拉萨市一起水源污染引起的校园细菌性痢疾暴发调查

饶娟; 次仁德吉; 索朗德吉; 次仁央宗

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024087

拉萨市一起水源污染引起的校园细菌性痢疾暴发调查

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024087

1.
西藏自治区疾病预防控制中心传染病所，拉萨 850000
2.
拉萨市疾病预防控制中心流行病学科

详细信息

作者简介:
饶娟(1994-)，女，四川成都人，大学本科，主管医师，主要从事呼吸道及肠道传染病预防控制方面工作

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G478 R123 R516.4 R193
计量
- 文章访问数: 236
- HTML全文浏览量: 115
- PDF下载量: 38
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-08-31
- 修回日期: 2023-12-02
- 网络出版日期: 2024-03-29
- 刊出日期: 2024-03-25

Outbreak investigation of a campus bacterial dysentery by water source pollution in Lhasa City

1.
Infectious Disease Institute, Center for Disease Control and Prevention of the Tibet Autonomous Region, Lhasa (850000), Tibet Autonomous Region, China

摘要

摘要: 目的了解拉萨市一起学校细菌性痢疾暴发的危险因素及事件性质，为制定相应防控措施提供参考。方法采用现场流行病学调查方法，以2022年6月26日至7月1日拉萨市1所学校和1所幼儿园细菌性痢疾的疑似病例、可能病例和确诊病例为研究对象，通过询问教职工、患者，查看学校晨检记录及因病缺勤追踪记录等方式开展病例搜索。采取病例对照研究，调查可疑餐次和饮生水因素，对患者粪便、肛拭子、留样食物等行核酸片段聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测志贺菌。结果两校共搜索到55例细菌性痢疾病例，罹患率为15.41%，其中学生53例，罹患率为16.71%；教职工2例，罹患率为7.5%；流行曲线提示为点源暴露。走读生与住校生罹患率差异无统计学意义(16.10%，17.09%)(χ²=0.05，P>0.05)，小学生罹患率高于幼儿园学生(19.83%，6.67%)(χ²=7.13，P < 0.05)。病例对照显示病例组与对照组在6月24—26日间饮用生水与发病有关联(OR=4.01，95%CI=1.75~9.19，P < 0.05)；两校共检出23份粪便志贺菌核酸阳性，食堂门前末梢水2份，井口周围污水管中的污泥2份。结论此次事件是由管网水受污染引起的一起细菌性痢疾暴发。卫生行政部门应加大对饮用水卫生安全的监督管理力度，学校应强化供水设施管理，有效预防介水传染病的暴发。
- 水污染 /
- 志贺菌 /
- 痢疾 /
- 疾病暴发流行 /
- 聚合酶链反应 /
- 患病率 /
- 少数民族 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To investigate risk factors and the nature of the outbreak of bacillary dysentery in Lhasa City, so as to customize targeted prevention and control measures. Methods Using on-site epidemiological investigation, the suspected, probable and confirmed cases of bacillary dysentery in one school and one kindergarten in Lhasa City from June 26 to July 1, 2022 were collected, and additional cases were identified through interview from school staffs and family members, reviewing morning examination records and tracking records of school illness-related absence. A case-control study was conducted to investigate suspicious meals and drinking raw water, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to detect Shigella line nucleic acid fragment in the patients' feces, anal swabs, retained food, and terminal water. Results A total of 55 cases were found in two schools, with the prevalence rate of 15.41% in total and 16.71% in students (n=53), 7.5% in staff (n=2). The epidemic curve was suggestive of a point source exposure. The prevalence rate among students who walk to school and students who live in the school showed no difference (16.10%, 17.09%)(χ²=0.05, P>0.05), and the prevalence rate was higher among elementary school students than kindergarten students (19.83%, 6.67%)(χ²=7.13, P < 0.05). Case-control comparisons showed a direct association between drinking raw water and morbidity in the case and control groups during June 24-26 (OR=4.01, 95%CI=1.75-9.19, P < 0.05). A total of 23 fecal Shigella nucleic acid positives were detected from the two schools, two from the end water in front of the cafeteria door, and two from sludge in the sewage pipe around the wellhead. Conclusions The outbreak of bacillary dysentery is caused by the contamination of the pipe network water. Health administrative departments should improve the supervision and management of drinking water health safety, and schools should strengthen the management of water supply facilities for effectively prevent of waterborne infectious disease outbreaks.
- Water pollution /
- Shigella /
- dysenteriae /
- Disease outbreaks /
- Polymerase chain reaction /
- Prevalence /
- Minority groups /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 病例组和对照组学生在学生食堂暴露的可疑餐次病例对照研究

Table 1. A case-control study of suspected meals exposed to students in student cafeterias between case group and control group students

