中学生负性情绪和家庭亲密度与网络成瘾的关系

盛佳婷; 杨亚明; 肖月; 蒋炫励; 王晓宇; 刘芳妒; 李敏辉; 苏立燕; 马俊; 张徐军

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.12.005

中学生负性情绪和家庭亲密度与网络成瘾的关系

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.12.005

1.
东南大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系，江苏南京 210009
2.
江苏省宜兴市疾病预防控制中心科教科

基金项目:

江苏省重点研发计划(社会发展)专项基金项目 BE2021617

详细信息

作者简介:
盛佳婷(1997-)，女，浙江台州人，在读硕士，主要研究方向为伤害流行病学

通讯作者:
张徐军, E-mail: xjzhang@seu.edu.cn

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G444 G78 TN711
计量
- 文章访问数: 436
- HTML全文浏览量: 194
- PDF下载量: 106
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-07-13
- 修回日期: 2023-10-09
- 网络出版日期: 2023-12-26
- 刊出日期: 2023-12-25

Association between negative emotion, family intimacy and Internet addiction among junior and senior school students

1.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing (210009), Jiangsu Province, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨中学生负性情绪(抑郁、焦虑、压力)和家庭亲密度与网络成瘾的关系，为中学生网络成瘾的干预提供依据。方法于2022年12月—2023年2月，采用分层随机整群抽样方法，纳入江苏省宜兴市初、高中3 026名学生为研究对象。问卷调查内容包括学生的人口学特征、抑郁-焦虑-压力量表简版(DASS-21)、家庭环境量表中文版(FES-CV)、中文网络成瘾量表(CIAS-R)。采用简单相关分析家庭亲密度、抑郁、焦虑、压力和网络成瘾的关系；采用中介效应模型分析负性情绪在家庭亲密度与网络成瘾之间的中介效应。结果中学生网络成瘾平均得分(46.26±15.58)，不同年级学生网络成瘾得分差异有统计学意义(F=87.15，P < 0.01)。抑郁(r=0.57)、焦虑(r=0.56)、压力(r=0.57)与中学生网络成瘾正相关，家庭亲密度(r=-0.34)与中学生网络成瘾负相关(P值均 < 0.01)。在中介效应模型中，家庭亲密度负向预测负性情绪(β=-0.48)和网络成瘾(β=-0.10)，负性情绪正向预测网络成瘾(β=0.45)(P值均 < 0.01)；负性情绪在家庭亲密度与网络成瘾之间起部分中介作用(中介效应值为-1.71，95%CI=-1.96~-1.49，中介效应占比67.9%，P < 0.05)。结论中学生负性情绪和家庭亲密度与网络成瘾存在关联，家庭亲密度主要通过负性情绪影响网络成瘾。应重视家庭教育，尤其是家庭亲密关系，有助于减少中学生网络成瘾的发生。
- 情绪 /
- 家庭关系 /
- 因特网 /
- 行为，成瘾 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To explore the association between negative emotion (depression, anxiety and stress), family intimacy and Internet addiction, so as to provide a basis for the intervention of Internet addiction among junior and senior high school students. Methods Students were selected by stratified random cluster sampling method from junior high schools and senior high schools from December 2022 to February 2023 in Yixing City, Jiangsu Provicne. A total of 3 026 students completed the questionnaire survey, including the demographic characteristics, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21), Family Environment Scale-Chinese Version (FES-CV), and Chinese Internet Addiction Scale Revised (CIAS-R). Bivariate correlation was used to analyzed the association of family intimacy, depression, anxiety, stress, and Internet addiction. Mediating effect model was used to analyzed the mediating effect of negative emotion between family intimacy and Internet addiction. Results The average score of Internet addiction among junior and senior high school students was (46.26±15.58), and there were statistical differences in the average scores of Internet addiction across different grades (F=87.15, P < 0.01). Depression (r=0.57), anxiety (r=0.56), stress (r=0.57) were positively correlated with Internet addiction, and family intimacy (r=-0.34) was negatively correlated with Internet diction (P < 0.01). In the mediating effect model, family intimacy negatively predicted negative emotion (β=-0.48) and Internet addiction (β=-0.10), and negative emotion positively predicted Internet addiction (β=0.45) (P < 0.01). Negative emotion played a partial mediating role between family intimacy and Internet addiction (the mediation value: -1.71, 95%CI=-1.96-1.49, mediation ratio: 67.9%, P < 0.05). Conclusions There are associations between negative emotion, family intimacy and Internet addiction among junior and senior school students. Family intimacy indirectly affects Internet addiction mainly through negative emotion. It suggests that family education is in need of attention to reduce the prevalence rate of Internet addiction among junior and senior high school students, especially family intimacy.
- Emotions /
- Family relations /
- Internet /
- Behavior, addictive /
- Mental health /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

图 1 中学生负性情绪在家庭亲密度与网络成瘾间的中介效应模型

Figure 1. Mediating effect model of negative emotion in the association between family intimacy and Internet addiction among junuor and senior school students

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同组别中学生网络成瘾得分比较(x±s)

Table 1. Comparison of scores of Internet addiction among junior and senior school students (x±s)

组别	选项	人数	网络成瘾得分	t/F值	P值
性别	男	1 540	46.39±15.94	0.24	0.62
	女	1 486	46.11±15.20
年级	初一	579	37.54±13.16	87.15	< 0.01
	初二	551	42.95±14.59
	初三	514	46.54±15.27
	高一	526	47.91±14.69
	高二	489	52.10±15.21
	高三	367	54.41±14.65
独生子女	否	1 922	45.88±15.70	3.13	0.08
	是	1 104	46.92±15.34
成绩	进步	823	43.74±15.44	51.98	< 0.01
	稳定	1 147	44.51±14.67
	退步	1 056	50.11±15.58

