中国《幼儿园教师性教育专业标准》的初步构建

李佳洋; 刘文利; 李依洋

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024336

中国《幼儿园教师性教育专业标准》的初步构建

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024336

李佳洋¹,
刘文利^{1, 2, ,},
李依洋³

1.
北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心, 北京 100875
2.
北京师范大学心理学部认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室
3.
北京师范大学教育学部

基金项目:

科技部外国文教专家项目 GDW20181100039

联合国教科文组织项目 324028040

北京师范大学项目 2020SKZZ01

详细信息

作者简介:
李佳洋(1982-), 女, 中国澳门人, 博士, 主要研究方向为儿童发展、儿童性教育及家庭亲子教育

通讯作者:
刘文利, E-mail: liuwenli@bnu.edu.cn

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G40 R167 G451
计量
- 文章访问数: 214
- HTML全文浏览量: 97
- PDF下载量: 16
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-05-09
- 修回日期: 2024-10-21
- 网络出版日期: 2024-12-10
- 刊出日期: 2024-11-15

Preliminary construction of Professional Standards for Sexuality Education Teachers in Kindergarten in China

LI Jiayang¹,
LIU Wenli^{1, 2
, ,},
LI Yiyang³

1.
Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing (100875), China

摘要

摘要: 目的构建中国《幼儿园教师性教育专业标准》，为加强幼儿园性教育教师队伍的建设、推进幼儿园性教育的顺利开展提供依据。方法依据《幼儿园教师专业标准(试行)》，结合国内外性教育领域已有的研究成果和实践成果以及中国幼儿园性教育发展现状，选取中国《幼儿园教师性教育专业标准》的各级指标及具体内容。2021年9月，采用2轮次的德尔菲专家咨询法，征集中国性教育领域内34位专家的建议，根据专家评定的重要性得分和具体建议对专业标准进行修改，直至专家意见趋于一致。最后，运用层次分析法，依据专家评定的同一层级每2个指标之间的相对重要性，为各个层级每项指标赋予权重。结果初步构建中国《幼儿园教师性教育专业标准》，包括3个一级指标(专业理念、专业能力、专业知识)、7个二级指标和27个三级指标。2轮咨询问卷回收率均为100%，专家积极性较高；2轮专家咨询的权威系数均>0.70，咨询结果可靠；专业理念、专业知识和专业能力3个维度的指标权重分别为0.44，0.32和0.25。结论经专家咨询构建的中国《幼儿园教师性教育专业标准》内容完整，确定了幼儿园教师从事性教育工作的最低合格标准。
- 性教育 /
- 参考标准 /
- 德尔菲技术 /
- 卫生保健辅助人员
Abstract: Objective To establish the Professional Standards for Sexuality Education Teachers in Kindergarten in China, so as to provide a basis for strengthening the construction of the sexuality education teacher team in kindergartens and promoting the smooth implementation of sexuality education in kindergartens. Methods According to the Professional Standards for Kindergarten Teachers (Trial), combined with the existing research and practice results in the field of sexuality education at home and abroad and the development status of kindergarten sexuality education in China, the indicators and specific contents of Professional Standards for Sexuality Education Teachers in Kindergarten in China were selected. In September 2021, two rounds of Delphi expert consultation method were adopted to collect suggestions on professional standards from 34 experts in the field of sexuality education in China, and modifications were made according to the importance scores assessed by experts and specific suggestions until expert opinions converged. Then, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to assign weights to each indicator at each level, based on the relative importance between each two indicators at the same level as assessed by experts. Results The Professional Standards for Sexuality Education Teachers in Kindergarten in China were initially established, including 3 primary indexes (professional concept, professional ability and professional knowledge), 7 secondary indexes and 27 tertiary indexes. The recovery rate of the two rounds of consultation documents was 100%, indicating that the experts were highly motivated. The authority coefficient of 2 rounds of expert consultation were both greater than 0.70, proving that the consultation results were reliable. The index weights of the three dimensions of professional concept, professional knowledge and professional ability were 0.44, 0.32 and 0.25, respectively. Conclusion The content of the Professional Standards for Sexuality Education Teachers in Kindergarten in China is complete, and the minimum qualified standard for kindergarten teachers engaged in sexuality education is determined.
- Sex education /
- Reference standards /
- Delphi technique /
- Allied health presonnel
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 《性教育专业标准》分类指标、一级指标及二级指标专家权威程度系数

