Effect of comprehensive intervention on executive dysfunction in children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder aged 7-14 years
-
摘要:
目的 分析综合干预治疗和单纯药物治疗对7~14岁注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患儿执行功能的改善情况,为改善ADHD的干预研究提供基础依据。 方法 将2021年1月—2022年6月在赣州市第三人民医院就诊的80例ADHD患儿采用随机数字对照法分为研究组和对照组,研究组采用药物和综合干预治疗,对患儿进行每周1次,每次60~90 min,持续12周的感觉统合训练,并对照顾者、学校教师进行相关训练;对照组仅采用药物治疗。干预12周后,应用stroop色-词关联测验、威斯康辛卡片分类测试(WCST)评估患儿执行功能的变化情况。 结果 研究组患儿干预后,Stroop色-词关联测验三类结果为(3.25±0.98,4.92±1.40,10.17±1.28)个,干预前为(6.47±1.92,8.35±1.25,16.55±1.57)个,差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为12.94,15.36,26.34,P值均 < 0.01);对照组干预后为(3.95±1.01,5.45±1.15,12.35±0.86)个,干预前为(6.17±1.87,8.10±1.03,16.02±1.38)个,差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为6.76,15.01,16.15,P值均 < 0.01)。研究组干预前,WCST中持续性错误数、非持续性错误数、完成分类数为(47.77±4.50,35.50±2.37,3.97±1.07)个,干预后分别为(31.42±2.01,24.75±2.05,5.05±1.13)个;对照组干预前为(46.45±7.34,34.87±2.29,3.70±1.11)个,干预后为(32.82±2.57,25.55±1.04,4.25±1.48)个,干预前后差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为21.93,22.27,-10.37;10.84,26.81,-6.90,P值均 < 0.01)。在Stroop色-词关联测验错误数和WCST中持续性错误数、非持续性错误数方面,综合干预组较单纯药物治疗组改善更为明显,差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-2.94,2.29,-9.07,-2.35,-2.06,P值均 < 0.05)。 结论 对患儿进行训练以及采用综合干预治疗模式,一定程度上可以改善患儿的执行功能。 -
关键词:
- 注意力缺陷障碍伴多动 /
- 执行功能 /
- 健康促进 /
- 干预性研究 /
- 儿童
Abstract:Objective To analyze the improvement of executive function in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) aged 7-14 years with comprehensive intervention and drug therapy alone, to provide a basis for intervention research to improve ADHD. Methods A total of 80 children with ADHD treated in the Third People's Hospital of Ganzhou from January 2021 to June 2022 were randomly divided into intervention group and control group. The intervention group received drug and comprehensive intervention therapy, and sensory integration training once a week for 60 to 90 min each for 12 weeks, and conduct related training for caregivers and school teachers, the control group received only drug therapy. The changes of executive function were assessed by the stroop color-word association test and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) after 12 weeks of intervention. Results After intervention, the results of the Stroop color-word test in the intervention group (3.25±0.98, 4.92±1.40, 10.17±1.28) showed statistically significant differences (t=12.94, 15.36, 26.34, P < 0.01) compared with those before intervention (6.47±1.92, 8.35±1.25, 16.55±1.57). There were also statistically significant differences (t=6.76, 15.01, 16.15, P < 0.01) in the control group (3.95±1.01, 5.45±1.15, 12.35±0.86) compared to those before intervention (6.17±1.87, 8.10±1.03, 16.02±1.38). Before intervention, the number of perseverative errors, non-perseverative errors, and completed categories by WCST in the intervention group were (47.77±4.50, 35.50±2.37, 3.97±1.07), and in the control group were (46.45±7.34, 34.87±2.29, 3.70±1.11). After intervention, those of the intervention group and control group were (31.42±2.01, 24.75±2.05, 5.05±1.13) and (32.82±2.57, 25.55±1.04, 4.25±1.48), respectively. There were significant differences in the two groups before and after intervention (t=21.93, 22.27, -10.37; 10.84, 26.81, -6.90, P < 0.01). After intervention, there were significant differences in the number of Stroop color-word test errors, perseverative errors and non-perseverative errors in WCST between the two groups (t=-2.94, 2.29, -9.07, -2.35, -2.06, P < 0.05). Conclusion Through training for children and the therapy model of comprehensive intervention could significantly improve the executive function of children for a certain extent. 1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。 -
表 1 研究组和对照组患儿干预前后执行功能比较(x ±s)
Table 1. Comparison of executive function between the research group and the control group before and after intervention(x ±s)
