Correlation between family environment and depressive symptoms among adolescents
-
摘要:
目的 了解青少年家庭环境与抑郁症状之间的关联,为青少年心理健康促进和干预提供参考和借鉴。 方法 2021年9—12月,采用随机整群抽样的方法,在上海、乌鲁木齐、长沙、昆明4座城市对8 102名中学生进行家庭环境、抑郁症状的问卷调查。采用χ2检验比较不同家庭环境学生抑郁状况,采用多因素Logistic回归分析探讨家庭环境与抑郁症状的关联。 结果 青少年可能抑郁、很可能抑郁、严重抑郁的检出率分别为11.2%,5.9%,8.4%。不同性别、学段、城乡、家庭形态及是否独生子女青少年抑郁状况检出率,差异均有统计学意义(χ2值分别为87.60,27.19,6.65,45.59,4.78,P值均 < 0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,与核心家庭相比,单亲家庭(OR=1.45)、重组家庭(OR=1.69)青少年与抑郁症状的发生存在正相关(P值均 < 0.01)。 结论 与核心家庭相比,单亲家庭、重组家庭中青少年抑郁症状的发生风险更高。应注重单亲和重组家庭青少年的心理健康教育,保障青少年身心健康发展。 Abstract:Objective To understand the relationship between family environment and depressive symptoms among adolescent, and to provide a reference for adolescent mental health promotion and intervention. Methods From September to December in 2021, a questionnaire survey on family environment and depressive symptoms was conducted among 8 102 middle school students by random cluster sampling method in Shanghai, Urumqi, Changsha and Kunming. The Chi-square test was used to compare the depression status of students in different family environments. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between family environment and depressive symptoms. Results The detection rates of possible depression, likely depression and severe depression in adolescents were 11.2%, 5.9% and 8.4%, respectively. There were significant differences in the detection rate of depression by gender, academic period, urban and rural areas, family forms and only-child statu(χ2=87.60, 27.19, 6.65, 45.59, 4.78, P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that adolescents in single parent families (OR=1.45) and reorganized families(OR=1.69) were positively correlated with the occurrence of depressive symptoms compared with those in nuclear families(P < 0.01). Conclusion Compared with nuclear families, the risks of adolescent depressive symptoms in single-parent families and reorganized families are higher. Attention should be paid to the mental health education of teenagers from single parents and reorganized families to ensure the development of their physical and mental health. -
Key words:
- Family /
- Environment /
- Depression /
- Regression analysis /
- Adolescent
1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。 -
表 1 不同组别青少年抑郁症状检出率比较
Table 1. Comparison of prevalence of depressive symptoms among adolescents of different groups
组别 选项 人数 抑郁症状检出人数 χ2值 P值 性别 男 4 060 855(21.1) 87.60 <0.01 女 4 042 1 218(30.1) 学段 初中 3 988 918(23.0) 27.19 <0.01 高中 4 114 1 155(28.1) 城乡 城市 5 642 1 397(24.8) 6.65 0.01 乡村 2 460 676(27.5) 是否独生子女 否 3 858 1 030(26.7) 4.78 0.03 是 4 244 1 043(24.6) SES 低 2 582 694(26.9) 3.33 0.19 中 2 746 685(24.9) 高 2 774 694(25.0) 家庭形态 核心家庭 5 517 1 401(25.4) 45.59 <0.01 主干家庭 1 844 414(22.5) 联合家庭 78 25(32.1) 单亲家庭 428 142(33.2) 重组家庭 235 91(38.7) 注:()内数字为检出率/%。 表 2 不同组别青少年不同程度抑郁症状检出率比较
Table 2. Comparison of detection rates of depressive symptoms in different groups of adolescents
组别 选项 男生 女生 人数 可能抑郁 很可能抑郁 严重抑郁 χ2值 P值 人数 可能抑郁 很可能抑郁 严重抑郁 χ2值 P值 是否独生子女 否 1 791 193(10.8) 83(4.6) 111(6.2) 4.44 0.22 2 067 278(13.4) 144(7.0) 221(10.7) 2.56 0.46 是 2 269 202(8.9) 114(5.0) 152(6.7) 1 975 238(12.1) 139(7.0) 198(10.0) SES 低 1 292 140(10.8) 58(4.5) 83(6.4) 11.93 0.06 1 290 175(13.6) 90(7.0) 148(11.5) 4.82 0.57 中 1 335 139(10.4) 54(4.0) 87(6.5) 1 411 168(11.9) 99(7.0) 138(9.8) 高 1 433 116(8.1) 85(5.9) 93(6.5) 1 341 173(12.9) 94(7.0) 133(9.9) 家庭形态 核心家庭 2 831 290(10.2) 135(4.8) 181(6.4) 33.10 <0.01 2 686 346(12.9) 197(7.3) 252(9.4) 38.92 <0.01 主干家庭 906 70(7.7) 33(3.6) 54(6.0) 938 108(11.5) 56(6.0) 93(9.9) 联合家庭 42 5(11.9) 2(4.8) 5(11.9) 36 4(11.1) 4(11.1) 5(13.9) 单亲家庭 193 18(9.3) 16(8.3) 18(9.3) 235 36(15.3) 14(6.0) 40(17.0) 重组家庭 88 12(13.6) 11(12.5) 5(5.7) 147 22(15.0) 12(8.2) 29(19.7) 注:()内数字为检出率/%。 表 3 青少年家庭环境与抑郁症状的Logistic回归分析(n=8 102)
