上行社会比较与大学生网络攻击行为的交叉滞后分析

雷泽宇; 金童林; 乌云特娜

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.10.023

上行社会比较与大学生网络攻击行为的交叉滞后分析

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.10.023

内蒙古师范大学心理学院, 呼和浩特 010022

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目 22XSH002

内蒙古自治区研究生教育创新计划资助项目 S20210252Z

详细信息

作者简介:
雷泽宇(1998-)，女，内蒙古包头人，在读博士，主要研究方向为发展与教育心理学

通讯作者:
乌云特娜，E-mail：wuyuntena@163.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: TN711 B844.2 G478
计量
- 文章访问数: 275
- HTML全文浏览量: 146
- PDF下载量: 43
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-03-16
- 修回日期: 2023-07-02
- 网络出版日期: 2023-10-27
- 刊出日期: 2023-10-25

Cross-lagged analysis of upward social comparison and online aggressive behavior among college students

College of Psychology, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Huhhot (010022), China

摘要

摘要: 目的探究大学生上行社会比较和网络攻击行为之间的纵向关系，为开展大学生心理健康教育提供实证依据。方法于2021年12月—2022年3月，采用上行社会比较问卷和网络攻击行为量表对内蒙古某高校539名大学生进行为期4个月的追踪，使用结构方程模型对所得数据进行交叉滞后分析。结果基线(T1)和4个月后(T2)追踪大学生上行社会比较得分平均值为(2.77±0.93，2.70±1.00)分，网络攻击行为得分平均值为(1.06±0.13，1.05±0.11)分。大学生上行社会比较与网络攻击行为在两次测量中均呈正相关(r=0.14~0.19，P值均 < 0.05)。自回归中，T1上行社会比较能够正向预测T2上行社会比较(β=0.66)，T1网络攻击行为能够正向预测T2网络攻击行为(β=0.47)(P值均 < 0.01)；交叉滞后回归中，T1上行社会比较能够正向预测T2网络攻击行为(β=0.10，P < 0.01)，但T1网络攻击行为不能预测T2上行社会比较(β=0.04，P>0.05)。结论上行社会比较是大学生网络攻击行为的原因。应引导学生正确看待自己与他人之间的差距，降低大学生出现网络攻击行为的概率。
- 因特网 /
- 攻击 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 交叉研究 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To explore the longitudinal relationship between upward social comparison and online aggressive behavior among college students, in order to provide an empirical evidence for educators to carry out mental health promotion for college students. Methods From December 2021 to March 2022, 539 college students from one university in Inner Mongolia were recruited to complete the Upward Social Comparison Questionnaire (USCQ) and Online Aggressive Behavior Scale (OABS) in a 4-month follow-up study. The structural equation model was used to conduct cross-lagged analysis. Results The mean scores of upward social comparison for college students tracked at baseline (T1) and 4-months follow-up (T2) were (2.77±0.93, 2.70±1.00) points, and the mean scores of online aggressive behavior were (1.06±0.13, 1.05±0.11) points. There were positive relations between upward social comparison and online aggressive behavior of college students at both cross-sectional levels (r=0.14-0.19, P < 0.05). In the autoregression, T1 upward social comparison could positively predict T2 upward social comparison (β=0.66), and T1 online aggressive behavior could positively predict T2 online aggressive behavior (β=0.47)(P < 0.01); In the cross-lagged regression, T1 upward social comparison could positively predict T2 online aggressive behavior (β=0.10, P < 0.01), whereas T1 online aggressive behavior could not predict T2 upward social comparison (β=0.04, P>0.05). Conclusion Upward social comparison is the cause of online aggressive behavior among college students. The probability of online aggressive behavior among college students should be reduced by guiding students to correctly view the gap between themselves and others.
- Internet /
- Aggression /
- Mental health /
- Cross-over studies /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

参考文献(28)

