Epidemiological investigation of an outbreak of pertussis in a primary school in Rizhao
-
摘要:
目的 了解日照市某小学一起百日咳暴发疫情流行情况,为针对性地采取百日咳的防控策略提供参考。 方法 采用现场流行病学调查方法,开展病例搜索与个案调查,通过描述性流行病学方法综合分析暴发疫情的特征。 结果 疫情从2022年4月19日至5月17日,持续29 d,共发现病例14例。病例均为该小学一年级2班学生,年龄6~7岁,其中男生6名、女生8名,男生和女生罹患率分别为30.00%,34.78%。14例病例发病至诊断时间间隔为2~22 d,中位数为10 d。所有学生均已接种4剂次无细胞百白破联合疫苗,末次接种至发病时间间隔为5~6年。经隔离治疗后,14名患病学生均痊愈,无重症或死亡病例。 结论 该起百日咳暴发疫情的发生,可能与百日咳疫苗保护效果随时间推移而下降,学校因病缺勤登记报告制度落实不严格,以及现有百日咳监测系统灵敏性差有关。 Abstract:Objective To investigate the epidemiological characteristics of a pertussis outbreak in a primary school in Rizhao City, so as to provide reference for the prevention and control strategy of pertussis. Methods The method of field epidemiological investigation was used to determine case definition for case search and case investigation, and the characteristics of the outbreak were comprehensively analyzed through descriptive epidemiological method. Results The outbreak lasted for 29 days from April 19 to May 17, 2022, with a total of 14 cases detected. All the cases were students aged 6-7 years from Class 2, Grade 1 in this primary school, including 6 boys and 8 girls. The attack rates of boys and girls were 30.00% and 34.78%, respectively. The time interval from onset to diagnosis of 14 cases ranged from 2 to 22 days, with a median of 10 days. All of them had received 4 doses of Diphtheria and Tetanus and acellular Pertussis(DTaP) combined vaccine, and the interval between the last vaccination and the onset of disease was 5-6 years. After isolated treatment, all the 14 sick students recovered, without severe or death cases. Conclusion The outbreak of pertussis in a primary school may be related to the decline in the effectiveness of pertussis vaccine protection over time, the lax implementation of a school registration and reporting system for sick absenteeism, and the poor sensitivity of existing pertussis surveillance systems. -
Key words:
- Whooping cough /
- Disease outbreaks /
- Epidemiologic studies /
- Incidence /
- Students
1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。 -
[1] 李兰娟, 任红. 传染病学[M]. 9版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 200-203.LI L J, REN H. Infectious diseases[M]. 9 ed. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2018: 200-203. (in Chinese) [2] 中华预防医学会, 中华预防医学会疫苗与免疫分会. 中国百日咳行动计划专家共识[J]. 中国疫苗和免疫, 2021, 27(3): 317-327. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJM202103019.htmChinese Preventive Medicine Association, Vaccine and Immunology Branch of the Chinese Preventive Medicine Association. Expert consensus on the China pertussis initiative[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2021, 27(3): 317-327. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJM202103019.htm [3] 汪海波, 罗会明, 温宁, 等. 我国2006—2010年百日咳流行病学分析[J]. 中国疫苗和免疫, 2012, 18(3): 207-210. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJM201203006.htmWANG H B, LUO H M, WEN N, et al. Epidemiological analysis on pertussis in China during 2006-2010[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2012, 18(3): 207-210. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJM201203006.htm [4] 吴丹, 郑徽, 李明爽, 等. 中国2018—2021年百日咳流行病学特征[J]. 中国疫苗和免疫, 2022, 28(6): 638-643. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJM202206002.htmWU D, ZHENG H, LI M S, et al. Epidemiology of pertussis in China, 2018-2021[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2022, 28(6): 638-643. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJM202206002.htm [5] 张莉萍, 汪梦, 王鹏飞, 等. 百日咳再现的原因分析及防控策略研究[J]. 中国初级卫生保健, 2022, 36(7): 80-83. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGCW202207023.htmZHANG L P, WANG M, WANG P F, et al. Cause analysis and prevention and control strategies on the pertussis reappearance[J]. Chin Primary Health Care, 2022, 36(7): 80-83. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGCW202207023.htm [6] 中华人民共和国卫生部. 百日咳诊断标准: WS 274—2007[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.Ministry of Health of the PRC. Diagnostic criteria for pertussis: WS 274-2007[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2007. (in Chinese) [7] 贺培兰, 王鑫, 畅晋, 等. 河北省2019—2021年中小学校传染病防控监督结果[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2023, 44(2): 299-301. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.02.032HE P L, WANG X, CHANG J, et al. Surveillance and control of infectious disease in primary and middle schools in Hebei Province from 2019 to 2021[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2023, 44(2): 299-301. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.02.032 [8] 黄荷, 王雯雯, 王丹, 等. 2021年贵州省中小学及幼儿园传染病防控工作现况分析[J]. 预防医学情报杂志, 2022, 38(12): 1561-1565. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YFYX202212006.htmHUANG H, WANG W W, WANG D, et al. An investigation of infectious disease prevention and control in primary schools, secondary schools and kindergartens in Guizhou Province[J]. J Prev Med Inf, 2022, 38(12): 1561-1565. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YFYX202212006.htm [9] 贾丽, 吴殿坤, 李权. 2020年黑龙江省学校传染病与常见病防控随机监督抽检结果分析[J]. 中国公共卫生管理, 2021, 37(4): 513-515. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGWS202104026.htmJIA L, WU D K, LI Q. Analysis of random supervision sampling test results of epidemic disease and common disease prevention and control in schools in Heilongjiang Province in 2020[J]. Chin J Public Health Manage, 2021, 37(4): 513-515. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGWS202104026.htm [10] 李学, 高岚, 王秋云. 2014—2021年贵阳市百日咳报告病例流行病学特征分析[J]. 应用预防医学, 2023, 29(1): 39-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXYX202301010.htmLI X, GAO L, WANG Q Y. Epidemiological characteristics of reported cases of pertussis in Guiyang from 2014 to 2021[J]. Appl Prev Med, 2023, 29(1): 39-41. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXYX202301010.htm [11] 任佳, 胡家瑜, 王静, 等. 2017年上海市百日咳监测病例流行病学特征分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2019, 34(5): 417-421. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBJC201905012.htmREN J, HU J Y, WANG J, et al. Epidemiologic characteristics of pertussis cases detected in Shanghai, 2017[J]. Dis Surveill, 2019, 34(5): 417-421. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBJC201905012.htm [12] 赵晓燕, 宋泰霞, 岳勇. 成都市某学校百日咳聚集性疫情流行病学调查[J]. 中国初级卫生保健, 2022, 36(7): 95-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGCW202207027.htmZHAO X Y, SONG T X, YUE Y. Epidemiological investigation and analysis of rare pertussis aggregation in a certain school in Chengdu[J]. Chin Prim Health Care, 2022, 36(7): 95-97. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGCW202207027.htm [13] 蒋凤, 张丽, 张德著, 等. 贵州省百日咳监测点医务人员百日咳防治知识知晓情况的基线调查分析[J]. 疾病监测与控制杂志, 2017, 11(5): 349-351. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBJK201705004.htmJIANG F, ZHANG L, ZHANG D Z, et al. Baseline survey analysis on pertussis prevention knowledge awareness of pertussis surveillance sites' health care workers in Guizhou Province[J]. J Dis Monitor Control, 2017, 11(5): 349-351. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBJK201705004.htm [14] 刘倩, 王文慧, 豆巧华, 等. 百日咳疑似病例实验室检测法的比较研究[J]. 微生物学免疫学进展, 2022, 50(1): 53-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSMY202201009.htmLIU Q, WANG W H, DOU Q H, et al. Comparison of laboratory detection methods of suspected pertussis cases[J]. Prog Microbiol Immunol, 2022, 50(1): 53-57. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSMY202201009.htm [15] 伍金倩, 黄道连, 崔经和, 等. 外周血裂隙淋巴细胞计数对百日咳诊断价值的研究[J]. 实验与检验医学, 2020, 38(5): 872-875. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXJL202005018.htmWU J Q, HUANG D L, CUI J H, et al. Study on the value of peripheral blood cleaved lymphocyte count in diagnosis of pertussis[J]. Exper Laborat Med, 2020, 38(5): 872-875. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXJL202005018.htm [16] 黄广丽, 李军勤, 李杰, 等. 裂隙淋巴细胞联合血细胞检测对百日咳的诊断价值[J]. 浙江医学, 2022, 44(22): 2437-2439. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJYE202222017.htmHUANG G L, LI J Q, LI J, et al. Diagnostic value of cleaved lymphocytes combined with blood cell detection in pertussis[J]. Zhejiang Med J, 2022, 44(22): 2437-2439. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJYE202222017.htm [17] 许秀妆, 章金灿. 裂隙淋巴细胞辅助诊断儿童百日咳的临床价值[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2020, 22(9): 996-1000. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDKZ202009015.htmXU X Z, ZHANG J C. Clinical value of cleaved lymphocytes in assisting the diagnosis of pertussis in children[J]. Chin J Contemp Pediatr, 2020, 22(9): 996-1000. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDKZ202009015.htm [18] 骆鹏, 马霄. 百日咳和百日咳疫苗的现状与挑战[J]. 中国疫苗和免疫, 2019, 25(3): 334-338. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJM201903023.htmLUO P, MA X. Status and challenges of pertussis and pertussis vaccines[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2019, 25(3): 334-338. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJM201903023.htm [19] 张梦, 吴丹, 李艺星, 等. 中国部分地区2004—2021年百日咳发病率趋势的Joinpoint回归分析[J]. 中国疫苗和免疫, 2023, 29(1): 25-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJM202301005.htmZHANG M, WU D, LI Y X, et al. Pertussis incidence trends in several areas of China from 2004 to 2021: a Joinpoint regression analysis[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2023, 29(1): 25-30. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJM202301005.htm [20] 王翠玲, 吕海英, 王曼. 无细胞百白破联合疫苗对<5岁儿童百日咳保护效果的病例对照研究[J]. 中国疫苗和免疫, 2019, 25(5): 528-531.WANG C L, LYU H Y, WANG M. Effectiveness of diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis combined vaccine against pertussis in < 5-year-old children: a case-control study[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2019, 25(5): 528-531. (in Chinese) [21] 李文豪, 邱春红, 彭远舟, 等. 深圳市4月龄~6岁儿童百日咳疫苗保护效果的配对病例对照研究[J]. 中国疫苗和免疫, 2022, 28(5): 525-528. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJM202205006.htmLI W H, QIU C H, PENG Y Z, et al. Effectiveness of pertussis vaccine among children 4 months to 6 years of age in Shenzhen City: a matched case-control study[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2022, 28(5): 525-528. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJM202205006.htm [22] 朱频频, 吴丹, 李艺星, 等. 2022年8月世界卫生组织194个成员国百日咳疫苗免疫程序现状[J]. 中国疫苗和免疫, 2022, 28(6): 650-658. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJM202206004.htmZHU P P, WU D, LI Y X, et al. Pertussis vaccination schedules in 194 World Health Organization member states, August 2022[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2022, 28(6): 650-658. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJM202206004.htm
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 186
- HTML全文浏览量: 95
- PDF下载量: 24
- 被引次数: 0