Analysis of the current situation of sexting and its related factors among college students in Jiangxi Province
-
摘要:
目的 探究江西省大学生文爱行为的流行现状及其相关因素,为高校性教育提供参考依据。 方法 采用整群随机抽样与方便抽样相结合的方法,2023年10月对江西省14所高校的13 042名在校学生进行匿名问卷调查。使用自编问卷了解大学生文爱行为现状,通过χ2检验和二元Logistic回归分析探讨江西省大学生文爱行为的相关因素。 结果 江西省大学生文爱行为报告率为11.5%。二元Logistic回归分析结果显示,女性、非独生子女、不浏览色情小说/视频/影片的大学生发生文爱行为的可能性较低(OR值分别为0.72,0.83,0.23,P值均 < 0.05);同性恋、不知晓艾滋病、不介意婚前性行为、对多性伴行为不介意和无所谓态度的大学生发生文爱行为的可能性较高(OR值分别为1.66,1.53,1.25,2.26,1.78,P值均 < 0.05)。吸烟、饮酒、报告有高危性行为史的大学生发生文爱行为可能性更高(OR=1.38~12.20,P值均 < 0.05);熬夜会降低大学生发生文爱行为发生情况(OR=0.24~0.58,P值均 < 0.05)。 结论 江西省大学生中存在一定比例的文爱行为,文爱行为与性别、性倾向、健康行为等多因素相关。建议高校加强性教育工作,同时注重网络素养的培养,以促进大学生身心健康发展。 Abstract:Objective To investigate the prevalence and associated factors of sexting among college students in Jiangxi Province, so as to provide a reference for sexual education interventions in colleges. Methods A combined method of random cluster sampling and convenience sampling was used to conduct an anonymous questionnaire survey on 13 042 students from 14 colleges in Jiangxi Province in October 2023. A self-designed questionnaire was used to collect data on sexting among students, and Chi-square tests and binary Logistic regression analysis were conducted to explore the factors associated with sexting among college students in Jiangxi Province. Results The reported rate of sexting among college students in Jiangxi Province was 11.5%. Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that female students, non-only children, and those who do not view pornographic novels/videos/films had a lower likelihood of engaging in sexting (OR=0.72, 0.83, 0.23, P < 0.05). Students who identified as homosexual, lacked knowledge about AIDS, did not mind premarital sex, and had indifferent attitudes towards multiple sexual partners were more likely to engage in sexting (OR=1.66, 1.53, 1.25, 2.26, 1.78, P < 0.05). Students who smoke, drink, and report a history of high-risk sexual behavior were more likely to engage in sexting behavior (OR=1.38-12.20, P < 0.05); night owls showed a negative correlation with sexting behavior (OR=0.24-0.58, P < 0.05). Conclusions A significant proportion of college students in Jiangxi Province engage in sexting. It is recommended that colleges and universities strengthen their sexual education efforts and focus on cultivating internet literacy to promote the physical and mental health development of college students. -
Key words:
- Sex /
- Communication /
- Behavior /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。 -
表 1 江西省不同组别大学生文爱行为报告率比较
Table 1. Comparison of reporting rates of sexting behaviors among college students of different groups in Jiangxi Province
组别 选项 人数 文爱行为人数 χ2值 P值 组别 选项 人数 文爱行为人数 χ2值 P值 性别 男 5 062 1 066(21.1) 749.06 < 0.01 是否介意同性 介意 6 641 652(9.8) 125.90 < 0.01 女 7 980 429(5.4) 性行为 不介意 3 569 590(16.5) 生源地 城市 4 007 599(14.9) 68.76 < 0.01 无所谓 2 832 253(8.9) 农村 9 035 896(9.9) 饮酒 从不 7 013 472(6.7) 745.41 < 0.01 年级 大一 5 868 656(11.2) 2.51 0.29 很少 4 052 479(11.8) 大二 3 192 356(11.1) 有时候 1 675 416(24.8) 大三及以上 3 982 483(12.1) 经常 188 71(37.8) 是否有过恋爱经历 是 5 688 941(16.6) 255.68 < 0.01 总是 114 57(50.0) 否 7 354 554(7.5) 吸烟 从不 11 760 1 028(8.7) 1 030.77 < 0.01 是否独生子女 是 2 072 399(19.3) 146.52 < 0.01 很少 511 132(25.8) 否 10 970 1 096(10.0) 有时候 298 96(32.2) 每月可支配收入/元 < 1 000 1 657 178(10.7) 561.84 < 0.01 经常 242 116(47.9) 1 000~ < 2 000 9 783 919(9.4) 总是 231 123(53.2) 2 000~ < 3 000 1 106 184(16.6) 熬夜 从不 1 018 162(15.9) 332.21 < 0.01 ≥3 000 496 214(43.1) 很少 1 776 88(5.0) 安全套使用意愿 愿意 12 108 1 249(10.3) 217.77 < 0.01 有时候 4 888 409(8.4) 不愿意 934 246(26.3) 经常 4 183 555(13.3) 是否浏览过色情小 是 4 944 1 221(24.7) 1 371.88 < 0.01 总是 1 177 281(23.9) 说/视频/影片 否 8 098 274(33.8) 艾滋病知识知晓 知晓 11 592 1 170(10.1) 191.55 < 0.01 是否介意婚前性行为 介意 5 888 294(5.0) 498.68 < 0.01 不知晓 1 450 325(22.4) 不介意 4 551 861(18.9) 高危性行为 有 1 353 870(64.3) 4 147.03 < 0.01 无所谓 2 603 340(13.1) 无 11 689 625(5.3) 是否介意多性伴行为 介意 11 027 800(7.3) 1 424.25 < 0.01 性倾向 异性恋 11 141 1 003(9.0) 908.07 < 0.01 不介意 1 042 455(43.7) 同性恋 592 290(49.0) 无所谓 973 240(24.7) 双性恋 1 309 202(15.4) 注: ()内数字为检出率/%。 表 2 大学生文爱行为相关因素二元Logistic回归分析(n=13 042)
Table 2. Binary Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with sexting behavior among college students (n=13 042)
