领悟社会支持与大学生情绪调节的关系

顾曼丽; 徐济达; 姜茂敏; 李志祥; 张鸿来

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024016

领悟社会支持与大学生情绪调节的关系

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024016

1.
南京医科大学康达学院，江苏 222000
2.
厦门大学公共事务学院
3.
南京师范大学公共管理学院

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目 72274023

江苏省高校哲学社会科学思想政治工作专项课题 2022SJSZ0945

南京医科大学康达学院一流课程培育项目 KD2020YLKCHH002

详细信息

作者简介:
顾曼丽(1991-)，女，江苏盐城人，硕士，讲师，主要研究方向为高校生命教育

通讯作者:
张鸿来，E-mail: Honglaizhang@njmu.edu.cn

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: B844.2 R193 C915
计量
- 文章访问数: 186
- HTML全文浏览量: 76
- PDF下载量: 41
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-06-06
- 修回日期: 2023-08-01
- 网络出版日期: 2024-02-01
- 刊出日期: 2024-01-25

Association of perceived social support and emotional regulation among college students

1.
Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang (222000), Jiangsu Province, China

摘要

摘要: 目的了解大学生情绪调节现状及其与社会支持的关系，为提升大学生情绪调节能力提供参考依据。方法于2022年9月15日—10月15日，采用多阶段随机数字整群抽样的方法，根据GDP及高校分类选取广东、江苏、山东、上海、安徽、河北、云南、山西、甘肃9个省市27所高校15 560名大学生为研究对象，采用领悟社会支持量表(Perceived Social Support Scale，PSSS)和情绪调节问卷(Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, ERQ)进行调查，并利用多元逐步回归分析探讨领悟社会支持与大学生情绪调节的关系。结果大学生情绪调节、认知重评、表达抑制得分分别为44(40，50)，24(20，28)，20(19，24)分。通过单因素分析发现，年龄、年级、户籍、独生子女、每月生活费用、睡眠质量不同的大学生在认知重评、表达抑制及情绪调节得分上差异均有统计学意义(H/Z值分别为77.72，49.73，-5.10，-9.77，7.68，168.27；204.55，317.32，-5.96，-7.60，131.20，968.08；82.18，148.04，-2.30，-8.03，64.82，188.08，P值均 < 0.05)。多元逐步回归分析结果发现，领悟社会支持中家庭支持、朋友支持、其他支持均对大学生情绪调节状态呈正向影响(β值分别为0.137，0.207，0.090)，家庭支持、朋友支持对表达抑制(β值分别为0.079，0.053)、认知重评(β值分别为0.153，0.296)呈正向效应(P值均 < 0.01)。结论领悟社会支持可能影响大学生的情绪调节，提升大学生情绪调节能力对促进大学生心理健康水平有积极意义。
- 社会支持 /
- 情绪 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 回归分析 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To understand the current situation of college students' emotional regulation and its correlation with perceived social support, so as to provide a reference for improving emotional regulation ability among college students. Methods From September 15 to October 15, 2022, a total of 15 560 students from 27 colleges and universities in Guangdong, Jiangsu, Shandong, Shanghai, Anhui, Hebei, Yunnan, Shanxi and Gansu were enrolled by stratified random sampling method. The Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) and the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) were used to investigate, and multiple stepwise regression was used to explore the relationship between perceived social support and emotion regulation of college students. Results The scores of emotion regulation, cognitive reappraisal and expression inhibition were 44(40, 50), 24(20, 28) and 20(19, 24) respectively. There were significant differences in the scores of emotion regulation, cognitive reappraisal and expression inhibition by age, grade, household registration, only-child status, cost of living, and sleep (H/Z=77.72, 49.73, -5.10, -9.77, 7.68, 168.27; 204.55, 317.32, -5.96, -7.60, 131.20, 968.08; 82.18, 148.04, -2.30, -8.03, 64.82, 188.08, P < 0.05). In addition, the multiple stepwise regression found that family support, friend support, and other support in perceived social support all had a positive impact on the emotional regulation state of college students (β=0.137, 0.207, 0.090), and family support and friend support had a significant positive effect on expression inhibition(β=0.079, 0.053) and cognitive reappraisal(β=0.153, 0.296)(P < 0.01). Conclusion The perceived social support can directly affect the emotional regulation of college students, and improving the emotional regulation ability has a positive significance to promote the mental health level among college students.
- Social support /
- Emotions /
- Mental health /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 不同人口学特征大学生情绪调节得分比较[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)]

Table 1. Comparison of emotional regulation scores among college students with different demographic characteristics[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)]