Table 1. Expert authority coefficient of classification index, primary index and second index of Professional Standards for Sexuality Education

指标	Ca值	Cs值	Cr值	专家权威程度平均值
分类指标
内在素质	0.70	0.85	0.78	0.76
外在表现	0.66	0.84	0.75
一级指标
专业理念	0.70	0.85	0.77	0.77
专业知识	0.66	0.84	0.75
专业发展	0.66	0.79	0.73
教学能力	0.70	0.86	0.78
管理能力	0.71	0.91	0.81
实施能力	0.73	0.84	0.78
二级指标
职业信念和认同	0.66	0.85	0.76	0.76
工作态度与行为	0.71	0.9	0.81
个人修养与行为	0.72	0.85	0.79
教育知识	0.64	0.82	0.73
学科知识	0.70	0.81	0.76
教学技能与通识	0.70	0.80	0.75
生涯规划	0.65	0.77	0.71
反思与发展	0.70	0.84	0.77
科研能力	0.60	0.74	0.67
教学设计	0.69	0.86	0.77
教学实施	0.73	0.86	0.79
教学评价	0.71	0.83	0.77
课堂管理	0.73	0.87	0.80
幼儿活动管理	0.74	0.82	0.78
教学资源管理	0.70	0.81	0.75
师幼沟通	0.68	0.84	0.76
家园合作	0.72	0.88	0.80
获取支持	0.68	0.82	0.75

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 《性教育专业标准》一、二级指标权重

Table 2. Weights of indicators at one and two level of Professional Standards for Sexuality Education

一级指标	二级指标	权重
专业理念		0.44
	性教育理念	0.18
	对幼儿的态度与行为	0.18
	反思与专业发展	0.08
专业知识		0.32
	幼儿性教育知识	0.32
专业能力		0.25
	性教育资源及环境的创设与利用	0.05
	性教育活动的计划与实施	0.10
	性教育的沟通与合作	0.10

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(21)