自变量 选项 β值 标准误 Wald χ2值 P值 OR值(95%CI) 性别 男 1.00 女 -0.34 0.09 13.68 < 0.01 0.72(0.60~0.85) 是否独生子女 是 1.00 否 -0.19 0.10 4.06 0.04 0.83(0.69~1.00) 性倾向 异性恋 1.00 同性恋 0.51 0.15 11.77 < 0.01 1.66(1.24~2.22) 双性恋 0.05 0.12 0.16 0.69 1.05(0.83~1.33) 是否浏览过色情小说/视频/影片 是 1.00 否 -1.49 0.09 299.58 < 0.01 0.23(0.19~0.27) 吸烟 从不 1.00 很少 0.29 0.15 3.83 0.05 1.33(1.00~1.78) 有时候 0.08 0.19 0.17 0.68 1.08(0.74~1.58) 经常 0.10 0.21 0.22 0.64 1.10(0.73~1.66) 总是 0.53 0.23 5.62 0.02 1.70(1.10~2.65) 饮酒 从不 1.00 很少 0.32 0.09 12.18 < 0.01 1.38(1.15~1.65) 有时候 0.52 0.11 21.13 < 0.01 1.68(1.35~2.10) 经常 0.51 0.25 4.26 0.04 1.67(1.03~2.71) 总是 < 0.01 0.32 < 0.01 0.99 1.00(0.54~1.87) 熬夜 从不 1.00 很少 -1.44 0.20 51.67 < 0.01 0.24(0.16~0.35) 有时候 -0.68 0.17 16.76 < 0.01 0.51(0.37~0.70) 经常 -0.55 0.16 11.04 < 0.01 0.58(0.42~0.80) 总是 0.05 0.18 0.07 0.80 1.05(0.74~1.48) 艾滋病知识知晓 知晓 1.00 不知晓 0.43 0.11 15.41 < 0.01 1.53(1.24~1.90) 是否介意婚前性行为 介意 1.00 不介意 0.22 0.09 5.75 0.02 1.25(1.04~1.50) 无所谓 0.14 0.11 1.53 0.22 1.15(0.92~1.90) 是否介意多性伴行为 介意 1.00 不介意 0.81 0.11 53.28 < 0.01 2.26(1.81~2.81) 无所谓 0.58 0.12 21.92 < 0.01 1.78(1.40~2.26) 高危性行为 无 1.00 有 2.50 0.09 757.08 < 0.01 12.20(10.21~14.57) -
[1] GEORGE M J, ODGERS C L. Seven fears and the science of how mobile technologies may be influencing adolescents in the digital age[J]. Perspect Psychol Sci, 2015, 10(6): 832-851. doi: 10.1177/1745691615596788 [2] MADIGAN S, LY A, RASH C L, et al. Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2018, 172(4): 327-335. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5314 [3] MORI C, TEMPLE J R, BROWNE D, et al. Association of sexting with sexual behaviors and mental health among adolescents: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2019, 173(8): 770-779. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1658 [4] MOLLA-ESPARZA C, LOSILLA J M, LOPEZ-GONZALEZ E. Prevalence of sending, receiving and forwarding sexts among youths: a three-level Meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(12): e243653. [5] QU J, SHEN S, SUN I Y, et al. Sexting victimization among dating APP users: a comparison of U.S. and Chinese college students[J]. J Interp Violence, 2022, 37(19/20): NP17109-NP17132. [6] MORELLI M, URBINI F, BIANCHI D, et al. The relationship between dark triad personality traits and sexting behaviors among adolescents and young adults across 11 countries[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(5): 2526. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052526 [7] TEMPLE J R, LE V D, VAN DEN BERG P, et al. Brief report: teen sexting and psychosocial health[J]. J Adolesc, 2014, 37(1): 33-36. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.10.008 [8] GASSO A M, MUELLER-JOHNSON K, MONTIEL I. Sexting, online sexual victimization, and psychopathology correlates by sex: depression, anxiety, and global psychopathology[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(3): 1018. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031018 [9] LAN Y T, PAN Y C, LIN Y H. Association between adolescents' problematic online behaviors and self-harm risk[J]. J Affect Disord, 2022, 317: 46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.073 [10] 马媛媛, 杜瑶瑶, 汪昊, 等. 广东省大学生文爱行为及其与高危性行为关系的横断面研究[J]. 中国艾滋病性病, 2021, 27(11): 1238-1241.MA Y Y, DU Y Y, WANG H, et al. A cross-sectional study on sexting and the relationship between sexting and high-risk sexual behavior among college students in Guangdong Province[J]. Chin J AIDS STD, 2021, 27(11): 1238-1241. (in Chinese) [11] 国务院防治艾滋病工作委员会办公室. 中国艾滋病防治督导与评估框架(试行)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2007.State Council AIDS Working Committee Office. The framework for HIV/AIDS supervision and assessment in China (Trial)[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2007. (in Chinese) [12] 汪妍, 王海俊, 彭畅, 等. 湖北省大学生性倾向与高危性行为相关性分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2023, 44(6): 840-844. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.06.010WANG Y, WANG H J, PENG C, et al. Association between sexual orientation and high-risk sexual behaviors among college students in Hubei Province[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2023, 44(6): 840-844. