Latent class characteristics and related factors of health-risk behaviors among higher vocational college students in the Wuling Mountain Area
-
摘要:
目的 探究武陵山区高等职业院校学生(简称高职生)危害健康行为潜在类别特征及相关因素,为高职生健康成长和制定有效的干预措施提供参考。 方法 于2024年4—6月,采用分层随机整群抽样法从地处武陵山区的湖南湘西地区、湖北恩施地区、贵州铜仁地区的3所高等职业院校抽取1 737名学生,采用大学生危害健康行为问卷、亲子关系量表、社会支持量表、学校联结量表进行问卷调查,采用潜在类别分析高职生在危害健康行为方面存在的异质性分布特征,采用多元Logistic回归分析探讨高职生危害健康行为潜在类别的相关因素。 结果 高职生12种危害健康行为分为3个潜在类别:综合高危组(151名,8.7%)、心理问题组(883名,50.8%)、低危组(703名,40.5%);危害健康行为各潜在类别在不同性别、是否独生子女高职生间分布差异均有统计学意义(χ2值分别为121.25,9.85,P值均 < 0.05);“低危组”亲子关系(29.26±6.19)、社会支持(63.98±18.16)、学校联结得分(35.97±7.71)均高于“综合高危组”“心理问题组”(27.28±6.03,57.67±15.60,32.97±7.55;27.52±5.19,62.06±14.54,33.80±6.14)(F值分别为20.37,23.51,9.89,P值均 < 0.05)。多元Logistic回归分析结果显示,男生更易类属“综合高危组”(OR=3.29),社会支持、学校联结水平高的学生不易类属“综合高危组”(OR值分别为0.03,0.92)和“心理问题组”(OR值分别为0.21,0.96)(P值均 < 0.05)。 结论 武陵山区高职大学生危害健康行为存在3个潜在类别,学校、家庭、社会应针对不同类别高职大学生加强亲子关系、学校联结、社会支持水平,促进身心健康发展。 Abstract:Objective To explore the latent class characteristics and related factors of health-risk behaviors among higher vocational college students (referred to as vocational students) in the Wuling Mountain Area, so as to provide references for promoting their healthy development and formulating effective intervention measures. Methods From April to June 2024, a stratified random cluster sampling method was used to survey 1 737 students from three higher vocational colleges in the Wuling Mountain Area (Xiangxi in Hunan, Enshi in Hubei, and Tongren in Guizhou). The study employed the Health-risk Behavior Questionnaire for College Students, the Parent-Child Relationship Scale, the Social Support Scale, and the School Connection Scale for data collection. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to examine the heterogeneous distribution characteristics of health-risk behaviors among vocational students, and multivariate Logistic regression was applied to analyze the related factors of latent classes. Results The LCA results identified three latent classes based on 12 health-risk behaviors: the comprehensive high-risk group (151 students, 8.7%), the psychological distress group (883 students, 50.8%), and the low-risk group (703 students, 40.5%). The distribution of latent classes showed statistically significant differences in gender and only-child status (χ2=121.25, 9.85, both P < 0.05). The low-risk group scored higher in parent-child relationship (29.26±6.19), social support (63.98±18.16), and school connection (35.97±7.71) compared to the comprehensive high-risk group (27.28±6.03, 57.67±15.60, 32.97±7.55) and the psychological distress group (27.52±5.19, 62.06±14.54, 33.80±6.14) (F=20.37, 23.51, 9.89, all P < 0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression revealed that boys(OR=3.29) were more likely to belong to the comprehensive high-risk group, social support (OR=0.03, 0.21) and school connection (OR=0.92, 0.96) were less likely to belong to both the comprehensive high-risk and psychological distress groups (all P < 0.05). Conclusions There are three potential categories of health-harmful behaviors among vocational college students in Wuling Mountain Area. Schools, families and society should enhance the levels of parent-child relationship, school connections and social support for vocational college students of different categories to promote their physical and mental health development. -
