成都市学龄前独生子女与非独生子女情绪与行为问题比较

任妍; 朱帝玲; 叶丽雯; 李春荣; 陈月; 杨柳; 秦成洁; 罗同勇

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.05.021

成都市学龄前独生子女与非独生子女情绪与行为问题比较

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.05.021

1.
电子科技大学医学院附属妇女儿童医院/成都市妇女儿童中心医院保健部，四川成都 610000
2.
成都医学院公共卫生学院
3.
四川省妇幼保健院儿童健康中心

基金项目:

中国疾控预防控制中心妇幼保健中心母婴营养与健康研究资助项目 2022FYH005

四川省科技计划资助重点研发项目 2020YFS0484

详细信息

作者简介:
任妍(1982-)，女，四川宜宾人，硕士，副主任医师，主要从事妇幼保健管理工作

通讯作者:
罗同勇，E-mail：whnic@msn.com

利益冲突声明所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: B844.1 R179 R193
计量
- 文章访问数: 325
- HTML全文浏览量: 114
- PDF下载量: 50
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-12-09
- 修回日期: 2023-02-22
- 网络出版日期: 2023-05-25
- 刊出日期: 2023-05-25

Comparison of emotional and behavioral problems of only and non-only child in the kindergartens in Chengdu

1.
Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu(610000), China

摘要

摘要: 目的分析学龄前独生与非独生子女存在的情绪与行为问题差异，为开展学龄前儿童心理行为发育情况监测及干预工作提供依据。方法采用方便抽样的方法，于2021年5—6月在成都市23个区市县抽取153所幼儿园共45 065名儿童，通过监护人填写在线问卷的方式调查人口学特征、儿童心理行为发育情况，采用χ²检验分析各维度异常率在独生子女与非独生子女间的差异，通过倾向性评分匹配方法对独生子女与非独生子女的情绪与行为问题进行分析。结果儿童情绪行为问题异常检出率为6.10%，其中独生子女为6.34%，非独生子女为5.84%。匹配后独生子女组与非独生子女组的困难总分、情绪症状、品行问题、多动注意缺陷、同伴交往、社会行为评分差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为9.91，8.97，3.91，15.57，-5.46，4.08，P值均 < 0.01)。结论在困难总分及情绪症状、品行问题、多动注意缺陷方面，非独生子女情况均好于独生子女；在同伴交往、社会行为方面，独生子女情况优于非独生子女。是否独生子女应作为学龄前儿童心理保健工作中制定具体方案的重要考虑因素。
- 情绪 /
- 行为 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 独生子女 /
- 儿童，学龄前
Abstract: Objective To analyze the emotional and behavioral problems and associated factors of the only and non-only child, and to provide some clues for further monitoring and intervention of psychological and behavioral development among preschool children. Methods Using a convenience sampling method, a total of 45 065 children enrolled in 153 kindergartens in 23 districts and counties of Chengdu were selected from May to June 2021 to investigate demographic characteristics and children's psycho-behavioral development through online questionnaires filled out by their guardians. The Chi-square tests were used to analyze whether the differences in abnormality rates of each dimension were statistically significant between the only and non-only children. The emotional and behavioral problems of only children and non-only children were analyzed by propensity score measurement. Results The detection rate of abnormal emotional behavior problems in children was 6.10%, including 6.34% in the only child group and 5.84% in the non-only child group. After matching, total difficulty score, and scores of emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactive attention deficit, peer interaction, and social behavior differed between the only child group and the non-only child group (t=9.91, 8.97, 3.91, 15.57, -5.46, 4.08, P < 0.01). Conclusion In terms of the total score of difficulties, emotional symptoms, moral problems, and hyperactivity attention defects, the non-only child is better than the only child, but the opposite is true in terms of peer interaction and social behavior. Mental health conditions among the only child should be paid more attention. Whether or not the only child should be taken as an important consideration for preschool children's mental health care.
- Emotions /
- Behavior /
- Mental health /
- Only child /
- Child, preschool
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 匹配前独生子女与非独生子女情绪及行为异常检出率比较

Table 1. Comparison of pre-matching detection rates of emotional and behavioural abnormalities in only child and non-only child