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	CHEMNAD K, ALSHAKHSI S, AL-HARAHSHEH S, et al. Is it contagious? Does parents' Internet addiction impact their adolescents' Internet addiction?[J]. Soc Sci Comput Rev, 2023, 41(5): 1691-1711. doi: 10.1177/08944393221117408
[2]	CHI X L, HONG X, CHEN X C. Profiles and sociodemographic correlates of Internet addiction in early adolescents in southern China[J]. Addict Behav, 2020, 106: 106385. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106385
[3]	ZHOU M, ZHU W M, SUN X T, et al. Internet addiction and child physical and mental health: evidence from panel dataset in China[J]. J Affect Disord, 2022, 309: 52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.115
[4]	LEI H, LI S Y, CHIU M M, et al. Social support and Internet addiction among mainland Chinese teenagers and young adults: a Meta-analysis[J]. Comput Hum Behav, 2018, 85: 200-209. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.041
[5]	CHANG E, KIM B. School and individual factors on game addiction: a multilevel analysis[J]. Int J Psychol, 2020, 55(5): 822-831. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12645
[6]	HUANG Y, WANG T, HUANG J, et al. In fluences of major public health emergencies on the psychology of primary and middle school students and strategies for their emotional guidance[J]. J Southwest Univ, 2021, 43(12): 147-156.
[7]	CARVALHO P O, HUELSDUENKER T, CARSON F. The impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on European students' negative emotional symptoms: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Behav Sci, 2022, 12(1): 3.
[8]	LIANG L, ZHU M, DAI J, et al. The mediating roles of emotional regulation on negative emotion and Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents from a development perspective[J]. Front Psychiatry, 2021, 12: 608317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.608317
[9]	LOVIBOND P F, LOVIBOND S H. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories[J]. Behav Res Ther, 1995, 33(3): 335-343. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U
[10]	GONG X, XIE X, XU R, et al. Psychometric properties of the Chinese versions of DASS-21 in Chinese college students[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2010, 18(4): 443-446.
[11]	李小玲, 唐海波, 郭锋, 等. 抑郁-焦虑-压力量表信效度研究述评[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2012, 20(3): 350-352. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201203019.htm LI X L, TANG H B, GUO F, et al. A review of Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale's reliability and validity[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2012, 20(3): 350-352. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201203019.htm
[12]	费立鹏, 沈其杰, 郑延平, 等. "家庭亲密度和适应性量表"和"家庭环境量表"的初步评价: 正常家庭与精神分裂症家庭成员对照研究[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1991, 5(5): 198-202, 238. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS199105001.htm FEI L P, SHEN Q J, ZHENG Y P, et al. Preliminary evaluation of Chinese version of FACES Ⅱ and FES: comparison of normal families and families of schizophrenic patients[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 1991, 5(5): 198-202, 238. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS199105001.htm
[13]	陶金花, 金凤仙, 张嫚茹, 等. 家庭环境量表中文版在问题青少年群体的信效度验证[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23(6): 1024-1027. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201506015.htm TAO J H, JIN F X, ZHANG M R, et al. Reliability and validity of FES-CV in the adolescent population[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2015, 23(6): 1024-1027. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201506015.htm
[14]	陈淑惠, 翁俪祯, 苏逸人, 等. 中文网络成瘾量表之编制与心理计量特性研究[J]. 中华心理学刊, 2003, 45(3): 279-294. CHEN S H, WENG L Z, SU Y R, et al. Development SNF psychometric characteristics of Chinese Internet Addiction Scale[J]. Chin J Psychol, 2003, 45(3): 279-294. (in Chinese)
[15]	方杰, 温忠麟, 张敏强, 等. 基于结构方程模型的多重中介效应分析[J]. 心理科学, 2014, 37(3): 735-741. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX201403035.htm FANG J, WEN Z L, ZHANG M Q, et al. The analyses of multiple mediation effedts based on structural equation modeling[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2014, 37(3): 735-741. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX201403035.htm
[16]	SAROUR E O, El KESHKY M E S. Deviant peer affiliation as a mediating variable in the relationship between family cohesion and adaptability and Internet addiction among adolescents[J]. Curr Psychol, 2022, 42(25): 21833-21841.
[17]	LIU Q X, FANG X Y, YAN N, et al. Multi-family group therapy for adolescent Internet addiction: exploring the underlying mechanisms[J]. Addict Behav, 2015, 42: 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.021
[18]	PACE U, ZAPPULLA C, GUZZO G, et al. Internet addiction, temperament, and the moderator role of family emotional involvement[J]. Int J Ment Health Addict, 2014, 12(1): 52-63. doi: 10.1007/s11469-013-9468-8
[19]	LI F, ZHANG D, WU S, et al. Positive effects of online games on the growth of college students: a qualitative study from China[J]. Front Psychol, 2023, 14: 1008211. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1008211
[20]	MOHAMMAD S, JAN R A, ALSAEDI S L. Symptoms, mechanisms, and treatments of video game addiction[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(3): e36957.
[21]	XU L X, WU L L, GENG X M, et al. A review of psychological interventions for Internet addiction[J]. Psychiatry Res, 2021, 302: 114016. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114016
[22]	BÄCKLUND C, ELBE P, GAVELIN H M, et al. Gaming motivations and gaming disorder symptoms: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Behav Addict, 2022, 11(3): 667-688. doi: 10.1556/2006.2022.00053
[23]	PINE R, FLEMING T, MCCALLUM S, et al. The effects of casual videogames on anxiety, depression, stress, and low mood: a systematic review[J]. Games Health J, 2020, 9(4): 255-264. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2019.0132