大学生负面评价恐惧相关因素的随机森林模型分析

汪星宇; 孟莎; 王颖; 常红娟

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024342

大学生负面评价恐惧相关因素的随机森林模型分析

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024342

武汉科技大学医学院，湖北 430000

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 81803252

武汉科技大学教学研究项目 2023X046

详细信息

作者简介:
汪星宇(1998-)，女，湖北十堰人，在读硕士，主要研究方向为儿童青少年卫生学

通讯作者:
常红娟，E-mail: changhj0812@126.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: C913.5 B844.2 R179
计量
- 文章访问数: 137
- HTML全文浏览量: 44
- PDF下载量: 18
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-07-12
- 修回日期: 2024-09-21
- 网络出版日期: 2024-12-10
- 刊出日期: 2024-11-15

Random forest model analysis of cognitive emotion regulation strategies and fear of negative evaluation among college students

School of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan (430000), Hubei Province, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨大学生负面评价恐惧的影响因素，为提高大学生心理健康水平提供实证依据。方法 2024年3月采用方便抽样方法，从湖北省武汉市某3所大学抽取5 750名大学生，利用简明负面评价恐惧量表、中文版认知情绪调节策略量表、家庭关怀度指数量表和自编一般情况调查表进行线上问卷调查。利用最小二乘法回归模型分析负面评价恐惧的影响因素，同时构建随机森林模型探索负面评价恐惧的影响因素及各变量的重要性排序。结果最小二乘法回归模型结果显示，认知情绪调节策略对大学生负面评价恐惧水平的影响有统计学意义，其中相比适应性情绪调节策略组，非适应性情绪调节策略显著影响大学生负面评价恐惧水平(β=4.25，95%CI=3.81~4.68)；家庭关怀中轻度障碍(β=-2.71，95%CI=-3.36~-2.06)、重度障碍(β=-1.64，95%CI=-2.27~-1.01)可能增加大学生负面评价恐惧水平(P值均＜0.05)。随机森林模型中，根据%IncMSE排序和节点纯度排序，认知情绪调节策略均为影响大学生负面评价恐惧水平的最主要因素。结论认知情绪调节策略是影响大学生负面评价恐惧水平的关键因素。高校可采取针对性干预措施，缓解大学生的负面评价恐惧。
- 恐惧 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 模型 /
- 结构 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To explore the impact of cognitive emotion regulation strategies on fear of negative evaluation among college students using a random forest algorithm in order to provide empirical evidence to support mental health improvements. Methods In March 2024, a convenience sampling method was used to conduct an online survey with 5 750 college students from three universities in Wuhan, Hubei Province. A least squares regression model was employed to analyze whether cognitive emotion regulation strategies significantly influenced fear of negative evaluation. A random forest model was also constructed to identify predictors and rank the importance of various factors affecting fear of negative evaluation. Results The least squares regression model indicated that cognitive emotion regulation strategies significantly impacted fear of negative evaluation among college students (β=4.25, 95%CI=3.81-4.68, P < 0.05). Family support, including mild impairment (β=-2.71, 95%CI=-3.36 to -2.06, P < 0.05) and severe impairment in the domain (β=-1.64, 95%CI=-2.27 to -1.01, P < 0.05), were associated with increased fear. The random forest model further revealed that cognitive emotion regulation strategies, family support index, and academic ranking were the main factors affecting the fear of negative evaluation among college students. Conclusions Cognitive emotion regulation strategies are key factors influencing fear of negative evaluation among college students. Universities should provide enhanced mental health resources, offer training to strengthen cognitive emotion regulation strategies, and offer additional support to students with low family support.
- Fear /
- Mental health /
- Models /
- Structural /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

图 1 大学生负面评价恐惧影响因素的%IncMSE重要性排序

Figure 1. %IncMSE importance ranking of factors affecting college students' fear of negative evaluation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 大学生负面评价恐惧影响因素的节点纯度重要性排序

Figure 2. Node purity importance ranking of factors affecting college student's fear of negative evaluation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同组别大学生负面评价高低分组分布比较

Table 1. Comparison of high and low scores of negative evaluation among college students in different groups