Key words:
- Dangerous behavior /
- Mental health /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。 -
表 1 高职生危害健康行为潜在类别模型拟合指标信息(n=1 737)
Table 1. Potential category model fitting index information of health hazard behaviors among higher vocctronal college students(n=1 737)
类别数目 参数条目 AIC值 BIC值 aBIC值 Entropy值 PLMR值 PBLRT值 类别概率 1 1 20 866.69 20 932.12 20 894.00 — — — 1.00 2 25 19 282.77 19 419.08 19 339.66 0.86 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.42/0.58 3 38 18 961.21 19 168.40 19 047.68 0.89 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.09/0.51/0.41 4 51 18 857.64 19 135.71 18 973.69 0.80 0.02 < 0.01 0.09/0.25/0.27/0.39 表 2 不同人口学特征高职生危害健康行为潜在类别的单因素分析
Table 2. Single factor analysis of potential categories of health-risk behaviors among vocational college students with different demographic characteristics
人口学指标 选项 人数 综合高危组 心理问题组 低危组 χ2值 性别 男 652 108(16.6) 242(37.1) 302(46.3) 121.25** 女 1 085 43(4.0) 641(59.1) 401(37.1) 年级 大一 584 45(7.7) 319(54.6) 220(37.1) 8.08 大二 578 58(10.0) 269(46.5) 251(43.4) 大三 575 48(8.3) 295(51.3) 232(40.3) 民族 汉族 1 098 92(8.4) 564(51.4) 442(40.3) 3.61 土家族 219 24(11.0) 112(51.1) 83(37.9) 苗族 173 12(6.9) 84(48.6) 77(44.5) 其他民族 247 23(9.3) 123(49.8) 101(40.9) 独生子女 是 319 35(11.0) 136(42.6) 148(46.4) 9.85** 否 1 418 116(8.2) 747(52.7) 555(39.1) 父亲学历 小学及以下 410 36(8.8) 209(51.0) 165(40.2) 0.02 初中及以上 1 327 115(8.7) 674(50.8) 538(40.5) 母亲学历 小学及以下 711 53(7.5) 377(53.0) 281(39.5) 3.26 初中及以上 1 026 98(9.6) 506(49.3) 422(41.1) 家庭类型 完整家庭 1 485 129(8.7) 740(49.8) 616(41.5) 5.54 不完整家庭 252 22(8.7) 143(56.7) 87(34.5) 注: ()内数字为构成比/%;家庭类型中,“完整家庭”包括与父母共同生活的核心家庭和三代同堂家庭,“不完整家庭”涵盖单亲、重组及其他非传统家庭类型;**P < 0.01。 表 3 高职生危害健康行为潜类别分组的多元Logistic回归分析[n=1 737, OR值(95%CI)]
Table 3. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of subcategory grouping of health-risk behaviors among higher vocational college students[n=1 737, OR(95%CI)]
自变量 选项 综合高危组 心理问题组 性别 男 3.29(2.23~4.86)** 0.52(0.42~0.65)** 女 1.00 1.00 独生子女 是 0.77(0.46~1.35) 0.75(0.58~0.98)* 否 1.00 1.00 亲子关系 0.99(0.93~1.04) 0.97(0.94~0.98)* 社会支持 0.03(0.02~0.04)** 0.21(0.17~0.25)** 学校联结 0.92(0.88~0.97)** 0.96(0.93~0.98)** 注:亲子关系、社会支持和学校联结为连续变量;*P < 0.05,**P < 0.01。 -
[1] 季成叶. 青少年健康危险行为[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2007, 28(4): 289-291.JI C Y. Adolescent health risk behavior[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2007, 28(4): 289-291. (in Chinese) [2] 王澳伦, 张天成, 徐涛, 等. 武陵山区大学生危害健康行为潜在类别及其与校园欺凌的关联[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2023, 44(5): 751-755. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.05.025 WANG A L, ZHANG T C, XU T, et al. Potential categories of health risk behaviors of college students in Wuling Mountain Area and its association with campus bullying[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2023, 44(5): 751-755. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.05.025 [3] 徐涛, 余静, 张天成, 等. 贵州省农村初中生危害健康行为共存状况及与自我控制相关性研究[J]. 中国预防医学杂志, 2023, 24(9): 935-940.XU T, YU J, ZHANG T C, et al. Co-occurrence of health risk behaviors and its association with self-control among secondary school students in rural areas in Guizhou Province[J]. Chin J Prev Med, 2023, 24(9): 935-940. (in Chinese) [4] 胡万里, 陈志伟, 秦宏展, 等. 累积生态风险对河南省大学生健康危险行为的影响[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2023, 44(11): 1636-1640. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.11.009 HU W L, CHEN Z W, QIN H Z, et al. The impact of cumulative ecological risks on health risk behaviors among college students in Henan Province[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2023, 44(11): 1636-1640. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.11.009 [5] 王雪冰, 刘宇, 路瑛丽. 基于社会生态模型的儿童青少年体力活动干预系统评价[J]. 广州体育学院学报, 2022, 42(4): 35-44.WANG X B, LIU Y, LU Y L. Systematic review of physical activity intervention for children and adolescents based on social ecological model[J]. J Guangzhou Univ Sport, 2022, 42(4): 35-44. (in Chinese) [6] 殷融. 论班杜拉三元交互决定论中蕴含的先锋思想[J]. 心理研究, 2022, 15(2): 115-120.YIN R. On the pioneer thought contained in Bandura's triadic reciprocality determinism[J]. Psychol Res, 2022, 15(2): 115-120. (in Chinese) [7] 董倩, 马青艳, 董莹莹, 等. 亲子关系和环境敏感性对青少年心理健康的共同作用[J]. 西安交通大学学报(医学版), 2024, 45(5): 866-871.DONG Q, MA Q Y, DONG Y Y, et al. Joint effects of parent-child relationship and environmental sensitivity on adolescent mental health[J]. J Xi'an Jiaotong Univ (Med Edit), 2024, 45(5): 866-871. (in Chinese) [8] 张天成, 周县委, 徐涛, 等. 武陵山区青少年危害健康行为潜在类别及与学校联结的关联[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2024, 45(4): 509-513. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024127 ZHANG T C, ZHOU X W, XU T, et al. Latent classes of health-risk behaviors and their association with school connectedness among adolescents in the Wuling Mountain Area[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2024, 45(4): 509-513. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024127 [9] 王澳伦, 张天成, 郭淑媛, 等. 童年期不良经历与初中生抑郁症状的关系: 自尊的中介作用和社会支持的调节作用[J]. 现代预防医学, 2024, 51(5): 842-847.WANG A L ZHANG T C, GUO S Y, et al. The relationship between adverse childhood experiences and depressive symptoms of junior middle school students: the mediating role of self-esteem and the regulating role of social support[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2024, 51(5): 842-847. (in Chinese) [10] 王璐, 胡达振, 段文静, 等. 江西省中学生被欺凌与非自杀性自伤的关系: 社会支持和心理韧性的链式中介作用[J]. 现代预防医学, 2024, 51(16): 2998-3003.WANG L, HU D Z, DUAN W J, et al. Association between bullying victimization and NSSI in secondary school students in Jiangxi Province: the chain-mediated role of social support and resilience[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2019, 51(16): 2998-3003. (in Chinese) [11] 季成叶. 中国青少年健康相关/危险行为调查综合报告2005[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2007: 7-334.JI C Y. Comprehensive report of health related/risk behavior survey of chinese adolescents 2005[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2007: 7-334. (in Chinese) [12] 孙晓艳, 李怡雪, 余灿清, 等. 中文版抑郁量表信效度研究的系统综述[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2017, 38(1): 110-116.SUN X Y, LI Y X, YU C Q, et al. Reliability and validity of Depression Scales of Chinese version: a systematic review[J]. Chin J Epidemiol, 2017, 38(1): 110-116. (in Chinese) [13] RAJA S N, MCGEE R, STANTON W R. Perceived attachments to parents and peers and psychological well-being in adolescence[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 1992, 21(4): 471-485. doi: 10.1007/BF01537898 [14] 喻承甫, 张卫, 曾毅茵, 等. 