亲子关系与初中生欺凌行为及社区凝聚力的关联

尤丽君; 楼超华; 余春艳; 廉启国; 房宇航; 涂晓雯; 左霞云

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025212

亲子关系与初中生欺凌行为及社区凝聚力的关联

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025212

复旦大学公共卫生学院/上海市生物医药技术研究院/上海市疾病与健康基因组学重点实验室/国家卫生健康委员会计划生育药具重点实验室, 上海 200237

基金项目:

国家卫生健康委员会计划生育药具重点实验室科技创新导向项目 CX2017-05

世界卫生组织项目 ERC0003027

详细信息

作者简介:
尤丽君(1999-), 女, 福建泉州人, 在读硕士, 主要研究方向为青少年健康

通讯作者:
左霞云, E-mail: zuoxiayun@sibpt.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G78 C913.5 B844.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 12
- HTML全文浏览量: 7
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2025-02-20
- 修回日期: 2025-05-27
- 网络出版日期: 2025-08-30
- 刊出日期: 2025-08-25

Correlation of parent-child relationships with junior high school students bullying behaviors and social cohesion

School of Public Health, Fudan University/Shanghai Institute of Biomedical Technology/Shanghai Key Laboratory of Disease and Health Genomics/National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Contraceptives and Devices, Shanghai 200237, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨初中生的亲子关系与欺凌行为的关联以及社区凝聚力的调节作用, 为开展青少年欺凌行为的干预提供依据。方法 2017年11—12月, 采用整群抽样的方法选取上海市静安区3所初中的六至八年级1 589名学生进行问卷调查。使用匿名电子问卷收集亲子关系、社区凝聚力和欺凌行为等数据。采用多因素Logistic回归分析亲子关系与欺凌行为的关联以及社区凝聚力的调节作用。结果初中生欺凌行为的报告率为7.80%。Spearman相关分析结果显示, 亲子关系和社区凝聚力与初中生欺凌行为均呈负相关(r值分别为-0.13, -0.10), 亲子关系与社区凝聚力呈正相关(r=0.29)(P值均 < 0.01)。具有积极的亲子关系和感知社区凝聚力水平较高的初中生欺凌行为发生风险较低(OR=0.51, 95%CI=0.36~0.72;OR=0.58, 95%CI=0.45~0.76), 亲子关系与社区凝聚力之间有交互作用(P值均 < 0.05)。结论初中生的积极亲子关系和社区凝聚力与欺凌行为存在负相关, 积极的亲子关系有利于减少初中生的欺凌行为, 较高的社区凝聚力能增强积极亲子关系对欺凌行为的保护作用。
- 亲子关系 /
- 暴力 /
- 社区医学 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 回归分析 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To examine the association between parent-child relationships and bullying behaviors among junior high school students, and to explore the moderating effect of community cohesion, so as to provide evidences for bullying intervention strategies. Methods From November to December 2017, a cluster sampling method was used to survey 1 589 students in grades 6-8 from three junior high schools in Jing'an District, Shanghai. Anonymous electronic questionnaires collected data on parent-child relationships, community cohesion, and bullying behaviors. Multivariate Logistic regression analyzed the associations and moderation effects. Results The prevalence of bullying behaviors among junior high school students was 7.80%. Spearman correlation analysis revealed negative associations between both parent-child relationships (r=-0.13) and community cohesion (r=-0.10) with bullying behaviors, while parent-child relationships positively correlated with community cohesion (r=0.29) (all P < 0.01). Junior high school students with positive parent-child relationships and higher perceived community cohesion showed lower risks of bullying behaviors (OR=0.51, 95%CI=0.36-0.72; OR=0.58, 95%CI=0.45-0.76), with a significant interaction effect between the two factors (all P < 0.05). Conclusions Positive parent-child relationships and community cohesion are negatively associated with bullying behaviors in middle school students. Supportive family relationships help reduce bullying, while stronger community cohesion enhances the protective effect of positive parent-child relationships against bullying.
- Parent-child relations /
- Violence /
- Community medicine /
- Mental health /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

图 1 社区凝聚力对亲子关系和初中生欺凌行为关联的调节作用

Figure 1. The moderating effect of social cohesion on the association between parent-child relationships and junior high school students bullying behavior

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同特征初中生欺凌行为报告率比较

Table 1. Comparison of the reporting rates of bullying behaviors among junior high school students with different characteristics

