上海市中小学教室采光照明现况及监管效果分析

杨艰萍; 林建海; 李萍; 郑朝军; 王亚宁; 刘佳佳; 毛洁

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024176

上海市中小学教室采光照明现况及监管效果分析

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024176

上海市卫生健康委员会监督所，200031

详细信息

作者简介:
杨艰萍(1972-)，女，江苏苏州人，大学本科，主管医师，主要研究方向为学校卫生监督管理

通讯作者:
毛洁，E-mail：maojie0902@sina.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: R179 G627.8 G478.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 294
- HTML全文浏览量: 161
- PDF下载量: 46
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-04-08
- 修回日期: 2024-04-28
- 网络出版日期: 2024-06-27
- 刊出日期: 2024-06-25

Analysis of the current status and regulatory effectiveness of daylighting and artificial lighting in primary and secondary school classrooms in Shanghai

Inspecting Agency, Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, Shanghai (200031), China

摘要

摘要: 目的了解上海市中小学教室采光照明现况及监管效果，为改善学校教室视觉环境提供依据。方法于2021年4月至2023年12月，对上海市正常开设中的全部普通中小学校1 735所进行教室采光照明监测，并计算各指标合格率。采用χ²检验或Fisher确切概率法比较不同学段、区域、办学性质及采取监管措施(包括约谈、宣教、责令改正、发监督意见书、承诺整改期限、依法处罚)前后合格率的差异。结果中小学教室采光照明合格率为30.1%，其中采光合格率85.6%，照明合格率32.9%；小学和中学教室采光照明合格率(32.4%，28.1%)差异无统计学意义(χ²=3.76，P>0.05)，城市与乡镇(32.6%，26.7%)、公办与民办学校(31.4%，20.6%)教室采光照明合格率差异均有统计学意义(χ²值分别为6.99，9.92，P值均＜0.05)。采取监管措施整改后，教室采光照明合格率由30.1%提升至83.2%，其中采光合格率由85.6%提升至91.1%，照明合格率由32.9%提升至90.5%；整改前与整改后比较，教室采光照明合格率、采光合格率和照明合格率差异均有统计学意义(χ²值分别为995.29，25.34，1 219.87，P值均＜0.01)。结论有效的监管措施可促进教室采光照明的改善。应重视改善学校教室照明，为学生提供良好的视觉环境。
- 采光 /
- 合格鉴定 /
- 中小学生卫生保健服务 /
- 环境监测
Abstract: Objective To understand the current situation and regulatory effectiveness of daylighting and artificial lighting in primary and secondary school classrooms in Shanghai, so as to provide a basis for enhancing the visual environment of school classrooms. Methods From April 2021 to December 2023, the daylighting and artificial lighting conditions of classrooms in 1 735 regular primary and secondary schools currently in operation in Shanghai were monitored, and the qualified rate of each indicator was calculated. The Chi-square test or Fisher exact probability method were used to compare the differences in qualification rates across different educational stages, regions, school type, both before and after the implementation of regulatory measures. The regulatory measures included convene interview, propaganda and education, supervision order, supervisory opinion paper, rectification requests and offenses and punishment. Results The qualified rate of daylighting and artificial lighting in primary and secondary school classrooms was 30.1%, with a qualified daylighting rate of 85.6% and a qualified artificial lighting rate of 32.9%. There was no statistically significant differences in the qualified rate of daylighting and artificial lighting in primary and secondary schools (32.4%, 28.1%;χ²=3.76, P > 0.05). However, statistically significant differences were found in the qualified rate of daylighting and artificial lighting in urban and rural school classrooms (32.6%, 26.7%), as well as in public and private schools (31.4%, 20.6%) (χ²=6.99, 9.92, P < 0.05). Following the implementation of regulatory measures, the qualified rate of classroom daylighting and artificial lighting improved from 30.1% to 83.2%, while the respective qualified rates of daylighting and artificial lighting increased from 85.6% to 91.1% and 32.9% to 90.5%. Compared to the pre-implementation period, the qualified rate of classroom daylighting and artificial lighting, as well as the respective rates of daylighting and artificial lighting, all showed statistically significant differences after the implementation of regulatory measures (χ²=995.29, 25.34, 1 219.87, P < 0.01). Conclusions Effective regulatory measures can promote enhanced classroom daylighting and artificial lighting. Attention should be paid to improving classroom artificial lighting, in order to provide students with enhanced visual environment.
- Lighting /
- Eligibility determination /
- School health services /
- Environmental monitoring
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 上海市不同组别中小学教室整改前采光照明合格率比较

