农村中学生遭受校园欺凌与焦虑症状的网络分析

朱怡然; 王宇豪; 王颖雪; 王乙涵; 蔡嘉琳; 严娜; 罗运娇; 王威

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024343

农村中学生遭受校园欺凌与焦虑症状的网络分析

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024343

朱怡然^{1, 2},
王宇豪¹,
王颖雪¹,
王乙涵¹,
蔡嘉琳^{1, 2},
严娜¹,
罗运娇¹,
王威^1, ,

1.
徐州医科大学公共卫生学院，江苏 221000
2.
基础医学国家级实验教学示范中心(徐州医科大学)

基金项目:

江苏省教育科学“十四五”规划一般课题项目 D/2021/01/163

徐州市社会科学研究课题项目 24XSZ-183

江苏省大学生创新创业训练计划项目 202410313029Z

详细信息

作者简介:
朱怡然(2003-)，女，江苏徐州人，在读本科

通讯作者:
王威，E-mail：weiwang90@163.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: C913.5 G444 R179
计量
- 文章访问数: 188
- HTML全文浏览量: 73
- PDF下载量: 35
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-04-17
- 修回日期: 2024-08-27
- 网络出版日期: 2024-12-10
- 刊出日期: 2024-11-15

Network analysis of campus bullying and anxiety symptoms among rural middle school students

ZHU Yiran^{1, 2},
WANG Yuhao¹,
WANG Yingxue¹,
WANG Yihan¹,
CAI Jialin^{1, 2},
YAN Na¹,
LUO Yunjiao¹,
WANG Wei^{1
, ,}

1.
School of Public Health/National Demonstration Center for Experimental Basic Medical Science Education, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou (221000), Jiangsu Province, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨农村中学生遭受校园欺凌和焦虑症状的网络结构特征和核心项目，为精准化预防和干预校园欺凌和焦虑症状的共病提供参考依据。方法 2021年9月至2022年3月，采用多阶段整群随机抽样方法抽取徐州市1 920名农村中学生为研究对象，采用中文版Olweus欺负问卷调查校园欺凌情况，采用中文版7项广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)评估焦虑症状。使用网络分析方法构建农村中学生遭受校园欺凌-焦虑症状网络，评估各项目的中心性程度、桥梁强度及其稳定性和精确性。结果农村中学生遭受校园欺凌症状总分为(10.42±3.26)分，焦虑症状总分为(11.47±4.93)分；强度和预期影响最高的症状是“不能停止或控制自己的担忧情绪”，节点强度与预期影响值为1.041 7；节点“感到紧张、焦虑或烦躁”和“不能停止或控制自己的担忧情绪”关联最紧密；桥梁强度最高的症状是“别人给我取难听的外号骂我，或者取笑、讽刺我”和“不能停止或控制自己的担忧情绪”。结论农村中学生遭受校园欺凌与焦虑症状相关，根据干预靶点进行精准干预，可能会最大程度减轻遭受校园欺凌与焦虑症状对农村中学生的负面影响。
- 暴力 /
- 焦虑 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 学生 /
- 农村人口
Abstract: Objective To explore the network structure characteristics and core items of rural middle school students suffering from campus bullying and anxiety symptoms, so as to provide a reference basis for the precise prevention and intervention of the comorbidity of campus bullying and anxiety symptoms. Methods From September 2021 to March 2022, a multi-stage random cluster sampling method was used to select 1 920 rural middle school students from Xuzhou. The Chinese version of the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire was used to investigate the situation of campus bullying, and the Chinese version of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) was used to assess anxiety symptoms. The network analysis method was used to construct the network between suffering from campus bullying and anxiety symptoms of rural middle school students to evaluate the centrality, bridge strength, stability and accuracy of each item. Results The total score of suffering from campus bullying symptoms of rural middle school students was (10.42±3.26) points, and the total score of anxiety symptoms was (11.47±4.93) points. The symptom with the highest strength and expected influence was "unable to stop or control one's worry emotions", and the node strength and expected influence value was 1.041 7. The nodes "feel nervous, anxious or irritable" and "unable to stop or control one's worry emotions" were most closely related. The symptoms with the highest bridge strength were "others give me ugly nicknames to scold me or make fun of and satirize me" and "unable to stop or control one's worry emotions". Conclusions Rural middle school students' suffering from campus bullying is related to anxiety symptoms. Accurate intervention according to the intervention targets may minimize the negative impact of suffering from campus bullying and anxiety symptoms on rural middle school students.
- Violence /
- Anxiety /
- Mental health /
- Students /
- Rural population
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

图 1 农村中学生遭受校园欺凌与焦虑症状的症状网络

注： B1~B7含义见1.2.2；A1~A7含义见1.2.3。

Figure 1. The network between suffering from campus bullying and anxiety symptoms among rural middle school students

