累积家庭风险与儿童青少年抑郁情绪关系的追踪研究

刘艳; 孙旭; 陈欢

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024005

累积家庭风险与儿童青少年抑郁情绪关系的追踪研究

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2024005

湖南科技大学教育学院，湘潭 411201

基金项目:

湖南省哲学社科基金项目 21YBA110

详细信息

作者简介:
刘艳(1984-)，女，湖南浏阳人，博士，副教授，主要研究方向为教育心理学

通讯作者:
陈欢，E-mail：chenhan101199@163.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: B844.2 G78 R179
计量
- 文章访问数: 141
- HTML全文浏览量: 65
- PDF下载量: 72
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-09-04
- 修回日期: 2023-11-12
- 网络出版日期: 2024-03-02
- 刊出日期: 2024-02-25

Longitudinal study on the relationship between cumulative family risk and depression symptoms among children and adolescents

School of Education, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan (411201), Hunan Province, China

摘要

摘要: 目的考察累积家庭风险与2，4年后儿童青少年抑郁情绪的关系，为促进儿童青少年心理健康提供参考依据。方法选取中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)中2016(T1)、2018(T2)和2020年(T3)调查的730名儿童青少年及其家庭、父母的数据进行分析。测量工具包括累积家庭风险问卷和流调中心用抑郁量表。采用χ²检验和Logistic回归分析累积家庭风险与儿童青少年抑郁情绪的关系。结果儿童青少年中度及以上抑郁情绪在T1、T2和T3的检出率分别为14.4%，15.9%和24.5%。T2女生的抑郁情绪检出率(19.8%)高于男生(12.5%)(χ²=7.28，P < 0.01)。Logistic回归分析结果显示，T1累积家庭风险可预测T1、T2、T3儿童青少年的抑郁情绪(OR值分别为1.73, 1.32, 1.38, P值均＜0.05)。结论累积家庭风险对2，4年后儿童青少年的抑郁情绪有着较为持久的影响。家庭和学校应重视儿童青少年抑郁情绪的变化并及时提供干预和帮助，以促进其心理健康发展。
- 家庭 /
- 抑郁 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 回归分析 /
- 儿童 /
- 青少年
Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship between cumulative family risk and depression symptoms at 2- and 4-year follow-up among children and adolescents, so as to provide reference basis for promoting the mental health of children and adolescents. Methods Data were acquired from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) project in 2016(T1), 2018 (T2), and 2020 (T3), which included 730 children and adolescents, their families and parents. The measurement tools included the Cumulative Family Risk Scales and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Chi-square test and Logistic regression were used to analyze the relationship between cumulative family risk and depression symptoms among children and adolescents. Results The detection rates of moderate and above depression symptoms among children and adolescents at T1, T2, and T3 were 14.4%, 15.9%, and 24.5%, respectively. The prevalence of depression symptoms of children and adolescents at T2 was higher in females (19.8%) than males (12.5%)(χ²=7.28, P < 0.01). Logistic regression analyses showed that the cumulative family risk at T1 positively predicted depression symptoms of children and adolescents at T1, T2, and T3(OR=1.73, 1.32, 1.38, P < 0.05). Conclusions The cumulative family risk has a long-lasting impact on depressive symptoms among children and adolescents after 2 and 4 years. Family and schools should pay attention to the changes in depression among children and adolescents, and provide timely intervention and assistance to promote their mental health development.
- Family /
- Depression /
- Mental health /
- Regression analysis /
- Child /
- Adolescent
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 不同组别儿童青少年不同调查时间抑郁情绪检出率比较

Table 1. Comparison of detection rates of depression symptoms in children and adolescents with different survey time in different groups

组别	选项	人数	统计值	T1	T2	T3
性别	男	392		62(15.8)	49(12.5)	93(23.7)
	女	338		43(12.7)	67(19.8)	86(25.4)
			χ²值	1.41	7.28	0.29
			P值	0.24	< 0.01	0.59
T1年龄/岁	10	192		27(14.1)	30(15.6)	43(22.4)
	11	187		22(11.8)	32(17.1)	52(27.8)
	12	188		29(15.4)	29(15.4)	42(22.3)
	13	153		26(17.0)	23(15.0)	40(26.1)
	14	10		1(10.0)	2(20.0)	2(20.0)
			χ²值	2.23	0.46	2.37
			P值	0.69	0.98	0.67
地区	农村	444		63(14.2)	66(14.9)	113(25.5)
	城市	286		42(14.7)	50(17.5)	66(23.1)
			χ²值	0.04	0.89	0.53
			P值	0.85	0.35	0.47
注： ()内数字为检出率/%。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 T1累积家庭风险与T1、T2、T3儿童青少年抑郁情绪Logistic回归分析(n=730)

