Effects of group sports game intervention on social skills and quality of life in children with austism spectrum disorders
-
摘要:
目的 探讨小组体育游戏干预方法对孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童社交能力及生活质量的影响,为ASD儿童社交及生活质量的改善提供参考。 方法 于2021年9月至2022年1月,筛选襄阳市中心医院儿童康复科72名4~6岁ASD儿童,随机分为试验组(36名)和对照组(36名)。对照组进行常规康复训练(其中包括体育游戏个训课训练),试验组在常规康复训练的基础上将体育游戏个训课替换为小组体育游戏课,课程内容主要包括课前热身、小组体育游戏、课后放松3个部分。课程将社交技能与体育游戏相结合,以小组形式开展(共分12组,每组3人),每周5次,60 min/次,为期12周。观察两组治疗前后儿童孤独症评定量表(CARS)、孤独症治疗评估量表(ATEC)、社交反应量表(SRS)、儿童生活质量普适性核心评定量表(PedsQL 4.0)得分情况。采用t检验与χ2检验进行统计学分析。 结果 干预前,试验组与对照组的SRS量表评分差异无统计学意义(t=-0.63,P>0.05)。干预后,试验组总有效率为83.33%,高于对照组的41.67%(χ2=13.33,P<0.05);试验组与对照组SRS量表得分均降低(t值分别为17.75,8.71,P值均<0.05),且试验组社交知觉(17.67±4.12)、社交认知(30.33±4.99)、社交沟通(50.33±9.39)、社交动机(24.25±6.78)评分及总分(152.67±25.82)均低于对照组(22.17±5.34,36.00±4.13,62.58±11.07,34.42±7.13,186.33±29.03)(t值分别为-4.88,-2.03,-2.13,-3.58,-3.01,P值均<0.05);干预后,试验组PedsQL 4.0量表中社会功能(53.33±18.01)及总分(283.83±51.83)两个维度得分高于对照组(23.33±15.13,218.00±39.01)(t值分别为4.42,3.52,P值均<0.05);试验组ATEC量表得分(44.33±14.72)低于对照组(59.33±16.95)(t=-2.32,P<0.05)。 结论 小组体育游戏干预能够显著改善ASD儿童的社交能力及生活质量。 Abstract:Objective To explore the effects of group sports game intervention on social ability and quality of life of children with austism spectrum disorders (ASD), so as to provide reference for rehabilitation intervention of social and quality of life of children with ASD. Methods From September 2021 to January 2022, 72 children with ASD aged 4-6 in the children's rehabilitation department of Xiangyang Central Hospital were selected to participate in the study, and were randomly divided into experimental group (n=36) and control group (n=36). The control group received routine rehabilitation training (including individual sports game training), and the experimental group replaced individual sports game training with group sports game training on the basis of routine rehabilitation.The course content mainly included three parts: warm-up before class, group sports games and relaxation after class. The course combined social skills with sports games, and was carried out in a group form (divided into 12 groups with 3 people in each group), and was trained five times a week for 60 minutes, for a total of 12 weeks. The scores of Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC), Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL 4.0) were observed before and after treatment. t-test and χ2 test were used for statistical analysis. Results There was no significant difference in SRS scores between the experimental group and the control group before intervention (t=-0.63, P>0.05). After the intervention, the total response rate in the experimental group was 83.33%, higher than 41.67% in the control group (χ2=13.33, P<0.05), and the SRS scores decreased in the experimental group and control group (t=17.75, 8.71, P<0.05). The SRS scale score of the experimental group Social perception (17.67±4.12), social cognition (30.33±4.99), social communication (50.33±9.39), social motivation (24.25±6.78) scores and total scores (152.67±25.82) were lower than those of the control group(22.17±5.34, 36.00±4.13, 62.58±11.07, 34.42±7.13, 186.33±29.03)(t=-4.88, -2.03, -2.13, -3.58, -3.01, P<0.05).After the intervention, the scores of social function (53.33±18.01) and total score (283.83±51.83) on PedsQL 4.0 scale in experimental group were higher than those in control group(23.33±15.13, 218.00±39.01) (t=4.42, 3.52, P<0.05). After the intervention, Autism Treatment Evaluation Scale (ATEC) scores of experimental groups(44.33±14.72) was lower than that in control group (59.33±16.95)(t=-2.32, P<0.05). Conclusion The intervention of group sports game has a significant effect on improving social ability and life quality of children with ASD. 1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。 -
表 1 试验组与对照组干预前后SRS量表评分比较(x±s)
Table 1. Comparison of SRS scores between experimental group and control group before and after intervention(x±s)
