12~15岁青少年纵跳能力特征及其与身体形态的相关性

田俊龙; 高翔; 刘艺; 李林

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.03.025

12~15岁青少年纵跳能力特征及其与身体形态的相关性

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.03.025

田俊龙¹,
高翔¹,
刘艺²,
李林^1, ,

1.
首都体育学院体育教育训练学院，北京 100191
2.
江西师范大学附属中学

详细信息

作者简介:
田俊龙(1988-)，男，江西赣州人，在读博士，讲师，主要研究方向为青少年身体运动功能训练

通讯作者:
李林，E-mail: lilin@cupes.edu.cn

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: R87 G807.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 554
- HTML全文浏览量: 197
- PDF下载量: 44
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-10-29
- 修回日期: 2023-01-13
- 刊出日期: 2023-03-25

Association of vertical jump performance with anthropological variables among adolescents aged 12-15

TIAN Junlong¹,
GAO Xiang¹,
LIU Yi²,
LI Lin^{1
, ,}

1.
Institute of Physical Education and Training, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing(100191), China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨12~15岁青少年纵跳能力的年龄与性别特征，分析纵跳能力与身体形态的相关性。方法采用区域分层方法选取中国9省(市)15所中学的12~15岁青少年1 280名，采用Smartjump纵跳测试系统测量半蹲跳高度(SJ-H)、下蹲跳高度(CMJ-H)、左腿下蹲跳高度(LCMJ-H)、右腿下蹲跳高度(RCMJ-H)，通过CMJ-H和SJ-H的比值计算出离心利用率(EUR)。测量受试者的身高、体重、体质量指数(BMI)、小腿围和足长5项身体形态指标。分析12~15岁青少年纵跳能力的年龄和性别特征，以及与身体形态指标间的相关性。结果男生纵跳高度随年龄增加而上升，12~15岁SJ-H(29.3~37.0 cm)、CMJ-H(30.8~39.9 cm)、LCMJ-H(15.1~19.2 cm)、RCMJ-H(14.8~18.9 cm)呈上升趋势。而女生纵跳高度仅有14与13岁之间差异有统计学意义，14岁SJ-H(25.3 cm)、CMJ-H(27.0 cm)高于13岁(24.5，26.1 cm)(t值分别为2.01，2.19，P值均 < 0.05)；男生SJ-H、CMJ-H、LCMJ-H、RCMJ-H均优于女生，且随着年龄的增长性别差异逐渐加大；EUR在各年龄男、女生间差异均无统计学意义(1.06~1.09)(t值分别为-0.11~0.94，P值均>0.05)；偏相关分析显示，全体12~15岁青少年SJ-H、CMJ-H、LCMJ-H、RCMJ-H与身高(r=0.38~0.43)、足长(r=0.22~0.29)存在中、低度相关，与体重(r=-0.17~-0.14)存在低度负相关(P值均 < 0.01)。结论 12~15岁男生纵跳高度随年龄增加而上升，而女生14岁之后纵跳高度无增长趋势，12~15岁青少年纵跳能力与身高、体重、足长存在显著相关性；较大的体重对纵跳能力会产生限制作用。
- 运动活动 /
- 身体测量 /
- 生长和发育 /
- 青少年
Abstract: Objective To explore characteristics of vertical jump ability by age and gender and its correlation with anthropological variables among adolescents aged 12-15. Methods A total of 1 280 adolescents aged 12-15 years were recruited from 15 middle schools in 9 provinces and cities in China. The Smartjump contact mat, an assessing vertical jump system, was used to measure the squat jump height (SJ-H), countermovement jump height (CMJ-H), left-leg countermovement jump height (LCMJ-H) and right-leg countermovement jump height (RCMJ-H). The eccentric utilization ratio (EUR) was calculated as the ratio between CMJ-H and SJ-H. Data on height, weight, body mass index (BMI), calf circumference, and foot length of participants were collected. The differences in vertical jump ability by age and gender were compared by using a one-way ANOVA and the correlation between vertical jump ability and anthropological variables was analyzed by using a partial correlation analysis. Results The SJ-H (29.3-37.0 cm), CMJ-H (30.8-39.9 cm), LCMJ-H (15.1-19.2 cm) and RCMJ-H (14.8-18.9 cm) increased significantly with age among boys aged 12-15. But among girls, only the SJ-H and CMJ-H significantly increased in the 14-year-old group (SJ-H: 25.3 cm, CMJ-H: 27.0 cm) compared to the 13-year-old (24.5, 26.1 cm) (t=2.01, 2.19, P < 0.05). Additionally, boys performed better on the SJ-H, CMJ-H, LCMJ-H, and RCMJ-H, and this sex difference increased with age. There was no significant difference in EUR between boys and girls at different ages (1.06-1.09) (t=-0.11-0.94, P>0.05). The partial correlation analysis showed that SJ-H, CMJ-H, LCMJ-H, and RCMJ-H had low to moderate positive correlations with height (r=0.38-0.43), foot length (r=0.22-0.29) while low negative correlation with weight (r=-0.17-0.14)(P < 0.01). Conclusion The vertical jump performance increases with age among boys aged 12-15, while girls hardly increase until over the age of 14. The vertical jump performance is significantly associated with height, weight, and foot length and is restricted by greater weight among adolescents aged 12-15 years.
- Motor activity /
- Body size /
- Growth and development /
- Adolescent
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 12~15岁不同性别青少年纵跳高度特征比较(x±s)