变量	选项	人数	欺凌行为报告人数	χ²值	P值
性别	男	800	79(9.88)	9.61	＜0.01
	女	789	45(5.70)
年龄/岁	10~12	791	57(7.21)	0.78	0.38
	13~14	798	67(8.40)
是否上海出生^*	是	1 338	104(7.77)	0.03	0.86
	否	234	19(8.12)
是否与父母居住	是	1 213	76(6.27)	12.55	＜0.01
在一起^*	否	332	40(12.05)
是否独生子女^*	是	983	68(6.92)	2.59	0.11
	否	566	52(9.19)
父母婚姻状况^*	在婚	1 388	97(6.99)	9.07	＜0.01
	离婚/丧偶	189	25(13.23)
父母最高受教育	初中及以下	190	20(10.53)	2.37	0.31
水平^*	高中/中专/技校	479	36(7.52)
	大学及以上	801	58(7.24)
自我报告的学习	较差	213	26(12.21)	6.86	0.03
成绩^*	一般	646	47(7.28)
	较好	712	49(6.88)
注：^*存在缺失值；()内数字为报告率/%。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Behind the numbers: ending school violence and bullying[R]. Paris: UNESCO, 2019.
[2]	赵福江, 刘京翠, 周镭. 全国中小学生欺凌现状调查与分析: 基于对全国11万余名学生和6千余名教师的问卷调查[J]. 教育科学研究, 2022(5): 32-39, 55. ZHAO F J, LIU J C, ZHOU L. National survey and analysis of bullying among primary and secondary school students-based on a questionnaire survey of more than 110 000 students and more than 6 000 teachers across the country[J]. Educ Sci Res, 2022(5): 32-39, 55. (in Chinese)
[3]	GHARDALLOU M, MTIRAOUI A, ENNAMOUCHI D, et al. Bullying victimization among adolescents: prevalence, associated factors and correlation with mental health outcomes[J]. PLoS One, 2024, 19(3): e0299161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299161
[4]	WANG W, LIVINGSTON J A, NICKERSON A B, et al. Joint trajectories of bullying victimization and sexual harassment victimization as predictors of adolescent alcohol use[J]. Psychol Addict Behav, 2024, 38(3): 383-396. doi: 10.1037/adb0001005
[5]	KELLY E V, NEWTON N C, STAPINSKI L A, et al. Suicidality, internalizing problems and externalizing problems among adolescent bullies, victims and bully-victims[J]. Prev Med, 2015, 73: 100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.01.020
[6]	FERGUSSON D M, BODEN J M, HORWOOD L J. Bullying in childhood, externalizing behaviors, and adult offending: evidence from a 30-year study[J]. J Sch Violence, 2014, 13(1): 146-164. doi: 10.1080/15388220.2013.840642
[7]	VRIJEN C, WIERTSEMA M, ACKERMANS M A, et al. Childhood and adolescent bullying perpetration and later substance use: a Meta-analysis[J]. Pediatrics, 2021, 147(3): e2020034751. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-034751
[8]	华龙, 李宁, 常微微, 等. 中学生校园欺凌行为与家庭环境及教育方式的关联[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2023, 44(2): 233-236, 241. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.02.017 HUA L, LI N, CHANG W W, et al. Relationship between middle school students' bullying and family environment and education style[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2023, 44(2): 233-236, 241. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.02.017
[9]	MALM E K, HENRICH C C. Longitudinal relationships between parent factors, children's bullying, and victimization behaviors[J]. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev, 2019, 50(5): 789-802. doi: 10.1007/s10578-019-00882-9
[10]	ESPELAGE D L, BOSWORTH K, SIMON T R. Examining the social context of bullying behaviors in early adolescence[J]. J Counsel Dev, 2000, 78(3): 326-333. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2000.tb01914.x
[11]	BOWES L, ARSENEAULT L, MAUGHAN B, et al. School, neighborhood, and family factors are associated with children's bullying involvement: a nationally representative longitudinal study[J]. J Am Academy Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2009, 48(5): 545-553. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819cb017
[12]	ARMSDEN G C, GREENBERG M T. The inventory of parent and peer attachment: individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 1987, 16(5): 427-454. doi: 10.1007/BF02202939
[13]	张迎黎, 张亚林, 张迎新, 等. 修订版青少年依恋问卷中文版在初中生中应用的信效度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25(1): 66-70. ZHANG Y L, ZHANG Y L, ZHANG Y X, et al. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of revised Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment in junior high school students[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2011, 25(1): 66-70. (in Chinese)
[14]	MUJAHID M S, DIEZ ROUX A V, MORENOFF J D, et al. Assessing the Measurement Properties of Neighborhood Scales: from psychometrics to ecometrics[J]. Am J Epidemiol, 2007, 165(8): 858-867. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm040
[15]	张紫微, 楼超华, 钟向阳, 等. 校园欺凌中不同角色与抑郁的相关性[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2019, 40(2): 228-231. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.02.019 ZHANG Z W, LOU C H, ZHONG X Y, et al. Relationship between different roles in campus bullying and depression[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2019, 40(2): 228-231. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.02.019
[16]	郝义彬, 吴柯, 权菊青, 等. 中小学生心理问题与欺凌他人行为的相关性[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(2): 225-228. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.02.015 HAO Y B, WU K, QUAN J Q, et al. Correlation between mental health problems with bullying behaviors among primary and middle school students[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(2): 225-228. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.02.015
[17]	CHAN H C O, WONG D S W. The overlap between school bullying perpetration and victimization: assessing the psychological, familial, and school factors of Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong[J]. J Child Fam Stud, 2015, 24(11): 3224-3234. doi: 10.1007/s10826-015-0125-7
[18]	CHO S, HONG J S, STERZING P R, et al. Parental attachment and bullying in South Korean adolescents: mediating effects of low self-control, deviant peer associations, and delinquency[J]. Crime Delinquency, 2017, 63(9): 1168-1188. doi: 10.1177/0011128717714968
[19]	BRONFENBRENNER U, MORRIS P A. The bioecological model of human development[M]//PAUL H M. Handbook of child psychology. New York: Wiley, 2007.
[20]	DORSEY S, FOREHAND R. The relation of social capital to child psychosocial adjustment difficulties: the role of positive parenting and neighborhood dangerousness[J]. J Psychopathol Behav Assess, 2003, 25(1): 11-23. doi: 10.1023/A:1022295802449