Associations between physical activity intensity and body compositions in adolescents
-
摘要:
目的 研究青少年不同强度身体活动水平和身体成分指标之间的相关性，为中国青少年身体成分的改善提供指导。 方法 采用随机数编码抽样法，于2019年9—12月在北京市清华附中等8所中学抽取971名初、高中学生进行基于生物电阻抗的身体成分测量和基于加速度计的身体活动水平测量。采用独立样本t检验、Pearson相关系数法和多元线性回归法进行统计学分析。 结果 初、高中阶段男生静坐行为(SB)均低于女生，高强度身体活动(VPA)和中高强度身体活动(MVPA)均高于女生(t值分别为-1.98，-8.09；5.20，4.52；3.53，4.03，P值均 < 0.05)；男生低强度身体活动(LPA)、中等强度身体活动(MPA)仅高中阶段高于女生(t值分别为3.67，5.63，P值均 < 0.01)。初中男生全身LM与MVPA(β=0.302)，全身骨矿物质含量(BMC)与SB(β=-0.001)、MVPA(β=0.002)，全身脂肪含量(FM)与SB(β=0.050)、MVPA(β=-0.323)之间存在相关关系；初中女生全身LM与LPA(β=0.080)、MVPA(β=0.613)，全身BMC与SB(β=-0.004)、MVPA(β=0.008)，全身FM与MVPA(β=-0.237)之间存在相关关系；高中男生全身LM与MVPA(β=0.393)，全身BMC与SB(β=-0.001)、MVPA(β=0.002)，全身FM与MVPA(β=-0.393)之间存在相关关系；高中女生全身LM与LPA(β=0.063)、MVPA(β=0.601)，全身FM与SB(β=0.029)、MVPA(β=-0.529)之间存在相关关系(P值均 < 0.05)。 结论 青少年身体活动水平和身体成分特征存在性别差异和定量化的相关关系。相关部门应为青少年提供个性化的身体活动剂量指导，改善青少年的身体素质。 Abstract:Objective To study the specific correlation between physical activity intensities and body compositions of adolescents and to provide guidance for the improvement of various body compositions of Chinese adolescents. Methods From September to December 2019, body composition measurement based on bioelectrical impedance analyzer and the physical activity measurement based on accelerometers were performed among 971 adolescents from 8 high schools, such as Tsinghua Middle School in Beijing, by random number coding sampling. Statistical analysis was conducted by using independent sample t-test, Pearson correlation coefficient method and multiple linear regression method. Results Sedentary behavior(SB) of the junior and senior high school boys was significantly lower than that of girls, while the VPA(vigorous physical activity) and moderate-vigorous physical activity(MVPA) were significantly higher than those of boys (t=-1.98, -8.09; 5.20, 4.52; 3.53, 4.03, P < 0.05). light physical activity(LPA) and moderate physical activity(MPA) of boys were significantly higher than those of girls in the senior high schools (t=3.67, 5.63, P < 0.01). Lean mass(LM) of the junior school boys was correlated to their MVPA(β=0.302), bone mineral content(BMC) was quantitively related to SB(β=-0.001), MVPA(β=0.002), and fat mass(FM) was related to SB(β=0.050), and MVPA(β=-0.323) (P < 0.05). LM of junior school girls was quantitively correlated to LPA (β=0.080) and MVPA(β=0.613). And there was also correlation among BMC, SB(β=-0.004) and MVPA(β=0.008) between FM and MVPA(β=-0.237) (P < 0.05). There was a correlation between total body LM and MVPA (β=0.393), total body BMC and SB (β=-0.001), MVPA (β=0.002), and total body FM and MVPA (β=-0.393) in senior high school boys(P < 0.05). There was a correlation between senior high school girls' total body LM and LPA (β=0.063), MVPA (β=0.601), total body FM and SB (β=0.029), and MVPA (B=-0.529)(P < 0.05). Conclusion There are gender differences and correlations between adolescent physical activity intensity and body composition. It is recommended that relevant departments provide personalized physical activity dose guidance for adolescents to improve their physical fitness. -
Key words:
- Motor activity /
- Body composition /
- Regression analysis /
- Growth and development /
- Adolescent
1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。 -
表 1 不同学段男女生基本情况比较(x ±s)
Table 1. Comparison of basic informations between male and female students in different grades(x ±s)
学段 性别 人数 统计值 年龄/岁 身高/cm 体重/kg BMI/(kg·m-2) 初中 男 196 13.61±0.91 171.80±7.93 63.80±14.87 21.51±4.24 女 326 13.34±0.91 163.12±5.88 52.62±9.38 19.70±2.90 t值 1.28 14.28 10.54 5.76 P值 0.30 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 高中 男 289 16.65±0.70 177.01±5.55 71.91±15.12 22.93±4.57 女 160 15.98±0.95 162.96±5.40 59.72±10.93 22.43±3.59 t值 1.66 25.95 8.97 1.20 P值 0.31 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.23 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同学段男女生身体活动水平及身体成分指标比较(x ±s)
Table 2. Comparison of physical activity level and body composition between male and female students in different grades(x ±s)
学段 性别 人数 统计值 SB/(min·d-1) LPA/(min·d-1) MPA/(min·d-1) VPA/(min·d-1) MVPA/(min·d-1) LM(g·kg-1) BMC(g·kg-1) FM(g·kg-1) 初中 男 196 431.04±266.27 453.11±201.00 40.62±22.98 18.11±42.54 51.42±52.96 772.28±75.59 37.21±1.52 228.49±76.42 女 326 466.60±192.41 479.42±163.10 40.76±21.24 1.84±13.49 37.27±24.29 694.66±46.91 37.96±1.55 295.81±126.36 t值 -1.98 -1.63 -0.07 5.20 3.53 13.92 -0.87 -2.29 P值 0.03 0.10 0.94 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.39 0.02 高中 男 289 486.37±388.19 283.72±159.01 34.38±21.54 10.56±29.52 38.64±40.13 753.09±72.54 40.22±1.87 246.91±70.54 女 160 495.24±319.33 226.60±155.68 23.53±15.39 0.00±0.00 25.38±14.72 642.30±46.49 41.02±2.07 357.70±45.01 t值 -8.09 3.67 5.63 4.52 4.03 22.02 -10.08 -10.38 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.06 < 0.01