Table 1. Comparison of vertical jump height characteristics of different sex adolescents aged 12-15 years(x±s)

年龄/岁	性别	人数	统计值	SJ-H/cm	CMJ-H/cm	EUR	LCMJ-H/cm	RCMJ-H/cm
12	男	50		29.3±4.8	30.8±5.4	1.06±0.15	15.1±2.9	14.8±3.5
	女	78		24.7±4.9	26.1±4.6	1.07±0.11	12.4±2.3	13.0±2.8
	合计	128		26.4±5.3	27.9±5.4	1.07±0.13	13.5±2.9	13.7±3.2
			t值	5.23	5.08	-0.11	5.50	3.12
			P值	< 0.01	< 0.01	0.92	< 0.01	< 0.01
13	男	295		33.1±6.4^**	35.4±6.5^**	1.08±0.13	16.8±3.7^**	17.2±4.1^**
	女	283		24.5±4.2	26.1±4.3	1.07±0.10	12.6±2.4	13.2±2.8
	合计	578		28.9±6.9^**	30.9±7.2^**	1.08±0.12	14.8±3.8^**	15.3±4.1^**
			t值	19.82	20.19	0.80	16.61	14.54
			P值	< 0.01	< 0.01	0.42	< 0.01	< 0.01
14	男	224		34.9±5.6^**	37.4±6.2^**	1.08±0.11	17.7±3.7^**	18.3±3.9^**
	女	205		25.3±4.6^*	27.0±4.6^*	1.07±0.11	13.0±2.5	13.4±2.7
	合计	429		30.4±7.1^**	32.5±7.6^**	1.08±0.10	15.5±4.0^**	16.0±4.1^**
			t值	20.18	20.79	0.27	15.97	16.68
			P值	< 0.01	< 0.01	0.79	< 0.01	< 0.01
15	男	84		37.0±6.6^**	39.9±6.6^**	1.09±0.10	19.2±3.4^**	18.9±3.6
	女	61		24.9±4.3	26.5±4.5	1.07±0.11	13.0±2.4	13.6±2.4
	合计	145		32.0±8.2^*	34.4±8.8^*	1.08±0.10	16.6±4.3^**	16.7±4.1
			t值	13.70	15.13	0.94	12.73	10.63
			P值	< 0.01	< 0.01	0.35	< 0.01	< 0.01
注：与上一年龄组相比，P < 0.05，*P < 0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 12~15岁青少年身体形态与纵跳能力的偏相关分析(r值)

Table 2. Partial correlation analysis of body morphology and vertical jump ability in adolescents aged 12-15 years(r)

身体形态	男生(n=653)					女生(n=627)					合计(n=1 280)
身体形态	SJ-H	CMJ-H	EUR	LCMJ-H	RCMJ-H	SJ-H	CMJ-H	EUR	LCMJ-H	RCMJ-H	SJ-H	CMJ-H	EUR	LCMJ-H	RCMJ-H
身高	0.30^**	0.32^**	0.03	0.26^**	0.27^**	0.09^*	0.10^*	0.01	0.11^**	0.12^**	0.41^**	0.43^**	0.03	0.38^**	0.39^**
体重	-0.22^**	-0.22^**	0.01	-0.21^**	-0.22^**	-0.18^**	-0.20^**	-0.03	-0.24^**	-0.25^**	-0.14^**	-0.14^**	0.00	-0.16^**	-0.17^**
BMI	-0.02	0.07	0.05	0.05	0.03	0.02	-0.02	-0.07	-0.00	-0.04	-0.05	-0.02	0.05	-0.02	-0.04
小腿围	0.09^*	0.03	-0.05	0.03	0.06	0.07	0.06	-0.01	0.14^**	0.10^*	0.08^**	0.05	-0.06	0.07^*	0.07^**
足长	-0.06	-0.09^*	-0.01	-0.03	-0.07	-0.05	-0.04	0.02	-0.08^*	-0.09^*	0.29^**	0.29^**	0.01	0.26^**	0.22^**
注： P < 0.05，*P < 0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(21)