组别 干预前后 人数 统计值 社交知觉 社交认知 社交沟通 社交动机 ASD行为 总分 试验组 干预前 36 24.92±4.10 35.50±5.25 67.00±8.26 34.58±5.38 35.17±4.36 197.67±21.45 干预后 36 17.67±4.12 30.33±4.99 50.33±9.39 24.25±6.78 29.25±4.14 152.67±25.82 t值 12.28 12.64 16.34 11.39 12.23 17.75 P值 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 对照组 干预前 36 25.00±5.43 38.08±3.80 68.08±10.21 37.67±6.58 34.50±4.82 203.75±25.97 干预后 36 22.17±5.34 36.00±4.13 62.58±11.07 34.42±7.13 30.00±6.14 186.33±29.03 t值 6.17 5.00 11.35 8.74 4.70 8.71 P值 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 表 2 试验组与对照组干预前后PedsQL 4.0量表评分比较(x±s)
Table 2. Comparison of PedsQL 4.0 scores between experimental group and control group before and after intervention(x±s)
组别 干预前后 人数 统计值 生理 情感 社会 角色 总分 试验组 干预前 36 70.50±10.58 58.33±14.67 16.67±12.31 45.83±21.20 191.33±46.74 干预后 36 82.17±11.22 77.50±14.54 53.33±18.01 70.83±18.67 283.83±51.83 t值 -2.62 -11.13 -12.08 -10.49 -11.67 P值 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 对照组 干预前 36 67.42±9.02 60.83±13.46 17.92±16.02 51.67±15.28 197.83±41.67 干预后 36 73.83±12.33 64.17±15.20 23.33±15.13 56.17±15.13 218.00±39.01 t值 -2.68 -2.15 -3.22 -3.63 -4.40 P值 0.02 0.05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 -
[1] DAWSON G, ROGERS S, MUNSON J, et al. Randomized controlled trial of an intervention for toddlers with autism: the early start denver model[J]. Pediatrics, 2010, 125(1): e17-e23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0958 [2] MAENNER M J, SHAW K A, BAKIAN A V, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years-autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2018[J]. MMWR Surveill Summ, 2021, 70(11): 1-16. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7011a1 [3] SUN X, ALLISON C, WEI L, et al. Autism prevalence in China is comparable to Western prevalence[J]. Mol Autism, 2019, 10(1): 1-19. doi: 10.1186/s13229-018-0253-1 [4] 张丹. 体育干预对培养自闭症儿童社会交往能力的实证研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2018.ZHANG D. An empirical study of sports intervention on cultivating autistic children's social communication ability[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2018. (in Chinese) [5] 董良山, 卜瑾, 沈波, 等. 10周运动干预对自闭症儿童基本动作技能与社会交往能力的影响[J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 2021, 40(3): 171-180.DONG L S, BU J, SHEN B, et al. The effect of ten-week exercise intervention on fundamental motor skills and social ability of children with autism spectrum disorders[J]. Chin J Sports Med, 2021, 40(3): 171-180. (in Chinese) [6] CHRISTENSEN-SANDFORT R J, WHINNERY S B. Impact of milieu teaching on communication skills of young children with autism spectrum disorder[J]. Topics Early Child Spec Educ, 2013, 32(4): 211-222. doi: 10.1177/0271121411404930 [7] LIU T L, HSIAO R C, CHOU W J, et al. Social anxiety in victimization and perpetration of cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(11): 5728. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115728 [8] American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-V[M]. Washington: American Psychiatric Association Publishing, 2013: 50-59. [9] SCHOPLER E, REICHLER R J, DEVELLIS R F, et al. Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS)[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 1980, 10(1): 91-103. doi: 10.1007/BF02408436 [10] 龚耀先, 戴晓阳. 中国-韦氏幼儿智力量表(C-WYCSI)的编制[J]. 心理学报, 1988, 20(4): 364-376.GONG Y X, DAI X Y. Development of the Chinese-Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Young Children (C-WYCSI)[J]. Acta Psychol Sinica, 1988, 20(4): 364-376. (in Chinese) [11] SHANKER S, PRADHAN B. Effect of Yoga on the motor proficiency of children with autism spectrum disorder and the feasibility of its inclusion in special school environments[J]. Adapt Phys Act Q, 2022, 39(2): 247-267. [12] CONSTANTINO J N, GRUBER C P. Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) manual[M]. USA: Western Psychological Services, 2005. [13] 陈秋如. 社交反应量表的修订和应用初步研究[D]. 广州: 中山大学, 2009.CHEN Q R. The revision and application of Social Response Scale[D]. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University, 2009. (in Chinese) [14] CEN C Q, LIANG Y Y, CHEN Q R, et al. Investigating the validation of the Chinese Mandarin version of the Social Responsiveness Scale in a Mainland China child population[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2017, 17(1): 51. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1185-y [15] VARNI J W, SEID M, KNIGHT T S, et al. The PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales: sensitivity, responsiveness, and impact on clinical decision-making[J]. J Behav Med, 2002, 25(2): 175-193. doi: 10.1023/A:1014836921812 [16] EDELSON S M, RIMLAND B, GRANDIN T. Response to Goldstein's commentary: interventions to facilitate auditory, visual, and motor integration: "show me the data"[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2003, 33(5): 551-552. doi: 10.1023/A:1025843931535 [17] DE LA ROSA A, OLASO-GONZALEZ G, ARC-CHAGNAUD C, et al. Physical exercise in the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer's disease[J]. J Sport Health Sci, 2020, 9(5): 394-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.01.004 [18] TAN B W, POOLEY J A, SPEELMAN C P. A Meta-analytic review of the efficacy of physical exercise interventions on cognition in indivicluals with autism spectrum disorder and ADHD[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2016, 46(9): 3126-3143. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2854-x [19] 林君薇. 体育游戏论[J]. 体育文化导刊, 2009(10): 103-105, 115.LIN J W. Sports game theory[J]. Sports Cult Guide, 2009(10): 103-105, 115. (in Chinese) [20] TOSCANO C V A, CARVALHO H M, FERREIRA J P. Exercise effects for children with autism spectrum disorder: metabolic health, autistic traits, and quality of life[J]. Percept Mot Skills, 2018, 125(1): 126-146. doi: 10.1177/0031512517743823 [21] 潘红玲, 李艳翎, 谭慧. 体育游戏对孤独症儿童沟通行为影响的个案研究[J]. 武汉体育学院学报, 2018, 52(1): 95-100.PAN H L, LI Y L, TAN H. Influences of sports games on autistic children's communicative behavior[J]. J Wuhan Inst Phys Educ, 2018, 52(1): 95-100. (in Chinese) [22] 徐云, 季灵芝. 体感游戏在孤独症儿童干预中的效用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24(4): 762-765.XU Y, JI L Z. Effects of motion sensing games on children with autism[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2016, 24(4): 762-765. (in Chinese) [23] 张俊梅, 王少兵, 林钦杰. 体育运动对孤独症的影响研究进展[J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 2017, 36(6): 552-557.ZHANG J M, WANG S B, LIN Q J. Research progress on the influence of physical exercise on autism[J]. Chin J Sports Med, 2017, 36(6): 552-557. (in Chinese) [24] 王婧媛. 体育游戏文化的演进过程探究[D]. 武汉: 武汉体育学院, 2013.WANG J Y. Research on the evolution process of sports game culture[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan Sports University, 2013. (in Chinese) [25] 潘红玲, 张恳, 王岐富. 适应体育运动对孤独症儿童影响的干预研究[J]. 现代特殊教育, 2017(16) : 40-44, 50.PAN H L, ZHANG K, WANG Q F. An intervention study on the influence of adaptive physical exercise on autistic children[J]. Mod Spec Educ, 2017(16) : 40-44, 50. (in Chinese) [26] 徐雷. 自闭症谱系障碍个体运动干预研究进展[J]. 中国体育科技, 2017, 53(6) : 117-126, 141.XU L. Research progress of exercise intervention on individuals with autism spectrum disorders[J]. China Sport Sci Technol, 2017, 53(6) : 117-126, 141. (in Chinese) [27] 宦丽, 刘丽. 小组教学法在高校田径教学中的应用技巧[J]. 吉林省教育学院学报, 2015, 31(7) : 97-98.HUAN L, LIU L. Application skills of group teaching method in college track and field teaching[J]. J Educ Inst Jilin Prov, 2015, 31(7) : 97-98. (in Chinese) [28] VERNON T W, KOEGEL R L, DAUTERMAN H, et al. An early social engagement intervention for young children with autism and their parents[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2012, 42(12): 2702-2717. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1535-7 [29] 夏薇, 王佳, 孙礼, 等. 孤独症患儿家庭环境及父母生存质量分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2010, 31(2): 136-137, 140.XIA W, WANG J, SUN L, et al. Autism familial environment and their parents quality of life(QOL)[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2010, 31(2): 136-137, 140. (in Chinese) [30] 蓬欢. 体育游戏对3至6岁自闭症儿童的心理影响[J]. 当代体育科技, 2019, 9(3): 237, 239.PENG H. The psychological impact of sports games on autistic children aged 3 to 6[J]. Contemp Sports Technol, 2019, 9(3): 237, 239. (in Chinese) -

计量
- 文章访问数: 577
- HTML全文浏览量: 275
- PDF下载量: 63
- 被引次数: 0