泸州市小学生防性侵知识态度行为现状及相关因素分析

李茂; 陈小雪; 杨文秀; 徐思佳; 廖茂旭; 张容; 叶运莉

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024340

泸州市小学生防性侵知识态度行为现状及相关因素分析

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024340

1.
西南医科大学公共卫生学院, 四川泸州 646000
2.
西南医科大学信息与教育技术中心

基金项目:

四川省性社会学与性教育研究中心一般项目 SXJYB2303

四川省教育厅人文社会科学重点研究基地—统筹城乡教育发展研究中心一般课题项目(家校合作式农村地区留守儿童防性侵教育模式探索) TCCXJY-2024-B16

西南医科大学大学生创新创业训练计划国家级项目 202410632070

详细信息

作者简介:
李茂(1995-), 女, 四川泸州人, 硕士, 助教, 主要研究方向为儿童性教育

通讯作者:
叶运莉, E-mail: wushuangyewu@163.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: R179 R167 G479
计量
- 文章访问数: 204
- HTML全文浏览量: 74
- PDF下载量: 39
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-08-20
- 修回日期: 2024-11-03
- 网络出版日期: 2024-12-10
- 刊出日期: 2024-11-15

Analysis of the current situation and related factors of the knowledge, behavior and educational attitude of sexual abuse prevention among primary school students in Luzhou City

1.
School of Public Health, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou (646000), Sichuan Province, China

摘要

摘要: 目的了解四川省泸州市小学生防性侵知识、行为和防性侵教育态度现状及其相关因素，为开展小学生防性侵教育提供参考依据。方法 2023年12月—2024年1月，采用分层整群随机抽样方法抽取泸州市4 563名小学生，并开展自填式问卷调查。使用二元Logistic回归分析小学生防性侵知识、行为和防性侵教育态度相关因素。结果泸州市小学生防性侵知识、行为、防性侵教育态度合格率分别为76.2%，21.3%和90.2%。二元Logistic回归分析结果显示，性别为男(OR=0.66，95%CI=0.56~0.78)、就读于农村学校(OR=0.77，95%CI=0.64~0.92)、留守状态(OR=0.66，95%CI=0.53~0.81)、户籍地为泸县(OR=0.57，95%CI=0.46~0.70)和古蔺县(OR=0.70，95%CI=0.57~0.86)的小学生防性侵知识合格率较低，而小学生年级增长与防性侵知识合格呈正相关(OR=3.05~18.81)(P值均＜0.05)；就读于农村学校(OR=0.82，95%CI=0.70~0.95)和未接受过防性侵教育(OR=0.55，95%CI=0.47~0.64)的小学生防性侵行为合格率较低(P值均＜0.05)；户籍地为泸县(OR=0.73，95%CI=0.58~0.92)和未接受防性侵教育(OR=0.33，95%CI=0.26~0.40)的小学生防性侵教育态度合格率较低(P值均＜0.05)。结论泸州市小学生防性侵知识和行为合格率有待提升，学校和家庭应根据相关因素开展针对性防性侵教育，以提高小学生防性侵意识和技能。
- 性犯罪 /
- 健康知识, 态度, 实践 /
- 回归分析 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To assess the current situation and related factors of the knowledge, attitude and behavior toward sexual abuse prevention among primary school students in Luzhou City, Sichuan Province, so as to provide a reference basis for the development of sexual abuse prevention education for primary school students. Methods A total of 4 563 primary school students in Luzhou City were sampled from December 2023 to January 2024 by stratified cluster sampling, and self-administered questionnaires were conducted. The binary Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze related factors of the knowledge, attitude and behavior toward sexual abuse prevention. Results The qualified rates of knowledge, behavior and attitude among primary school students towards sexual abuse prevention in Luzhou were 76.2%, 21.3%, and 90.2%, respectively. The binary Logistic regression showed that males (OR=0.66, 95%CI=0.56-0.78), attending rural schools (OR=0.77, 95%CI=0.64-0.92), left-behind status (OR=0.66, 95%CI=0.53-0.81), and household registration in Lu County (OR=0.57, 95%CI=0.46-0.70) and Gulin County (OR=0.70, 95%CI=0.57-0.86) had lower qualified rates of the knowledge of sexual abuse prevention among primary school students (P < 0.05); while qualified knowledge of sexual abuse prevention was positively associated with grade (OR=3.05-18.81); attending rural schools (OR=0.82, 95%CI=0.70-0.95) and not having received education on prevention of sexual abuse (OR=0.55, 95%CI=0.47-0.64) had lower qualified rates of the behavior of sexual abuse prevention among primary school students (P < 0.05); household registration in Lu County (OR=0.73, 95%CI=0.58-0.92) and not having received education on prevention of sexual abuse (OR=0.33, 95%CI=0.26-0.40) had lower qualified rates of the educational attitudes of sexual abuse prevention among primary school students (P < 0.05). Conclusions The qualified rates of knowledge and behavior of sexual abuse prevention among primary school students in Luzhou City needs to be improved. Health education regarding sexual abuse prevention might help enhance primary school students' awareness and skills of sexual abuse prevention.
- Sex offenses /
- Health knowledge, attitudes, practice /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 不同组别小学生防性侵知识、行为和防性侵教育态度合格率比较