组别	人数	情绪症状	品行问题	多动注意缺陷	同伴交往	社会行为	困难总分
独生子女	22 924	1 518(6.62)	532(2.32)	8 376(36.54)	1 039(4.53)	2 273(9.92)	1 454(6.34)
非独生子女	22 141	1 326(5.99)	544(2.46)	6 892(31.13)	1 131(5.11)	2 330(10.52)	1 293(5.84)
合计	45 065	2 844(6.31)	1 076(2.39)	15 268(33.88)	2 170(4.82)	4 603(10.21)	2 747(6.10)
χ²值		31.33	0.93	206.11	38.03	84.55	14.35
P值		< 0.01	0.63	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01
注：()内数字为检出率/%。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 匹配前独生子女与非独生子女情绪及行为评分比较(x ±s)

Table 2. Comparison of emotional and behavioural scores of pre-matched only child and non-only child(x ±s)

组别	人数	情绪症状	品行问题	多动注意力缺陷	同伴交往	社会行为	困难总分
独生子女	22 924	1.84±1.56	1.74±1.15	3.91±2.08	1.82±1.43	6.92±2.02	9.31±4.29
非独生子女	22 141	1.69±1.54	1.69±1.17	3.59±2.03	1.97±1.44	6.78±2.05	8.94±4.34
t值		10.17	4.86	16.72	-11.10	7.18	9.22
P值		< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 匹配前后独生子女组与非独生子女组特征性变量对比

Table 3. Comparing the characteristic variables of the only child group with the non-only child group before and after matching

变量	匹配前(44 974名)		匹配后(25 414名)
变量	Wald χ²值	P值	Wald χ²值	P值
民族	0.20	0.65	0.06	0.81
儿童性别	54.29	< 0.01	0.00	0.96
儿童年龄	18.96	< 0.01	2.32	0.50
父亲年龄	235.39	< 0.01	0.35	0.55
母亲年龄	444.08	< 0.01	0.13	0.72
是否高危育龄	28.14	< 0.01	0.16	0.69
父亲文化程度	50.80	< 0.01	4.88	0.31
母亲文化程度	626.47	< 0.01	13.33	0.01
家庭年收入	9.25	< 0.01	8.28	0.65
家庭管教主要由谁负责	70.47	< 0.01	6.22	0.08
注：匹配前有91名混杂因素填写不全，未纳入分析。

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 匹配后独生子女与非独生子女情绪及行为评分比较(x ±s)

Table 4. Comparison of emotional and behavioural scores of only child and non-only child after matching(x ±s)

组别	人数	情绪症状	品行问题	多动注意缺陷	同伴交往	社会行为	困难总分
独生子女	12 707	1.88±1.58	1.76±1.16	3.98±2.08	1.84±1.43	6.90±2.02	9.47±4.31
非独生子女	12 707	1.72±1.54	1.71±1.18	3.61±2.05	1.93±1.43	6.80±2.05	8.97±4.35
t值		8.97	3.91	15.57	-5.46	4.08	9.91
P值		< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(31)

