留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

天津市小学生生活方式与近视风险的列线图预测模型构建

刘盛鑫 杜蓓 金楠 唐春玉 宋德胜 张欣 魏瑞华

刘盛鑫, 杜蓓, 金楠, 唐春玉, 宋德胜, 张欣, 魏瑞华. 天津市小学生生活方式与近视风险的列线图预测模型构建[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2024, 45(1): 21-24. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024008
引用本文: 刘盛鑫, 杜蓓, 金楠, 唐春玉, 宋德胜, 张欣, 魏瑞华. 天津市小学生生活方式与近视风险的列线图预测模型构建[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2024, 45(1): 21-24. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024008
LIU Shengxin, DU Bei, JIN Nan, TANG Chunyu, SONG Desheng, ZHANG Xin, WEI Ruihua. Construction of Nomogram prediction model of myopia risk and lifestyle among primary school students in Tianjin City[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2024, 45(1): 21-24. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024008
Citation: LIU Shengxin, DU Bei, JIN Nan, TANG Chunyu, SONG Desheng, ZHANG Xin, WEI Ruihua. Construction of Nomogram prediction model of myopia risk and lifestyle among primary school students in Tianjin City[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2024, 45(1): 21-24. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024008

天津市小学生生活方式与近视风险的列线图预测模型构建

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024008
基金项目: 

天津市教委科研计划项目 2021SK134

详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘盛鑫(1991-),女,天津市人,博士,讲师,主要研究方向为儿童青少年近视屈光发育

    通讯作者:

    张欣,E-mail: zhangxin@tmu.edu.cn

    魏瑞华,E-mail: rwei@tmu.edu.cn

  • 利益冲突声明  所有作者声明无利益冲突。
  • 中图分类号: R778.1+1  R179  R174+3

Construction of Nomogram prediction model of myopia risk and lifestyle among primary school students in Tianjin City

  • 摘要:   目的  探讨天津市小学生生活方式与近视的关联,构建列线图模型预测近视风险,为小学生近视精准防控提供科学依据。  方法  于2022年4—7月,采用普查的方式对天津市15个区的373 180名小学生进行裸眼远视力检查、屈光检测和生活方式相关问卷调查。采用多因素Logistic回归模型分析小学生生活方式与近视的关联,并构建近视风险的列线图预测模型。  结果  天津市小学生近视检出率为37.6%。多因素Logistic回归模型分析结果显示,每日户外活动时长1~2 h(OR=0.94)和>2 h(OR=0.84)、每日近距离电子产品使用时长>2 h(OR=1.03)、每日近距离纸质材料读写时长1~2 h(OR=1.02)和>2 h(OR=1.09)、每周新鲜蔬菜摄入2~6次(OR=0.93)和≥7次(OR=0.88)均与近视关联有统计学意义(P值均<0.01)。近视风险列线图预测模型表明,影响天津市小学生近视患病风险的因素依次是年级、近视家族史、性别、每日户外活动时长、每周新鲜蔬菜摄入频率、每日近距离纸质材料读写时长和每日近距离电子产品使用时长。  结论  天津市小学生生活方式与近视存在关联,所构建的列线图模型可以为识别近视重点干预人群及采取有针对性的防控措施提供科学依据。
    1)  利益冲突声明  所有作者声明无利益冲突。
  • 图  1  天津市小学生近视患病风险的列线图预测模型

    Figure  1.  A Nomogram model for predicting the risk of myopia among primary school students in Tianjin City

    表  1  天津市不同组别小学生近视检出率比较

    Table  1.   Comparison of myopia detection rates among different groups of primary school students in Tianjin

    组别 选项 人数 近视人数 χ2 P
    性别 194 497 69 658(35.8) 576.76 < 0.01
    178 683 70 807(39.6)
    年级 64 293 9 353(14.5) 42 750.30 < 0.01
    67 529 15 406(22.8)
    65 200 22 391(34.3)
    62 755 27 960(44.6)
    58 699 31 340(53.4)
    54 704 34 015(62.2)
    近视家族史 211 812 69 879(33.0) 4 510.33 < 0.01
    161 368 70 586(43.7)
    每日睡眠时长/h < 10 190 882 75 315(39.5) 564.58 < 0.01
    ≥10 182 298 65 056(35.7)
    每日户外活动时长/h < 1 100 805 41 029(40.7) 651.35 < 0.01
    1~2 216 784 80 160(37.0)
    >2 55 591 19 276(34.7)
    每日近距离电子产品使用时长/h < 1 221 262 79 155(35.8) 1 086.72 < 0.01
    1~2 115 130 45 108(39.2)
    >2 36 788 16 202(44.0)
    每日近距离纸质材料读写时长/h < 1 108 044 37 262(34.5) 1 195.16 < 0.01
    1~2 190 153 71 378(37.5)
    >2 74 983 31 825(42.4)
    每周新鲜水果摄入频率/次 ≤1 9 093 3 743(41.2) 105.97 < 0.01
    2~6 55 533 21 645(39.0)
    ≥7 308 554 115 077(37.3)
    每周新鲜蔬菜摄入频率/次 ≤1 15 644 6 076(38.8) 16.13 < 0.01
    2~6 56 737 21 588(38.0)
    ≥7 300 799 112 801(37.5)
    每周油炸烧烤类食品摄入频率/次 ≤1 225 458 83 192(36.9) 160.73 < 0.01
    2~6 127 827 49 226(38.5)
    ≥7 19 895 8 047(40.4)
    每周碳酸饮料摄入频率/次 ≤1 316 277 116 596(36.9) 539.29 < 0.01
    2~6 49 113 20 484(41.7)
    ≥7 7 790 3 385(43.5)
    注: ()内数字为检出率/%。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  天津市小学生生活方式与近视的多因素Logistic回归分析(n=373 180)

