留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于离散选择试验的学龄儿童正餐偏好研究

周玮玮 吴晓宇 刘爱东 黄绯绯 关方旭 张继国 王惠君 仲学锋 刘爽 杜文雯

周玮玮, 吴晓宇, 刘爱东, 黄绯绯, 关方旭, 张继国, 王惠君, 仲学锋, 刘爽, 杜文雯. 基于离散选择试验的学龄儿童正餐偏好研究[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2025, 46(1): 45-49. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025020
引用本文: 周玮玮, 吴晓宇, 刘爱东, 黄绯绯, 关方旭, 张继国, 王惠君, 仲学锋, 刘爽, 杜文雯. 基于离散选择试验的学龄儿童正餐偏好研究[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2025, 46(1): 45-49. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025020
ZHOU Weiwei, WU Xiaoyu, LIU Aidong, HUANG Feifei, GUAN Fangxu, ZHANG Jiguo, WANG Huijun, ZHONG Xuefeng, LIU Shuang, DU Wenwen. Study on meal preferences of school-aged children based on discrete choice experiment[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2025, 46(1): 45-49. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025020
Citation: ZHOU Weiwei, WU Xiaoyu, LIU Aidong, HUANG Feifei, GUAN Fangxu, ZHANG Jiguo, WANG Huijun, ZHONG Xuefeng, LIU Shuang, DU Wenwen. Study on meal preferences of school-aged children based on discrete choice experiment[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2025, 46(1): 45-49. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025020

基于离散选择试验的学龄儿童正餐偏好研究

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025020
基金项目: 

中国学生营养与健康促进会—美赞臣学优营养科研基金项目 CASNHP-MJN2023-18

详细信息
    作者简介:

    周玮玮(2000-),女,湖北宜昌人,在读硕士,主要研究方向为公共营养

    通讯作者:

    杜文雯,E-mail:duww@ninh.chinacdc.cn

  • 利益冲突声明  所有作者声明无利益冲突。
  • 中图分类号: R79 R155.1 R153.2

Study on meal preferences of school-aged children based on discrete choice experiment

  • 摘要:   目的  探究学龄儿童饮食决策中不同食物属性及其水平的相对重要性,了解学龄儿童的正餐偏好,为制定学龄儿童饮食行为干预精准策略提供依据。  方法  2024年5—6月,采用分层整群随机抽样方法,从湖北省、安徽省各抽取2所中学(城乡各1所)854名11~15岁学龄儿童开展D-最优设计离散选择试验问卷调查。应用混合Logit模型分析儿童对正餐属性及不同水平的偏好程度,并计算选择决策中属性的相对重要性(RI)和支付意愿。  结果  纳入的5个食物属性对学龄儿童正餐选择的影响均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。影响学龄儿童正餐选择的食物属性相对重要性从高到低依次为就餐方式(RI=31.26%)、食物种类(RI=30.56%)、烹饪方式(RI=23.84%)、口味(RI=8.06%)和每餐人均价格(RI=6.27%)。其中,学龄儿童更偏好家庭烹饪的正餐(β=0.74),支付意愿为86.3元;偏好食物种类多样的餐食(谷薯类+蔬菜+鱼肉蛋豆类)(β=0.61),支付意愿为71.9元;偏好煎/炸/烤(β=0.51)的烹饪方式以及偏辣的口味(β=0.33);每餐人均价格与学龄儿童正餐选择呈负相关(β=-0.01)(P值均<0.05)。依据居住地区、体质量指数(BMI)分层分析后发现,就餐方式对农村儿童及超重肥胖儿童的相对重要性最高(RI值分别为31.28%,34.17%),均偏好家庭烹饪的餐食(β值分别为0.76,0.91),且二者在食物种类的选择上更偏爱包含鱼肉蛋豆类与谷薯类、鱼肉蛋豆类与谷薯类和蔬菜的正餐(地区:β值分别为0.53,0.53;BMI:β值分别为0.55,0.56)(P值均<0.05)。  结论  学龄儿童对正餐不同属性的偏好存在差异。在学龄儿童饮食行为干预中应提升学校供餐质量,降低健康膳食购买成本,分类开展针对性的家庭健康教育,倡导健康烹饪方式。
    1)  利益冲突声明  所有作者声明无利益冲突。
  • 表  1  基于混合Logit分析模型的学龄儿童正餐偏好分析结果(n=854)

    Table  1.   Analysis results of meal preferences of school-aged children based on mixed Logit model(n=854)

