青少年手机多任务行为评定问卷编制及其信效度评价

李人杰; 陶舒曼; 万宇辉; 伍晓艳; 许韶君; 陶芳标

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.09.014

青少年手机多任务行为评定问卷编制及其信效度评价

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.09.014

李人杰¹,
陶舒曼^{2, 3, ,},
万宇辉³,
伍晓艳^{1, 3},
许韶君^{1, 3},
陶芳标^{1, 3}

1.
安徽医科大学儿少卫生与妇幼保健学系，合肥 230032
2.
安徽医科大学第二附属医院眼科
3.
出生人口健康教育部重点实验室/安徽人口健康与优生省级实验室

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 82273653

详细信息

作者简介:
李人杰(1996-)，男，安徽铜陵人，在读硕士，主要研究方向为青少年行为与心理健康

通讯作者:
陶舒曼，E-mail：shumantao@126.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: TN916.9 R195 R179
计量
- 文章访问数: 227
- HTML全文浏览量: 123
- PDF下载量: 28
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-03-13
- 修回日期: 2023-07-18
- 网络出版日期: 2023-09-28
- 刊出日期: 2023-09-25

Development and evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Assessment of Smartphone Multitasking for Adolescents

LI Renjie¹,
TAO Shuman^{2, 3
, ,},
WAN Yuhui³,
WU Xiaoyan^{1, 3},
XU Shaojun^{1, 3},
TAO Fangbiao^{1, 3}

1.
Department of Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei (230032), China

摘要

摘要: 目的编制青少年手机多任务行为评定问卷并评价信度和结构效度，为开展相关流行病学研究提供评价工具。方法通过文献综述、专家资讯、小组讨论自行编制青少年手机多任务行为评定问卷，确定手机活动与非媒体活动多任务、手机活动与其他媒体活动多任务以及手机功能使用多任务3个维度，初步纳入27个条目。于2021年10—12月选取辽宁、山西、河南、上海、重庆、深圳、云南7个地区，采取多阶段整群抽样方法抽取5 566名在校大学生进行问卷调查，结合条目分析、因子分析、信度评价等多种统计学方法对问卷的条目进行筛选和信度、效度评价。结果青少年手机多任务行为评定问卷最终包含3个维度，共计26个条目；方差累计贡献率为59.63%，内部一致性检验得出问卷的Cronbach α系数为0.944，各维度的Cronbach α系数为0.838~0.928；问卷的分半系数为0.849，各维度的分半系数为0.781~0.874。验证性因子分析结果显示，问卷的近似均方根残差、比较拟合指数、塔克—刘易斯指数分别为0.068，0.901，0.891，具有较好的拟合优度。Pearson相关性分析结果显示问卷效标效度较好(r=0.206~0.351，P值均 < 0.01)。结论青少年手机多任务行为评定问卷符合心理统计学评价标准，可作为评价青少年手机多任务行为的评估工具。
- 便携式电话 /
- 多媒体 /
- 问卷调查 /
- 青少年
Abstract: Objective To develop the Assessment of Smartphone Multitasking for Adolescents (ASMA) and evaluate its reliability and construct validity, so that to provide an evaluation tool for relevant epidemiological studies. Methods Based on literature review, expert-based judgement, and group discussion, the self-administered ASMA identified 3 dimensions named smartphone activities and non-media activities multitasking, smartphone activities and other media activities multitasking, and smartphone functional use multitasking, which initially included 27 items. From October to December 2021, 5 566 college students were selected from 7 regions, including Liaoning, Shanxi, Henan, Shanghai, Chongqing, Shenzhen, and Yunnan by multi-stage cluster sampling method, and item analysis, factor analysis, and reliability evaluation were used to screen items and evaluate reliability and validity. Results The final version of AMSA contained 3 dimensions covering 26 items. The variance cumulative contribution rate was 59.63%. The internal consistency test showed that Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the questionnaire was 0.944, and ranged from 0.838 to 0.928 for each dimension. The split-half coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.849 and ranging from 0.781 to 0.874 for each dimension. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), comparative fit index (CFI), and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) of the questionnaire were 0.068, 0.901, and 0.891, respectively, which had which had a good fitting degree. The results of Pearson correlation analysis showed that the criterion validity of the questionnaire was good (r=0.206-0.351, P < 0.01). Conclusion The ASMA is consistent with the evaluation standard of psychometrics and can be used as an assessment tool to evaluate smartphone multitasking behaviors in adolescents.
- Cellular phone /
- Multimedia /
- Questionnaires /
- Adolescent
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 青少年手机多任务行为评定问卷(初始版本)条目筛选结果

