童年期虐待与初中生大五人格特征的关联

潘俊彦; 李敏; 单芳玲; 何慕然; 李缘; 文雪; 王君; 苏普玉; 汪耿夫

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.02.016

童年期虐待与初中生大五人格特征的关联

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.02.016

1.
安徽医科大学公共卫生学院妇幼保健医学专业，合肥 230032
2.
安徽医科大学公共卫生学院儿少卫生与妇幼保健学系/出生人口健康教育部重点实验室/人口健康与优生安徽省重点实验室

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 82204071

国家自然科学基金项目 82173539

国家自然科学基金项目 81874268

详细信息

作者简介:
潘俊彦(2000-)，男，江苏泰州人，在读本科

通讯作者:
汪耿夫，E-mail：wanggenfu@ahmu.edu.cn

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: R179G627.8G444
计量
- 文章访问数: 283
- HTML全文浏览量: 137
- PDF下载量: 40
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-09-14
- 修回日期: 2022-10-11
- 网络出版日期: 2023-03-02
- 刊出日期: 2023-02-25

Association between childhood maltreatment and the Big Five personality traits in middle school students

1.
Department of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei(230032), China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨童年期虐待(childhood maltreatment, CM)与初中生大五人格特征之间的关联，为促进初中生人格健康发育提供科学依据。方法采用多阶段随机整群抽样方法选取安徽省宣城、合肥、淮北共5 724名初中生进行问卷调查，内容包括人口统计学特征、CM经历以及大五人格特征。采用线性回归分析和典则相关分析探索CM与大五人格特征之间的关联。结果初中生躯体虐待、情感虐待、性虐待、躯体忽视、情感忽视与谨慎性(β=-1.71~-2.55)、情绪性(β=1.93~3.87)人格特征关联均有统计学意义(P值均 < 0.05)。除躯体虐待外，其余各类型CM与外向性(β=-1.04~-2.32)、宜人性(β=-1.07~-1.37)人格特征关联均有统计学意义(P值均 < 0.05)，仅有性虐待与开放性人格特征关联有统计学意义(β=-0.70，P < 0.05)。除开放性人格特征外，CM经历数量与初中生人格特征关联均有统计学意义；且CM经历数量与各维度人格特征得分呈现剂量反应关系(P值均 < 0.05)。典则相关分析中，典则相关系数为-0.375(P < 0.05)，童年期虐待经历主要由情感虐待、情感忽视与躯体忽视来反映(典则载荷系数为0.556~0.951)，大五人格特征主要由情绪性、谨慎性与外向性来反映(典则载荷系数为-0.702~0.639)。结论 CM与初中生人格特征之间存在关联，预防CM对于促进早期初中生的人格健康发育具有重要意义。
- 虐待儿童 /
- 人格 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 回归分析 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective The study aimed to explore the relationship between childhood maltreatment (CM) and the Big Five personality traits of middle school students, so as to provide scientific evidence for promoting the healthy development of middle school students' personality. Methods A total of 5 724 middle school students from Xuancheng, Hefei and Huaibei of Anhui Province were selected by using a multi-stage stratified cluster sampling method to conduct a questionnaire survey, including demographic characteristics, CM experience and Big Five personality traits. Linear regression analysis and canonical correlation analysis were used to explore the associations between CM and the Big Five personality traits. Results Physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, physical neglect, and emotional neglect of middle school students were significantly associated with conscientiousness (β=-1.71--2.55) and neuroticism (β=1.93-3.87) personality traits(P < 0.05). Except physical abuse, all other types of CM were significantly associated with extraversion (β=-1.04--2.32) and agreeableness (β=-1.07--1.37) personality traits(P < 0.05), and only sexual abuse was associated with openness personality trait(β=-0.70, P < 0.05). Except for openness personality trait, the relationship between the number of CM experience and the personality traits of middle school students was statistically significant; there was a dose-response relationship between the number of CM experiences and the scores of personality traits each dimension(P < 0.05). In the canonical correlation analysis, the canonical correlation coefficient was -0.375(P < 0.05). CM experiences were mainly reflected by emotional abuse, emotional neglect and physical neglect (canonical load coefficient was 0.556-0.951). The Big Five personality traits were mainly reflected by neuroticism, conscientiousness and extraversion (canonical load coefficient was -0.702-0.639). Conclusion There is a correlation between CM and the personality traits of middle school students, and prevention of CM is of great significance for promoting the healthy development of middle school students' personality.
- Child abuse /
- Personality /
- Mental health /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 是否有童年期虐待经历初中生大五人格特征得分比较(x±s)

Table 1. Comparison of Big Five personality traits of middle school students with or without childhood maltreatment experiences(x±s)