Table 3. Logistic regression analysis of adolescent family environment and depressive symptoms(n=8 102)
自变量 选项 β值 标准误 Wald χ2值 P值 OR值(OR值95%CI) 是否独生子女 是 1.00 否 0.10 0.06 3.34 0.11 1.11(0.99~1.23) SES 高 1.00 中 -0.05 0.06 0.61 0.39 0.95(0.84~1.08) 低 0.10 0.07 0.02 0.49 1.01(0.89~1.15) 家庭形态 核心家庭 1.00 主干家庭 -1.23 0.07 3.93 0.03 0.88(0.77~1.00) 联合家庭 0.32 0.25 1.67 0.15 1.38(0.85~2.24) 单亲家庭 0.37 0.11 11.54 <0.01 1.45(1.17~1.80) 重组家庭 0.53 0.14 14.23 <0.01 1.69(1.29~2.23) -
[1] COVAX delivers its 1 billionth COVID-19 vaccine dose COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide[J]. Saud Med J, 2022, 43(4): 438-439. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWXX200204019.htm [2] MAZZA M G, DE LORENZO R, CONTE C, et al. Anxiety and depression in COVID-19 survivors: role of inflammatory and clinical predictors[J]. Brain Behav Immun, 2020, 89: 594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.07.037 [3] 李佩, 李新影. 主要看护人教养方式及亲子沟通频率对留守青少年抑郁的影响[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2022, 30(6): 944-950. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL202206030.htmLI P, LI X Y. Effect of parent-adolescent communication frequency and primary caregiver's parenting style on adolescent depression of left-behind children[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2022, 30(6): 944-950. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL202206030.htm [4] 张婕, 蒋冰怡, 查世梅, 等. 社会支持在大学生家庭环境与心理健康间的中介作用[J]. 教育观察, 2022, 11(17): 37-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYGN202217010.htmZHANG J, JIANG B Y, ZHA S M, et al. Mediation of social support between college students' family environment and mental health[J]. Sur Educ, 2022, 11(17): 37-40. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYGN202217010.htm [5] FORMAN-HOFFMAN V L, VISWANATHAN M. Screening for depression in pediatric primary care[J]. Curr Psychiatry Rep, 2018, 20(8): 62. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0926-7 [6] TANG X F, TANG S Q, RRN Z H, et al. Psychosocial risk factors associated with depressive symptoms among adolescents in secondary schools inmainland China: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Affect Disord, 2020, 263: 155-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.118 [7] 李小彩, 赵丽娜, 杨森焙, 等. 儿童抑郁症状与家庭因素的关系[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2010, 25(12): 1665-1667. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB201012033.htmLI X C, ZHAO L N, YANG S P, et al. Relationship between depression symptom and family factors in children[J]. Matern Child Health Care Chin, 2010, 25(12): 1665-1667. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB201012033.htm [8] 和红, 王攀, 闫辰聿, 等. 家庭健康促进视角下青少年抑郁的代际传递研究: 基于CFPS2018的实证分析[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2022, 15(7): 45-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGWZ202207007.htmHE H, WANG P, YAN C Y, et al. Intergenerational transmission of depression in adolescents from the perspective of family-cen-tered health promotion: an empirical analysis based on CFPS 2018[J]. Chin J Health Policy, 2022, 15(7): 45-57. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGWZ202207007.htm [9] 王跃生. 直系组家庭: 当代家庭形态和代际关系分析的视角[J]. 中国社会科学, 2020(1): 107-132, 206-207. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSHK202001006.htmWANG Y S. Lineal family: a perspective of contemporary family morphology an intergenerational relationship analysis[J]. Soc Sci Chin, 2020(1): 107-132, 206-207. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSHK202001006.htm [10] 张帅, 范晓莉, 李士龙, 等. 