组别	选项	人数	高分组	低分组	χ²值	组别	选项	人数	高分组	低分组	χ²值
性别	男	1 610	982(60.99)	628(39.01)	14.44^**	家庭类型	核心家庭	2 009	1 120(56.00)	880(44.00)	9.26
	女	3 917	2 171(55.43)	1 746(44.57)			大家庭	320	196(61.25)	124(38.75)
学历	专科	1 065	526(49.39)	539(50.61)	38.31^**		单亲家庭	50	30(60.00)	20(40.00)
	本科	3 786	2 252(59.48)	1 534(40.52)			联合家庭	91	52(57.14)	39(42.86)
	研究生及以上	676	375(55.47)	301(44.53)			重组家庭	100	69(69.00)	31(31.00)
居住地	城镇	2 900	2 268(78.21)	632(21.79)	1.42		隔代家庭	2 966	1 686(56.84)	1 280(43.16)
	农村	2 627	885(33.69)	1 742(66.31)		家庭教养方式	严格	1 331	749(56.27)	582(43.73)	72.95^**
独生子女	是	717	421(58.72)	296(41.28)	0.94		溺爱	92	63(68.48)	29(31.52)
	否	4 810	2 732(56.80)	2 078(43.20)			漠不关心	218	150(68.81)	68(31.19)
学习成绩排名	排名前十	793	408(51.45)	385(48.55)	41.68^**		粗暴	22	16(72.73)	6(27.27)
	中等偏上	1 264	682(53.96)	582(46.04)			变化无常	386	284(73.58)	102(26.42)
	中等	2 643	1 522(57.59)	1 121(42.41)			温暖	3 478	1 891(54.37)	1 587(45.63)
	中等偏下	619	415(67.04)	204(32.96)		家庭人均月	＞6 000	696	382(54.89)	314(45.11)	2.74
	倒数后十	208	126(60.58)	82(39.42)		收入/元	4 000~6 000	1 160	672(57.93)	488(42.07)
运动频率	频繁	1 974	1 001(50.71)	973(49.29)	82.51^**		2 000~＜4 000	1 917	1 081(56.39)	836(43.61)
	经常	2 454	1 409(57.42)	1 045(42.58)			＜2 000	1 754	1 018(58.04)	736(41.96)
	几乎不	1 099	743(67.61)	356(32.39)		认知情绪调节	适应性	3 445	1 216(35.30)	2 229(64.70)	753.80^**
睡眠情况	良好	3 170	1 584(49.97)	1 586(50.03)	160.40^**	策略	非适应性	2 082	1 937(93.04)	145(6.96)
	一般	2 284	1 365(59.76)	919(40.24)		家庭关怀度	重度障碍	584	345(59.08)	239(40.92)	263.20^**
	差	273	204(74.73)	69(25.27)		指数	轻度障碍	2 397	1 643(68.54)	754(31.46)
是否有留守	是	2 148	1 318(61.36)	830(38.64)	26.66^**		功能良好	2 546	1 165(45.76)	1 381(54.24)
经历	否	3 379	1 835(54.31)	1 544(45.69)
注： ()内数字为构成比/%，^**P < 0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(21)