人口统计学指标	选项	人数	认知重评			表达抑制			情绪调节
人口统计学指标	选项	人数	得分	H/Z值	P值	得分	H/Z值	P值	得分	H/Z值	P值
性别	男	7 427	24(20，28)	-1.25	0.21	20(19，25)	-16.59	< 0.01	45(40，50)	-8.01	< 0.01
	女	8 133	24(20，27)			20(18，23)			44(40，49)
年龄/岁	≤18	4 206	25(21，29)	204.55	< 0.01	20(18，24)	82.18	< 0.01	45(40，50)	77.72	< 0.01
	19~20	6 386	24(20，28)			20(19，24)			44(40，50)
	21~22	4 019	23(20，26)			20(19，23)			44(40，49)
	23~24	682	25(22，28)			20(18，22)			44(40，49)
	≥25	267	25(25，27)			25(23，27)			49(44，50)
年级	大一	5 703	25(21，29)	317.32	< 0.01	20(18，25)	148.04	< 0.01	46(40，51)	49.73	< 0.01
	大二	3 174	24(20，27)			20(19，24)			43(40，50)
	大三	4 919	23(20，26)			20(19，23)			43(40，50)
	大四	946	23(20，26)			20(18，23)			43(40，48)
	硕士及以上	818	25(24，28)			20(18，23)			45(42，49)
户籍	农村	8 461	24(20，27)	-5.96	< 0.01	20(19，23)	-2.30	< 0.05	44(40，50)	-5.10	< 0.01
	非农村	7 099	25(20，28)			20(19，24)			45(40，50)
独生子女	是	6 818	25(20，29)	-7.60	< 0.01	20(19，25)	-8.03	< 0.01	45(40，50)	-9.77	< 0.01
	否	8 742	24(20，27)			20(18，23)			44(40，50)
每月生活费用/元	≤1 000	2 122	23(20，26)	131.20	< 0.01	20(19，23)	64.82	0.05	43(40，49)	7.68	< 0.01
	1 001~1 500	6 046	24(20，27)			20(19，24)			44(40，50)
	1 501~2 000	4 960	25(20，28)			20(19，25)			45(40，50)
	≥2 001	2 432	25(20，30)			20(19，25)			45(40，51)
睡眠质量	不好	1 585	22(20，25)	968.08	< 0.01	21(20，25)	188.08	< 0.01	43(40，50)	168.27	< 0.01
	一般	5 087	23(20，25)			20(20，24)			43(40，50)
	比较好	4 584	25(21，27)			20(19，24)			45(40，50)
	好	4 304	26(22，30)			20(17，23)			46(40，52)

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 领悟社会支持对大学生情绪调节影响多元逐步回归分析[β值(95%CI)，n=15 560]

Table 2. Multiple stepwise regression results of understanding the impact of social support on college students' emotional regulation[β(95%CI), n=15 560]

自变量	认知重评		表达抑制		情绪调节
自变量	第1步	第2步	第1步	第2步	第1步	第2步
性别	-0.014(-0.186~0.143)	-0.031(-0.432~-0.016)^**	-0.115(-1.414~-0.093)^**	-0.117(-1.453~-0.104)^**	-0.074(-1.556~-0.054)^**	-0.086(-1.847~-0.027)^**
年龄	0.013(0.010~0.177)	0.024(0.062~0.392)^*	0.056(0.037~0.621)^**	0.064(0.002~0.685)^**	0.024(0.021~0.746)^**	0.051(0.019~1.032)^**
年级	-0.024(-0.242~-0.004)	-0.020(-0.158~0.011)	0.107(0.018~0.322)^**	0.105(0.004~0.308)^**	0.076(0.034~0.389)^**	0.072(0.040~0.920)^**
户籍	-0.004(-0.252~0.101)	-0.023(-0.417~-0.013)^**	0.002(-0.157~0.186)	-0.003(-0.207~-0.002)	-0.002(-0.362~0.241)	-0.016(-0.585~-0.008)^*
独生子女	-0.020(-0.389~-0.015)^*	-0.003(-0.198~-0.001)^**	-0.035(-0.517~-0.012)^**	-0.030(-0.468~0.025)^**	-0.032(-0.859~-0.014)^**	-0.015(-0.526~-0.013)
每月生活费用	0.079(0.044~0.335)^**	0.026(0.019~0.238)^**	0.039(0.021~0.336)^**	0.028(0.024~0.279)^**	0.069(0.029~0.845)^**	0.031(0.021~0.278)^**
睡眠质量	0.224(0.151~1.321)^**	0.047(0.024~0.324)^**	0.084(0.058~0.392)^**	0.121(0.015~0.582)^**	0.086(0.015~0.906)^**	-0.041(-0.561~-0.018)^**
家庭支持		0.153(0.135~0.188)^**		0.079(0.055~0.116)^**		0.137(0.117~0.297)^**
朋友支持		0.296(0.292~0.347)^**		0.053(0.028~0.092)^**		0.207(0.127~0.431)^**
其他支持		0.153(0.127~0.188)		-0.003(-0.055~0.017)		0.090(0.080~0.196)^**
注： * P < 0.05，** P < 0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(24)

