大学生价值观生命意义感和主观幸福感与抑郁的关联

兰丽丽; 王晓峰

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025238

大学生价值观生命意义感和主观幸福感与抑郁的关联

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025238

兰丽丽¹,
王晓峰^2, ,

1.
上海立信会计金融学院工商管理学院，上海 201620
2.
上海政法学院学生心理健康教育中心

基金项目:

2024年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目 24YJA710022

详细信息

作者简介:
兰丽丽(1982-)，女，山西运城人，博士，副教授，主要研究方向为青年价值观教育

通讯作者:
王晓峰，E-mail：lndafeng@163.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: R179 C913.5 B844.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 15
- HTML全文浏览量: 6
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2025-03-20
- 修回日期: 2025-05-22
- 网络出版日期: 2025-08-30
- 刊出日期: 2025-08-25

Association of college students' values, sense of life meaning and subjective well-being with depression

LAN Lili¹,
WANG Xiaofeng^{2
, ,}

1.
School of Business Administration, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai 201620, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨大学生生命意义感和主观幸福感在价值观对抑郁影响的中介效应，为减少大学生抑郁的发生提供参考。方法通过纵向方法，运用中国青少年价值观、生命意义感、主观幸福感和抑郁量表对上海市2所大学576名大学生进行2年追踪调查(2021年9月T1; 2023年9月T2)，应用PROCESS 3.0模型6进行中介分析。结果两次调查中，大学生对集体责任[(3.74±0.67)(3.64±0.65)分]和超越进取[(3.78±0.75)(3.54±0.73)分]的认同下降，而对享受快乐[(3.46±0.77)(3.70±0.71)分]的认同及抑郁水平[(0.92±0.43)(0.99±0.50)分]上升。T1享受快乐通过增强T2主观幸福感(β=0.20)负向预测T2抑郁(β=-0.21), 中介效应值为-0.04(95%CI=-0.07~-0.02)；T1超越进取通过增强T2生命意义感(β=0.49)及链式中介(T2生命意义感→T2主观幸福感，β=0.29)负向预测T2抑郁(β值分别为-0.08，-0.20)，中介效应值分别为-0.04(95%CI=-0.06~-0.02)，-0.03(95%CI=-0.04~-0.02)；T1集体责任通过T2生命意义感和T2主观幸福感单独(β值分别为0.29，0.17)及链式中介(T2生命意义感→T2主观幸福感，β=0.28)负向预测T2抑郁症状(β值分别为-0.08，-0.21), 中介效应值分别为-0.02(95%CI=-0.04~-0.01)，-0.04(95%CI=-0.07~-0.01)，-0.02(95%CI=-0.03~-0.01) (P值均＜0.01)。结论大学生对3种价值观的认同通过不同心理机制影响抑郁水平，可为大学生心理健康及价值观教育提供依据。
- 价值观 /
- 抑郁 /
- 生命意义感 /
- 主观幸福感 /
- 大学生
Abstract: Objective To explore the mediating effect of life meaning and subjective well-being during college students' values influence depression, providing insights for reducing college students' depression. Methods Utilizing a longitudinal approach, the study employed four scales of assessing Chinese adolescent values, sense of life meaning, subjective well-being, and depression to conduct a two-year follow-up survey of 576 university students (September 2021 T1; September 2023 T2). Three multiple chained mediation models were constructed and analyzed using PROCESS Model 6. Results Across the two waves, students' endorsement of collective responsibility [(3.74±0.67)(3.64±0.65)] and self-improvement [(3.78±0.75)(3.54±0.73)] decreased, while personal happiness [(3.46±0.77)(3.70±0.71)] and depression levels [(0.92±0.43)(0.99±0.50)] increased. Personal happiness T1 negatively predicted depression T2 (β=-0.21) by enhancing subjective well-being T2 (β=0.20), with a mediation effect of -0.04 (95%CI=-0.07 to -0.02)(all P < 0.01). Self-improvement T1 negatively predicted depression T2(β=-0.08, -0.20) by increasing sense of life meaning T2 (β=0.49) and through a serial mediation (sense of life meaning T2 →subjective well-being T2, β=0.29), with mediation effects of -0.04 (95%CI=-0.06 to -0.02) and -0.03 (95%CI=-0.04 to -0.02)(all P < 0.01). Collective responsibility negatively T1 predicted depression T2 (β=-0.08, -0.21) via separate pathways (sense of life meaning T2: β=0.29; subjective well-being T2: β=0.17) and a serial mediation (sense of life meaning T2→ subjective well-being T2, β=0.28), with mediation effects of -0.02 (95%CI=-0.04 to -0.01), -0.04 (95%CI=-0.07 to -0.01) and -0.02 (95%CI=-0.03 to -0.01)(all P < 0.01). Conclusion The three values influence depression through distinct psychological mechanisms, providing a basis for mental health interventions and values education.
- Values /
- Depression /
- Sense of life meaning /
- Subjective well-being /
- Chinese college students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