    属性 水平 β 标准误 P
    口味 偏甜 -0.20 0.05 <0.01
    偏咸 0.02 0.05 0.66
    偏辣 0.33 0.07 <0.01
    烹饪方式 蒸/煮/炖/烩 0.22 0.06 <0.01
    炒/爆/熘 0.37 0.05 <0.01
    煎/炸/烤 0.51 0.05 <0.01
    就餐方式 家庭烹饪 0.74 0.05 <0.01
    学校供餐 0.30 0.06 <0.01
    餐馆/食品摊 0.31 0.05 <0.01
    食物种类 谷薯类+蔬菜 0.34 0.05 <0.01
    谷薯类+鱼肉蛋豆类 0.51 0.05 <0.01
    谷薯类+蔬菜+鱼肉蛋豆类 0.61 0.05 <0.01
    每餐人均价格 -0.01 0.00 <0.01
    注:口味以清淡为参照,烹饪方式以预制/即食为参照,就餐方式以外卖为参照,食物种类以谷薯类为参照,每餐人均价格为连续性变量。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  不同地区学龄儿童的正餐偏好分析(n=854)

    Table  2.   Analysis of meal preferences of school-aged children in different regions(n=854)

    属性 水平 城市 农村
    β 标准误 β 标准误
    口味 偏甜 -0.16* 0.08 -0.27* 0.08
    偏咸 0.18* 0.07 -0.15 0.08
    偏辣 0.38** 0.09 0.33** 0.11
    烹饪方式 蒸/煮/炖/烩 0.17* 0.08 0.33** 0.10
    炒/爆/熘 0.43** 0.07 0.33** 0.08
    煎/炸/烤 0.56** 0.08 0.52** 0.08
    就餐方式 家庭烹饪 0.77** 0.07 0.76** 0.08
    学校供餐 0.32** 0.08 0.30** 0.09
    餐馆/食品摊 0.23** 0.07 0.39** 0.08
    食物种类 谷薯类+蔬菜 0.28** 0.07 0.39** 0.09
    谷薯类+鱼肉蛋豆类 0.51** 0.08 0.53** 0.08
    谷薯类+蔬菜+鱼肉蛋豆类 0.70** 0.07 0.53** 0.08
    每餐人均价格 -0.01** 0.00 -0.01** 0.00
    注: **p<0.01,*p<0.05;口味以清淡为参照,烹饪方式以预制/即食为参照,就餐方式以外卖为参照,食物种类以谷薯类为参照,每餐人均价格为连续性变量。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  BMI正常和超重肥胖学龄儿童的正餐偏好分析(n=726)

    Table  3.   Analysis of meal preferences in school-aged children with normal BMI and overweight obesity(n=726)

    属性 水平 BMI正常 超重肥胖
    β 标准误 β 标准误
    口味 偏甜 -0.21** 0.07 -0.15 0.14
    偏咸 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.12
    偏辣 0.30** 0.09 0.63** 0.16
    烹饪方式 蒸/煮/炖/烩 0.17* 0.07 0.37** 0.14
    炒/爆/熘 0.28** 0.07 0.66** 0.13
    煎/炸/烤 0.45** 0.07 0.75** 0.13
    就餐方式 家庭烹饪 0.70** 0.06 0.91** 0.13
    学校供餐 0.20** 0.07 0.70** 0.16
    餐馆/食品摊 0.25** 0.06 0.39** 0.12
    食物种类 谷薯类+蔬菜 0.35** 0.07 0.31* 0.14
    谷薯类+鱼肉蛋豆类 0.51** 0.07 0.55** 0.13
    谷薯类+蔬菜+鱼肉蛋豆类 0.63** 0.07 0.56** 0.13
    每餐人均价格 -0.01* 0.00 -0.01* 0.00
    注: **p<0.01,*p<0.05;口味以清淡为参照,烹饪方式以预制/即食为参照,就餐方式以外卖为参照,食物种类以谷薯类为参照,每餐人均价格为连续性变量。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  不同模型学龄儿童的正餐偏好分析结果比较

    Table  4.   Comparison of analysis results on meal preferences of school-aged children with different models

