经济困难与青少年社会适应的关系: 应对效能的补偿, 中介和调节效应[J]. 北京师范大学学报: 社会科学版, 2010(4): 22-32. WANG J P, LI D P, ZHANG W. Adolescence's family financial difficulty and social adaptation: coping efficacy of compensatory, mediation, and moderation effects[J]. J Beijing Norm Univ(Soc Sci), 2010(4): 22-32. (in Chinese)
[10]	费立鹏, 沈其杰, 郑延平, 等. "家庭亲密度和适应性量表"和"家庭环境量表"的初步评价: 正常家庭与精神分裂症家庭成员对照研究[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1991, 5(5): 198-202, 238. FEI L P, SHEN Q J, ZHENG Y P, et al. Preliminary evaluation of Chinese version of FACES Ⅱ and FES: comparison of normal families and families of schizophrenic patients[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 1991, 5(5): 198-202, 238. (in Chinese)
[11]	方晓义, 袁晓娇, 胡伟, 等. 中国大学生心理健康筛查量表的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 111-118. FANG X Y, YUAN X J, HU W, et al. The development of College Students Mental Health Screening Scale[J]. Stud Psychol Behav, 2018, 16(1): 111-118. (in Chinese)
[12]	汪向东, 王希林, 马弘, 等. 心理卫生评定量表手册: 增订版[M]. 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999: 131-133, 318-320. WANG X D, WANG X L, MA H, et al. Manual of mental health rating scale: revised edition[M]. Beijing: Chinese Mental Health Journal, 1999: 131-133, 318-320. (in Chinese)
[13]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247. WANG Y L, ZHAO J F, LIN X Y. Cumulative effects of family risk factors on adolescent non-suicidal self-injury and its gender difference[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2024, 40(2): 240-247. (in Chinese)
[14]	石绪亮, 王硕, 李子涵, 等. 青少年睡眠质量在家庭亲密度与情绪问题间的纵向中介作用: 一项为期3年的追踪研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2021, 29(4): 789-793. SHI X L, WANG S, LI Z H, et al. Poor sleep quality mediates the relationship between family cohesion and emotional problems in Chinese adolescents: a three-year follow-up study[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2021, 29(4): 789-793. (in Chinese)
[15]	BENSON P L. Developmental assets and asset-building community: conceptual and empirical foundations[M]//LERNER R M, BENSON P L. Developmental assets and asset-building communities: implications for research, policy, and practice. New York: Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers, 2003: 19-43.
[16]	尹霞云, 朱康慈, 黎志华. 家庭功能对低收入家庭儿童外化问题行为的影响: 同伴关系与希望的链式中介[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(6): 775-781, 820. YIN X Y, ZHU K C, LI Z H. The impact of family function on children's externalizing behavior problems in low-income families: the chain mediation between peer relationship and children's hope[J]. Stud Psychol Behav, 2022, 20(6): 775-781, 820. (in Chinese)
[17]	常丽, 杜建政. IAT范式下自尊内隐性的再证明[J]. 心理学探新, 2007, 27(1): 61-64. CHANG L, DU J Z. The reconfirmation on implicitness of self-esteem under IAT paradigm[J]. Psychol Explor, 2007, 27(1): 61-64. (in Chinese)
[18]	常淑敏, 张文新. 人类积极发展的资源模型: 积极青少年发展研究的一个重要取向和领域[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(1): 86-95. CHANG S M, ZHANG W X. The developmental assets framework of positive human development: an important approach and field in positive youth development studies[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2013, 21(1): 86-95. (in Chinese)
[19]	刘世宏, 李丹, 刘晓洁, 等. 青少年的学校适应问题: 家庭亲密度、家庭道德情绪和责任感的作用[J]. 心理科学, 2014, 37(3): 617-624. LIU S H, LI D, LIU X J, et al. Adolescent school maladjustment: the role of family cohesion and family-based moral emotion and responsibility[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2014, 37(3): 617-624. (in Chinese)
[20]	JOSEPHS R A, MARKUS H R, TAFARODI R W. Gender and self-esteem[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1992, 63(3): 391.