Table 1. Items screening of the Assessment of Smartphone Multitasking for Adolescents (initial version)

序号	条目	相关性分析			最大负荷	Cronbach α系数变化	反应度	筛选结果
序号	条目	与总量表的相关系数	与所属维度的相关系数	与其他维度的相关系数	最大负荷	Cronbach α系数变化	反应度	筛选结果
1	用餐	0.438	0.565	<	0.550	↑	0	√
2	上课、学习或作业	0.222	0.393	<	0.665	↑	1	√
3	会议培训	0.650	0.725	<	0.542	↓	0	√
4	体育活动	0.647	0.721	<	0.565	↓	1	√
5	与别人面对面交谈	0.634	0.718	<	0.576	↓	1	√
6	乘坐交通工具	0.548	0.610	<	0.699	—	0	√
7	驾驶，如骑共享单车	0.503	0.560	<	0.468	—	2	√
8	夜间醒来或躺在床上	0.600	0.647	<	0.450	↓	0	√
9	上卫生间	0.604	0.661	<	0.631	↓	0	√
10	家务劳动(不符合因子分析)	0.673	0.712	<	0.537	↓	1	×
11	走路上学或放学途中	0.700	0.741	<	0.450	↓	0	√
12	阅读报纸、杂志、书籍等	0.686	0.768	<	0.639	↓	1	√
13	看电视	0.693	0.804	<	0.706	↓	0	√
14	用电脑	0.711	0.790	<	0.633	↓	0	√
15	用平板电脑	0.661	0.807	<	0.759	↓	1	√
16	听音频媒体，如MP3等	0.672	0.797	<	0.699	↓	0	√
17	玩游戏机	0.655	0.767	<	0.690	↓	1	√
18	用手机打电话、语音或视屏通话	0.689	0.754	<	0.617	↓	0	√
19	用手机收发即时讯息，如微信、短信、QQ等	0.698	0.801	<	0.671	↓	0	√
20	用手机看视频或直播	0.720	0.809	<	0.689	↓	0	√
21	用手机听音乐	0.699	0.776	<	0.627	↓	0	√
22	用手机玩游戏	0.667	0.748	<	0.691	↓	0	√
23	用手机看电子小说	0.665	0.716	<	0.674	↓	0	√
24	用手机浏览网站	0.751	0.827	<	0.773	↓	0	√
25	用手机收发邮件	0.698	0.726	<	0.675	↓	1	√
26	用手机购物或在线支付	0.757	0.848	<	0.768	↓	0	√
27	其他用手机的活动，如计算器等	0.739	0.789	<	0.710	↓	0	√
注： < 表示该条目与其他维度的相关系数均小于该条目与所属维度的相关系数；Cronbach α系数变化是指删除该条目问卷后问卷的总Cronbach α系数的变化，↑表示升高，↓表示下降，—表示维持恒定，√表示条目保留，×表示条目删除。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 青少年手机多任务行为评定问卷因子负荷系数

Table 2. Factor loading coefficients of the Assessment of Smartphone Multitasking for Adolescents

维度	条目	公因子1	公因子2	公因子3	公因子4
手机活动与非媒体活动多任务	1.用餐				0.567
	2.上课、学习或作业				0.694
	3.会议培训				0.540
	4.体育活动				0.552
	5.与别人面对面交谈				0.561
	6.乘坐交通工具			0.703
	7.驾驶，如骑共享单车				0.446
	8.夜间醒来或躺在床上			0.463
	9.上卫生间			0.642
	10.走路上学或放学途中			0.469
手机活动与其他媒体活动多任务	11.阅读报纸、杂志、书籍等		0.640
	12.看电视		0.706
	13.用电脑		0.634
	14.用平板电脑		0.764
	15.听音频媒体，如MP3等		0.704
	16.玩游戏机		0.693
手机功能使用多任务	17.用手机打电话、语音或视屏通话	0.613
	18.用手机收发即时讯息，如微信、短信、QQ等	0.663
	19.用手机看视频或直播	0.684
	20.用手机听音乐	0.620
	21.用手机玩游戏	0.689
	22.用手机看电子小说	0.677
	23.用手机浏览网站	0.774
	24.用手机收发邮件	0.680
	25.用手机购物或在线支付	0.765
	26.其他用手机的活动，如计算器等	0.710