分组	6月24日		6月25日			6月26日
分组	午餐	晚餐	早餐	午餐	晚餐	早餐	午餐	晚餐
病例组(n=53)	35(66.04)	38(71.70)	33(60.26)	39(73.58)	33(62.26)	26(49.06)	40(75.47)	32(60.38)
对照组(n=53)	32(60.38)	33(62.26)	30(56.60)	40(75.47)	35(66.04)	31(58.49)	36(67.92)	30(56.60)
OR值	1.28	1.54	1.26	0.91	0.85	0.68	1.45	1.17
OR值95%CI	0.57~2.81	0.68~3.47	0.58~2.75	0.38~2.17	0.38~1.88	0.32~1.47	0.62~3.40	0.54~2.53
χ²值	0.37	1.07	0.35	0.49	0.16	0.95	0.74	0.15
P值	0.54	0.30	0.55	0.82	0.68	0.33	0.39	0.69
注： ()内数字为暴露率/%。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(13)

[1]	中国疾病预防控制中心. 全国细菌性痢疾监测方案[Z]. 北京: 中国疾病预防控制中心, 2005. Center for Disease Control and Prevention of China. Dysentery surveillance plan of China[Z]. Beijing: Center for Disease Control and Prevention of China, 2005. (in Chinese)
[2]	中华人民共和国卫生部. 食品安全国家标准食品微生物检验志贺氏菌检验: GB 4789.5—2012[S]. 2012-07-17. Ministry of Health of the PRC. National food safety standards Shigella tests: GB 4789.5-2012[S]. 2012-07-17. (in Chinese)
[3]	吕冰, 田祎, 杨艳娜, 等. 北京市一起由宋内志贺菌引起的细菌性痢疾暴发病原学分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2022, 37(1): 139. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBJC202201028.htm LYU B, TIAN Y, YANG Y N, et al. Aetiologic analysis of an outbreak of bacillary dysentery caused by Shigella sonnei in Beijing, China[J]. Dis Surveill, 2022, 37(1): 139. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBJC202201028.htm
[4]	姚建忠, 王跃力, 王娟, 等. 志贺菌感染: 新型的性传播感染[J]. 中国艾滋病性病, 2018, 24(5): 516-517. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBYA201805026.htm YAO J Z, WANG Y L, WANG J, et al. Shigella infections: a new type of sexually transmitted infection[J]. Chin J AIDS STD, 2018, 24(5): 516-517. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBYA201805026.htm
[5]	王亚丽. 两寄宿制学校细菌性痢疾暴发特征分析[J]. 河南预防医学杂志, 2020, 31(10): 781-783. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYF202010022.htm WANG Y L. Characterization of bacillary dysentery outbreaks in two boarding schools[J]. Henan J Prev Med, 2020, 31(10): 781-783. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYF202010022.htm
[6]	郑灵媚, 吕强, 吴朝学, 等. 四川省某学校一起细菌性痢疾暴发疫情调查[J]. 预防医学情报杂志, 2020, 36(4): 411-416. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YFYX202004009.htm ZHENG L M, LYU Q, WU C X, et al. Investigation of an outbreak of bacillary dysentery in a school in Sichuan Province[J]. J Prev Med Inform, 2020, 36(4): 411-416. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YFYX202004009.htm
[7]	ZHANG Y, BI P, HILLER J E, et al. Climate variations and bacillary dysentery in northem and southem cities of China[J]. J Infect, 2007, 55(2): 194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2006.12.002
[8]	YAN W R, XU Y, YANG X B, et al. A hybrid model foe short-term bacillary dysentery in Yichang City, China[J]. Jpn J Infect Dis, 2010, 63(4): 264-270. doi: 10.7883/yoken.63.264
[9]	NICOLAS X, GRANIER H, GUEN P L. Shigellosis or bacillary dysentery[J]. Presse Med, 2007, 63(4): 264-270.
[10]	李立明. 流行病学[M]. 6版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2007: 490-495. LI L M. Epidemiological[M]. 6th ed. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2007: 490-495. (in Chinese)
[11]	SHAO F, ZHANG H, LI G, et al. Investigating the effects of climate factors on bacillary dysentery transmission in Harbin City, China[J]. Inter J Comput Healthcare, 2015, 2(2): 72-83. doi: 10.1504/IJCIH.2015.069789
[12]	吴家兵, 张进, 龚磊, 等. 安徽省某小学一起细菌性痢疾暴发疫情的流行病学调查[J]. 现代预防医学, 2013, 24(18): 3475-3478. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF201318049.htm WU J B, ZHANG J, GONG L, et al. Epidemiologic investigation of a bacillary dysentery outbreak in an elementary school in Anhui Province, China[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2013, 24(18): 3475-3478. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF201318049.htm
[13]	刘晓青, 赵玉芹, 杨梦, 等. 一起学校细菌性痢疾暴发疫情的病原追溯和流行性特征分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2015, 42(16): 2904-2907. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF201516011.htm LIU X Q, ZHAO Y Q, YANG M, et al. Pathogen tracing and epidemiologic characterization of a school bacillary dysentery outbreak[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2015, 42(16): 2904-2907. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF201516011.htm