[1]	闫纪霞, 刘林霞, 史培培, 等. 大学生攻击性行为潜在类别与家庭关怀度和生命意义感的相关性[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(12): 1817-1821. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.014 YAN J X, LIU L X, SHI P P, et al. Correlation between latent classes of aggressive behavior and family care with meaning in life among college students[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(12): 1817-1821. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.014
[2]	马兰, 郭丽芳, 李越, 等. 大学生抑郁症状现况及其与负性生活事件的关系[J]. 现代预防医学, 2020, 47(8): 1435-1438. MA L, GUO L F, LI Y, et al. Relationship between depressive symptoms and negative life events of university students[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2020, 47(8): 1435-1438. (in Chinese)
[3]	翟文海, 张琼, 闫俊. 新冠肺炎疫情前后中国大学生抑郁症状检出率及相关因素的Meta分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(7): 1055-1060. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.07.023 ZHAI W H, ZHANG Q, YAN J. Meta-analysis of prevalence and associated factors of depressive symptoms in Chinese college students before and after the COVID-19 epidemic[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(7): 1055-1060. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.07.023
[4]	苗正淼, 程明, 丁紫夏, 等. 述情障碍与非适应性认知情绪调节策略中介家庭环境与抑郁的关系[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2022, 30(6): 1270-1275, 1281. MIAO Z M, CHENG M, DING Z X, et al. The mediation of alexithymia and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies on the relationship between family environment and depression[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2022, 30(6): 1270-1275, 1281. (in Chinese)
[5]	徐璐璐, 王芳, 汤丽. 感恩和领悟社会支持在上海市临床医学本科生共情能力与利他行为间的作用分析[J]. 医学与社会, 2022, 35(9): 87-92. XU L L, WANG F, TANG L. Analysis of effect of gratitude and perceived social support on empathy ability and altruistic behavior among clinical medical undergraduates in Shanghai[J]. Med Soc, 2022, 35(9): 87-92. (in Chinese)
[6]	余金聪, 赵志雅, 唐雪梅, 等. 大学生心理控制源与健康危险行为的关系[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(2): 260-264. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.02.023 YU J C, ZHAO Z Y, TANG X M, et al. Association between locus of control and health risk behaviors among college students[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(2): 260-264. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.02.023
[7]	姜乾金. 心理卫生评定量表手册[M]. 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999: 131-133. JIANG Q J. Rating scales for mental health[M]. Beijing: Chinese Mental Health Journal, 1999: 131-133. (in Chinese)
[8]	王力, 柳恒超, 李中权, 等. 情绪调节问卷中文版的信效度研究[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2007, 15(6): 503-505. WANG L, LIU H C, LI Z Q, et al. Reliability and validity of Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Chinese revised version[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2007, 15(6): 503-505. (in Chinese)
[9]	LOHANI M, ISAACOWITZ D M. Age differences in managing response to sadness elicitors using attentional deployment, positive reappraisal and suppression[J]. Cogn Emot, 2014, 28(4): 678-697. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.853648
[10]	谭金城, 陈丽凌, 冯林森, 等. 远程教育下大学生一般自我效能感、领悟社会支持度与学习投入度的现状研究[J]. 中国医学教育技术, 2021, 35(6): 693-697. TAN J C, CHEN L L, FENG L S, et al. Study on the status quo of college students' general self-efficacy, perceived social support and learning engagement under distance education[J]. Chin Med Educ Technol, 2021, 35(6): 693-697. (in Chinese)
[11]	张家喜, 黄申, 齐啸, 等. 气质性乐观对大学生主观幸福感的影响: 领悟社会支持的中介作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2022, 30(6): 881-885. ZHANG J X, HUANG S, QI X, et al. Effect of dispositional optimism on subjective well-being: the mediating role of perceived social support[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2022, 30(6): 881-885. (in Chinese)
[12]	黄凤, 郭锋, 丁倩, 等. 社交焦虑对大学生手机成瘾的影响: 认知失败和情绪调节自我效能感的作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2021, 29(1): 56-59, 13. HUANG F, GUO F, DING Q, et al. Social anxiety and mobile phone addition in college students: the influence of cognitive failure and regulatory emotional self-efficacy[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2021, 29(1): 56-59, 13. (in Chinese)
