基于心理测量网络分析儿童青少年特质攻击的网络结构特征

王旭; 刘衍玲; 魏铭辰; 朱霓; 耿毅博; 刘韦君; 陈帅

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025199

基于心理测量网络分析儿童青少年特质攻击的网络结构特征

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025199

王旭^{1, 2},
刘衍玲^{1, 2, ,},
魏铭辰³,
朱霓⁴,
耿毅博^{1, 2},
刘韦君^{1, 2},
陈帅⁵

1.
西南大学心理学部, 重庆 400715
2.
西南大学心理健康教育研究中心
3.
华东师范大学教育学部
4.
重庆渝北启诚巴蜀小学校
5.
华南师范大学心理学院

基金项目:

重庆市人文社会科学重点研究基地重点项目 14SKB033

重庆市教育科学规划课题项目 K23YB2020021

详细信息

作者简介:
王旭(1995-), 男, 安徽蚌埠人, 在读博士, 主要研究方向为儿童青少年心理健康

通讯作者:
刘衍玲, E-mail: ssq@swu.edu.cn

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: R179 G444 TN711
计量
- 文章访问数: 6
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-09-04
- 修回日期: 2025-04-15
- 网络出版日期: 2025-08-02
- 刊出日期: 2025-07-25

Network structure characteristics of trait aggression in children and adolescents based on psychometric network analysis

WANG Xu^{1, 2},
LIU Yanling^{1, 2
, ,},
WEI Mingchen³,
ZHU Ni⁴,
GENG Yibo^{1, 2},
LIU Weijun^{1, 2},
CHEN Shuai⁵

1.
Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨儿童青少年攻击特质的核心特征，为针对儿童青少年攻击性的核心心理特征开展行为干预提供理论依据。方法 2020年3—5月，采用单纯随机方便抽样法从四川、重庆、贵州和山东抽取小学四年级至高中三年级共39 165名学生，以网络问卷的方式展开调查，所有被试均完成中文版攻击特质问卷，采用心理测量网络分析进行数据分析。结果中国儿童青少年的特质攻击处于中等偏下水平，其网络结构的核心节点包括身体攻击[如果有人故意找我麻烦，严重时我会揍他(AGG6)；如果有人打我，我会还击(AGG11)]和自我攻击[很烦躁时我会想到伤害自己(AGG5)；情绪不好时我会做出诸如暴饮暴食等危害自身健康的行为(AGG25)]；各年级的核心节点主要来自愤怒维度[我生气时感觉像个火药库，随时会爆炸(AGG13)；我难以控制自己的脾气(AGG18)；看到不顺眼的事，我容易发火(AGG23)；我会无缘无故发脾气(AGG27)]，除七和九年级外，其他年级的核心节点包含言语攻击维度[我容易与人发生争吵(AGG22)]；八年级前，核心节点包含自我攻击维度(AGG 5，AGG 25)；八年级后，核心节点包含身体攻击维度[AGG 6，AGG 11，我比别人打架稍多一些(AGG16)，如果周围人为难我到一定程度，我和他们会动手打架(AGG26)]；不同年级、不同性别或同一性别不同年级学生的特质攻击性网络结构差异无统计学意义。结论扩展对儿童青少年攻击性的理解，采用行为干预可减少儿童青少年攻击性行为的发生。
- 精神卫生 /
- 网络分析 /
- 攻击 /
- 儿童 /
- 青少年
Abstract: Objective To explore the core features of trait aggression in children and adolescents, so as to provide a theoretical basis for behavioral interventions targeting the central psychological characteristics of aggression in children and adolescents. Methods From March to May 2020, a simple random convenience sampling method was employed to recruit 39 165 students from grades 4 to 12 in Sichuan, Chongqing, Guizhou, and Shandong. Data were collected via online questionnaires, with all participants completing the Chinese Version of the Aggression Questionnaire. Psychometric network analysis was utilized for data processing. Results Trait aggression among Chinese children and adolescents was at a moderately low level. The core nodes of the network structure included physical aggression [if someone intentionally causes trouble for me, I will hit them severely (AGG6); if someone hits me, I will retaliate (AGG11)] and self-aggression [When I am very irritable, I think of hurting myself (AGG5); when I am in a bad mood, I engage in behaviors that harm my health, such as overeating (AGG25)]. Across grade levels, core nodes primarily originated from the anger dimension [When I'm angry, I feel like a powder magazine that could explode at any moment (AGG13); I can't control my temper (AGG18); I am prone to getting angry when I see things that are not pleasing to the eye (AGG23); I will get angry for no reason (AGG27)]. Except for grades 7 and 9, core nodes in other grades included the verbal aggression dimension [I am prone to arguments with people (AGG22)]. Before grade 8, core nodes incorporated the self-aggression dimension (AGG 5, AGG 25); after grade 8, core nodes included the physical aggression dimension [AGG 6, AGG 11, I fight slightly more than others (AGG16), and if people around me make things difficult for me to a certain extent, I will fight with them (AGG26)]. No statistically significant differences were found in the trait aggression network structures across grades, genders, or within-gender comparisons of different grades. Conclusion These findings broaden our understanding of aggression in children and adolescents, suggesting that behavioral interventions can effectively reduce aggressive behaviors in this population.
- Mental health /
- Network analysis /
- Aggression /
- Child /
- Adolescents
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