Table 1. Comparison of the qualification rates of daylighting and artificial lighting in classrooms of primary and secondary schools in Shanghai City among different groups before the rectification

组别	选项	学校数	统计值	教室采光					教室照明						教室采光照明总体
组别	选项	学校数	统计值	采光方向	窗帘设置	书写板眩光	窗地面积比	总体	书写板局部照明灯	课桌面平均照度	课桌面照度均匀度	书写板平均照度	书写板照度均匀度	总体	教室采光照明总体
学段	小学	816		813(99.6)	802(98.3)	816(100.0)	724(88.7)	710(87.0)	812(99.5)	635(77.8)	589(72.2)	499(61.2)	337(41.3)	286(35.0)	264(32.4)
	中学	919		913(99.3)	915(99.6)	917(99.8)	784(85.3)	776(84.4)	910(99.0)	688(74.9)	669(72.8)	496(54.0)	341(37.1)	285(31.0)	258(28.1)
			χ²值	0.24	6.90	—	4.43	2.32	1.39	2.08	0.08	9.11	3.19	3.19	3.76
			P值	0.62	< 0.01	0.50^*	0.04	0.13	0.24	0.15	0.77	< 0.01	0.07	0.07	0.05
区域	城市	1 004		998(99.4)	995(99.1)	1 002(99.8)	844(84.1)	830(82.7)	997(99.3)	798(79.5)	720(71.7)	625(62.3)	416(41.4)	365(36.4)	327(32.6)
	乡镇	731		728(99.6)	722(98.8)	731(100.0)	664(90.8)	656(89.7)	725(99.2)	525(71.8)	538(73.6)	370(50.6)	262(35.8)	206(28.2)	195(26.7)
			χ²值	0.04	0.46	—	17.05	17.21	0.09	13.72	0.75	23.41	5.56	12.80	6.99
			P值	0.84	0.50	0.51^*	＜0.01	＜0.01	0.77	＜0.01	0.39	＜0.01	0.02	＜0.01	< 0.01
性质	公办	1 531		1 527(99.7)	1 517(99.1)	1 530(99.9)	1 354(88.4)	1 337(87.3)	1 528(99.8)	1 173(76.6)	1 108(72.4)	911(59.5)	602(39.3)	522(34.1)	480(31.4)
	民办	204		199(97.5)	200(98.0)	203(99.5)	154(75.5)	149(73.0)	194(95.1)	150(73.5)	150(73.5)	84(41.2)	76(37.3)	49(24.0)	42(20.6)
			χ²值	12.75	1.04	—	26.54	29.90	47.47	0.95	0.12	24.72	0.32	8.28	9.92
			P值	＜0.01	0.31	0.22^*	＜0.01	＜0.01	＜0.01	0.33	0.73	＜0.01	0.57	< 0.01	< 0.01
注： ()内数字为合格率/%；*采用Fisher确切概率法；教室人工照明合格率均为100%。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 上海市中小学教室采光照明整改前后合格率比较

Table 2. Comparison of the qualification rates of classroom daylighting and artificial lighting in primary and secondary schools in Shanghai City before and after the rectification