    属性 水平 模型Ⅰ(n=13 664) 模型Ⅱ(n=11 310)
    β 标准误 β 标准误
    口味 偏甜 -0.20** 0.05 -0.18** 0.06
    偏咸 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.06
    偏辣 0.33** 0.07 0.41** 0.08
    烹饪方式 蒸/煮/炖/烩 0.22** 0.06 0.27** 0.07
    炒/爆/熘 0.37** 0.05 0.42** 0.06
    煎/炸/烤 0.51** 0.05 0.59** 0.06
    就餐方式 家庭烹饪 0.74** 0.05 0.95** 0.06
    学校供餐 0.30** 0.06 0.36** 0.07
    餐馆/食品摊 0.31** 0.05 0.40** 0.06
    食物种类 谷薯类+蔬菜 0.34** 0.05 0.42** 0.06
    谷薯类+鱼肉蛋豆类 0.51** 0.05 0.57** 0.07
    谷薯类+蔬菜+鱼肉蛋豆类 0.61** 0.05 0.67** 0.06
    每餐人均价格 -0.01** 0.00 -0.01** 0.00
    注: **p<0.01;模型Ⅰ为全体样本观测量,模型Ⅱ为第2阶段问题选择“会”的观测量。口味以清淡为参照,烹饪方式以预制/即食为参照,就餐方式以外卖为参照,食物种类以谷薯类为参照,每餐人均价格为连续性变量。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] UNICEF. Nutrition strategy 2020-2030[EB/OL]. (2020-12-01)[2024-10-18]. https://knowledge.unicef.org/child-nutrition-and-development/resource/unicef-nutrition-strategy-2020-2030.
    [2] UNICEF. The state of the world's children 2019—children, food and nutrition: growing well in a changing world[EB/OL]. (2019-10-01)[2024-10-18]. https://www.unicef.org/reports/state-of-worlds-children-2019.
    [3] COSTA C S, DEL-PONTE, ASSUNCÃO M, et al. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and body fat during childhood and adolescence: a systematic review[J]. Public Health Nutr, 2018, 21(1): 148-159. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001331
    [4] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 中国居民营养与慢性病状况报告(2020年)[J]. 营养学报, 2020, 42(6): 521.

    National Health Commission of the PRC. Report on the nutrition and chronic diseases status of Chinese residents 2020[J]. Acta Nutr Sin, 2020, 42(6): 521. (in Chinese)
    [5] WEIHRAUCH B S, SCHWARZ P, KLUSMANN J H. Childhood obesity: increased risk for cardiometabolic disease and cancer in adulthood[J]. Metabolism, 2019, 92: 147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.12.001
    [6] 中国营养学会. 中国学龄儿童膳食指南(2022)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2022.

    Chinese Nutrition Society. Dietary guidelines for Chinese school-aged children(2022)[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2022. (in Chinese)
    [7] LI M, XUE H, JIA P, et al. Pocket money, eating behaviors, and weight status among Chinese children: the childhood obesity study in China mega-cities[J]. Prev Med, 2017, 100: 208-215. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.04.031
    [8] ORME B K. Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research[M]. Wisconsin: Research Publishers LLC, 2005.
    [9] LANCSAR E, LOUVIERE J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide[J]. Pharmacoeconomics, 2008, 26(8): 661-677. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004
    [10] CAPPELLOTTO M, OLSEN A. Food texture acceptance, sensory sensitivity, and food neophobia in children and their parents[J]. Foods, 2021, 10(10): 2327. doi: 10.3390/foods10102327
    [11] HAHNRATHS M, WILLEBOORDSE M, VAN ASSEMA P, et al. The effects of the healthy primary school of the future on children's fruit and vegetable preferences, familiarity and intake[J]. Nutrients, 2021, 13(9): 3241. doi: 10.3390/nu13093241
    [12] LI L, BAI R, ZHANG R, et al. Temporal trends in food preferences and their association with overweight/obesity among children in China[J]. Int J Gastron Food Sci, 2021, 24(2): 100335.
    [13] MORRISSEY T W, JACKNOWITZ A, VINOPAL K. Local food pri-ces and their associations with children's weight and food security[J]. Pediatrics, 2014, 133(3): 422-430. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1963
    [14] PIENIAK M, PISANSKI K, KUPCZYK P, et al. The impact of food variety on taste identification and preferences: evidence from the cook islands archipelago[J]. Food Qual Prefer, 2022, 98: 104512. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104512
    [15] GUERRIERO C A-O, JAUME N A, DIAZ-ORDAZ K, et al. Using animation to self-report health: a randomized experiment with children[J]. Patient, 2020, 13(2): 175-188. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00392-9
    [16] 贾二萍. 湖北省中老年居民长期护理保险选择偏好及支付意愿研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2021.