图 1 生命意义感和主观幸福感在大学生享受快乐与抑郁症状关系间的中介模型

注：图中数据为标准化路径系数；^* P＜0.05，^** P＜0.01。

Figure 1. Mediation model of sense of life meaning and subjective well-being in the relationship between college students' personal happiness and depression

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 生命意义感和主观幸福感在大学生超越进取与抑郁症状关系间的多重中介模型

注：图中数据为标准化路径系数；^** P＜0.01。

Figure 2. Multiple mediation model of sense of life meaning and subjective well-being in the relationship between college students' self-improvement and depression

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 生命意义感和主观幸福感在大学生集体责任与抑郁症状关系间的多重中介模型

注：图中数据为标准化路径系数；^** P＜0.01。

Figure 3. Multiple mediating model of sense of life meaning and subjective well-being in the relationship between college students' collective responsibility and depression

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 大学生价值观、生命意义感、主观幸福感与抑郁的相关性分析(r值，n=576)

Table 1. Correlation analysis of college students' values, sense of life meaning, subjective well-being, and depression(r, n=576)

变量	性别	年龄	SES	T1集体责任	T2集体责任	T1超越进取	T2超越进取	T1享受快乐	T2享受快乐	T1生命意义感	T2生命意义感	T1主观幸福感	T2主观幸福感	T1抑郁症状
年龄	0.04
SES	0.06	-0.10^*
T1集体责任	-0.03	-0.05	-0.11^**
T2集体责任	0.08	0.00	-0.05	0.52^**
T1超越进取	-0.04	-0.09^*	-0.03	0.43^**	0.29^**
T2超越进取	0.08	0.08	-0.01	0.29^**	0.51^**	0.50^**
T1享受快乐	-0.10^**	0.02	0.19^**	0.04	0.02	0.02	0.03
T2享受快乐	-0.05	0.03	0.16^**	0.02	0.13^**	0.02	0.12^**	0.42^**
T1生命意义感	0.03	-0.08	0.08^*	0.20^**	0.18^**	0.42^**	0.28^**	0.02	-0.06
T2生命意义感	0.02	-0.03	0.01	0.20^**	0.30^**	0.31^**	0.43^**	0.10^*	0.10^*	0.47^**
T1主观幸福感	-0.01	0.02	0.12^**	0.31^**	0.28^**	0.15^**	0.24^**	0.25^**	0.14^**	0.30^**	0.29^**
T2主观幸福感	-0.04	0.04	0.10^*	0.21^**	0.31^**	0.15^**	0.28^**	0.22^**	0.24^**	0.19^**	0.41^**	0.55^**
T1抑郁症状	0.05	0.05	-0.11^**	-0.21^**	-0.17^**	-0.13^**	-0.18^**	-0.14^**	-0.08^*	-0.29^**	-0.30^**	-0.64^**	-0.39^**
T2抑郁症状	0.08	-0.03	-0.04	-0.13^**	-0.26^**	-0.13^**	-0.23^**	-0.08^*	-0.09^*	-0.20^**	-0.45^**	-0.64^**	-0.64^**	0.49^**
注：性别赋值0=女性，1=男性；^* P＜0.05，^** P＜0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(24)