[1]	全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 中华人民共和国未成年人保护法[EB/OL]. (2020-10-17)[2024-01-02]. https://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c2/c30834/2020-10/t20201017_308279.html. Standing Committee of the NPC. Law of the PRC on the protection of minors[EB/OL]. (2020-10-17)[2024-01-02]. https://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c2/c30834/2020-10/t20201017_308279.html. (in Chinese)
[2]	李雨朦, 刘文利. 中国基础教育阶段性教育教师队伍现状及建设建议[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(12): 1766-1770. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.002 LI Y M, LIU W L. Current situation and constructive suggestions for basic sexuality education teachers in China[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(12): 1766-1770. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.002
[3]	刘文利, 李佳洋. 中国学校性教育开展现状与对策[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(12): 1761-1765, 1770. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.001 LIU W L, LI J Y. Issues and challenges of school-based sexuality education in China[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(12): 1761-1765, 1770. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.001
[4]	芦咏莉, 申继亮. 教师评价[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2012: 37-41. LU Y L, SHEN J L. Teacher evaluation[M]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press, 2012: 37-41. (in Chinese)
[5]	中华人民共和国教育部关于印发《幼儿园教师专业标准(试行)》《小学教师专业标准(试行)》和《中学教师专业标准(试行)》的通知[EB/OL]. (2012-09-13)[2024-04-20]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s6991/201209/t20120913_145603.html. Notice of the Ministry of Education of the PRC on the issuance of Professional Standards for Kindergarten Teachers (trial), Professional Standards for Primary School Teachers (trial) and Professional Standards for Secondary School Teachers (trial)[EB/OL]. (2012-09-13)[2024-04-20]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s6991/201209/t20120913_145603.html. (in Chinese)
[6]	联合国人口基金, 联合国教育、科学及文化组织. 全面性教育技术指南——国际标准在中国的潜在本土化应用(第一版)[M]. 北京: 联合国人口基金, 2022. UNFPA, UNESCO. Comprehensive sexuality education technical guideline adaptation of global standards for potential use in China(Frist edit)[M]. Beijing: UNFPA, 2022. (in Chinese)
[7]	李雨朦. 我国中学性教育教师专业标准的初步构建[D]. 北京: 北京师范大学, 2021. LI Y M. The preliminary construction of professional standards for sexuality education teachers in middle schools in China[D]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University, 2021. (in Chinese)
[8]	樊长军, 张馨, 连宇江, 等. 基于德尔菲法的高校图书馆公共服务能力指标体系构建[J]. 情报杂志, 2011, 30(3): 97-100, 169. FAN C J, ZHANG X, LIAN Y J, et al. The construction of academic library public service index system based on Delphi method[J]. J Intell, 2011, 30(3): 97-100, 169. (in Chinese)
[9]	曹茂林. 层次分析法确定评价指标权重及Excel计算[J]. 江苏科技信息, 2012(2): 39-40. CAO M L. Analytic hierarchy process is used to determine the weight of evaluation indicators and Excel calculation[J]. Jiangsu Sci Technol Inf, 2012(2): 39-40. (in Chinese)
[10]	邓雪, 李家铭, 曾浩健, 等. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(7): 93-100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0984.2012.07.012 DENG X, LI J M, ZENG H J, et al. Research on computation methods of AHP wight vector and its applications[J]. Math Pract Theory, 2012, 42(7): 93-100. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0984.2012.07.012
[11]	王林, 王迎春. 层次分析法在指标权重赋值中的应用[J]. 教学研究, 2002(4): 303-306. WANG L, WANG Y C. The application of analytic hierarchy process in index' weight given value[J]. Res Teach, 2002(4): 303-306. (in Chinese)
[12]	刘莹昕, 刘飒, 王威尧. 层次分析法的权重计算及其应用[J]. 沈阳大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 26(5): 372-375. LIU Y X, LIU S, WANG W Y. Computation of weight in AHP and its application[J]. J Shenyang Univ(Nat Sci), 2014, 26(5): 372-375. (in Chinese)
[13]	刘文利. 儿童性教育: 必须全民高度关注的教育领域[J]. 人民教育, 2013(22): 21-23. LIU W L. Sexuality education for children: an area of education that must be of great concern to all[J]. People's Educ, 2013(22): 21-23. (in Chinese)
[14]	陈佳悦, 郭凌风, 刘文利. 全面性教育视角下中国幼儿园性教育实践的困境与展望[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(12): 1906-1910. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.035 CHEN J Y, GUO L F, LIU W L. Sexuality education in kindergartens in China based on the perspective of comprehensive sexuality education[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(12): 1906-1910. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.035
[15]	罗小璐. 幼儿教师在幼儿园开展性教育的调查研究[J]. 教育观察, 2020, 9(20): 65-67. LUO X L. Investigation and research on sexuality education carried out by preschool teachers in kindergartens[J]. Surv Educ, 2020, 9(20): 65-67. (in Chinese)
[16]	海鹰, 刘天娥. 教师开展幼儿性健康教育的困境与破局[J]. 早期教育, 2021(Z4): 45-50. HAI Y, LIU T E. The difficulties and problems of teachers in carrying out infant sexual health education[J]. Early Educ, 2021(Z4): 45-50. (in Chinese)
[17]	张容, 刘娅, 邹艳莉, 等. 四川省乡镇幼儿园教师对幼儿性教育的态度及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国健康教育, 2020, 36(11): 1049-1052. ZHANG R, LIU Y, ZOU Y L, et al. Analysis on teachers' sexual education attitude and its influencing factors among township kindergartens in Sichuan Province[J]. Chin J Health Educ, 2020, 36(11): 1049-1052. (in Chinese)
[18]	胡芳. 教师专业标准制定的主体、依据和原则[J]. 当代教育科学, 2011, 318(15): 23-25. HU F. The main body, basis and principle of the formulation of teacher professional standards[J]. Contemp Educ Sci, 2011, 318(15): 23-25. (in Chinese)
[19]	World Association for Sexual Health. International standards of practice for sexuality educators and sexual health promotion[R]. Gothenburg: WAS, 2009.
[20]	Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States. National teacher preparation standards for sexuality education[EB/OL]. (2018-07)[2024-08-23]. https://siecus.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/teacher-standards.pdf.
[21]	World Health Organization, Federal Centre for Health Education. Tra-ining matters: a framework for core competencies of sexuality educators[M]. Geneva: WHO, 2017.