Longitudinal association between mobile phone dependence and depressive symptoms in Yunnan college students
-
摘要:
目的 分析手机依赖与大学生抑郁症状的纵向关联,为大学生心理健康教育提供理论依据。 方法 于2021年11月—2023年6月,采用整群随机抽样方法从云南省2所高校抽取2 515名大一年级学生进行问卷调查,包括基线调查(2021年11月,T1)和3次随访(2022年6月,T2;2022年11月,T3;2023年6月,T4)。应用青少年手机使用依赖自评问卷和抑郁-焦虑-压力量表-21(DASS-21)评估大学生手机依赖情况和抑郁症状;采用χ2检验对抑郁症状检出率进行单因素分析,应用广义估计方程进行手机依赖症状与抑郁症状的关联分析。 结果 云南大学生抑郁症状检出率T1、T2、T3、T4时点分别为23.02%,33.36%,34.79%,35.51%。在时点T1、T2、T3、T4不同自评学习负担,时点T1、T2、T3不同亲密朋友数量,时点T1不同父亲文化程度,时点T2、T4不同母亲文化程度,时点T4不同性别,时点T3、T4不同专业,时点T2、T3、T4不同学历,时点T1、T2不同家庭居住地,时点T1、T2、T4不同自评家庭经济条件的大学生抑郁症状检出率差异均有统计学意义(χ2值分别为59.68,49.38,16.70,39.31;55.35,26.01,16.69;10.22;14.87,11.51;14.90;27.81,50.28;9.75,7.42,24.76;6.06,4.47;15.88,14.58,15.85,P值均<0.05)。在广义估计方程模型控制人口学变量及混杂因素后,手机依赖、手机依赖戒断症状、手机依赖身心影响与抑郁症状均呈正相关(β值分别为0.11,0.14,0.14,P值均<0.01);进一步分性别分析显示,男生和女生的抑郁症状与手机依赖、手机依赖戒断症状、手机依赖身心影响均存在关联(β值分别为0.13,0.13,0.18;0.10,0.13,0.13,P值均<0.01)。 结论 大学生抑郁症状与手机依赖呈正相关,家庭经济条件、学习负担、亲密朋友数量是持续影响抑郁症状的因素。应引导大学生关注手机过度使用对身心健康的影响,合理使用手机,降低大学生抑郁症状发生率。 Abstract:Objective To analyze the longitudinal association between mobile phone dependence and depressive symptoms in college students, so as to provide a theoretical basis for psychological health education among college students. Methods From November 2021 to June 2023, 2 515 first-year students from 2 universities in Yunnan Province were surveyed with a questionnaire by a cluster random sampling method, including baseline survey (November 2021, T1) and three follow-up visits (June 2022, T2; November 2022, T3; June 2023, T4). The Self-rating Questionnaire for Adolescent Problematic Mobile Phone Use and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) were used to evaluate mobile phone dependence and depressive symptoms of college students. The χ2 test was used to analyze the difference in depressive symptoms among different demographic groups, and a generalized estimation equation model was established to analyze the association between mobile phone dependence symptoms and depressive symptoms. Results The detection rates of depressive symptoms among university students in Yunnan Province at time points T1, T2, T3, and T4 were 23.02%, 33.36%, 34.79% and 35.51%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in the detection rates of depressive symptoms among college students with different sacademic burden (T1, T2, T3, T4), different number of close friends (T1, T2, T3), as well as their father's educational level (T1), mother's educational level (T2, T4), gender (T4), major (T3, T4), education (T2, T3, T4), family residency (T1, T2), and family economic conditions (T1, T2, T4) (χ2=59.68, 49.38, 16.70, 39.31; 55.35, 26.01, 16.69; 10.22; 14.87, 11.51; 14.90; 27.81, 50.28; 9.75, 7.42, 24.76; 6.06, 4.47; 15.88, 14.58, 15.85, P<0.05). After controlling for demographic variables and confounding factors in the generalized estimation equation model, mobile phone dependence (β=0.11), withdrawal symptoms of mobile phone dependence (β=0.14), and the physical and mental effects of mobile phone dependence (β=0.14) were all positively correlated with depressive symptoms (P<0.01). Further gender analysis showed that depressive symptoms in both boys (β=0.13, 0.13, 0.18) and girls (β=0.10, 0.13, 0.13) were associated with mobile phone dependence, withdrawal symptoms of mobile phone dependence and the physical and mental effects of mobile phone dependence (P<0.01). Conclusions Depressive symptoms of college students are positively correlated with mobile phone dependence, and family economic conditions, academic burden and number of close friends are factors that continued to affect depressive symptoms. College students should be guided to pay attention to the impact of excessive use of mobile phones on their physical and mental health, use mobile phones reasonably to reduce the incidence of depressive symptoms among college students. -