Table 2. Logistic analysis between T1 cumulative family risk and T1, T2, T3 children and adolescents' depression symptoms (n=730)

调查时间	自变量	标准误	Wald χ²值	P值	OR值(95%CI)
T1	性别	0.22	2.31	0.13	0.72(0.47~1.10)
	T1累积家庭风险	0.10	27.83	< 0.01	1.73(1.41~2.13)
T2	性别	0.21	6.50	0.01	1.69(1.13~2.53)
	T1累积家庭风险	0.10	7.62	0.01	1.32(1.08~1.61)
T3	性别	0.17	0.13	0.72	1.06(0.76~1.50)
	T1累积家庭风险	0.09	13.35	< 0.01	1.38(1.16~1.64)

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(28)

[1]	刘小燕, 冯雪英, 衣明纪, 等. 儿童抑郁症状及其行为与家庭因素的相关性[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2019, 40(12): 1849-1854. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.12.023 LIU X Y, FENG X Y, YI M J, et al. Association of childhood depressive symptoms behaviors with family factors[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2019, 40(12): 1849-1854. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.12.023
[2]	NGIN C, PAL K, TUPT S, et al. Social and behavioral factors associated with depressive symptoms among university students in Cambodia: a cross-sectional study[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(9): e019918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019918
[3]	BRONFENBRENNER U, MORRIS P A. The bioecological model of human development[M]//DAMON W, LERNER R M. Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1: theoretical models of human development (6th ed). New York: Wiley, 2006: 793-828.
[4]	RUTTER M. Statistical and personal interactions: facets and perspectives[M]//MAGNUSSON D, ALLEN V. Human development: an interactional perspective. New York: Academic Press, 1983: 295-319.
[5]	EVANS G W, LI D, WHIPPLE S S. Cumulative risk and child development[J]. Psychol Bull, 2013, 139(6): 1342-1396. doi: 10.1037/a0031808
[6]	李董平. 多重生态学风险因素与青少年社会适应: 风险建模与作用机制研究[D]. 广州: 华南师范大学, 2012. LI D P. Multiple ecological risk factors and adolescent social adaptation: a study of risk modelling and mechanisms of action[D]. Guangzhou: South China Normal University, 2012. (in Chinese)
[7]	HUSTON A C, BENTLEY A C. Human development in societal context[J]. Annu Rev Psychol, 2010, 61: 411-437. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100442
[8]	熊俊梅, 海曼, 黄飞, 等. 家庭累积风险与青少年心理健康的关系: 心理资本的补偿效应和调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 94-102. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ202001011.htm XIONG J M, HAI M, HUANG F, et al. Family cumulative risk and mental health in Chinese adolescents: the compensatory and moderating effects of psychological capital[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2020, 36(1): 94-102. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ202001011.htm
[9]	MULLOLA S, BROOKS-GUNN J, ELOVAINIO M, et al. Early childhood psychosocial family risks and cumulative dopaminergic sensitizing score: links to behavior problems in U.S. 9-year-old[J]. J Affect Disord, 2021, 280(Pt A): 432-441.
[10]	PIQUERO A R, FARRINGTON D P, FONTAINE N M G, et al. Childhood risk, offending trajectories, and psychopathy at age 48 years in the cambridge study in delinquent development[J]. Psychol Public Policy Law, 2012, 18(4): 577-598. doi: 10.1037/a0027061
[11]	徐文明, 叶彩霞, 方烨仪. 早期累积家庭风险对青少年内化问题的影响: 弹性双重机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 361-368. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CLXW202003011.htm XU W M, YE C X, FANG Y Y. The effects of early cumulative family risk on internalization problems in adolescents: a dual mechanism of resilience[J]. Stud Psychol Behav, 2020, 18(3): 361-368. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CLXW202003011.htm
[12]	袁言云, 王志航, 孙庆, 等. 累积家庭风险与贫困儿童情绪问题的关系: 有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 100-108. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ202201012.htm YUAN Y Y, WANG Z H, SUN Q, et al. The relationship between cumulative family risk and emotional problems among impoverished children: a moderated mediation model[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2022, 38(1): 100-108. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ202201012.htm
[13]	SULLIVAN A D, BENOIT R, BRESLEND N L, et al. Cumulative socioeconomic status risk and observations of parent depression: are there associations with child outcomes?[J]. J Fam Psychol, 2019, 33(8): 883-893. doi: 10.1037/fam0000567
[14]	LANDERS-POTTS A M, WICKRAMA S A K, SIMONS G L, et al. An extension and moderational analysis of the family stress model focusing on African American adolescents[J]. Fam Relat, 2015, 64(2): 233-248. doi: 10.1111/fare.12117