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 农村中学生遭受校园欺凌与焦虑症状网络的中心性特征

注： B1~B7含义见1.2.2；A1~A7含义见1.2.3。

Figure 2. Central characteristics of the network between suffering from campus bullying and anxiety symptoms among rural middle school students

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同性别农村中学生遭受校园欺凌与焦虑症状的网络比较

Figure 3. Network comparison of suffering from campus bullying and anxiety symptoms among ruralmiddle school students of different genders

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同人口学特征农村中学生遭受校园欺凌及焦虑症状得分比较(x±s)

Table 1. Comparison of different demographic characteristics of rural middle school students suffering from campus bullying and anxiety symptoms scores(x±s)

人口学指标	人数	遭受校园欺凌		焦虑症状
人口学指标	人数	得分	Z/H值	得分	Z/H值
性别
男	837	10.88±4.01	-4.65^**	11.11±4.75	-3.32^**
女	1 083	10.07±2.49		11.76±5.05
是否为独生子女
是	204	10.70±3.80	-0.31	11.22±4.54	-0.35
否	1 716	10.39±3.19		11.51±4.98
性取向
异性恋	1 773	10.36±3.11	-1.69	11.33±4.79	-3.28^**
非异性恋	147	11.14±4.73		13.24±6.20
学段
初中	826	10.63±3.55	-1.34	10.88±5.18	-7.56^**
高中	1 094	10.27±3.02		11.92±4.69
父亲文化程度
小学及以下	130	11.09±4.00	6.51	12.53±5.32	9.78^*
初中	900	10.43±3.24		11.40±4.85
高中或中专	648	10.24±2.85		11.40±4.86
大学或大专	229	10.47±3.81		11.52±5.25
硕士及以上	13	11.77±4.51		9.23±2.98
母亲文化程度
小学及以下	270	10.70±3.78	2.79	11.89±5.14	6.97
初中	958	10.36±3.08		11.54±4.91
高中或中专	483	10.35±3.08		11.19±4.94
大学或大专	193	10.47±3.72		11.43±4.80
硕士及以上	16	11.44±4.24		9.63±3.01
家庭类型
核心家庭	1 670	10.39±3.25	4.45	11.35±4.86	9.86^*
单亲家庭	135	10.43±2.59		12.24±5.26
重组家庭	40	12.00±5.91		11.32±4.26
隔代家庭	58	10.43±2.54		12.76±5.90
其他	17	10.35±2.67		13.59±6.02
注： ^P < 0.05，^*P < 0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(24)