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(19)

[1]	LANG A, CHRZAN J. Media multitasking: good, bad, or ugly?[J]. Ann Int Commun Assoc, 2015, 39(1): 99-128.
[2]	LIM S, SHIM H. Who multitasks on smartphones? Smartphone multi-taskers' motivations and personality traits[J]. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2016, 19(3): 223-227. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0225
[3]	UNCAPHER M R, LIN L, ROSEN L D, et al. Media multitasking and cognitive, psychological, neural, and learning differences[J]. Pediatrics, 2017, 140(Suppl 2): S62-S66.
[4]	OPHIR E, NASS C, WAGNER A D. Cognitive control in media multitaskers[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106(37): 15583-15587. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903620106
[5]	RA C K, CHO J, STONE M D, et al. Association of digital media use with subsequent symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among adolescents[J]. JAMA, 2018, 320(3): 255-263. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8931
[6]	吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务: SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010: 5. WU M L. Statistical analysis of questionnaires in practice: SPSS operation and application[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2010: 5. (in Chinese)
[7]	陶舒曼, 万宇辉, 伍晓艳, 等. 《青少年脊柱健康评定问卷》编制及常模的研制[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2021, 55(9): 1051-1058. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20210727-00714 TAO S M, WAN Y H, WU X Y, et al. The development and national norm of the assessment of spinal health of youths[J]. Chin J Prev Med, 2021, 55(9): 1051-1058. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20210727-00714
[8]	XIE Y, WU X Y, TAO S M, et al. Development and validation of the self-rating of biological rhythm disorder for Chinese adolescents[J]. Chronobiol Int, 2022, 39(2): 198-204. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2021.1989450
[9]	陈开元. 量表条目筛选的统计学方法研究[J]. 智富时代, 2018(6): 224. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFSD201806355.htm CHEN K Y. A statistical methodological study on the screening of scale entries[J]. Jiffy Times, 2018(6): 224. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFSD201806355.htm
[10]	XIA Y, YANG Y. RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: the story they tell depends on the estimation methods[J]. Behav Res Methods, 2019, 51(1): 409-428. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2
[11]	中国互联网络信息中心. 2021年全国未成年人互联网使用情况研究报告[EB/OL]. (2022-12-01)[2023-02-10]. https://www.cnnic.cn/NMediaFile/2022/1201/MAIN1669871621762HOSKOXCEP1.pdf. China Internet Network Information Center. Research report on Internet usage of minors in China in 2021[EB/OL]. (2022-12-01)[2023-02-10]. https://www.cnnic.cn/NMediaFile/2022/1201/MAIN1669871621762HOSKOXCEP1.pdf. (in Chinese)
[12]	LIMTRAKUL N, LOUTHRENOO O, NARKPONGPHUN A, et al. Media use and psychosocial adjustment in children and adolescents[J]. J Paediatr Child Health, 2018, 54(3): 296-301. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13725
[13]	RIDEOUT V J, FOEHR U G, ROBERTS D F. Generation M2: media in the lives of 8-to 18-year-olds[EB/OL]. (2010-01-20)[2023-02-10]. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED527859.pdf.
[14]	UNCAPHER M R, THIEU M K, WAGNER A D. Media multitasking and memory: differences in working memory and long-term memory[J]. Psychon Bull Rev, 2016, 23(2): 483-490. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0907-3
[15]	MOISALA M, SALMELA V, HIETAJÄRVI L, et al. Media multitasking is associated with distractibility and increased prefrontal activity in adolescents and young adults[J]. Neuroimage, 2016, 134: 113-121.
[16]	MADORE K P, KHAZENZON A M, BACKES C W, et al. Memory failure predicted by attention lapsing and media multitasking[J]. Nature, 2020, 587(7832): 87-91.
[17]	MARTÍN-PERPIÑÁ M M, VIÑAS POCH F, MALO CERRATO S. Media multitasking impact in homework, executive function and academic performance in Spanish adolescents[J]. Psicothema, 2019, 31(1): 81-87.
[18]	EXELMANS L, VAN DEN BULCK J. Bedtime mobile phone use and sleep in adults[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2016, 148: 93-101.
[19]	LUO J, SUN M, YEUNG P S, et al. Development and validation of a scale to measure media multitasking among adolescents: results from China[J]. Child Youth Serv Rev, 2018, 95: 377-383.