组别	学校数	教室采光					教室照明						教室采光照明总体
组别	学校数	采光方向	窗帘设置	书写板眩光	窗地面积比	总体	书写板局部照明灯	课桌面平均照度	课桌面照度均匀度	书写板平均照度	书写板照度均匀度	总体	教室采光照明总体
整改前	1 735	1 726(99.5)	1 717(99.0)	1 733(99.9)	1 508(86.9)	1 486(85.6)	1 722(99.3)	1 323(76.3)	1 258(72.5)	995(57.3)	678(39.1)	571(32.9)	522(30.1)
整改后	1 735	1 733(99.9)	1 733(99.9)	1 735(100.0)	1 584(91.3)	1 581(91.1)	1 735(100.0)	1 684(97.1)	1 660(95.7)	1 622(93.5)	1 583(91.2)	1 571(90.5)	1 443(83.2)
χ²值		4.47	12.87	0.50	17.15	25.34	13.05	324.81	348.14	611.10	1 039.68	1 219.87	995.29
P值		0.04	< 0.01	0.48	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01
注： ()内数字为合格率/%；教室人工照明合格率均为100%。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(19)

[1]	陶芳标. 《儿童青少年近视防控公共卫生综合干预技术指南》专题解读[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2023, 44(10): 1445-1449. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.10.002 TAO F B. Expert interpretation of Comprehensive Public Health Intervention Technical Guidelines for Prevention and Control of Myopia among Children and Adolescents[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2023, 44(10): 1445-1449. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.10.002
[2]	张雅萍, 王丽娟, 张卿, 等. 上海市某社区小学生近视状况及相关因素分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2022, 34(1): 63-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYI202201013.htm ZHANG Y P, WANG L J, ZHANG Q, et al. The prevalence of myopic refractive error and its associated risk factors among primary school students in a community in Shanghai[J]. Shanghai J Prev Med, 2022, 34(1): 63-65. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYI202201013.htm
[3]	朱超, 高希彬. 上海市8~12岁儿童近视相关因素调查分析: 家庭、习惯、环境与运动[J]. 上海教育科研, 2024(1): 56-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJYY202401009.htm ZHU C, GAO X B. Survey and analysis of factors related to myopia in 8-12 year old children in Shanghai: family, habits, environment, and exercise[J]. J Shanghai Educ Res, 2024(1): 56-62. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJYY202401009.htm
[4]	张锡彦, 周永林, 张凤云, 等. 教室环境与学生近视的关联研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2023, 44(4): 598-606. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20220824-00729 ZHANG X Y, ZHOU Y L, ZHANG F Y, et al. The relationship between classroom environment and myopia[J]. Chin J Epidemiol, 2023, 44(4): 598-606. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20220824-00729
[5]	刘忠慧, 徐渴, 孙志颖, 等. 天津市中小学校教室采光照明与学生视力不良的关系[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2021, 42(8): 1228-1232. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.08.025 LIU Z H, XU K, SUN Z Y, et al. Relationship betweeen classroom lighting and poor vision of students in primary and secondary schools in Tianjin[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2021, 42(8): 1228-1232. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.08.025
[6]	中华人民共和国教育部等八部门关于印发《综合防控儿童青少年近视实施方案》的通知[EB/OL]. (2018-08-30)[2024-03-22]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A17/moe_943/s3285/201808/t20180830_346672.html. Ministry of Education of the PRC and other seven departments issuing a notice of Implementation Plan for the Comprehensive Prevention and Control of Myopia in Children and Adolescents[EB/OL]. (2018-08-30)[2024-03-22]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A17/moe_943/s3285/201808/t20180830_346672.html. (in Chinese)
[7]	中华人民共和国教育部. 教育管理信息教育管理基础代码: JY/T 1001—2012[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2012. Ministry of Education of the PRC. Educational management information-educational management general codes: JY/T 1001-2012[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2012. (in Chinese)
[8]	中华人民共和国卫生部. 中小学校教室采光和照明卫生标准: GB 7793—2010[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010. Ministry of Health of the PRC. Hygienic standard for day lighting and artificial lighting for middle and elementary school: GB 7793-2010[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2010. (in Chinese)