[1]	FAIGENBAUM A D, MACDONALD J P, STRACCIOLINI A, et al. Making a strong case for prioritizing muscular fitness in youth physical activity guidelines[J]. Curr Sport Med Rep, 2020, 19(12): 530-536. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000784
[2]	SALINERO J J, GONZALEZ-MILLAN C, GUTIERREZ D, et al. Age-related trends in anthropometry and jump and sprint performances in elite soccer players from 13 to 20 years of age: a cross-sectional study[J]. J Hum Sport Exerc, 2019, 14(4): 772-783.
[3]	SUMNIK Z, MATYSKOVA J, HLAVKA Z, et al. Reference data for jumping mechanography in healthy children and adolescents aged 6-18 years[J]. J Musculoskelet Neuron Interact, 2013, 13(3): 297-311.
[4]	AOUICHAOUI C, TRABELSI Y, BOUHLEL E, et al. The relative contributions of anthropometric variables to vertical jumping ability and leg power in Tunisian children[J]. J Strength Cond Res, 2012, 26(3): 777-788. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31822a61a2
[5]	PLESA J, KOZINC Z, SARABON N. A brief review of selected biomechanical variables for sport performance monitoring and training optimization[J]. Appl Mechanics, 2022, 3(1): 144-159. doi: 10.3390/applmech3010011
[6]	袁尽州, 黄海. 体育测量与评价[M]. 北京: 人民体育出版社, 2011. YUAN J Z, HUANG H. Physical measurement and evaluation[M]. Beijing: People's Sports Publishing House, 2011. (in Chinese)
[7]	POLAKOVICOVA M, VAVAK M, OLLE R, et al. Vertical jump development in elite adolescent volleyball players: effects of sex and age[J]. Acta Gymnic, 2018, 48(3): 115-120. doi: 10.5507/ag.2018.016
[8]	刘姝, 刘珂, 王欢. 2005年与2015年澳门儿童青少年生长发育快速增长期体质特征的比较研究[J]. 中国体育科技, 2019, 55(12): 39-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTY201912006.htm LIU S, LIU K, WANG H. Comparative study on physical characteristics of children and adolescents in Macao during rapid growth period in 2005 and 2015[J]. Chin Sports Sci Technol, 2019, 55(12): 39-48. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTY201912006.htm
[9]	LAFFAYE G, CHOUKOU M A, BENGUIGUI N, et al. Age-and gender-related development of stretch shortening cycle during a sub-maximal hopping task[J]. Biol Sport, 2016, 33(1): 29-35. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786579/
[10]	METAXAS T I, MANDROUKAS A, VAMVAKOUDIS E, et al. Muscle fiber characteristics, satellite cells and soccer performance in young athletes[J]. J Sports Sci Med, 2014, 13(3): 493-501.
[11]	RADNOR J M, OLIVER J L, WAUGH C M, et al. The influence of growth and maturation on stretch-shortening cycle function in youth[J]. Sport Med, 2018, 48(1): 57-71. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0785-0
[12]	HARRISON A J, GAFFNEY S. Motor development and gender effects on stretch-shortening cycle performance[J]. J Sci Med Sport, 2001, 4(4): 406-415. doi: 10.1016/S1440-2440(01)80050-5
[13]	TONSON A, RATEL S, LE FUR Y, et al. Effect of maturation on the relationship between muscle size and force production[J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2008, 40(5): 918-925. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181641bed
[14]	GERODIMOS V, ZAFEIRIDIS A, PERKOS S, et al. The contribution of stretch-shortening cycle and arm-swing to vertical jumping performance in children, adolescents, and adult basketball players[J]. Pediatr Exerc Sci, 2008, 20(4): 379-389. doi: 10.1123/pes.20.4.379
[15]	LLOYD R S, OLIVER J L, HUGHES M G, et al. Reliability and validity of field-based measures of leg stiffness and reactive strength index in youths[J]. J Sports Sci, 2009, 27(14): 1565-1573. doi: 10.1080/02640410903311572
[16]	MEYLAN C M P, CRONIN J B, OLIVER J L, et al. The reliability of jump kinematics and kinetics in children of different maturity status[J]. J Strength Cond Res, 2012, 26(4): 1015-1026. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31822dcec7
[17]	SHARMA H B, GANDHI S, MEITEI K K, et al. Anthropometric basis of vertical jump performance: a study in young Indian national players[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2017, 11(2): 1-5.
[18]	FUSTER V, JEREZ A, ORTEGA A. Anthropometry and strength relationship: male-female differences[J]. Anthropol Anz, 1998, 56(1): 49-56. doi: 10.1127/anthranz/56/1998/49
[19]	HAWLEY V S. The relationship between foot anthropometry and jump performance[D]. North Carolina: Appalachian State University, 2016.
[20]	AIYEGBUSI A, FAPOJUWO O, AYODELE A. Vertical jump performances in recreational basketball players: the role of physical characteristics and anthropometric parameters of the lower limbs[J]. J Rom Sports Med Soc, 2017, 13(1): 2853-2859.
[21]	NAGANO A, KOMURA T. Longer moment arm results in smaller joint moment development, power and work outputs in fast motions[J]. J Biomech, 2003, 36(11): 1675-1681. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00171-4