Key words:
- Cellular phone /
- Behavior, addictive /
- Depression /
- Mental health /
- Students
1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。 -
表 1 不同人口统计学特征大学生抑郁症状检出率比较
Table 1. Comparison of depressive symptoms detection rates among college students with different demographic characteristics
人口学指标 分类 人数 T1 T2 T3 T4 检出人数 χ2值 检出人数 χ2值 检出人数 χ2值 检出人数 χ2值 性别 男 697 164(23.53) 0.14 232(33.29) < 0.01 259(37.16) 2.38 289(41.46) 14.90** 女 1 818 415(22.83) 607(33.39) 616(33.88) 604(33.22) 年龄/岁 17~18 697 142(20.37) 3.83 228(32.71) 0.18 238(34.15) 0.44 248(35.58) 0.08 19~20 1 670 402(24.07) 561(33.59) 588(35.21) 594(35.57) 21~24 148 35(23.65) 50(33.78) 49(33.11) 51(34.46) 民族 汉族 1 810 400(22.10) 3.10 592(32.71) 1.24 622(34.36) 0.52 629(34.75) 1.61 少数民族 705 179(25.39) 247(35.04) 253(35.89) 264(37.45) 专业 工科 266 61(22.93) 9.07 88(33.08) 4.67 91(34.21) 27.81** 101(37.97) 50.28** 管理学 341 87(25.51) 116(34.02) 153(44.87) 151(44.28) 教育学 129 20(15.50) 40(31.01) 42(32.56) 40(31.01) 理学 399 96(24.06) 129(32.33) 146(36.59) 160(40.10) 农学 264 60(22.73) 81(30.68) 89(33.71) 88(33.33) 文学 203 53(26.11) 63(31.03) 71(34.98) 79(38.92) 医学 848 183(21.58) 295(34.79) 254(29.95) 238(28.07) 其他 65 19(29.23) 27(41.54) 29(44.62) 36(55.38) 学历 本科 1 894 429(22.65) 0.60 600(31.68) 9.75** 687(36.27) 7.42* 724(38.23) 24.76** 专科 621 150(24.15) 239(38.49) 188(30.27) 169(27.21) 家庭居住地 农村 2 087 500(23.96) 6.06* 715(34.26) 4.47* 726(34.79) < 0.01 755(36.18) 2.40 城市 428 79(18.46) 124(28.97) 149(34.81) 138(32.24) 独生子女 是 381 80(21.00) 1.04 119(31.23) 0.91 132(34.65) < 0.01 142(37.27) 0.61 否 2 134 499(23.38) 720(33.74) 743(34.82) 751(35.19) 家庭类型 双亲家庭 2 187 513(23.46) 2.62 730(33.38) 0.92 759(34.71) 0.75 767(35.07) 2.65 单亲家庭 171 37(21.65) 53(30.99) 57(33.33) 69(40.35) 组合家庭a 121 21(17.36) 44(36.36) 46(38.02) 46(38.02) 其他 36 8(22.22) 12(33.33) 13(36.11) 11(30.56) 亲密家庭经济条件 差 198 57(28.79) 15.88** 65(32.83) 14.58* 67(33.84) 3.40 89(44.95) 15.85** 较差 600 163(27.17) 235(39.17) 227(37.83) 227(37.83) 中等 1 612 342(21.22) 512(31.76) 547(33.93) 551(34.18) 较好 88 13(14.77) 21(23.86) 28(31.82) 21(23.86) 好 17 4(23.53) 6(35.29) 6(35.29) 5(29.41) 自评学习负担 很重 117 49(41.88) 59.68** 48(41.03) 49.38** 49(41.88) 16.70** 57(48.72) 39.31** 重 872 251(28.78) 362(41.51) 342(39.22) 364(41.74) 一般 1 489 274(18.40) 421(28.27) 471(31.63) 463(31.09) 轻 28 4(14.29) 7(25.00) 10(35.71) 8(28.57) 很轻 9 1(11.11) 1(11.11) 3(33.33) 1(11.11) 亲密朋友数量/个 0 28 17(60.71) 55.35** 15(53.57) 26.01** 14(50.00) 16.69** 12(42.86) 5.82 1~2 317 103(32.49) 136(42.90) 137(43.22) 125(39.43) 3~4 474 129(27.22) 171(36.08) 171(36.08) 180(37.97) ≥5 1 696 330(19.46) 517(30.48) 553(32.61) 576(33.96) 父亲文化程度 文盲 483 135(27.95) 10.22* 188(38.92) 8.64 177(36.65) 3.62 194(40.17) 6.87 小学 622 142(22.83) 202(32.48) 219(35.21) 221(35.53) 初中 926 207(22.35) 299(32.29) 303(32.72) 320(34.56) 高中/中专 321 61(19.00) 100(31.15) 113(35.20) 107(33.33) 大专及以上 163 34(20.86) 50(30.67) 63(38.65) 51(31.29) 母亲文化程度 文盲 840 213(25.36) 7.65 322(38.33) 14.87* 302(35.95) 6.97 335(39.88) 11.51* 小学 597 139(23.28) 180(30.15) 202(33.84) 206(34.51) 初中 725 161(22.21) 230(31.72) 235(32.41) 234(32.28) 高中/中专 242 49(20.25) 76(31.40) 87(35.95) 83(34.30) 大专及以上 111 17(15.32) 31(27.93) 49(44.14) 35(31.53) 父亲职业 公职人员b 136 32(23.53) 6.85 43(31.62) 8.47 55(40.44) 6.32 45(33.09) 8.73 工人 66 8(12.12) 24(36.36) 24(36.36) 22(33.33) 公司职员 110 22(20.00) 30(27.27) 39(35.45) 35(31.82) 商人 1 557 375(24.08) 530(34.04) 543(34.87) 560(35.97) 农民 334 77(23.05) 124(37.13) 122(36.53) 136(40.72) 其他 312 65(20.83) 88(28.21) 92(29.49) 95(30.45) 母亲职业 公职人员b 81 12(14.81) 9.29 21(25.93) 5.99 28(34.57) 1.89 26(32.10) 2.68 工人 67 11(16.42) 21(31.34) 23(34.33) 23(34.33) 公司职员 111 20(18.02) 33(29.73) 43(38.74) 35(31.53) 商人 1 666 409(24.55) 581(34.87) 587(35.23) 601(36.07) 农民 204 45(22.06) 64(31.37) 68(33.33) 78(38.24) 其他 386 82(21.24) 119(30.83) 126(32.64) 130(33.68) 注: ()内数字为检出率/%;*P<0.05,**P<0.01。a有继父或继母,b公务员及事业单位人员;文盲指未上过学。 表 2 大学生手机依赖与抑郁症状的关联(n=2 515)
