中文版儿童执行功能量表在小学生中应用的信效度分析

高翔; 黄荣芝; 田俊龙; 陈娟; 崔旭艳; 罗智

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.07.015

中文版儿童执行功能量表在小学生中应用的信效度分析

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.07.015

高翔^{1, 2},
黄荣芝³,
田俊龙¹,
陈娟⁴,
崔旭艳²,
罗智^2, ,

1.
首都体育学院研究生部，北京 100000
2.
广州体育学院运动训练学院
3.
广州体育学院研究生院
4.
长沙师范学院

基金项目:

广东省教育科学规划研究项目 2019GXJK182

详细信息

作者简介:
高翔(1991-)，男，湖南常德人，在读博士，助教，主要研究方向为儿童青少年身心健康

通讯作者:
罗智，E-mail：luozhi197091@163.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: R195 R179 G444
计量
- 文章访问数: 349
- HTML全文浏览量: 165
- PDF下载量: 45
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-03-08
- 修回日期: 2023-05-16
- 网络出版日期: 2023-07-25
- 刊出日期: 2023-07-25

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Questionnaire of Executive Functioning among elementary school students

1.
Graduate School, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing(100000), China

摘要

摘要: 目的检验中文版儿童执行功能量表(QEF)应用于7~12岁小学生的信度和效度，为开发具有针对性的儿童执行功能评价工具提供参考。方法于2022年9月，通过分层整群抽样方法分别选取珠三角(广州)、粤东(揭阳)、粤北(韶关)、粤西(茂名)4所小学的841名小学生进行项目分析，从4所小学中选取377名小学生进行量表结构效度和信度的检验，并抽取广州市某小学87名小学生间隔15 d进行重测信度检验。结果该量表具有较好的区分度，各条目与量表总分的相关系数为0.22~0.46(P值均 < 0.01)。探索性因素分析显示，累积方差贡献率为56.68%，各项目载荷在0.41~0.74。验证性因素分析显示模型拟合度较好(χ²/df=3.048，CFI=0.988，TLI=0.980，RMSEA=0.058，SRMR=0.009)。问卷总体Cronbach α系数、分半信度和重测信度分别为0.72，0.76，0.79。结论中文版儿童执行功能量表具有良好的信度和效度，适合于小学生执行功能的自测。
- 执行功能 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 问卷调查 /
- 儿童
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Questionnaire of Executive Functioning (QEF) among elementary school students aged 7-12 years. Methods A total of 841 elementary school students from four primary schools in the Pearl River Delta (Guangzhou), eastern Guangdong area (Jieyang), northern Guangdong area (Shaoguan), and western Guangdong area (Maoming) were selected for item analysis by using a stratified whole-group sampling method in September 2022. A total of 377 elementary school students from the four elementary schools were selected for testing the structural validity and reliability, and 87 subjects from an elementary school in Guangzhou were selected at 15-day intervals for assessing test-retest reliability test. Results The questionnaire had good discrimination, and the correlation between the items and the total score ranged from 0.22 to 0.46 (P < 0.01). Exploratory factor analysis showed a cumulative variance contribution rate of 56.68%, with item loadings ranging from 0.41 to 0.74. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit (χ²/df=3.048, CFI=0.988, TLI=0.980, RMSEA=0.058, SRMR=0.009). The overall Cronbach's α, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability of the questionnaire were 0.72, 0.76, 0.79, respectively. Conclusion The Chinese version of the Questionnaire of Executive Functioning has good reliability and validity, and it is suitable for application to the self-assessment of executive function among elementary school students.
- Executive function /
- Mental health /
- Questionnaires /
- Child
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 中文版QEF的因子载荷

Table 1. Factor load of the Chinese version of QEF

因子	条目	载荷	因子	条目	载荷
注意集中	1	0.58	自我调控	10	0.48
	5	0.53		12	0.69
	8	0.67		18	0.51
	20	0.45		23	0.42
	29	0.51		32	0.74
工作记忆	2	0.43	心理理论	3	0.69
	9	0.64		4	0.71
	14	0.55		16	0.52
	22	0.47		24	0.63
冲动抑制	11	0.72	灵活转换	6	0.56
	17	0.65		13	0.43
	25	0.63		26	0.62
	34	0.44	情绪调节	19	0.62
	36	0.57		21	0.58
计划发动	7	0.69		30	0.41
	15	0.47		31	0.70
	27	0.64		33	0.54
	28	0.53		35	0.52

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 Rothbart儿童行为问卷及S-UPPS-P冲动行为效标量表与中文版QEF得分相关性分析(r值，n=377)

Table 2. Correlation analysis of scores between the Chinese version of QEF, Rothhart Children's Behavior Questionnaire, and S-UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale(r, n=377)

量表	因子	注意集中	工作记忆	自我调控	心理理论	灵活转换	冲动抑制	计划发动	情绪调节	QEF总分
Rothbart	注意集中	0.69	0.62	0.58	0.43	0.67	0.40	0.55	0.61	0.63
儿童行为问卷	注意转移	0.56	0.61	0.23	0.19	0.68	0.44	0.59	0.50	0.56
	冲动性	0.25	0.22	0.37	0.28	0.31	0.50	0.26	0.19	0.35
	抑制性	0.47	0.53	0.24	0.17	0.56	0.60	0.63	0.50	0.52
	总分	0.58	0.61	0.53	0.59	0.66	0.68	0.61	0.54	0.63
S-UPPS-P	感觉寻求	0.42	0.35	0.38	0.51	0.20	0.47	0.54	0.49	0.37
冲动行为量表	缺乏坚持性	0.18	0.14	0.22	0.17	0.25	0.43	0.58	0.36	0.51
	缺乏预见性	0.35	0.27	0.32	0.26	0.15	0.33	0.40	0.26	0.48
	负性急迫性	0.22	0.49	0.31	0.30	0.42	0.38	0.55	0.22	0.59
	正性急迫性	0.58	0.62	0.47	0.35	0.60	0.67	0.51	0.34	0.63
	总分	0.50	0.45	0.61	0.53	0.44	0.65	0.42	0.64	0.57
注： P值均 < 0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 中文版QEF各分量表的内部一致性系数分半信度和重测信度(n=87)