[13]	叶青青, 刘洁, 王新柳. 大学生的感戴与归因方式、领悟社会支持[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2012, 26(4): 315-318. YE Q Q, LIU J, WANG X L. Relation of gratitude to attribution style and perceived social support in college students[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2012, 26(4): 315-318. (in Chinese)
[14]	蒋佩, 胡运鑫, 李琪, 等. 负性生活事件对大一新生抑郁的影响: 自尊的中介效应[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2019, 27(10): 1567-1570. JIANG P, HU Y X, LI Q. Influence of negative life events on depression in freshmen: the mediating effect of self-esteem[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2019, 27(10): 1567-1570. (in Chinese)
[15]	王蜜源, 韩芳芳, 刘佳, 等. 大学生抑郁症状检出率及相关因素的Meta分析[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2020, 34(12): 1041-1047. WANG M Y, HAN F F, LIU J, et al. A Meta-analysis of detection rate of depression symptoms and related factors in college students[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2020, 34(12): 1041-1047. (in Chinese)
[16]	张璐明, 胡成洋, 黄凯, 等. 大学生风险感知自我效能和态度与新冠肺炎防护行为的关系[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(10): 1539-1543. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.10.023 ZHANG L M, HU C Y, HUANG K, et al. Group risk perception and self-efficacy with individual prevention/control behaviors among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(10): 1539-1543. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.10.023
[17]	郭佩佩, 姜茂敏, 叶俊. 家庭关系、自我分化对上海高校大学生焦虑状况的影响[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2021, 38(12): 936-940. GUO P P, JIANG M M, YE J. Studying on the influence of family relationship and self-differentiation on the status of anxiety of college students in Shanghai[J]. Chin Health Serv Manage, 2021, 38(12): 936-940. (in Chinese)
[18]	牟星月, 陶舒曼, 谢阳, 等. 大学生饮食模式与抑郁症状的关联[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(10): 1520-1524. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.10.019 MOU X Y, TAO S M, XIE Y, et al. Association of dietary patterns and depressive symptoms among college students[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(10): 1520-1524. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.10.019
[19]	邹长华, 信中贵, 李泳汉, 等. 大学生情绪调节自我效能感和积极心理资本在心理弹性与心理健康关联中的作用[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2023, 44(1): 94-98. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.01.021 ZOU C H, XIN Z G, LI Y H, et al. Role of regulatory emotional self-efficacy and positive psychological capital in the relationship between resilience and the mental health of college students[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2023, 44(1): 94-98. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.01.021
[20]	郭佩佩, 姜茂敏, 叶俊. 上海市大学生生命价值观与高危性行为的实证考察[J]. 现代预防医学, 2020, 47(23): 4295-4298. GUO P P, JIANG M M, YE J. Empirical study of the life values and high-risk sexual behaviors of college students, Shanghai[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2020, 47(23): 4295-4298. (in Chinese)
[21]	HU T, ZHANG D, WANG J, et al. Relation between emotion regulation and mental health: a Meta-analysis review[J]. Psychol Rep, 2014, 114(2): 341-362. doi: 10.2466/03.20.PR0.114k22w4
[22]	陈梅, 黄时华, 陈正, 等. 认知重评对青少年网络游戏成瘾的影响: 自尊的中介作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2022, 30(9): 1350-1354. CHEN M, HUANG S H, CHEN Z, et al. Relationship between cognitive reappraisal and Internet gaming disorder of adolescents: mediating role of self-esteem[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2022, 30(9): 1350-1354. (in Chinese)
[23]	王小琴, 谈雅菲, 蒙杰, 等. 情绪调节灵活性对负性情绪的影响: 来自经验取样的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(2): 192-209. WANG X Q, TAN Y F, MENG J, et al. The influence of emotion regulation flexibility on negative emotions: evidence from experience sampling[J]. Acta Psychol Sinica, 2023, 55(2): 192-209. (in Chinese)
[24]	WATTICK R A, HAGEDORN R L, OLFERT M D. Relationship between diet and mental health in a young adult appalachian college population[J]. Nutrients, 2018, 10(8): 957. doi: 10.3390/nu10080957