[1]	冯帮, 李璇. 我国近十年校园欺凌问题研究述评[J]. 上海教育科研, 2017(4): 10-15. FENG B, LI X. Research review on bullying problem nearly a decade in China[J]. J Shanghai Educ Res, 2017(4): 10-15. (in Chinese)
[2]	姚建龙. 防治学生欺凌的中国路径: 对近期治理校园欺凌政策之评析[J]. 中国青年社会科学, 2017, 36(1): 19-25. YAO J L. China's approach to preventing and controlling students bullying: an analysis of recent policies on campus bullying governance[J]. J Chin Youth Soc Sci, 2017, 36(1): 19-25. (in Chinese)
[3]	郝肖肖. 乡村振兴战略背景下农村青少年家庭教育现状与提升策略研究[J]. 公关世界, 2023(12): 52-54. HAO X X. Research on the present situation and promotion strategy of family education of rural adolescents under the background of rural revitalization strategy[J]. Pr World, 2023(12): 52-54. (in Chinese)
[4]	吴家钰, 张珊珊, 刘致宏. 中学生校园欺凌与睡眠质量: 社交焦虑的中介作用及留守经历的调节作用[C]//第二十三届全国心理学学术会议, 呼和浩特, 2021. WU J Y, ZHANG S S, LIU Z H. School bullying and sleep quality among middle school students: the mediating role of social anxiety and the moderating role of left-behind experiences[C]//The 23th national psychology academic conferences, Hohhot, 2021. (in Chinese)
[5]	沈洪强. 农村留守中学生心理行为问题分析与教育引导[J]. 科教导刊(上旬刊), 2020(16): 170-171, 180. SHEN H Q. Analysis and education guidance on psychological and behavior problems of rural left-behind middle school students[J]. Guide Sci Educ (Early Edit), 2020(16): 170-171, 180. (in Chinese)
[6]	BORSBOOM D. Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems[J]. J Clin Psychol, 2008, 64(9): 1089-108. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20503
[7]	陈琛, 王力, 曹成琦, 等. 心理病理学网络理论、方法与挑战[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(10): 1724-1739. CHEN C, WANG L, CAO C Q, et al. Network theory, method and challenges of psychopathology[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2021, 29(10): 1724-1739. (in Chinese)
[8]	任垒, 郭力, 马竹静, 等. 军人广泛性焦虑症状的网络分析研究[J]. 职业与健康, 2020, 36(10): 1336-1341. REN L, GUO L, MA Z J, et al. Research on network analysis of generalized anxiety symptoms in soldiers[J]. Occup Health, 2020, 36(10): 1336-1341. (in Chinese)
[9]	HEVEY D. Network analysis: a brief overview and tutorial[J]. Health Psychol Behav Med, 2018, 6(1): 301-328.
[10]	张文新, 武建芬. Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1999(2): 8-12, 38. ZHANG W X, WU J F. Revision of the Chinese version of Olweus Child Bullying Questionnaire[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 1999(2): 8-12, 38. (in Chinese)
[11]	LIN Q, BONKANO O, WU K, et al. The value of Chinese version GAD-7 and PHQ-9 to screen anxiety and depression in Chinese outpatients with atypical chest pain[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2021, 17: 423-431.
[12]	FRIEDMAN J, HASTIE T, TIBSHIRANI R. Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso[J]. Biostatistics, 2007, 9(3): 432-441.
[13]	OPSAHL T, AGNEESSENS F, SKVORETZ J. Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths[J]. Soc Networks, 2010, 32(3): 245-251.
[14]	ONNELA J P, SARAMKI J, HYVÖNEN J, et al. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks[J]. Proceed Nation Acad Sci, 2007, 104(18): 7332-7336.
[15]	BAI W, CAI H, LIU S, et al. Anxiety and depressive symptoms in college students during the late stage of the COVID-19 outbreak: a network approach[J]. Translat Psychiatry, 2021, 11(1): 638.
[16]	DAVISON A C, HINKLEY D V. Bootstrap methods and their application[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
[17]	EPSKAMP S, BORSBOOM D, FRIED E I. Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: a tutorial paper[J]. Beh Res Methods, 2017, 50(1): 195-212.
[18]	VAN BORKULO C D, VAN BORK R, BOSCHLOO L, et al. Comparing network structures on three aspects: a permutation test[J]. Psychol Methods, 2023, 28(6): 1273-1285.
[19]	缪丽珺, 孙红莲, 张宇怡, 等. 亲子分离对留守儿童欺凌受害与自卑感的影响[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2020, 37(12): 943-945, 960. MIU L J, SUN H L, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Studying on the influence of parent-child separation on bullying victimization and feeling of inferiority of the left-behind children[J]. Chin Health Servic Manag, 2020, 37(12): 943-945, 960. (in Chinese)
[20]	陈佳怡, 赵颖, 李可晗, 等. 儿童青少年网络欺凌现状及其与焦虑、抑郁症状的关联性分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2022, 49(5): 808-813. CHEN J Y, ZHAO Y, LI K H, et al. Status quo of cyberbullying and its correlation with anxiety and depressive symptoms among children and adolescents[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2022, 49(5): 808-813. (in Chinese)
[21]	肖彩燕. 同伴关系、自尊对初一学生校园欺凌的影响及干预研究[D]. 广州: 广州大学, 2019. XIAO C Y. The influence and intervention study of peer relationship and self-esteem on school bullying of junior students[D]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[22]	平凡, 周宗奎, 韩磊, 等. BMI、嘲笑对进食障碍和社交焦虑的影响: 负面身体自我的中介作用[C]//中国心理学会成立90周年纪念大会暨第十四届全国心理学学术会议, 驻马店, 2011. PING F, ZHOU Z K, HAN L, et al. Influence of BMI and perceived teasing on eating disorder and social anxiety: the mediation effect of body dissatisfaction[C]//The 90th anniversary of the founding of the Chinese psychological association and the 14th national psychological academic conference, Zhumadian, 2011. (in Chinese)
[23]	吴方文, 宋映泉, 黄晓婷. 校园欺凌: 让农村寄宿生更"受伤": 基于17 841名农村寄宿制学校学生的实证研究[J]. 中小学管理, 2016(8): 8-11. WU F W, SONG Y Q, HUANG X T. School bullying: making rural boarding students more "hurt": based on an empirical study of 17 841 rural boarding school students[J]. Manage Primary Second Sch, 2016(8): 8-11. (in Chinese)
[24]	高屾, 闵文斌, 常芳, 等. 农村初中生校园欺凌与心理健康的相关性研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2018, 36(2): 60-67, 155. GAO S, MIN W B, CHANG F, et al. Correlations between school bullying and mental health among rural middle school students[J]. J East China Norm Univ (Educ Sci), 2018, 36(2): 60-67, 155. (in Chinese)