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.06.010 [13] KOKKINOS C M, KROMMIDA C, MARKOS A, et al. A latent profile analysis of Greek university students' sexting profiles: associations with big five personality traits[J]. Arch Sex Behav, 2024, 53(3): 1129-1140. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02762-9 [14] 中国计划生育协会. 大学生性与生殖健康调查报告[R]. 北京, 2016-09-26.China Family Planning Association. College students' sexual and reproductive health survey report[R]. Beijing, 2016-09-26. (in Chinese) [15] CHARMARAMAN L, ZHANG A, WANG K, et al. Sexual minorities and loneliness: exploring sexuality through social media and gender-sexuality alliance (GSA) supports[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2024, 21(3): 300. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030300 [16] HOWARD D, JARMAN H K, CLANCY E M, et al. Sexting among Australian adolescents: risk and protective factors[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 2023, 52(10): 2113-2130. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01827-1 [17] LIONG M, CHENG G H L. Sext and gender: examining gender eff-ects on sexting based on the theory of planned behaviour[J]. Behav Inf Technol, 2017(7): 726-736. [18] GASSO A M, KLETTKE B, AGUSTINA J R, et al. Sexting, mental health, and victimization among adolescents: a literature review[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019, 16(13): 2364. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132364 [19] VALIDO A, ESPELAGE D L, HONG J S, et al. Social-ecological examination of non-consensual sexting perpetration among U.S. adolescents[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(24): 9477. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249477 [20] BURGESS D E, NOEL J. Risk behaviors of high school students who report knowing someone who self-harms[J]. Issues Ment Health Nurs, 2020, 41(5): 415-420. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2019.1663568 [21] COSTA R, COSTA D, PESTANA J. Subjective sleep quality, unstimulated sexual arousal, and sexual frequency[J]. Sleep Sci, 2017, 10(4): 147-153. doi: 10.5935/1984-0063.20170026 [22] NORAIN M, NORLIZA A, SALMIAH M S, et al. Development of an online animated sexting prevention module based on the prototype willingness model to reduce intention and willingness to sexting among diploma students[J]. Med J Malaysia, 2023, 78(5): 646-652. [23] BEDNAR H, MCMILLAN S, SIDIBE T, et al. Addressing adolescent substance abuse and risky sexual health behaviors via youth-led initiatives: a review of the teens linked to care pilot program[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2024, 21(3): 252. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030252 [24] LUO R, XIE Z, SILENZIO V, et al. Gay APP use, sexuality traits, and high-risk sexual behaviors among men who have sex with men in China: mediation analysis[J]. J Med Int Res, 2023, 25: e49137. [25] KATZ-WISE S L, PERRY N S, NELSON K M, et al. Sexual fluidity in identity and behavior among cisgender youth: findings from the longitudinal growing up with media study[J]. J Pediatr, 2023;257: 113355. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.01.020 [26] LIU Y, YANG M, ZHAO C, et al. Self-identified sexual orientations and high-risk sexual behaviours among Chinese youth[J]. BMJ Sex Rep Health, 2019, 45(4): 255-262. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2018-200150 [27] BISWAS D, CHAUDHURI A, MITRA N, et al. Pride or closet? Unpacking experiences of minority stress, coping, and resistance among gender and sexual minorities in India[J]. J Homosex, 2023, 70(11): 2607-2633. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2022.2071662 [28] GERMANAUD E, CALLAHAN S, REVRANCHE M, et al. Mental disorders and suicidality by sexual orientation status among first-year college students in France[J]. J Homosex, 2024, 29: 1-16. [29] DANCKERS M, NUSYNOWITZ J, JAMNESHAN L, et al. The sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) medical trainee: the journey through medical education[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2024, 24(1): 67. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05047-4 -

计量
- 文章访问数: 308
- HTML全文浏览量: 318
- PDF下载量: 39
- 被引次数: 0