Table 1. Comparison of qualified rates for knowledge, behavior and educational attitude of sexual abuse prevention among primary school students in different groups

组别	选项	人数	防性侵知识			防性侵行为			防性侵教育态度
组别	选项	人数	合格人数	χ²/χ_趋势²值	P值	合格人数	χ²/χ_趋势²值	P值	合格人数	χ²/χ_趋势²值	P值
户籍地	江阳区	2 156	1 719(79.7)	33.84	＜0.01	469(21.7)	2.77	0.25	1 962(91.0)	12.57	＜0.01
	泸县	1 200	851(70.9)			236(19.7)			1 051(87.6)
	古蔺县	1 207	905(75.0)			268(22.2)			1 102(91.3)
学校类型	城市	2 752	2 164(78.6)	22.93	＜0.01	631(22.9)	10.55	＜0.01	2 514(91.4)	10.13	＜0.01
	农村	1 811	1 311(72.4)			342(18.9)			1 601(88.5)
年级^b	一	543	184(33.9)	824.45	＜0.01	107(19.7)	8.48	0.13	487(89.7)	3.52	0.62
	二	719	445(61.9)			159(22.1)			650(90.4)
	三	742	599(80.7)			165(22.2)			665(89.6)
	四	801	675(84.3)			169(21.1)			734(91.6)
	五	836	736(88.0)			200(23.9)			745(89.1)
	六	922	836(90.7)			173(18.8)			834(90.5)
性别^a	男	2 308	1 692(73.3)	21.58	＜0.01	466(20.2)	3.24	0.72	2 083(90.3)	0.04	0.84
	女	2 164	1 716(79.3)			485(22.4)			1 951(90.1)
家庭结构类型	原生家庭	3 768	2 899(76.9)	7.28	0.03	813(21.6)	1.04	0.59	3 413(90.6)	5.95	0.05
	重组家庭	401	290(72.3)			78(19.5)			348(86.8)
	单亲家庭	394	286(72.6)			82(20.8)			354(89.8)
家庭经济水平^a	好	968	659(68.1)	82.99	＜0.01	233(24.1)	5.40	0.07	871(90.1)	1.00	0.61
	中等	2 914	2 354(80.8)			609(20.9)			2 634(90.4)
	不好	316	212(67.1)			61(19.3)			280(88.6)
是否留守儿童^a	否	3 714	2 903(78.2)	45.10	＜0.01	799(21.5)	0.42	0.52	3 354(90.3)	0.35	0.55
	是	839	564(67.2)			172(20.5)			752(89.6)
是否接受防性侵	是	2 494	1 893(75.9)	0.20	0.66	644(25.8)	66.34	＜0.01	2 359(94.6)	120.55	＜0.01
教育	否	2 069	1 582(76.5)			329(15.9)			1 756(84.9)
注： ()内数字为合格率/%；^a表示数据存在缺失，^b表示趋势χ²检验。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 小学生防性侵知识多因素Logistic回归分析(n=4 563)

Table 2. Multifactorial Logistic regression analysis of the knowledge of sexual abuse prevention among primary school students (n=4 563)

自变量	选项	β值	标准误	Wald χ²值	P值	OR值(95%CI)
性别	女					1.00
	男	-0.41	0.08	23.74	＜0.01	0.66(0.56~0.78)
学校类型	城市					1.00
	农村	-0.26	0.09	8.73	＜0.01	0.77(0.64~0.92)
留守	否					1.00
	是	-0.42	0.11	15.13	＜0.01	0.66(0.53~0.81)
户籍地	江阳区					1.00
	泸县	-0.56	0.11	27.92	＜0.01	0.57(0.46~0.70)
	古蔺县	-0.36	0.10	11.99	＜0.01	0.70(0.57~0.86)
年级	一					1.00
	二	1.11	0.13	77.08	＜0.01	3.05(2.38~3.90)
	三	2.14	0.14	230.76	＜0.01	8.53(6.47~11.24)
	四	2.56	0.16	268.78	＜0.01	12.85(9.47~17.44)
	五	2.80	0.16	305.58	＜0.01	16.37(11.96~22.39)
	六	2.93	0.16	341.12	＜0.01	18.81(13.78~25.68)