[1]	叶宝娟, 朱黎君, 方小婷, 等. 压力知觉对大学生抑郁的影响: 有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 497-503. YE B J, ZHU L J, FANG X T, et al. The effect of perceived stress on college students' depression: moderated mediating effect[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2018, 34(4): 497-503. (in Chinese)
[2]	叶宝娟, 马婷婷. 社会支持与大学生抑郁的关系: 一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理学探新, 2020, 40(5): 465-471. YE B J, MA T T. The relationship between social support and college students' depression: a moderated mediation model[J]. Psychol Explor, 2020, 40(5): 465-471. (in Chinese)
[3]	刘海东, 虞芷筠, 叶宝娟, 等. 家庭亲密度与大学生抑郁: 社交焦虑和感恩的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(4): 556-563. LIU H D, YU Z J, YE B J, et al. Family cohesion and depression: the role of social anxiety and gratitude[J]. Stud Psychol Behav, 2023, 21(4): 556-563. (in Chinese)
[4]	SORTHEIX F M, SCHWARTZ S H. Values that underlie and undermine well-being: variability across countries[J]. Euro J Person, 2017, 31(2): 187-201. doi: 10.1002/per.2096
[5]	LIU X, FU R, LI D, et al. Self- and group-orientations and adjustment in urban and rural Chinese children[J]. J Cross-Cultural Psychol, 2018, 49(9): 1440-1456. doi: 10.1177/0022022118795294
[6]	王晓峰, 李丹, 陈欣银, 等. 新时代青少年价值观的构成特征与适应功能研究[J]. 心理科学, 2018, 41(6): 1282-1291. WANG X F, LI D, CHEN X Y, et al. Adolescent values and their relations with adjustment in the changing Chinese context[J]. Psychol Sci, 2018, 41(6): 1282-1291. (in Chinese)
[7]	李丹, 周同, 刘俊升, 等. 新时代青少年价值观及其与社会、学校和心理适应的关系: 三个地域的比较[J]. 心理科学, 2018, 41(6): 1292-1301. LI D, ZHOU T, LIU J S, et al. Values of adolescents across regions in China: relations with social, school, and psychological adjustment[J]. Psychol Sci, 2018, 41(6): 1292-1301. (in Chinese)
[8]	A-TJAK J G L, DAVIS M L, MORINA N, et al. A Meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems[J]. Psychother Psychosom, 2015, 84(1): 30-36. doi: 10.1159/000365764
[9]	SIWEK Z, OLESZKOWICZ A, SOWINSKA A. Values realized in personal strivings and motivation, and meaning in life in Polish university students[J]. J Happin Stud, 2017, 18(2): 549-573. doi: 10.1007/s10902-016-9737-x
[10]	FANG Y, NIU Y, DONG Y. Exploring the relationship between narcissism and depression: the mediating roles of perceived social support and life satisfaction[J]. Person Individ Diff, 2021, 173(3): 110604.
[11]	MASCARO N, ROSEN D H. Assessment of existential meaning and its longitudinal relations with depressive symptoms: erratum[J]. J Soc Clin Psychol, 2008, 27(6): 576-599. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2008.27.6.576
[12]	ZHANG M X, WANG X R, YU S M, et al. Purpose in life, social support, and Internet gaming disorder among Chinese university students: a 1-year follow-up study[J]. Addict Behav, 2019, 99: 106070. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106070
[13]	BOJANOWSKA A, PIOTROWSKI K. Values and psychological well-being among adolescents: are some values "healthier" than others?[J]. Euro J Dev Psychol, 2018, 16(4): 402-416.
[14]	刘萍, 张荣伟, 李丹. 自我超越价值观对持久幸福感的作用及机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 660-669. LIU P, ZHANG R W, LI D. The effect and mechanisms of self-transcendence values on durable happiness[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2022, 30(3): 660-669. (in Chinese)
[15]	LAN L, WANG X. Socio-economic status moderates the relationship between values and subjective well-being among Chinese college students[J]. Curr Psychol, 2023, 6(4): 6253-6260.
[16]	STEGER M F, FRAZIER P, OISHI S, et al. The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life[J]. J Counsel Psychol, 2006, 53(1): 80-93.
[17]	LYUBOMIRSKY S, LEPPER H S. A measure of subjective happiness: preliminary reliability and construct validation[J]. Soc Indicat Res, 1999, 46(2): 137-155.
[18]	RADLOFF L S. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population[J]. Appl Psychol Measure, 1977, 1(1): 385-401.
[19]	陈祉妍, 杨小冬, 李新影. 流调中心抑郁量表在我国青少年中的试用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(4): 443-445. CHEN Z Y, YANG X D, LI X Y. Psychometric features of CES-D in Chinese adolescents[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2009, 17(4): 443-445. (in Chinese)
[20]	BRADLEY R H, CORWYN R F. Socioeconomic status and child development[J]. Ann Rev Psychol, 2002, 53: 371-399.
[21]	VECCHIONE M, SCHWARTZ S H, DAVIDOV E, et al. Stability and change of basic personal values in early adolescence: a 2-year longitudinal study[J]. J Person, 2019, 87(2): 251-268.
[22]	DANIEL E, BENISH-WEISMAN M. Value development during adolescence: dimensions of change and stability[J]. J Person, 2019, 87(3): 620-632.
[23]	REKER G T, BIRREN J, SVENSSON C. Personal meaning in life and psychosocial adaptation in the later years[M]//WONG P T. The human quest for meaning: theories, research, and applications. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group, 2012: 433-456.
[24]	HEINTZELMAN S J, KING L A. Life is pretty meaningful[J]. Am Psychol, 2014, 69(6): 561-574.