Table 2. Association of mobile phone dependence with depressive symptoms among college students(n=2 515)
模型 自变量 标准误 β值(95%CI) Wald χ2值 P值 模型1 手机依赖 0.00 0.11(0.11~0.12) 1 956.15 < 0.01 手机依赖戒断症状 0.02 0.14(0.11~0.17) 77.87 < 0.01 手机依赖身心影响 0.02 0.14(0.11~0.18) 56.32 < 0.01 手机依赖渴求性 0.03 0.01(-0.04~0.06) 0.16 0.69 模型2 手机依赖 0.00 0.11(0.10~0.11) 1 792.36 < 0.01 手机依赖戒断症状 0.02 0.14(0.10~0.17) 72.10 < 0.01 手机依赖身心影响 0.02 0.14(0.11~0.18) 59.11 < 0.01 手机依赖渴求性 0.03 0.00(-0.05~0.41) 0.01 0.91 注:模型1,未控制变量;模型2,控制性别、民族、专业分类、学历、家庭居住地、家庭经济条件、朋友数量、父母亲文化程度、喝酒、抽烟、经历过家庭变故、住院经历、考试失败、恋爱失败、抑郁症家族史、身体活动、外卖快餐消费。 表 3 不同性别大学生手机依赖与抑郁症状的关联分析
Table 3. Association between mobile phone dependence and depressive symptoms in college students of different genders
性别 自变量 模型1 模型2 标准误 β值(95%CI) Wald χ2值 P值 标准误 β值(95%CI) Wald χ2值 P值 男生 手机依赖 0.01 0.14(0.13~0.15) 766.90 < 0.01 0.01 0.13(0.12~0.14) 677.91 < 0.01 (n=697) 手机依赖戒断症状 0.04 0.14(0.07~0.22) 15.30 < 0.01 0.04 0.13(0.06~0.20) 13.80 < 0.01 手机依赖身心影响 0.04 0.18(0.09~0.26) 16.75 < 0.01 0.04 0.18(0.10~0.26) 17.82 < 0.01 手机依赖渴求性 0.06 0.10(-0.02~0.21) 2.52 0.11 0.06 0.07(-0.04~0.19) 1.58 0.21 女生 手机依赖 0.00 0.10(0.09~0.11) 1 183.18 < 0.01 0.00 0.10(0.09~0.10) 1 088.78 < 0.01 (n=1 818) 手机依赖戒断症状 0.02 0.14(0.10~0.17) 59.99 < 0.01 0.02 0.13(0.09~0.16) 53.25 < 0.01 手机依赖身心影响 0.02 0.13(0.09~0.18) 42.66 < 0.01 0.02 0.13(0.09~0.17) 42.84 < 0.01 手机依赖渴求性 0.03 -0.02(-0.08~0.03) 0.70 0.40 0.03 -0.02(-0.08~0.04) 0.52 0.47 注:模型1,未控制变量;模型2,控制民族、专业分类、学历、家庭居住地、家庭经济条件、朋友数量、父母亲文化程度、喝酒、抽烟、经历过家庭变故、住院经历、考试失败、恋爱失败、抑郁症家族史、身体活动、外卖快餐消费。 -
[1] 钱淑红, 曾颖, 黄世伟. 大学生抑郁症状和神经质与网络社交活动的关系[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2019, 33(12): 932-937. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS201912010.htmQIAN S H, ZENG Y, HUANG S W. Relationship among depressive symptoms, neuroticism and network social activities in college students[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2019, 33(12): 932-937. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS201912010.htm [2] XU H, GUO J, WAN Y, et al. Association between screen time, fast foods, sugar-sweetened beverages and depressive symptoms in Chinese adolescents[J]. Front Psychiatry, 2020, 11: 458. [3] 王蜜源, 刘佳, 吴鑫, 等. 近十年中国大学生抑郁症患病率的Meta分析[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2020, 26(9): 686-693. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYY202009012.htmWANG M Y, LIU J, WU X, et al. The prevalence of depression among students in Chinese universities over the past decade: a Meta-analysis[J]. J Hainan Med Univ, 2020, 26(9): 686-693. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYY202009012.htm [4] 中国图书馆研究院. 中国互联网络信息中心发布第52次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2023, 32(5): 13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJJG202305011.htmLibrary Research Institute of China. China Internet network information center releases the 52nd statistical report on the development of the Internet in China[J]. J Natl Library Chin, 2023, 32(5): 13. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJJG202305011.htm [5] 陶建青, 骆朝京, 黄卷为, 等. 我国大中专学生手机依赖现状Meta分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2018, 39(9): 1391-1394. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.09.032TAO J Q, LUO C J, HUANG J W, et al. Meta-analysis of mobile phone dependence of college students in China[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2018, 39(9): 1391-1394. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.09.032 [6] THOMÉE S. Mobile phone use and mental health: a review of the research that takes a psychological perspective on exposure[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018, 15(12): 2692. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122692 [7] 邹立巍. 大学生手机使用依赖与抑郁症状关联及脑结构与奖赏环路相关功能变化调节效应的随访研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2022.ZOU L W. A longitudinal study on moderating effects of brain structure and reward-related functional changes among the association between mobile phone dependency and depressive symptom in college students[D]. Hefei: Anhui Medical University, 2022. (in Chinese) [8] YANG L, YUAN J, SUN H. Influencing factors of depressive symptoms among undergraduates: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2023, 18(3): e0279050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279050 [9] 卢珊, 段昕雨, 邱明悦. 抑郁-焦虑-压力量表简体中文版在大学生群体中的纵向等值性[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2020, 28(5): 950-953. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY202005019.htmLU S, DUAN X Y, QIU M Y. Longitudinal measurement invariance of the Chinese versions of DASS-21 in college students[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2020, 28(5): 950-953. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY202005019.htm [10] 龚栩, 谢熹瑶, 徐蕊, 等. 抑郁-焦虑-压力量表简体中文版(DASS-21)在中国大学生中的测试报告[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2010, 18(4): 443-446.GONG X, XIE X Y, XU R, et al. Psychometric properties of the Chinese versions of DASS-21 in Chinese college students[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2010, 18(4): 443-446. (in Chinese) [11] 陶舒曼, 付继玲, 王惠, 等. 青少年手机使用依赖自评问卷编制及其在大学生中的应用[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2013, 34(1): 26-29. http://www.cjsh.org.cn/article/id/zgxxws201301009TAO S M, FU J L, WANG H, et al. Development of Self-Rating Questionnaire for Adolescent Problematic Mobile Phone Use and the psychometric evaluation in undergraduates[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2013, 34(1): 26-29. (in Chinese) http://www.cjsh.org.cn/article/id/zgxxws201301009 [12] 胡东月, 陈碧霞, 李海, 等. 云南大学生手机依赖与便秘的关联[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(12): 826-1829, 1834. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.016HU D Y, CHEN B X, LI H, et al. Association between mobile phone dependence and constipation of college students in Yunnan Province[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(12): 826-1829, 1834. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.016 [13] RAMÓN-ARBUÉS E, GEA-CABALLERO V, GRANADA-LÓPEZ J M, et al. The prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress and their associated factors in college students[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(19): 7001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197001 [14] 翟文海, 张琼, 闫俊. 新冠肺炎疫情前后中国大学生抑郁症状检出率及相关因素的Meta分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(7): 1055-1060. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.07.023ZHAI W H, ZHANG Q, YAN J. Meta-analysis of prevalence and associated factors of depressive symptoms in Chinese college students before and after the COVID-19 epidemic[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(7): 1055-1060. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.07.023 [15] 王冠英. 后疫情时代大学生体力活动、手机依赖与抑郁倾向相关性实证研究[J]. 兵团教育学院学报, 2022, 32(5): 44-49. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BTJX202205008.htmWANG G Y. An empirical study on the correlation between physical activity, mobile phone dependence, and depression tendency of college students in the post-epidemic era[J]. J Bingtuan Educ Institute, 2022, 32(5): 44-49. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BTJX202205008.htm [16] WANG J, HAO Q H, PENG W, et al. Relationship between smartphone addiction and eating disorders and lifestyle among Chinese college students[J]. Front Public Health, 2023, 11: 1111477. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1111477 [17] ABUHAMDAH S M A, NASER A Y. Smart phone addiction and its mental health risks among university students in Jordan: a cross-sectional study[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2023, 23(1): 812. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05322-6 [18] YANG H, WANG Z, JIANG Y, et al. Absolute and relative preferences for mobile phone Internet content, mobile phone dependence, and depressive symptoms: a study of Chinese university students in the post-pandemic era[J]. Front Public Health, 2023, 11: 1247438. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1247438 [19] SSERUNKUUMA J, KAGGWA M M, MUWANGUZI M, et al. Problematic use of the Internet, smartphones, and social media among medical students and relationship with depression: an exploratory study[J]. PLoS One, 2023, 18(5): e0286424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286424 [20] IVANOVA A, GORBANIUK O, BŁACHNIO A, et al. Mobile phone addiction, phubbing, and depression among men and women: a moderated mediation analysis[J]. Psychiatr Q, 2020, 91(3): 655-668. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09723-8 [21] CUI G, YIN Y, LI S, et al. Longitudinal relationships among problematic mobile phone use, bedtime procrastination, sleep quality and depressive symptoms in Chinese college students: a cross-lagged panel analysis[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2021, 21(1): 449. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03451-4 [22] TAO S, WU X, ZHANG Y, et al. Effects of sleep quality on the association between problematic mobile phone use and mental health symptoms in Chinese college students[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2017, 14(2): 185. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020185 [23] SHINETSETSEG O, JUNG Y H, PARK Y S, et al. Association between smartphone addiction and suicide[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(18): 11600. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811600 [24] 刘致宏, 张珊珊. 中学生线上社交焦虑与抑郁症状和睡眠质量的关联[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(1): 77-81, 86. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.01.017LIU Z H, ZHANG S S. Association between online social anxiety in middle students with depressive symptoms and sleep quality[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(1): 77-81, 86. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.01.017 [25] 何安明, 万娇娇, 惠秋平. 青少年手机依赖者的心理健康状况及与生活事件、学业倦怠的关系[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2019, 27(2): 410-413. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201902042.htmHE A M, WAN J J, HUI Q P. Mental health status of mobile phone dependent adolescent and the relationship with life events and academic burnout[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2019, 27(2): 410-413. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201902042.htm [26] RATAN Z A, PARRISH A M, ZAMAN S B, et al. Smartphone addiction and associated health outcomes in adult populations: a systematic review[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(22): 12257. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212257 -

计量
- 文章访问数: 322
- HTML全文浏览量: 174
- PDF下载量: 52
- 被引次数: 0