[9]	上海市市场监督管理局. 中小学校及幼儿园教室照明设计规范: DB 31/T 539—2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020. Shanghai Municipal Administration for Market Regulation. Specification for lighting design of classrooms in primary and middle schools and kindergartens: DB 31/T 539-2020[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2020. (in Chinese)
[10]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 采光测量方法: GB/T 5699—2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the PRC. Method of daylighting measurements: GB/T 5699-2017[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2017. (in Chinese)
[11]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 照明测量方法: GB/T 5700—2008[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the PRC. Measurement methods for lighting: GB/T 5700-2008[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2008. (in Chinese)
[12]	中华人民共和国教育部, 中华人民共和国卫生部. 学校卫生工作条例[A]. 1990-06-04. Ministry of Education of the PRC, Ministry of Health of the PRC. Regulations on school health work[A]. 1990-06-04. (in Chinese)
[13]	赵金辉, 秦冉, 郭欣, 等. 北京市2017—2020年中小学校环境健康影响因素分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(7): 1100-1103. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.07.033 ZHAO J H, QIN R, GUO X, et al. Associated factors of environmental health in primary and secondary schools in Beijing from 2017 to 2020[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(7): 1100-1103. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.07.033
[14]	潘衍宇, 周贵兰, 沈蕙, 等. 苏州市2019年中小学校教学环境卫生现况[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2019, 40(11): 1709-1711. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.11.031 PAN Y Y, ZHOU G L, SHEN H, et al. Teaching environment of primary middle and high schools in Suzhou during 2019[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2019, 40(11): 1709-1711. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.11.031
[15]	罗清文, 谭晓东. 四川省2017—2021年中小学校教学环境卫生监测结果[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(2): 304-311. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.02.033 LUO Q W, TAN X D. Analysis of health monitoring results in the teaching environment of primary and secondary schools in Sichuan Province from 2017 to 2021[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(2): 304-311. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.02.033
[16]	中华人民共和国国家市场监督管理总局. 中小学校普通教室照明设计安装卫生要求: GB/T 36876—2018[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018. State Administration for Market Regulation of the PRC. Hygienic requirements of lighting design and setting in primary and middle school: GB/T 36876-2018[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2018. (in Chinese)
[17]	曲爽笑, 杨东玲, 黄生垒, 等. 中小学校教学环境及与筛查性近视关联的多水平模型分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2023, 44(8): 1256-1260. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.08.031 QU S X, YANG D L, HUANG S L, et al. Teaching environmental health in primary and secondary schools in Shanghai and its association with screening myopia applying multilevel models[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2023, 44(8): 1256-1260. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.08.031
[18]	国家疾控局综合司关于印发《儿童青少年近视防控公共卫生综合干预技术指南》的通知[EB/OL]. (2023-08-30)[2024-03-22]. https://www.ndcpa.gov.cn/jbkzzx/c100014/common/content/content_1698993133712699392.html#:~:textl. Notice of the Comprehensive Department of the National Bureau of Disease Control and Prevention on issuing the Comprehensive Public Health Intervention Technical Guidelines for Myopia Prevention and Control in Children and Adolescents[EB/OL]. (2023-08-30)[2024-03-22]. https://www.ndcpa.gov.cn/jbkzzx/c100014/common/content/content_1698993133712699392.html#:~:textl. (in Chinese)
[19]	赵金辉, 郭欣, 赵海, 等. 北京市2019年中小学校教学环境卫生监测[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2020, 41(10): 1562-1565. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.10.032 ZHAO J H, GUO X, ZHAO H, et al. Monitoring of teaching environmental health in primary and secondary schools in 2019 in Beijing[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2020, 41(10): 1562-1565. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.10.032