    Table  2.   Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of lifestyle and myopia among primary school students in Tianjin (n=373 180)

    自变量 选项 β 标准误 Wald χ2 OR值(95%CI) P
    每日睡眠时长/h < 10 1.00
    ≥10 0.01 0.01 0.57 1.02(0.99~1.04) 0.61
    每日户外活动时长/h < 1 1.00
    1~2 -0.06 0.01 48.00 0.94(0.93~0.96) < 0.01
    >2 -0.18 0.01 223.83 0.84(0.82~0.86) < 0.01
    每日近距离电子产品使用时长/h < 1 1.00
    1~2 -0.01 0.01 0.01 0.99(0.98~1.02) 0.91
    >2 0.03 0.01 5.58 1.03(1.01~1.06) 0.02
    每日近距离纸质材料读写时长/次 < 1 1.00
    1~2 0.02 0.01 6.23 1.02(1.01~1.04) 0.01
    >2 0.08 0.01 57.03 1.09(1.06~1.11) < 0.01
    每周新鲜水果摄入频率/次 ≤1 1.00
    2~6 -0.02 0.03 0.66 0.98(0.93~1.03) 0.42
    ≥7 -0.01 0.03 0.02 0.99(0.95~1.11) 0.88
    每周新鲜蔬菜摄入频率/次 ≤1 1.00
    2~6 -0.08 0.02 14.19 0.93(0.89~0.96) < 0.01
    ≥7 -0.12 0.02 41.17 0.88(0.85~0.92) < 0.01
    每周油炸烧烤类食品摄入频率/次 ≤1 1.00
    2~6 0.01 0.01 0.43 1.01(0.99~1.02) 0.51
    ≥7 0.03 0.02 3.72 1.03(0.99~1.07) 0.06
    每周碳酸饮料摄入频率/次 ≤1 1.00
    2~6 0.01 0.01 0.47 1.01(0.99~1.03) 0.49
    ≥7 0.01 0.03 0.16 1.01(0.96~1.06) 0.69
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] HOLDEN B A, FRICKE T R, WILSON D A, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050[J]. Ophthalmology, 2016, 123(5): 1036-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006
    [2] 陶芳标. 中国儿童青少年近视病因模型及其政策与策略导向的预防控制[J]. 安徽预防医学杂志, 2022, 28(4): 261-265.

    TAO F B. The etiological model and the prevention and control of myopic drived by policy and strategy among Chinese children and adolescents[J]. Anhui J Prev Med, 2022, 28(4): 261-265. (in Chinese)
    [3] 潘臣炜. 积极探索可控性环境和行为因素在儿童青少年近视防控中的作用[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(9): 1281-1283, 1292. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.09.001

    PAN C W. Actively explore the role of controllable environmental and behavioral factors in the prevention and control of myopia among children and adolescents[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(9): 1281-1283, 1292. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.09.001
    [4] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 国家卫生健康委员会2021年7月13日新闻发布会文字实录[EB/OL]. (2021-07-13)[2023-10-02]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/s3574/202107/2fef24a3b77246fc9fb36dc8943af700.shtml.

    National Health Commission of the PRC. Text transcript of the press conference of the National Health Commission on July 13, 2021[EB/OL]. (2021-07-13)[2023-10-02]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/s3574/202107/2fef24a3b77246fc9fb36dc8943af700.shtml. (in Chinese)
    [5] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 国家卫生健康委员会2019年4月29日例行新闻发布会文字实录[EB/OL]. (2019-04-29)[2023-10-02]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/s7847/201904/e9117ea8b6b84f48962e84401d305292.shtml.