青少年感恩与问题行为的关系: 学校联结的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(4): 425-433.YU C F, ZHANG W, ZENG Y Y, et al. Relationship between adolescents' gratitude and problem behavior: the mediating role of school connectedness[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2011, 27(4): 425-433. (in Chinese) [15] 叶悦妹, 戴晓阳. 大学生社会支持评定量表的编制[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2008, 16(5): 456-458.YE Y M, DAI X Y. Development of Social Support Scale for University Students[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2008, 16(5): 456-458. (in Chinese) [16] 彭咏梅, 杨琴, 凌瑞, 等. 心理健康素养对高职生手机依赖的影响: 一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2024, 32(4): 794-798.PENG Y M, YANG Q, LING R, et al. Mental health literacy on mobile phone addiction in vocational college students: a mediated moderation model[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2024, 32(4): 794-798. (in Chinese) [17] 苗春霞, 周崔红, 黄畅, 等. 不同性别大学生健康危险行为现状及影响因素研究[J]. 现代预防医学, 2021, 48(3): 491-495.MIAO C X, ZHOU C H, HUANG C, et al. Study on the status quo and influencing factors of health risk behaviors among college students of different genders[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2021, 48(3): 491-495. (in Chinese) [18] 陈奕荣, 邵华. 述情障碍对手机成瘾倾向的预测机制: 自尊和交往焦虑的双中介效应[J]. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 7(2): 79-86.CHEN Y R, SHAO H. Prediction mechanism of alexithymia on mobile phone addiction disorder: dual mediating effects of self-esteem and communication anxiety[J]. J Soochow Univ (Educ Sci Edit), 2019, 7(2): 79-86. (in Chinese) [19] 武华君, 俞宁, 蔡远, 等. 大学新生独生子女属性与心理健康的相关性[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2021, 35(9): 781-787.WU H J, YU N, CAI Y, et al. Relationship between only-child character and mental health in freshmen[J]. Chin J Ment Health, 2021, 35(9): 781-787. (in Chinese) [20] 陈伟, 房敏, 孙颖, 等. 父母冲突与大学生人际冲突解决策略的关系: 亲子三角关系的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2024, 32(1): 142-148.CHEN W, FANG M, SUN Y, et al. The relationship between interparental conflict and conflict resolution strategies for undergraduate students: mediating effect of parent-child triangulation and its gender difference[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2024, 32(1): 142-148. (in Chinese) [21] 李丹, 宋静媛, 李朝英, 等. 亲子关系对大学生生命价值观影响的研究[J]. 现代预防医学, 2011, 38(14): 2778-2780.LI D, SONG J Y, LI C Y, et al. Study on the parenthood influence for the formation of life-value among college students[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2011, 38(14): 2778-2780. (in Chinese) [22] 胡丹莹, 丁峻, 陈巍, 等. 成人依恋对大学生孤独感的影响: 社会支持和个人评价的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2023, 31(3): 750-753.HU D Y, DING J, CHEN W et al. Mediating effect of social support and personal evaluation on relationships among adult attachment and loneliness in college students[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2023, 31(3): 750-753. (in Chinese) [23] 徐涛, 周县委, 张天成, 等. 学校联结与初中生危害健康行为共存的交叉滞后分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2024, 45(11): 1565-1569. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024335 XU T, ZHOU X W, ZHANG T C, et al. A cross-lagged analysis of the co-occurrence of health-risk behaviors and school connectedness among junior high school students[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2024, 45(11): 1565-1569. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024335 -