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(26)

[1]	GEWIRTZ-MEYDAN A, LAHAV Y. Sexual functioning among chil-dhood sexual abuse survivors from an attachment perspective[J]. J Sex Med, 2020, 17(7): 1370-1382. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.03.014
[2]	ZAHRAK K R, FARBOD A F E, FARIDEH F K. Significance of knowledge in children on self-protection of sexual abuse: a systematic review[J]. Iran J Public Health, 2002, 51(8): 1755-1765.
[3]	BOYE N E Q. Self-harm among school-going adolescent survivors of sexual violence victimisation: a cross-sectional study[J]. Front Soc, 2021, 6(2): 605865.
[4]	於珊珊, 王撬撬, 苏燕, 等. 儿童性侵害的影响、成因与预防对策[J]. 科教文汇(上旬刊), 2020(16): 159-160. YU S S, WANG Q Q, SU Y, et al. The influence, causes and preventive measures of children's sexual abuse[J]. J Sci Educ(Early), 2020(16): 159-160. (in Chinese)
[5]	北京众一公益基金会与中国少年儿童文化艺术基金会女童保护基金. "女童保护"2023年性侵儿童案例统计分析报告[EB/OL]. (2024-05-18)[2024-08-16]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/ayk0PVENDo8rbIaN79C9Yw. Beijing Zhongyi Public Welfare Foundation and China Children and Youth Culture and Art Foundation Girls' Protection Fund. Girl Child Protection 2023 statistical analysis of child sexual abuse cases[EB/OL]. (2024-05-18)[2024-08-16]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/ayk0PVENDo8rbIaN79C9Yw. (in Chinese)
[6]	王曼伊. 小组工作介入农村留守儿童预防性侵害教育问题研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃政法大学, 2023. WANG M Y. Research on the intervention of group social work in the prevention of sexual assault for left-behind children in rural[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu University of Political Science and Law, 2023. (in Chinese)
[7]	杜毓倩. 小学高年级学生性教育现状研究[D]. 太原: 山西师范大学, 2023. DU Y Q. Research on sex education of senior students in primary school[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi Normal University, 2023. (in Chinese)
[8]	鲁露, 张潇, 宋先秦, 等. 泸州市农村幼儿防性侵教育开展现况分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2023, 39(8): 1018-1023. LU L, ZHANG X, SONG X Q, et al. Early childhood education on sexual assault prevention: an online survey among parents/caregivers of young children in rural kindergartens of Luzhou City[J]. Chin J Public Health, 2023, 39(8): 1018-1023. (in Chinese)
[9]	刘芝伯, 叶运莉, 廖茂旭, 等. 泸州市农村家庭防性侵幼儿教育开展现况及相关因素分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(10): 1516-1519. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.10.018 LIU Z B, YE Y L, LIAO M X, et al. Current situation and related factors of family-based child sexual abuse prevention education in rural areas of Luzhou[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(10): 1516-1519. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.10.018
[10]	卓俊. 农村小学低年级学生的性教育问题研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江大学, 2023. ZHUO J. Research on sex education of junior students in rural primary schools[D]. Harbing: Heilongjiang University, 2023. (in Chinese)
[11]	UNESCO. International technical guidance on sexuality education(revised edition)[Z]. Paris: UNESCO, 2018.
[12]	訾桂玲, 王淼, 李瑞, 等. 2019年与2021年天津市河西区居民健康素养比较及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学论坛, 2024, 30(6): 437-441. ZI G L, WANG M, LI R, et al. Comparaion on status and influencing factors of health literacy among residents in Hexi district, Tianjin City, 2019 and 2021[J]. Prev Med Trib, 2024, 30(6): 437-441. (in Chinese)
[13]	王冰, 李莎, 李国民, 等. 乡村振兴背景下农村留守儿童心理健康状况调查及云服务平台构建[J]. 辽宁教育, 2024(2): 48-52. WANG B, LI S, LI G M, et al. Survey on the mental health status of rural left-behind children in the context of rural revitalization and construction of a cloud service platform[J]. Liaoning Educ, 2024(2): 48-52. (in Chinese)