Table 3. Internal consistency coefficient, split-half reliability and retest reliability of Chinese version of QEF subscales(n=87)

因子	Cronbach α系数	分半信度	重测信度	因子	Cronbach α系数	分半信度	重测信度
注意集中	0.70	0.75	0.69	冲动抑制	0.73	0.78	0.62
工作记忆	0.76	0.64	0.53	计划发动	0.74	0.67	0.58
自我调控	0.79	0.83	0.54	情绪调节	0.80	0.62	0.63
心理理论	0.65	0.77	0.71	总体	0.72	0.76	0.69
灵活转换	0.68	0.63	0.65

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(16)

[1]	DONNELLY J E, HILLMAN C H, CASTELLI D, et al. Physical activity, fitness, cognitive function, and academic achievement in children: a systematic review[J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2016, 48(6): 1197-1222. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000901
[2]	DIAMOND A. Executive functions[J]. Annu Rev Psychol, 2013, 64: 135-168. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
[3]	XUE Y, YANG Y, HUANG T. Effects of chronic exercise interventions on executive function among children and adolescents: a systematic review with Meta-analysis[J]. Br J Sports Med, 2019, 53(22): 1397-1404. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099825
[4]	DEWALD J F, MEIJER A M, OORT F J, et al. The influence of sleep quality, sleep duration and sleepiness on school performance in children and adolescents: a Meta-analytic review[J]. Sleep Med Rev, 2010, 14(3): 179-189. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2009.10.004
[5]	SHORT M A, BLUNDEN S, RIGNEY G, et al. Cognition and objectively measured sleep duration in children: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Sleep Health, 2018, 4(3): 292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2018.02.004
[6]	BIDDLE S J H, CIACCIONI S, THOMAS G, et al. Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: an updated review of reviews and an analysis of causality[J]. Psychol Sport Exerc, 2019, 42: 146-155. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.08.011
[7]	杜亚松. 儿童心理执行功能的检查和评估[J]. 上海精神医学, 2008, 20(1): 44-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSYI200801019.htm DU Y S. Examination and evaluation of children's mental executive function[J]. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry, 2008, 20(1): 44-48. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSYI200801019.htm
[8]	魏威, 谢庆斌, 朱晶晶, 等. 儿童执行功能量表在中国学前儿童中的信效度分析[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2018, 26(1): 26-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201801006.htm WEI W, XIE Q B, ZHU J J, et al. The psychometric characteristics of Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory among Chinese preschoolers[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2018, 26(1): 26-29. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201801006.htm
[9]	薛朝霞, 毕婧华, 程萧, 等. 中文版Geurten执行功能问卷在大学生中的信效度检验[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2022, 30(3): 525-530, 567. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY202203006.htm XUE Z X, BI J H, CHENG X, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of the Geurten-Questionnaire of Executive Functioning in college students[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2022, 30(3): 525-530, 567. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY202203006.htm
[10]	薛朝霞, 毕婧华, 荆雷, 等. 简版执行功能网络问卷在大学生中的信效度检验[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2023, 31(1): 127-131, 135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY202301022.htm XUE Z X, BI J H, JING L, et al. Reliability and validity of the Web-based Executive Function Questionnaire in college students[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2023, 31(1): 127-131, 135. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY202301022.htm
[11]	THORELL L B, NYBERG L. The Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory(CHEXI): a new rating instrument for parents and teachers[J]. Dev Neuropsychol, 2008, 33(4): 536-552. doi: 10.1080/87565640802101516
[12]	GEURTEN M, CATALE C, GEURTEN C, et al. Studying self awareness in children: validation of the Questionnaire of Executive Functioning (QEF)[J]. Clin Neuropsychol, 2016, 30(4): 558-578. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1178331
[13]	ROTHBART M K, AHADI S A, HERSHEY K L, et al. Investigations of temperament at three to seven years: the children's behavior questionnaire[J]. Child Dev, 2001, 72(5): 1394-1408. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00355
[14]	路腾飞, 帅澜, 张劲松, 等. 中文版学龄前儿童执行功能行为评定问卷(BRIEF-P)父母版的效度和信度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2017, 31(2): 138-143. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS201702012.htm LU T F, SHUAI L, ZHANG J S, et al. Validity and reliability of the Behavior Rating Scale of Executive Function-Preschool Version pa-rent form in China[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2017, 31(2): 138-143. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS201702012.htm
[15]	薛朝霞, 胡勇娟, 王晶, 等. 简式UPPS-P冲动行为量表在大学生中的信度效度检测[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, 25(4): 662-666. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201704016.htm XUE Z X, HU Y J, WANG J, et al. Reliability and validity of the Short Version of UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale in college students[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2017, 25(4): 662-666. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201704016.htm
[16]	WATTS A L, SMITH G T, BARCH D M, et al. Factor structure, measurement and structural invariance, and external validity of an abbreviated youth version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale[J]. Psychol Assess, 2020, 32(4): 336-347.