[15]	CONGER R D, MCLOYD V C, WALLACE L, et al. Economic pressure in African American families: a replication and extension of the family stress model[J]. Dev Psychol, 2002, 38(2): 179-193. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.38.2.179
[16]	廖友国, 连榕, 张妍, 等. 青少年与父母抑郁情绪的关系: 交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(3): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX202204032.htm LIAO Y G, LIAN R, ZHANG Y, et al. The relationship between adolescents and their parents' depression: a cross-lagged regression analysis[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2022, 45(3): 1-6. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX202204032.htm
[17]	和红, 王攀, 闫辰聿, 等. 家庭健康促进视角下青少年抑郁的代际传递研究: 基于CFPS2018的实证分析[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2022, 15(7): 45-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGWZ202207007.htm HE H, WANG P, YAN C Y, et al. Intergenerational transmission of depression in adolescents from the perspective of family-centered health promotion: an empirical analysis based on CFPS 2018[J]. Chin J Health Policy, 2022, 15(7): 45-57. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGWZ202207007.htm
[18]	肖雪, 刘丽莎, 徐良苑, 等. 父母冲突、亲子关系与青少年抑郁的关系: 独生与非独生的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 468-476. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201704011.htm XIAO X, LIU L S, XU L Y, et al. Marital conflict, parent-child relationship and adolescents' depression in Chinese only and non-only child family[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2017, 33(4): 468-476. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201704011.htm
[19]	CONGER R D, DONNELLLAN M B. An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development[J]. Annu Rev Psychol, 2007, 58: 175-199. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551
[20]	李忠路, 邱泽奇. 家庭背景如何影响儿童学业成就: 义务教育阶段家庭社会经济地位影响差异分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2016, 4: 121-144, 244-245. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHXJ201604006.htm LI Z L, QIU Z Q. Family background and children' s academic performance: evidence from the compulsory education in China[J]. Sociol Stud, 2016, 4: 121-144, 244-245. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHXJ201604006.htm
[21]	TURVEY C L, WALLACE R B, HERZOG R. A revised CES-D measure of depressive symptoms and a DSM-based measure of major depressive episodes in the elderly[J]. Int Psychogeriatr, 1999, 11(2): 139-148. doi: 10.1017/S1041610299005694
[22]	LIU S, FANG Y, SU Z, et al. Factor structure and measurement invariance of the 8-item CES-D: a national longitudinal sample of Chinese adolescents[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2023, 23(1): 868. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05316-4
[23]	LUO W X, ZHAO M. Trends and socioeconomic differentials in depression prevalence in China, 2010-2018[J]. Chin J Sociol, 2021, 7(4): 535-556. doi: 10.1177/2057150X211043008
[24]	周浩, 龙立荣. 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12(6): 942-950. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2004.06.018 ZHOU H, LONG L R. Statistical remedies for common method biases[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2004, 12(6): 942-950. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2004.06.018
[25]	BIRMAHER B, RYAN N D, WILLIAMSON D E, et al. Childhood and adolescent depression: a review of the past 10 years[J]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 1996, 35(11): 1427-1439. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199611000-00011
[26]	侯金芹, 陈祉妍. 青少年抑郁情绪的发展轨迹: 界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(8): 957-968. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB201608005.htm HOU J Q, CHEN Z Y. The trajectories of adolescent depressive symptoms: identifying latent subgroups and risk factors[J]. Acta Psychol Sinica, 2016, 48(8): 957-968. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB201608005.htm
[27]	ADKINS D E, WANG V, DUPRE M E, et al. Structure and stress: trajectories of depressive symptoms across adolescence and young adulthood[J]. Soc Forces, 2009, 88(1): 31-60. doi: 10.1353/sof.0.0238
[28]	LI X Y, MCGUE M, GOTTESMAN I I. Two sources of genetic liability to depression: interpreting the relationship between stress sensitivity and depression under a multifactorial polygenic model[J]. Behav Genet, 2012, 42(2): 268-277. doi: 10.1007/s10519-011-9506-x