[1]	廖友国, 连榕. 独生与非独生子女心理健康变迁的差异: 一项横断历史研究[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 46(3): 117-126, 203. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBSW202003013.htm LIAO Y G, LIAN R. Differences of mental health changes between only and non-only children: across-temporal Meta-analysis[J]. J Southwest Univ(Soc Sci Edit), 2020, 46(3): 117-126, 203. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBSW202003013.htm
[2]	苑春永, 陈福美, 王耘, 等. 独生子女和非独生子女情绪适应的差异: 基于倾向分数配对模型的估计[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(2): 296-299. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201302034.htm YUAN C Y, CHEN F M, WANG Y. A comparison of single and non-single child's emotion adjustment: an evaluationof propensity score matching method[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2013, 21(2): 296-299. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201302034.htm
[3]	杨涵钰. 独生子女与非独生子女大学生综合素质比较研究[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2009, 42(3): 96-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZDX200903026.htm YANG H Y. A comparative study of the overall quality of university students with one child and those without one child[J]. J Zhengzhou Univ(Phil Soc Sci Edit), 2009, 42(3): 96-98. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZDX200903026.htm
[4]	章景丽, 陈瑞美, 陈秋, 等. 家庭因素与学龄前儿童情绪与行为问题的关联研究[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2019, 23(2): 168-171. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBKZ201902009.htm ZHANG J L, CHEN R M, CHEN Q, et al. Imapct of home environment on emotional and behavioral problems in preschool children[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2019, 23(2): 168-171. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBKZ201902009.htm
[5]	王道阳, 李书婷, 胡铭铭. 基于倾向得分匹配方法的双亲与单亲家庭孩子心理健康及抚养人身份的作用[J]. 卫生研究, 2017, 46(5): 709-716. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSYJ201705007.htm WANG D Y, LI S T, HU M M. Comparisons of the influence of raising people's identity on mental health between two-parents family children and single parent family children by propensity score matching[J]. J Hyg Res, 2017, 46(5): 709-716. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSYJ201705007.htm
[6]	余敏, 王睿, 何海燕, 等. 芜湖市学龄前儿童情绪和行为问题调查分析[J]. 实用预防医学, 2021, 28(3): 309-312. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3110.2021.03.016 YU M, WANG R, HE H Y, et al. Emotional and behavioral problems of preschool children in Wuhu City[J]. Pract Prev Med, 2021, 28(3): 309-312. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3110.2021.03.016
[7]	GOODMAN R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note[J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatry All Discipl, 1997, 38(5): 581-586. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x
[8]	寇建华, 杜亚松, 夏黎明. 儿童长处和困难问卷(父母版)上海常模的信度和效度[J]. 上海精神医学, 2005, 17(1): 25-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSYI200501006.htm KOU J H, DU Y S, XIA L M. Reliability and validity of "children strengths and difficulties questionnaire" in Shanghai norm[J]. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry, 2005, 17(1): 25-28. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSYI200501006.htm
[9]	邓延峰, 季建林, 范建红, 等. 上海市23325名学龄前儿童行为、情绪问题调查分析[J]. 中国社区医师, 2019, 35(11): 159-160, 163. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XCYS201911113.htm DENG Y F, JI J L, FAN J H, et al. Analysis of a survey on behavioural and emotional problems of 23 325 preschool children in Shanghai[J]. Chin Commun Doct, 2019, 35(11): 159-160, 163. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XCYS201911113.htm
[10]	安芹, 贾晓明. 北京市独生与非独生子女中学生行为及情绪反应比较[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2009, 30(11): 1003-1005. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XIWS200911024.htm AN Q, JIA X M, Comparison of behavior and emotional response between only-child and non-only-child middle school students in Beijing[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2009, 30(11): 1003-1005. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XIWS200911024.htm
[11]	韩阿珠, 张国宝, 苏普玉, 等. 家庭教养方式对学龄前儿童行为和情绪问题的影响[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2018, 39(12): 1773-1778. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.12.004 HAN A Z, ZHANG G B, SU P Y, et al. Relationships between parental rearing styles and emotional and behavioral problems in preschool children[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2018, 39(12): 1773-1778. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.12.004
[12]	汤银霞. 铜陵市城区学龄前儿童行为问题及影响因素调查分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2015, 30(18): 3038-3040. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB201518054.htm TANG Y X. Analysis on behavioral problems and influencing factors among urban preschool children in Tongling City[J]. Matern Child Health Care Chin, 2015, 30(18): 3038-3040. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB201518054.htm