[1]	MORRISON A S, GOLDIN P R, GROSS J J. Fear of negative and positive evaluation as mediators and moderators of treatment outcome in social anxiety disorder[J]. J Anxiety Disord, 2024, 104: 102874. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102874
[2]	叶贝, 李丹, 代同同, 等. 青少年早期负面评价恐惧的发展轨迹及其影响因素[J]. 心理科学, 2019, 42(1): 62-67. YE B, LI D, DAI T T, et al. Developmental trajectories and influencing factors of fear of negative evaluation in early adolescence[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2019, 42(1): 62-67. (in Chinese)
[3]	THUNNISSEN M R, DE JONG P J, RIJKEBOER M M, et al. Interventions targeting negative mental imagery in social anxiety: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of characteristics and outcomes[J]. Clin Psychol Psychoth, 2024, 31(3): e2996. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2996
[4]	CAVICCHIOLI M, SCALABRINI A, NORTHOFF G, et al. Dissociation and emotion regulation strategies: a Meta-analytic review[J]. J Psychiatr Res, 2021, 143: 370-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.011
[5]	ZHU P, LIU X, SHANG X, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for quality of life, psychological distress, and cognitive emotion regulation strategies in patients with breast cancer under early chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Holist Nurs Pract, 2023, 37(3): 131-142. doi: 10.1097/HNP.0000000000000580
[6]	JAZAIERI H, MORRISON A S, GOLDIN P R, et al. The role of emotion and emotion regulation in social anxiety disorder[J]. Curr Psychiatry Rep, 2015, 17(1): 531. doi: 10.1007/s11920-014-0531-3
[7]	徐扬, 刘海燕, 刘慧敏. 大学生社交焦虑和手机成瘾的关系: 科技侵扰和负面评价恐惧的并行中介作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2024, 32(6): 926-933. XU Y, LIU H Y, LIU H M. Parallel mediating role of technology intrusion and fear of negative evaluation in the relationship between social anxiety and smartphone addiction of college students[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2024, 32(6): 926-933. (in Chinese)
[8]	邹艳辉, 王晖. 我国家庭发展及特殊家庭类型研究[J]. 人口与健康, 2019(3): 37-42. ZOU Y H, WANG H. Research on family development and special family types in China[J]. Popul Health, 2019(3): 37-42. (in Chinese)
[9]	PITARCH M J. Brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale-Straightforward Items (BFNE-S): psychometric properties in a Spanish population[J]. Span J Psychol, 2010, 13(2): 981-989. doi: 10.1017/S1138741600002626
[10]	占萍萍, 古静静, 王金良. 父母教养方式类型与青少年网络成瘾的关系: 认知情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 776-783. ZHAN P P, GU J J, WANG J L. The relationship between types of parenting styles and adolescent Internet addiction: the mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies[J]. Res Psychol Behav, 2023, 21(6): 776-783. (in Chinese)
[11]	闫纪霞, 刘林霞, 史培培, 等. 大学生攻击性行为潜在类别与家庭关怀度和生命意义感的相关性[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(12): 1817-1821. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.014 YAN J X, LIU L X, SHI P P, et al. The correlation between potential categories of aggressive behavior among college students, family care, and sense of meaning in life[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(12): 1817-1821. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.014
[12]	HU L, LI L. Using tree-based machine learning for health studies: literature review and case series[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(23): 16080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316080
[13]	HEERMAN W J, SOMMER E C, QI A, et al. Evaluating dose delivered of a behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention: a secondary analysis[J]. BMC Public Health, 2020, 20(1): 885. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09020-w
[14]	彭顺, 汪夏, 牛更枫, 等. 负面评价恐惧对社交焦虑的影响: 基于社交焦虑的认知行为模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 121-128. PENG S, WANG X, NIU G F, et al. Fear of negative evaluation on social anxiety: base on cognitive behavioral model of social anxiety disorder[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2019, 35(1): 121-128. (in Chinese)
[15]	史敬怡, 韦欣雨, 王礼军. 负面评价恐惧与大学生容貌焦虑的关系: 功能失调性态度的中介作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2023, 31(12): 1898-1903. SHI J Y, WEI X Y, WANG L J. Relationship between fear of negative evaluation and appearance anxiety among college students: the mediating role of dysfunctional attitude[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2023, 31(12): 1898-1903. (in Chinese)
[16]	GROSS J J, JOHN O P. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2003, 85(2): 348-362. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
[17]	GELKOPF M, BERGER R, BLEICH A, et al. Protective factors and predictors of vulnerability to chronic stress: a comparative study of 4 communities after 7 years of continous rocket fire[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2012, 74(5): 757-766. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.022
[18]	袁坤, 罗艳艳, 叶林, 等. 非适应性认知情绪调节策略对研究生心理脆弱的影响: 心理资本的中介作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2022, 30(4): 596-601. YUAN K, LUO Y Y, YE L, et al. Influence of non-adaptive cognitive emotion regulation on mental vulnerability of master postgraduates: mediating role of psychological capital[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2022, 30(4): 596-601. (in Chinese)
[19]	何桂华, 黄财英. 大学生自我接纳与家庭关怀度的相关研究[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2009, 17(5): 582-584. HE G H, HUANG C Y. The relationship between college students' self-acceptance and their familial caring degrees[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2009, 17(5): 582-584. (in Chinese)
[20]	艾春燕, 王玲莉, 杨钰立, 等. 少数民族大学生性格优势在家庭关怀与生活满意度间的中介作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2020, 28(5): 788-792. AI C Y, WANG L L, YANG Y L, et al. The mediating role of character strengths in the relationship between family care and life satisfaction among ethnic minority college students[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2020, 28(5): 788-792. (in Chinese)
[21]	FARMAKOPOULOU I, LEKKA M, GKINTONI E. Clinical symptomatology of anxiety and family function in adolescents: the self-esteem mediator[J]. Children (Basel), 2024, 11(3): 338.