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 青少年身体成分与身体活动指标的相关性系数(r值)
Table 3. The correlation between physical activity and body composition of adolescents(r)
性别 身体活动指标 初中 高中 LM BMC FM LM BMC FM 男 SB -0.17 -0.40** 0.64** -0.11 -0.38* 0.77* LPA 0.35* 0.18** -0.13 0.05 0.30* -0.11 MVPA 0.47* 0.43** -0.80* 0.39* 0.53** -0.53* 女 SB -0.10 -0.30* 0.68** -0.27** -0.26** 0.46** LPA 0.33* 0.27** -0.19** 0.38* 0.47 -0.45* MVPA 0.45** 0.40** -0.59* 0.39* 0.40* -0.65** 注：*P < 0.05，**P < 0.01。
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 青少年身体成分与身体活动的回归系数(β值)
Table 4. Regression coefficient between physical activity and body composition of adolescents(β)
性别 身体活动指标 初中 高中 LM BMC FM LM BMC FM 男 SB -0.001** 0.050* -0.001* 0.016 LPA 0.055 0.001 MVPA 0.302** 0.002* -0.323* 0.393* 0.002* -0.393* 女 SB -0.004** 0.014 0.029** LPA 0.080* 0.012 -0.060 0.063* -0.066 MVPA 0.613** 0.008** -0.237** 0.601* 0.010 -0.529* 注：*P < 0.05，**P < 0.01。
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] VINER R B, WHITE B, CHRISTIE D. Type 2 diabetes in adolescents: a severe phenotype posing major clinical challenges and public health burden[J]. Lancet, 2017, 389(10085): 2252-2260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31371-5 [2] LANDRY B W, DRISCOLL S W. Physical activity in children and adolescents[J]. PM R, 2012, 4(11): 826-832. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.09.585 [3] SALEM M A, ABOELASRAR M A, ELBARBARY N S, et al. Is exercise a therapeutic tool for improvement of cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus? A randomised controlled trial[J]. Diabetol Metab Syndr, 2010, 2(1): 47. doi: 10.1186/1758-5996-2-47 [4] ATLANTIS E, BARNES E H, SINGH M A. Efficacy of exercise for treating overweight in children and adolescents: a systematic review[J]. Inter J Obes, 2006, 30(7): 1027-1040. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803286 [5] PIVOVAROV J A, TAPLIN C E, RIDDELL M C. Current perspectives on physical activity and exercise for youth with diabetes[J]. Pediatr Diabetes, 2015, 16(4): 242-255. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12272 [6] QUARESMA A M, PALMERIA A L, MARTINS S S, et al. Effect of a school-based intervention on physical activity and quality of life through serial mediation of social support and exercise motivation: the PESSOA program[J]. Health Educ Res, 2014, 29(6): 906-917. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu056 [7] JANZ K F, THOMAS D Q, FORD M A, et al. Top 10 research questions related to physical activity and bone health in children and adolescents[J]. Res Q Exerc Sport, 2015, 86(1): 5-12. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2014.995019 [8] HAO G, POLLOCK N K, HARRIS R A, et al. Associations between muscle mass, physical activity and dietary behaviour in adolescents[J]. Pediatr Obes, 2019, 14(3): e12471. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12471 [9] NEVES M V P, GOUVEIA P M C, RODRIG-UES De F E, et al. Inflammatory markers in relation to body composition, physical activity and assessment of nutritional status of the adolescents[J]. Nutr Hosp, 2015, 31(5): 1920-1927. [10] FREEDSON P, POBER D, JANZ K F. Calibration of accelerometer output for children[J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2005, 37(11 Suppl): S523-S530. [11] FARIAS E S, PAULA F, CARVALHO W R, et al. Influence of programmed physical activity on body composition among adolescent students[J]. J Pediatr (Rio J), 2009, 85(1): 28-34. [12] WERNECK A O, SILVA E C A, BUENO M R O, et al. Association(s) between objectively measured sedentary behavior patterns and obesity among brazilian adolescents[J]. Pediatr Exerc Sci, 2019, 31(1): 37-41. doi: 10.1123/pes.2018-0120 [13] ASHDOWN-FRANKS G, VANCAMPFORT D, FIRTH J, et al. Leisure-time sedentary behavior and obesity among 116762 adolescents aged 12-15 years from 41 low-and middle-income countries[J]. Obes, 2019, 27(5): 830-836. doi: 10.1002/oby.22424 [14] ROIG M, O'BRIEN K, KIRK G, et al. The effects of eccentric versus concentric resistance training on muscle strength and mass in healthy adults: a systematic review with Meta-analysis[J]. Br J Sports Med, 2009, 43(8): 556-568. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.051417 [15] SCHOENFELD B J, OGBORN D, KRIEGER J W. Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Sports Sci, 2017, 35(11): 1073-1082. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1210197 [16] TROY K L, MANCUSO M E, BUTLER T A, et al. Exercise early and often: effects of physical activity and exercise on women's bone health[J]. Inter J Environ Res Public Health, 2018, 15(5): 878. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050878 [17] GOMEZ-BRUTON A, MATUTE-LIORENTE A, GONZALEZ-AGUERO A, et al. Plyometric exercise and bone health in children and adolescents: a systematic review[J]. World J Pediatr, 2017, 13(2): 112-121. doi: 10.1007/s12519-016-0076-0 [18] MEKARY R A, WILLETT W C, HU F B, et al. Isotemporal substitution paradigm for physical activity epidemiology and weight change[J]. Am J Epidemiol, 2009, 170(4): 519-527. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp163 [19] TELFORD R M, TELFORD R D, COCHRANE T, et al. The influence of sport club participation on physical activity, fitness and body fat during childhood and adolescence: the look longitudinal study[J]. J Sci Med Sport, 2016, 19(5): 400-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.04.008 [20] HODGE M G, HOVINGA M, SHEPHERD J A, et al. Youth and young adult physical activity and body composition of young adult women: findings from the dietary intervention study in children[J]. Pediatr Exerc Sci, 2015, 27(1): 140-150. doi: 10.1123/pes.2014-0001 [21] SCHWARZFISCHER P, GRUSZFELD D, STOLARCZYK A, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behavior from 6 to 11 years[J]. Pediatrics, 2019, 143(1): e20180994. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0994 [22] VAN DYCK D, BARNETT A, CERIN E, et al. Associations of accelerometer measured school-and non-school based physical activity and sedentary time with body mass index: IPEN adolescent study[J]. Inter J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2022, 19(1): 85. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01324-x [23] BAXTER-JONES A D, EISENMANN J C, MIRWALD R L, et al. The influence of physical activity on lean mass accrual during adolescence: a longitudinal analysis[J]. J Appl Physiol, 2008, 105(2): 734-741. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00869.2007 [24] DELEZIE J, WEIHRAUCH M, MAIER G, et al. BDNF is a mediator of glycolytic fiber-type specification in mouse skeletal muscle[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2019, 116(32): 16111-16120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1900544116 [25] PEDERSEN B K. Physical activity and muscle-brain crosstalk[J]. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 2019, 15(7): 383-392. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0174-x [26] MORE-GONZALEZ J, MIGUELES J H, ESTEBAN-CORNEGO I, et al. Sedentarism, physical activity, steps, and neurotrophic factors in obese children[J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2019, 51(11): 2325-2333. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002064 [27] CONSTABLE A M, PORTER J E, BENGER D, et al. The positive relationship between moderate-to vigorous-physical activity and bone mineral content is not mediated by free leptin index in prepubertal children: the PANIC study[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(10): 5365. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105365 [28] NORDSTROM P, NORDSTROM G, THORSEN K, et al. Local bone mineral density, muscle strength, and exercise in adolescent boys: a comparative study of two groups with different muscle strength and exercise levels[J]. Calcif Tissue Int, 1996, 58(6): 402-408. doi: 10.1007/s002239900066 [29] POITRAS V J, GRAY C E, BORGHESE M M, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth[J]. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2016, 41(6S3): S197-S239. [30] GRGIC J, DUMUID D, BENGOECHEA E G, et al. Health outcomes associated with reallocations of time between sleep, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity: a systematic scoping review of isotemporal substitution studies[J]. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2018, 15(1): 69. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0691-3 -
点击查看大图
表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 306
- HTML全文浏览量: 186
- PDF下载量: 46
- 被引次数: 0