[14]	陆芳, 翟友华. 农村单亲家庭的亲子沟通: 基于儿童特点的家庭教育指导[J]. 盐城师范学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 43(6): 57-68. LU F, ZHAI Y H. Parent-child communication in rural single-parent families: guidance on family education based on children's personal traits[J]. J Yancheng Teach Univ(Humanit Soc Sci Edit), 2023, 43(6): 57-68. (in Chinese)
[15]	董蔚然, 钟景迅. 不同家庭结构对农村留守儿童自我效能感的影响研究: 以广东省15个县域107所乡村学校留守儿童为例[J]. 教育导刊, 2023(7): 86-96. DONG W R, ZHONG J X. A study on the influence of different family structures on the self-efficacy of rural left-behind children: a case study of rural schools in 15 counties in Guangdong Province[J]. J Educ Dev, 2023(7): 86-96. (in Chinese)
[16]	陆霜, 杜美玲. 儿童远离重组家庭虐待的法律探讨: 以曲某某、于某某故意伤害案为例[J]. 法制博览, 2023(27): 94-96. LU S, DU M L. Legal discussion on children's staying away from abuse in reorganized families: taking the case of intentional injury by Qu and Yu as an example[J]. Legal Vision, 2023(27): 94-96. (in Chinese)
[17]	全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 中华人民共和国未成年人保护法[EB/OL]. (2020-10-17)[2024-08-16]. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c2/c30834/202010/t20201017_308279.html. Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. Law of the People's Republic of China on the protection of minors[EB/OL]. (2020-10-17)[2024-08-16]. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c2/c30834/202010/t20201017_308279.html. (in Chinese)
[18]	邵丽晶. 我国农村留守中学生性侵犯发生现状及影响因素研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉科技大学, 2021. SHAO L J. Study on the prevalence and influencing factors of sexual abuse among rural left-behind middle school children in China[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University Science Technology, 2021. (in Chinese)
[19]	PAPALIA N, LUEBBERS S, OGLOFF J R P. Child sexual abuse and the propensity to engage in criminal behaviour: a critical review and examination of moderating factors[J]. Aggress Violence Behav, 2018(43): 71-89.
[20]	易子涵, 陈秋月, 赵丹, 等. 小学生防性侵教育现状及其实施策略[J]. 中国性科学, 2020, 29(6): 154-157. YI Z H, CHEN Q Y, ZHAO D, et al. The present situation and strategies of child sexual assault prevention education in primary schools[J]. Chin J Hum Sex, 2020, 29(6): 154-157. (in Chinese)
[21]	李艳明. 吉林市单亲家庭青少年性教育现状的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2014, 22(12): 1340-1342. LI Y M. Research on sexual education about single-parent family adolescents in Jilin City[J]. Chin J Child Health Care, 2014, 22(12): 1340-1342. (in Chinese)
[22]	庄茂华. 不同家庭类型对孩子问题行为的影响分析[J]. 黑河教育, 2022(7): 6-7. ZHUANG M H. Analysis of the effects of different family types on children's problem behaviors[J]. Heihe Educ, 2022(7): 6-7. (in Chinese)
[23]	刘娅, 杨靖, 张容, 等. 农村地区幼儿教师开展幼儿性教育现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2023, 40(5): 673-676. LIU Y, YANG J, ZHANG R, et al. Analysis on the current situation and influencing factors of sex education for preschool teachers in rural areas[J]. Chin J Health Stat, 2023, 40(5): 673-676. (in Chinese)
[24]	闫润, 夏华, 叶运莉. 幼儿性教育课程对大班幼儿知信行的干预效果评价[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2023, 44(10): 1501-1504. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.10.014 YAN R, XIA H, YE Y L. Effectiveness of sex education curriculum on sex-related knowledge, attitude and practice of preschool children in senior class[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2023, 44(10): 1501-1504. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.10.014
[25]	李沛瑶. 预防幼儿性侵安全教育的调查研究[D]. 鞍山: 鞍山师范学院, 2023. LI P Y. Investigation and study on safety education of children's sexual aggression prevention[D]. Anshan: Anshan Normal University, 2023. (in Chinese)
[26]	林欣亭. 教育戏剧应用于小学生命教育的行动研究: 以性侵害预防主题为例[D]. 漳州: 闽南师范大学, 2024. LIN X T. Action research on the application of educational drama in primary school life education: taking the topic of sexual assault prevention as an example[D]. Zhangzhou: Minnan Normal University, 2024. (in Chinese)