图 1 不同性别儿童青少年特质攻击的网络结构

注：图中线越粗表示相关性越强。

Figure 1. Network structure of trait aggression in children adolescents in the different genders

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 调查儿童青少年特质攻击得分情况(n=39 165，x ± s)

Table 1. Trait aggression scores of surveyed children and adolescents(n=39 165, x ± s)

序号	题项	得分	序号	题项	得分
AGG1	某些情况下，我会控制不住打人	2.07±1.17	AGG16	我比别人打架稍多一些	1.57±0.95
AGG2	我不同意朋友意见时，就当面反对	2.61±1.15	AGG17	当人们与我意见不同时，我会忍不住与其争论	2.39±1.15
AGG3	我的脾气一点就着，但一会儿就好	2.91±1.32	AGG18	我难以控制自己的脾气	2.21±1.21
AGG4	我的嫉妒心较强	2.02±1.09	AGG19	我对某些事情感到耿耿于怀	2.49±1.29
AGG5	很烦躁时我会想到伤害自己	1.94±1.22	AGG20	很自责时我会惩罚自己	2.30±1.24
AGG6	如果有人故意找我麻烦，严重时我会揍他	2.18±1.23	AGG21	必要时我用武力维护自己的权利	2.25±1.24
AGG7	我喜欢否定他人的意见	1.88±1.03	AGG22	我容易与人发生争吵	1.95±1.07
AGG8	事情不顺利时我的烦躁会表现出来	2.59±1.23	AGG23	看到不顺眼的事，我容易发火	2.08±1.15
AGG9	我觉得我遇到不公平的事较多	2.39±1.20	AGG24	我认为有“朋友”说我的坏话	2.12±1.18
AGG10	很生气时我会因不小心而受伤	2.25±1.22	AGG25	情绪不好时我会做出如暴饮暴食等危害自身健康的行为	1.69±1.05
AGG11	如果有人打我，我会还击	2.80±1.24	AGG26	如果周围人为难我到一定程度，我和他们会动手打架	1.95±1.14
AGG12	当人们干扰我时，我会毫不客气地指责他们	2.40±1.15	AGG27	我会无缘无故发脾气	1.76±1.08
AGG13	我生气时感觉像个火药库，随时会爆炸	2.36±1.29	AGG28	当别人对我特别好时，我觉得他们有所企图	2.08±1.18
AGG14	陌生人对我过于友好时，我怀疑对方另有目的	2.79±1.33	AGG29	我很生气时，会当他人面摔东西	1.73±1.06
AGG15	特别激动时我会忽视自身安全	2.25±1.23	AGG30	我怀疑有人在背后嘲笑我	2.04±1.21
注：AGG代表攻击特质。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同年级学生特质攻击网络结构的核心节点

Table 2. Core nodes in the network structure of trait aggression in children adolescents of different genders