[13]	胡敏, 静进, 金宇, 等. 广州市黄埔区学龄前儿童行为问题及影响因素的横断面调查[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2012, 7(1): 11-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XZEK201201005.htm HU M, JING J, JIN Y, et al. Cross-sectional study on behavior problems and influential factors among preschool children in Huangpu District of Guangzhou[J]. Chin J Evid Based Pediatr, 2012, 7(1): 11-18. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XZEK201201005.htm
[14]	FALBOT F. The only child: a review[J]. Individ Psychol, 1977, 1(33): 47-61.
[15]	THAPA S, BASNAYAKE S, FARR M G. Assessing demand for norplant in the general population: test of an approach in Sri Lanka[J]. Unpublished, 1987, 22(10): 237-260.
[16]	FALBO T, POLIT D F. Quantitative review of the only child literature: research evidence and theory development[J]. Psychol Bull, 1986, 100(2): 176-189.
[17]	POLIT D F, FALBO T. The intellectual achievement of only children[J]. J Biosoc Sci, 1988, 20(3): 275-285.
[18]	LIU R X, LIN W, CHEN Z Y. School performance, peer association, psychological and behavioral adjustments: a comparison between Chinese adolescents with and without siblings[J]. J Adolesc, 2010, 33(3): 411-417.
[19]	高越, 张云婷, 赵瑾, 等. 上海市入园儿童心理健康状况及影响因素研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(1): 28-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ERTO202101010.htm GAO Y, ZHANG Y T, ZHAO J, et al. Study on mental health status and its influencing factors in kindergarten children in Shanghai[J]. Chin J Child Health Care, 2021, 29(1): 28-32. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ERTO202101010.htm
[20]	屈艳红, 黄居源, 周秀艳. 大学新生心理健康现状分析及应对措施[J]. 青少年研究, 2007(5): 18-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QSNY200705008.htm QU Y H, HUANG J Y, ZHOU X Y. Investigation and analysis on mental health of university freshmen and its countermeasures[J]. Youth Adolesc Stud, 2007(5): 18-20. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QSNY200705008.htm
[21]	BLAKE J. Family size and the quality of children[J]. Demography, 1981, 18(4): 421-442.
[22]	王飞英, 倪钰飞, 陆梅娟, 等. 不同教养方式下的多动症儿童父母育儿压力研究[J]. 中国妇幼卫生杂志, 2020, 11(5): 46-48, 58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YZWS202005010.htm WANG F Y, NI Y F, LU M J, et al. Study on parental rearing pressure of children with ADHD under different rearing styles[J]. Chin J Women Children Health, 2020, 11(5): 46-48, 58. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YZWS202005010.htm
[23]	刘会娟, 赵章留. 独生子女与非独生子女心理健康状况调查研究[J]. 教育现代化(电子版), 2017, 4(43): 279-281. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYXD201743117.htm LIU H J, ZHAO Z L. A study on the mental health status of only child and non-only child[J]. Course Educ Res, 2017, 4(43): 279-281. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYXD201743117.htm
[24]	FINCH J E, YOUSAFZAI A K, RASHEED M, et al. Measuring and understanding social-emotional behaviors in preschoolers from rural Pakistan[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(11): e207807.
[25]	武瑞娜, 韦丽琴, 侯瑞丽, 等. 家庭养育环境对学龄前儿童心理行为发育的影响[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2014, 30(2): 140-142. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BTYX201402076.htm WU R N, WEI L Q, HOU R L, et al. The influence of the family parenting environment on the psycho-behavioural development of preschool children[J]. J Baotou Med Coll, 2014, 30(2): 140-142. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BTYX201402076.htm
[26]	HAN Z R, SHAFFER A. Maternal expressed emotion in relation to child behavior problems: differential and mediating effects[J]. J Child Fam Stud, 2014, 23(8): 1491-1500.
[27]	BJRK R F, HAVIGHURST S S, PONS F, et al. Pathways to behavior problems in Norwegian kindergarten children: the role of parent emotion socialization and child emotion understanding[J]. Scand J Psychol, 2020, 61(6): 751-762.
[28]	XIAO S X, SPINRAD T L, CARTER D B. Parental emotion regulation and preschoolers' prosocial behavior: the mediating roles of parental warmth and inductive discipline[J]. J Genet Psychol, 2018, 179(5): 246-255.
[29]	SIMPSON G A, BLOOM B, COHEN R A, et al. U.S. children with emotional and behavioral difficulties: data from the 2001, 2002 and 2003 national health interview surveys[J]. Adv Data, 2005, 360: 1-13.
[30]	彭一峰. 独生与非独生子女早期发展的比较研究[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2018. PENG Y F. A comparative study of the early development of only and non-only children[D]. Xi'an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[31]	ARIKAN G, KUMRU A. Patterns of associations between maternal symptoms and child problem behaviors: the mediating role of mentalization, negative intentionality, and unsupportive emotion socialization[J]. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev, 2021, 52(4): 640-653.