    JIA E P. Study on preferences and willingness to pay of longterm care insurance for middle-aged and elderly residents in Hubei Province[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University Science Technology, 2021. (in Chinese)
    [17] 刘仲琦, 郝春, 顾菁, 等. 离散选择试验中试验设计步骤的实现: 基于SAS宏程序的应用[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2018, 35(6): 949-952.

    LIU Z Q, HAO C, GU J, et al. Implementation of experiment design in discrete choice experiment: based on SAS macro program[J]. Chin J Health Stat, 2018, 35(6): 949-952. (in Chinese)
    [18] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 学龄儿童青少年超重与肥胖筛查:

    WS/T 586—2018[S]. 2018. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the PRC. Screening for overweight and obesity among school-age children and adolescents: WS/T 586-2018[S]. 2018. (in Chinese)
    [19] HESS S, BIERLAIRE M, POLAK J W. Estimation of value of travel-time savings using mixed Logit models[J]. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, 2005, 39(2): 221-236. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856404001028
    [20] LIVINGSTONE K, ABBOTT G, LAMB K, et al. Understanding meal choices in young adults and interactions with demographics, diet quality, and health behaviors: a discrete choice experiment[J]. J Nutr, 2021, 151(8): 2361-2371. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab106
    [21] 李佳洁, 于彤彤. 基于助推的健康饮食行为干预策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2052-2063.

    LI J J, YU T T. Nudging strategies to promote healthy eating behavior[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2020, 28(12): 2052-2063. (in Chinese)
    [22] KERSHAW K N, KLIKUSZOWIAN E, SCHRADER L, et al. Assessment of the influence of food attributes on meal choice selection by socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity among women living in Chicago, USA: a discrete choice experiment[J]. Appetite, 2019, 139: 19-25.
    [23] RUSMEVICHIENTONG P, JAYNES J, CHANDLER L. Understanding influencing attributes of adolescent snack choices: evidence from a discrete choice experiment[J]. Food Qual Prefer, 2021, 92: 104. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329320304407
    [24] 陈东宛, 李永进, 吕金昌, 等. 北京市某区三所学校食堂午餐食物供应情况分析[J]. 首都公共卫生, 2020, 14(4): 202-205.

    CHEN D W, LI Y J, LÜ J C, et al. Analysis of food supply of primary and secondary school canteens and students' lunch in a district of Beijing[J]. Cap J Public Health, 2020, 14(4): 202-205. (in Chinese)
    [25] WHO. Shake the salt habit[R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016.
    [26] 甘倩, 张倩, 杨媞媞, 等. 中小学生校园营养干预逻辑模型的构建与实施[J]. 中国健康教育, 2022, 38(5): 471-474.

    GAN Q, ZHANG Q, YANG T T, et al. The establishment of school nutrition intervention Logic model and its practice for primary and middle school students[J]. Chin J Health Educ, 2022, 38(5): 471-474. (in Chinese)
    [27] 张娇, 徐凌忠. 离散选择实验在我国卫生服务领域的应用与展望[J]. 卫生软科学, 2022, 36(11): 32-35.

    ZHANG J, XU L Z. Application and prospect of discrete choice experiment in the field of health service in China[J]. Soft Sci Health, 2022, 36(11): 32-35. (in Chinese)
    [28] MICHAELS I C, CURRIE G, KENNEDY B, et al. Methods for conducting stated preference research with children and adolescents in health: a scoping review of the application of discrete choice experiments[J]. Patient, 2021, 14(6): 741-758. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34008164/
    [29] HARTMANN M, CASH S B, YEH C H, et al. Children's purchase behavior in the snack market: can branding or lower prices motivate healthier choices?[J]. Appetite, 2017, 117: 247-254. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666317305573
    [30] BUTTORFF C, TRUJILLO A J, DIEZ C F, et al. Evaluating consumer preferences for healthy eating from community Kitchens in low-income urban areas: a discrete choice experiment of Comedores Populares in Peru[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2015, 140: 1-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26184703/
    [31] HAGHANI M, BLIEMER M C, ROSE J M, et al. Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part Ⅰ. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimaging[J]. J Choice Model, 2021, 41(4): 100309.
  • 加载中
表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  137
  • HTML全文浏览量:  52
  • PDF下载量:  15
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-11-15
  • 修回日期:  2024-11-27
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-01-25
  • 刊出日期:  2025-01-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回