青少年抑郁症患者出现非自杀性自伤行为的影响因素分析[J]. 保健医学研究与实践, 2022, 19(3): 6-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXBJ202203002.htmZHANG S, FAN X L, LI S L, et al. Analysis of the influencing factors for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescent major depressive disorder patients[J]. Health Med Res Pract, 2022, 19(3): 6-9. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXBJ202203002.htm [11] DUNCAN G J, YEUNG W J, BROOKS-GUNN J, et al. How much does childhood poverty affect the life chances of children?[J]. Am Sociol Rev, 1998, 63(3): 406-423. [12] CAO M, TIAN Y, LIAN S L, et al. Family socioeconomic status and adolescent depressive symptoms: a moderated mediation model[J]. J Child Fam Stud, 2021, 30: 2652-2663. [13] 何津, 陈祉妍, 郭菲, 等. 流调中心抑郁量表中文简版的编制[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2013, 22(12): 1133-1136.HE J, CHEN Z Y, GUO F, et al. A short Chinese version of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale[J]. Chin J Behav Med Brain Sci, 2013, 22(12): 1133-1136. (in Chinese) [14] 陈祉妍, 杨小冬, 李新影. 流调中心抑郁量表在我国青少年中的试用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(4): 443-445, 448. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY200904019.htmCHEN Z Y, YANG X D, LI X Y. Psychometric features of CES-D in Chinese adolescents[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2009, 17(4): 443-445, 448. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY200904019.htm [15] 张笑丰, 曹毓佳, 陈江河, 等. 全国5省份新冠肺炎疫情期间青少年抑郁检出率及其与气郁质相关性的研究[J]. 北京中医药大学学报, 2021, 44(9): 824-829. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZYB202109010.htmZHANG X F, CAO Y J, CHEN J H, et al. Study on the detection rate of depression among adolescents during COVID-19 epidemic in five provinces of China and its correlation with Qi stagnation[J]. J Beijing Univ Trad Chin Med, 2021, 44(9): 824-829. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZYB202109010.htm [16] 郭策, 段晓楠, 来亚平, 等. 青少年抑郁症状与清晨觉醒唾液皮质醇水平的相关性[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2018, 39(4): 540-542, 545. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.04.017GUO C, DUAN X N, LAI Y P, et al. Relationship between depressive symptoms and salivary awakening cortisol concentration in adolescents[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2018, 39(4): 540-542, 545. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.04.017 [17] GAO J, ZHENG P, JIA Y, et al. Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(4): e0231924. [18] CAO W, FANG Z, HOU G, et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemicon college students in China[J]. Psychiat Res Neuroim, 2020, 287: 112934. [19] 张凤梅, 陈建文, 徐恒戬, 等. 山东某高校大学生焦虑抑郁状况分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2014, 41(13): 2399-2400, 2425. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF201413033.htmZHENG F M, CHEN J W, XU H J, et al. Analysis on the status of anxiety and depress of students in a university in Shandong[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2014, 41(13): 2399-2400, 2425. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF201413033.htm [20] 余菊. 青少年重性抑郁障碍患者的公平决策行为和情绪研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2022.YU J. A study on equitable decision-making behavior and emotion of adolescent patients with major depressive[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2022. (in Chinese) [21] 王茜鑫. 青少年抑郁障碍患者共情能力及其相关影响因素研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2022.WANG Q X. Empathy and its clinical correlates in adolescents with depression[D]. Hefei: Anhui Medical University, 2022. (in Chinese) [22] 何颖, 徐明. 