    National Health Commission of the PRC. Text transcript of the routine press conference of the National Health Commission on April 29, 2019[EB/OL]. (2019-04-29)[2023-10-02]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/s7847/201904/e9117ea8b6b84f48962e84401d305292.shtml. (in Chinese)
    [6] MORGAN I G, ROSE K A. Myopia: is the nature-nurture debate finally over?[J]. Clin Exp Optom, 2019, 102(1): 3-17. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12845
    [7] DEMIR P, BASKARAN K, THEAGARAYAN B, et al. Refractive error, axial length, environmental and hereditary factors associated with myopia in Swedish children[J]. Clin Exp Optom, 2021, 104(5): 595-601. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1878833
    [8] 张欣. 重视儿童青少年近视环境危险因素的防控[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2018, 39(1): 6-8, 12. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.01.002

    ZHANG X. Environmental factors and myopia: prospects for prevention[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2018, 39(1): 6-8, 12. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.01.002
    [9] 中华人民共和国卫生部, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 标准对数视力表: GB 11533—2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011.

    Ministry of Health of the PRC, Standardization Administration of the PRC. Standard for logarithmic visual acuity charts: GB 11533-2011[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2011. (in Chinese)
    [10] 中华人民共和国卫生部, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 学生健康检查技术规范: GB/T 26343—2010[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010.

    Ministry of Health of the PRC, Standardization Administration of the PRC. Technical standard for physical examination for students: GB/T 26343-2010[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2010. (in Chinese)
    [11] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 中小学生屈光不正筛查规范: WS/T 663—2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020.

    National Health Commission of the PRC. Specification for screening of refractive error in primary and secondary school students: WS/T 663-2020[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2020. (in Chinese)
    [12] CHEN H, LIAO Y, ZHOU W, et al. The change of myopic prevalence in children and adolescents before and after COVID-19 pandemic in Suqian, China[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(3): e0262166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262166
    [13] MU J, ZHONG H, LIU M, et al. Trends in myopia development among primary and secondary school students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a large-scale cross-sectional study[J]. Front Public Health, 2022, 10: 859285. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.859285
    [14] XIONG S, SANKARIDURG P, NADUVILATH T, et al. Time spent in outdoor activities in relation to myopia prevention and control: a Meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017, 95(6): 551-566. doi: 10.1111/aos.13403
    [15] HE X, SANKARIDURG P, WANG J, et al. Time outdoors in reducing myopia: a school-based cluster randomized trial with objective monitoring of outdoor time and light intensity[J]. Ophthalmology, 2022, 129(11): 1245-1254. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.06.024
    [16] THOMSON K, KAROUTA C, ASHBY R. Form-deprivation and lens-induced myopia are similarly affected by pharmacological manipulation of the dopaminergic system in chicks[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2020, 61(12): 4. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.12.4
    [17] HUANG H M, CHANG D S, WU P C. The association between near work activities and myopia in children: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(10): e0140419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140419
    [18] JIANG D, LIN H, LI C, et al. Longitudinal association between myopia and parental myopia and outdoor time among students in Wenzhou: a 2.5-year longitudinal cohort study[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2021, 21(1): 11. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01763-9
    [19] MA Y, ZOU H, LIN S, et al. Cohort study with 4-year follow-up of myopia and refractive indicators in primary schoolchildren in Baoshan District, Shanghai[J]. Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2018, 46(8): 861-872. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13195
    [20] ENTHOVEN C A, TIDEMAN J W L, POLLING J R, et al. The impact of computer use on myopia development in childhood: the generation R study[J]. Prev Med, 2020, 132: 105988. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.105988
    [21] FOREMAN J, SALIM A T, PRAVEEN A, et al. Association between digital smart device use and myopia: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Digit Health, 2021, 3(12): e806-e818. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00135-7
    [22] LANCA C, SAW S M. The association between digital screen time and myopia: a systematic review[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2020, 40(2): 216-229. doi: 10.1111/opo.12657
    [23] MCCRANN S, LOUGHMAN J, BUTLER J S, et al. Smartphone use as a possible risk factor for myopia[J]. Clin Exp Optom, 2021, 104(1): 35-41. doi: 10.1111/cxo.13092
    [24] 程美嘉, 吴仪, 邹丹. 中国学生食物摄入与近视关系的Meta分析[J]. 中国校医, 2023, 37(1): 68-72.

    CHENG M J, WU Y, ZOU D. Meta-analysis of relationship between food intake and myopia in Chinese students[J]. Chin J School Doctor, 2023, 37(1): 68-72. (in Chinese)
    [25] LI M, TAN C S, FOO L L, et al. Dietary intake and associations with myopia in Singapore children[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2022, 42(2): 319-326. doi: 10.1111/opo.12929
    [26] 刘佳, 陶芳标. 睡眠不足与儿童青少年近视关联性研究进展[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(3): 463-466, 471. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.03.035

    LIU J, TAO F B. Study on the association between sleep deficiency and myopia in children and adolescents[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(3): 463-466, 471. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.03.035
    [27] CHAKRABORTY R, OSTRIN L A, NICKLA D L, et al. Circadian rhythms, refractive development, and myopia[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2018, 38(3): 217-245. doi: 10.1111/opo.12453
  • 加载中
图(1) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  247
  • HTML全文浏览量:  127
  • PDF下载量:  77
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-10-12
  • 修回日期:  2023-10-26
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-02-01
  • 刊出日期:  2024-01-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回