组别 干预前后 人数 统计值 Stroop WCST 测试一 测试二 测试三 持续性错误数 非持续性错误数 完成分类数 研究组 干预前 40 6.47±1.92 8.35±1.25 16.55±1.57 47.77±4.50 35.50±2.37 3.97±1.07 干预后 40 3.25±0.98 4.92±1.40 10.17±1.28 31.42±2.01 24.75±2.05 5.05±1.13 t值 12.94 15.36 26.34 21.93 22.27 -10.37 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 对照组 干预前 40 6.17±1.87 8.10±1.03 16.02±1.38 46.45±7.34 34.87±2.29 3.70±1.11 干预后 40 3.95±1.01 5.45±1.15 12.35±0.86 32.82±2.57 25.55±1.04 4.25±1.48 t值 6.76 15.01 16.15 10.84 26.81 -6.90 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 -
[1] PHILIPSEN A, DÖPFNER M. ADHD in the transition to adulthood: prevalence, symptoms, risks, andcare[J]. Bundesges Gesundheitsf Gesundh, 2020, 63(7): 910-915. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03175-y [2] 王玉凤. 注意缺陷与多动障碍[M]. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2019.WANG Y F. Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder[M]. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press, 2019. (in Chinese) [3] MOSTERT J C, ONNINK A M H, KLEIN M, et al. Cognitive heterogeneity in adult attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic analysis of neuropsychological measurements[J]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 2015, 25(11): 2062-2074. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.08.010 [4] 曹杏, 沈雷, 张伟东, 等. 盐酸托莫西汀联合执行障碍康复训练治疗小儿多动症效果观察[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2021, 24(10): 867-871. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNSJ202110007.htmCAO X, SHEN L, ZHANG W D, et al. Effect observation of atomoxetine hydrochloride combined with rehabilitation training for impaired performance in children with ADHD[J]. Chin J Prac Nerv Dis, 2021, 24(10): 867-871. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNSJ202110007.htm [5] 刘靖, 郑毅. 《中国注意缺陷多动障碍防治指南》第二版解读[J]. 中华精神科杂志, 2016, 49(3): 132-135. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7884.2016.03.002LIU J, ZHENG Y. Interpretation of the second edition of the Chinese Guidelines for The Prevention And Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder[J]. Chin J Psychiatry, 2016, 49(3): 132-135. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7884.2016.03.002 [6] JOYCE-BEAULIEU D, SULKOWSKI M L. The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: fifth edition (DSM-5) model of impairment[J]. Springer US, 2016, 32(3): 421-430. [7] 刘发荣, 陈彬彬, 廖震华, 等. 复发性抑郁障碍认知功能与营养不良性短杆菌素结合蛋白1基因多态性的关联研究[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2016, 25(1): 44-49.LIU F R, CHEN B B, LIAO Z H, et al. Correlation of cognitive function and dystrobrevin binding protein 1 gene polymorphisms in patients with recurrent depressive disorder[J]. Chin J Behav Med Brain Sci, 2016, 25(1): 44-49. (in Chinese) [8] KOLOVELONIS A, PESCE C, GOUDAS M. The effects of a cognitively challenging physical activity intervention on school children's executive functions and motivational regulations[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(19): 12742. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912742 [9] 谭云龙, 邹义壮, 屈英, 等. 威斯康星卡片分类测验常用指标的稳定性分析[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2002, 16(12): 831-833. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS200212008.htmTAN Y L, ZOU Y Z, QU Y, et al. Stability of commonly used measures in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test[J] Chin Ment Health J, 2002, 16(12): 831-833. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS200212008.htm [10] SÖĜÖVT M, GÖKSUN T, ALTAN-ATALAY A. The role of numeracy skills on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) performances of 5-to 8-year-old Turkish children[J]. Br J Dev Psychol, 2021, 39(1): 231-246. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12353 [11] 钱昀, 刘乐, 江文庆, 等. 综合干预治疗与单纯药物治疗对注意缺陷多动障碍患儿疗效的随机对照研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2020, 28(4): 395-398. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ERTO202004011.htmQIAN Y, LIU L, JIANG W Q, et al. Randomized controlled study on the effect of multimodal therapy and drug therapy on children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder[J]. Chin J Child Health Care, 2020, 28(4): 395-398. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ERTO202004011.htm [12] 杨莉. 注意缺陷多动障碍2017—2019年研究现状与展望[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2020, 34(7): 594-601. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS202007010.htmYANG L. Advancs and perspectives on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disoeder from 2017-2019[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2020, 34(7): 594-601. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS202007010.htm [13] 中华医学会儿科学分会发育行为学组. 注意缺陷多动障碍早期识别、规范诊断和治疗的儿科专家共识[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2020, 58(3): 188-193.Developmental Behavioral Group, Pediatrics Society of Chinese Medical Association. Consensus on pediatric clinical practice of early identification, standardized diagnosis and treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder[J]. Chin J Pediatr, 2020, 58(3): 188-193. (in Chinese) [14] ÇETIN F H M, BARI USTA U, AYDIN S, et al. A case study on EEG analysis: embedding entropy estimations indicate the decreased neuro-cortical complexity levels mediated by methylphenidate treatment in children with ADHD[J]. Clin EEG Neurosci, 2022, 53(5): 406-417. [15] 于晓雯. 盐酸托莫西汀胶囊对小儿多动症的治疗疗效及对血清25-羟维生素D3水平的影响[J]. 中国处方药, 2022, 20(5): 102-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGCF202205041.htmYU X W. Therapeutic effect of tomoxetine hydrochloride capsule on children with hyperactivity disorder and its effect on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 level[J]. J Chin Prescript Drug, 2022, 20(5): 102-104. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGCF202205041.htm [16] 王鑫洋. 注意缺陷与多动障碍儿童执行功能障碍诊断与康复训练的最新进展[J]. 中国医学创新, 2022, 19(13): 172-175. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYCX202213041.htmWANG X Y. Recent advances in executive dysfunction diagnosis and rehabilitation training in children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder[J]. Med Innov Chin, 2022, 19(13): 172-175. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYCX202213041.htm [17] 陈振辉, 李霞, 韩立, 等. 托莫西汀对注意缺陷与多动障碍合并焦虑患儿的效果[J]. 国际精神病学杂志, 2019, 46(6): 1039-1041. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWYJ201906024.htmCHEN Z H, LI X, HAN L, et al. Effect of atomoxetine on children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder and anxiety[J]. J Inter Psychiatry, 2019, 46(6): 1039-1041. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWYJ201906024.htm [18] DEMIRCI E, SENER E F, GUL M K, et al. A view of response and resistance to atomoxetine treatment in children with ADHD: effects of CYP2C19 polymorphisms and BDNF levels[J]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2022, 78(7): 1095-1104. [19] SHAYWITZ S, SHAYWITZ B, WIETECHA L, et al. Effect of atomoxetine treatment on reading and phonological skills in children with dyslexia or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and comorbid dyslexia in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial[J]. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol, 2017, 27(1): 19-28. [20] 陈思简, 郑毅. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童执行功能的功能影像学研究进展[J]. 中国医刊, 2021, 56(5): 480-483. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYI202105007.htmCHEN S J, ZHENG Y. Progress in functional imaging of executive function in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder[J]. Chin J Med, 2021, 56(5): 480-483. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYI202105007.htm [21] 王维千, 杜松妹, 杨闯, 等. 汉族男性注意缺陷多动障碍儿童执行功能与单胺氧化酶A基因活性相关分析[J]. 温州医科大学学报, 2015, 45(9): 641-645. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WZYX201509005.htmWANG W Q, DU S M, YANG C, et al. Correlative analysis between executive function of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in Han nationality people and the activity of monoamine oxidase A gene[J]. J Wenzhou Med Univ, 2015, 45(9): 641-645. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WZYX201509005.htm [22] 王宗琴, 王高华, 胡晓华. 基于万方数据库的威斯康星卡片分类测验的文献计量学分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版), 2018, 39(2): 340-344. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBYK201802038.htmWANG Z Q, WANG G H, HU X H. Bibliometric analysis of wisconsin card classification test based on wanfang database[J]. Med J Wuhan Univ, 2018, 39(2): 340-344. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBYK201802038.htm -

计量
- 文章访问数: 335
- HTML全文浏览量: 139
- PDF下载量: 37
- 被引次数: 0