[1]	中国互联网络信息中心. 第51次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》[EB/OL]. (2023-03-02)[2023-05-17]. https://www.cnnic.cn/n4/2023/0303/c88-10757.html. China Internet Network Information Center. The 51st Statistical Report on China's Internet Development[EB/OL]. (2023-03-02)[2023-05-17]. https://www.cnnic.cn/n4/2023/0303/c88-10757.html. (in Chinese)
[2]	王辰, 陈刚, 刘跃宁, 等. 社会排斥对网络偏差行为的影响: 自我控制的中介作用和道德同一性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 208-215. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ202002010.htm WANG C, CHEN G, LIU Y N, et al. The influence of social ostracism on online deviant behaviors: the mediating role of self-control and the moderating role of moral identity[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2020, 36(2): 208-215. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ202002010.htm
[3]	金童林. 暴力暴露对大学生网络攻击行为的影响: 反刍思维与网络道德的作用[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学, 2018. JIN T L. The relationship between violence exposure and online aggressive behavior in college students: the role of ruminative responses and Internet moral[D]. Harbin: Harbin Normal University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[4]	陆桂芝, 金童林, 葛俭, 等. 暴力暴露对大学生网络攻击行为的影响: 有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 360-367. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201903014.htm LU G Z, JIN T L, GE J, et al. The effect of violent exposure on online aggressive behavior of college students: a moderated mediation model[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2019, 35(3): 360-367. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201903014.htm
[5]	赵锋, 高文斌. 少年网络攻击行为评定量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2012, 26(6): 439-444. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2012.06.009 ZHAO F, GAO W B. Reliability and validity of the Adolescent Online Aggressive Behavior Scale[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2012, 26(6): 439-444. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2012.06.009
[6]	KOKKINOS C M, ANTONIADOU N, MARKOS A. Cyber-bullying: an investigation of the psychological profile of university student participants[J]. J Appl Dev Psychol, 2014, 35(3): 204-214. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.04.001
[7]	罗增让, 张欣怡. 宽恕水平在大学生特质愤怒与网络攻击行为关系中的调节作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2022, 30(10): 1565-1570. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL202210025.htm LUO Z R, ZHANG X Y. Moderating effect of forgiveness level on the relationship between trait anger and online aggressive behavior in college students[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2022, 30(10): 1565-1570. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL202210025.htm
[8]	崔允漷, 余文森, 郭元祥, 等. 在线教学的探索与反思(笔谈)[J]. 教育科学, 2020, 36(3): 1-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYKO202003002.htm CUI Y H, YU W S, GUO Y X, et al. Exploration and reflection on online teaching[J]. Educ Sci, 2020, 36(3): 1-24. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYKO202003002.htm
[9]	刘致宏, 张珊珊, 吴涵玉. 问题性社交网络使用与大学生线上社交焦虑和抑郁症状的关联[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(11): 1699-1703. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.11.024 LIU Z H, ZHANG S S, WU H Y. Relationship of problematic social networks use, online social anxiety and depressive symptoms in college students[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(11): 1699-1703. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.11.024
[10]	COYNE S M, MCDANIEL B T, STOCKDALE L A. "Do you dare to compare?" Associations between maternal social comparisons on social networking sites and parenting, mental health, and romantic relationship outcomes[J]. Comput Human Behav, 2017, 70: 335-340. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.081
[11]	连帅磊, 孙晓军, 牛更枫, 等. 社交网站中的上行社会比较与抑郁的关系: 一个有调节的中介模型及性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 941-952. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB201707009.htm LIAN S L, SUN X J, NIU G F, et al. Upward social comparison on SNS and depression: a moderated mediation model and gender difference[J]. Acta Psychol Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 941-952. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB201707009.htm
[12]	宋明华. 社会比较对攻击行为的影响: 自我效能和自我肯定的作用[D]. 宁波: 宁波大学, 2018. SONG M H. Effects of social comparisons on aggressive behaviors: roles of self-efficacy and self-affirmation[D]. Ningbo: Ningbo University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[13]	张豪. 社交网络中的社会比较与攻击[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2019. ZHANG H. Social comparison and aggression in social networks[D]. Xi'an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[14]	REH S, TRÖSTER C, VAN QUAQUEBEKE N. Keeping (future) rivals down: temporal social comparison predicts coworker social undermining via future status threat and envy[J]. J Appl Psychol, 2018, 103(4): 399-415. doi: 10.1037/apl0000281
[15]	BERKOWITZ L. Frustrations, appraisals, and aversively stimulated aggression[J]. Aggress behav, 1988, 14(1): 3-11.
[16]	BERKOWITZ L. Frustration-aggression hypothesis: examination and reformulation[J]. Psychol Bull, 1989, 106(1): 59-73.
[17]	汤丹丹, 温忠麟. 共同方法偏差检验: 问题与建议[J]. 心理科学, 2020, 43(1): 215-223. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD202304001.htm TANG D D, WEN Z L. Statistical approaches for testing common method bias: problems and suggestions[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2020, 43(1): 215-223. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD202304001.htm
[18]	常青. 上行社会比较与攻击性: 有调节的中介模型检验[D]. 太原: 山西大学, 2019. CHANG Q. Upward social comparison and aggression: a test of moderated mediating model[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[19]	CRAWFORD M T. The renegotiation of social identities in response to a threat to self-evaluation maintenance[J]. J Exp Soc Psychol, 2007, 43(1): 39-47.
[20]	韩晓燕, 迟毓凯. 自发社会比较中的威胁效应及自我平衡策略[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(12): 1628-1640. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB201212009.htm HAN X Y, CHI Y K. The self-threat of unsolicited social comparison and its balance[J]. Acta Psychol Sinica, 2012, 44(12): 1628-1640. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB201212009.htm
[21]	FEINSTEIN B A, HERSHENBERG R, BHATIA V, et al. Negative social comparison on facebook and depressive symptoms: rumination as a mechanism[J]. Psychol Pop Media Cult, 2013, 2(3): 161-170.
[22]	MULLER D, ATZENI T, BUTERA F. Coaction and upward social comparison reduce the illusory conjunction effect: support for distraction-conflict theory[J]. J Exp Soc Psychol, 2004, 40(5): 659-665.
[23]	MULLER D, BUTERA F. The focusing effect of self-evaluation threat in coaction and social comparison[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2007, 93(2): 194-211.
[24]	MULLER D, FAYANT M P. On being exposed to superior others: consequences of self-threatening upward social comparisons[J]. Soc Personal Psychol Compass, 2010, 4(8): 621-634.
[25]	DOLLARD J, MILLER N E, DOOB L W, et al. Frustration and aggression[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1939.
[26]	LEANDER N P, CHARTRAND T L. On thwarted goals and displaced aggression: a compensatory competence model[J]. J Exp Soc Psychol, 2017, 72: 88-100.
[27]	熊猛, 叶一舵. 相对剥夺感: 概念、测量、影响因素及作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(3): 438-453. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201603013.htm XIONG M, YE Y D. The concept, measurement, influencing factors and effects of relative deprivation[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2016, 24(3): 438-453. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201603013.htm
[28]	SMITH H J, PETTIGREW T F, PIPPIN G M, et al. Relative deprivation: a theoretical and Meta-analytic review[J]. Pers Soc Psychol Rev, 2012, 16(3): 203-232.