大学生体育锻炼与抑郁水平、身体自尊水平的相关性分析[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2002, 28(1): 65-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SORT200201017.htmHE Y, XU M. Analysis on the relation between the level of college students' physical exercises and depression, physical self-esteem[J]. J Chengdu Sport Univ, 2002, 28(1): 65-68. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SORT200201017.htm [23] 洪忻, 梁亚琼, 王志勇, 等. 南京市初高中学生睡眠状况及与抑郁障碍关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2007, 23(11): 1322-1324. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGW200711022.htmHONG X, LIANG Y Q, WANG Z Y, et al. Association of sleep status with depression among high school students in Nanjing[J]. Chin Public Health, 2007, 23(11): 1322-1324. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGW200711022.htm [24] 李宪伟. 城乡高中生睡眠质量及焦虑抑郁相关因素的对照研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2009.LI X W. A Comparative study on related factors of sleep quality, anxiety and depression between urban and rural senior high school students[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2009. (in Chinese) [25] 姚成玲, 杨蓉, 万宇辉, 等. 沈阳中学生健康素养睡眠质量与抑郁症状的关联[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2017, 38(12): 1849-1852, 1855. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2017.12.026YAO C L, YANG R, WAN Y H, et al. Interaction between health literacy and sleep quality on depressive symptoms among middle school students[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2017, 38(12): 1849-1852, 1855. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2017.12.026 [26] 刘致宏, 张珊珊. 中学生线上社交焦虑与抑郁症状和睡眠质量的关联[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(1): 77-81, 86. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.01.017LIU Z H, ZHANG S S. Association between online social anxiety in middle students with depressive symptoms and sleep quality[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(1): 77-81, 86. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.01.017 [27] 滕超. 家庭因素与抑郁障碍青少年非自杀性自伤行为的关系研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江中医药大学, 2022.TENG C. The relationship between family factors and non-suicidal self-injury behavior of adolescents with depressive disorder[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 2022. (in Chinese) [28] 卫金龙, 周勤学, 毛辉. 家庭治疗联合药物干预应用于青少年抑郁症患者的效果分析[J]. 心理月刊, 2022, 17(8): 45-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLYK202208015.htmWEI J L, ZHOU Q X, MAO H. Analysis of the effect of family therapy combined with drug intervention in adolescent with depression[J]. Psychol Mag, 2022, 17(8): 45-47. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLYK202208015.htm [29] 秦玮崧. 青少年抑郁情绪及其影响机制研究[D]. 北京: 中国社会科学院大学, 2022.QIN W S. Research on adolescent depression and its influence mechanism[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, 2022. (in Chinese) [30] 莫绮云. 学业鼓励与青少年抑郁情绪的纵向关系: 学校参与的中介作用[D]. 广州: 广州大学, 2022.MO Q Y. The longitudinal relationship between academic encouragement and adolescent depression: the mediating effect of school participation[D]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University, 2022. (in Chinese) [31] MCKETTA S, KEYES K M. Oral contraceptive use and depression among adolescents[J]. Ann Epidemiol, 2019, 29: 46-51. [32] 宋玲玲, 吴静, 苏普玉. 青少年抑郁的环境可控性因素[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(2): 312-315. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.02.035SONG L L, WU J, SU P Y. Environmental controllable factors of adolescents' depression[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(2): 312-315. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.02.035 -

计量
- 文章访问数: 832
- HTML全文浏览量: 356
- PDF下载量: 166
- 被引次数: 0