年级	核心节点
四	AGG 22、AGG 23、AGG 25、AGG 30
五	AGG 13、AGG 22、AGG 25、AGG 30
六	AGG 5、AGG 13、AGG 22、AGG 25
七	AGG 5、AGG 13、AGG 23、AGG 25
八	AGG 11、AGG 22、AGG 25、AGG 27
九	AGG 6、AGG 16、AGG 18、AGG 26
高一	AGG 13、AGG 16、AGG 22、AGG 26
高二	AGG 16、AGG 22、AGG 23、AGG 26
高三	AGG 13、AGG 16、AGG 22、AGG 23
注：AGG5指很烦躁时我会想到伤害自己；AGG6指如果有人故意找我麻烦，严重时我会揍他；AGG11指如果有人打我，我会还击；AGG13指我生气时感觉像个火药库，随时会爆炸；AGG16指我比别人打架稍多一些；AGG18指我难以控制自己的脾气；AGG22指我容易与人发生争吵；AGG23指看到不顺眼的事，我容易发火；AGG25指情绪不好时我会做出诸如暴饮暴食等危害自身健康的行为；AGG26指如果周围人为难我到一定程度，我和他们会动手打架；AGG27指我会无缘无故发脾气；AGG30指我怀疑有人在背后嘲笑我。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	VEGA A, CABELLO R, MEGíAS-ROBLES A, et al. Emotional intelligence and aggressive behaviors in adolescents: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Trauma Violence Abuse, 2022, 23(4): 1173-1183.
[2]	VUOKSIMAA E, ROSE R J, PULKKINEN L, et al. Higher aggression is related to poorer academic performance in compulsory education[J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2021, 62(3): 327-338.
[3]	UNDHEIM A M, SUND A M. Prevalence of bullying and aggressive behavior and their relationship to mental health problems among 12- to 15-year-old Norwegian adolescents[J]. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2010, 19: 803-811.
[4]	DETULLIO D, KENNEDY T D, MILLEN D H. Adolescent aggression and suicidality: a Meta-analysis[J]. Agg Violent Behav, 2022, 64: 101576.
[5]	LOEBER R, FARRINGTON D P. Young children who commit crime: epidemiology, developmental origins, risk factors, early interventions, and policy implications[J]. Dev Psychopathol, 2000, 12(4): 737-762.
[6]	MOFFITT T E, CASPI A, HARRINGTON H, et al. Males on the life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: follow-up at age 26 years[J]. Dev Psychopathol, 2002, 14(1): 179-207.
[7]	HIROTA T, DESERNO M, MCELROY E. The network structure of irritability and aggression in individuals with autism spectrum disorder[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2020, 50: 1210-1220.
[8]	WEST S J, CHESTER D S. The tangled webs we wreak: examining the structure of aggressive personality using psychometric networks[J]. J Pers, 2022, 90(5): 762-780.
[9]	王旭, 刘衍玲, 林杰, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情期间中小学生攻击性现状分析及影响因素[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(1): 12-21. WANG X, LIU Y L, LIN J, et al. Analysis of aggression in primary and middle school students during COVID-19 pandemic and its influence factors[J]. J Southwest Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 43(1): 12-21. (in Chinese)
[10]	WARBURTON W A, ANDERSON C A. Social psychology of aggression[M]WRIGHT J, BERRY J. International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences. 2nd Edition. Oxford, England: Elsevier, 2015: 373-380.
[11]	CHEN X, HUANG X, CHANG L, et al. Aggression, social competence, and academic achievement in Chinese children: a 5-year longitudinal study[J]. Dev Psychopathol, 2010, 22(3): 583-592.
[12]	BUSS A H, PERRY M. The aggression questionnaire[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1992, 63(3): 452.
[13]	李献云, 费立鹏, 张亚利, 等. Buss和Perry攻击问卷中文版的修订和信效度[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2011, 37(10): 607-613. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0152.2011.10.010 LI X Y, FEI L P, ZHANG Y L, et al. Development, reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Buss and Perry Aggression Questionnaire[J]. Chin J Nerv Ment Dis, 2011, 37(10): 607-613. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0152.2011.10.010
[14]	伍嘉麒, 任枭, 贡喆. 攻击性对恶意创造力的影响: 有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(2): 367-374. WU J Q, REN X, GONG Z. Aggression and malevolent creativity: a moderated mediation model[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2024, 47(2): 367-374. (in Chinese)
[15]	EPSKAMP S, CRAMER A O J, WALDORP L J, et al. Qgraph: network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data[J]. J Stat Softw, 2012, 48: 1-18.
[16]	ROBINAUGH D J, MILLNER A J, MCNALLY R J. Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network[J]. J Abnorm Psychol, 2016, 125(6): 747.
[17]	BRINGMANN L F, ELMER T, EPSKAMP S, et al. What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks?[J]. J Abnorm Psychol, 2019, 128(8): 892.
[18]	EPSKAMP S, BORSBOOM D, FRIED E I. Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: a tutorial paper[J]. Behav Res Methods, 2018, 50: 195-212.
[19]	VAN BORKULO C, BOSCHLOO L, BORSBOOM D, et al. Association of symptom network structure with the course of depression[J]. JAMA Psychiatry, 2015, 72(12): 1219-1226.
[20]	PENG Z, KLOMEK A B, LI L, et al. Associations between Chinese adolescents subjected to traditional and cyber bullying and suicidal ideation, self-harm and suicide attempts[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2019, 19(1): 324.