童年期虐待经历		人数	统计值	外向性	宜人性	开放性	谨慎性	情绪性
童年期虐待	否	4 105		39.62±7.99	38.92±6.72	33.22±6.30	39.59±7.92	28.30±7.39
	是	1 619		37.15±8.60	36.95±6.81	32.12±6.74	35.84±8.13	32.39±7.12
			t值	10.00	9.99	5.63	16.02	-19.35
躯体虐待	否	5 172		39.10±8.12	38.52±6.71	32.97±6.39	38.86±8.04	29.17±7.48
	是	552		37.28±9.21	36.88±7.49	32.31±6.92	35.43±8.64	32.16±7.58
			t值	4.45	4.96	2.15	8.93	-8.93
情感虐待	否	4 622		39.49±8.04	38.78±6.73	33.16±6.34	39.31±7.98	28.61±7.41
	是	1 102		36.52±8.66	36.64±6.83	31.84±6.75	35.28±8.10	33.04±7.03
			t值	10.38	9.44	5.89	15.01	-18.61
性虐待	否	5 319		39.02±8.16	38.48±6.73	32.98±6.37	38.69±8.08	29.32±7.52
	是	405		37.62±9.13	36.81±7.60	32.02±7.28	36.49±8.86	31.34±7.60
			t值	2.99	4.30	2.58	4.84	-5.23
情感忽视	否	5 312		39.23±8.11	38.58±6.73	33.06±6.37	38.90±8.02	29.10±7.44
	是	412		35.02±8.96	35.60±7.18	30.98±7.09	33.77±8.41	34.16±7.30
			t值	9.25	8.61	5.77	12.45	-13.32
躯体忽视	否	5 308		39.18±8.11	38.53±6.71	33.02±6.37	38.82±8.05	29.19±7.47
	是	416		35.63±9.24	36.19±7.61	31.55±7.22	34.84±8.59	32.95±7.58
			t值	7.61	6.09	4.02	9.67	-9.89
注：P值均 < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 童年期虐待经历与初中生大五人格特征关系的线性回归分析[n=5 724, β值(β值95%CI)]

Table 2. Linear regression analysis of the relationship between childhood maltreatment experience and the Big Five personality traits of middle school students [n=5 724, β(β 95%CI)]

自变量	外向性	宜人性	开放性	谨慎性	情绪性
童年期虐待	-1.30(-1.76~-0.84)^*	-1.07(-1.46~-0.69)^*	-0.25(-0.62~0.12)	-2.34(-2.80~-1.89)^*	3.48(3.05~3.91)^*
躯体虐待	-0.56(-1.26~0.13)	-0.54(-1.13~0.04)	0.24(-0.31~0.80)	-1.83(-2.52~-1.15)^*	2.43(1.78~3.08)^*
情感虐待	-1.61(-2.13~-1.08)^*	-1.13(-1.58~-0.69)^*	-0.34(-0.76~0.09)	-2.39(-2.91~-1.87)^*	3.61(3.12~4.11)^*
性虐待	-1.04(-1.82~-0.26)^*	-1.31(-1.97~-0.65)^*	-0.70(-1.33~-0.07)^*	-1.71(-2.49~-0.94)^*	1.93(1.19~2.67)^*
情感忽视	-2.15(-2.95~-1.35)^*	-1.37(-2.04~-0.69)^*	-0.62(-1.26~0.03)	-2.55(-3.35~-1.76)^*	3.87(3.11~4.62)^*
躯体忽视	-2.32(-3.10~-1.54)^*	-1.34(-2.00~-0.68)^*	-0.59(-1.22~0.04)	-2.50(-3.27~-1.73)^*	3.08(2.35~3.82)^*
注：控制了性别、年级、家庭类型、自评家庭经济、与母亲关系、与父亲关系、朋友数量；*P < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 童年期虐待经历数量与初中生大五人格特征关系的线性回归分析[n=5 724, β值(β值95%CI)]

Table 3. Linear regression analysis of the relationship between the number of childhood maltreatment experiences and the Big Five personality traits of middle school students [n=5 724, β(β 95%CI)]

童年期虐待经历数量/种	外向性	宜人性	开放性	谨慎性	情绪性
1	-0.66(-1.23~-0.09)^*	-0.81(-1.29~-0.33)^*	-0.01(-0.46~0.46)	-1.96(-2.52~-1.40)^*	2.89(2.36~3.42)^*
2	-1.83(-2.64~-1.03)^*	-1.24(-1.91~-0.56)^*	-0.60(-1.25~0.05)	-2.18(-2.97~-1.39)^*	3.91(3.17~4.66)^*
3	-2.68(-3.79~-1.57)^*	-1.47(-2.40~-0.53)^*	-0.67(-1.56~0.22)	-3.97(-5.06~-2.88)^*	5.32(4.30~6.35)^*
≥4	-2.13(-3.44~-0.81)^*	-1.83(-2.94~-0.73)^*	-0.26(-1.31~0.80)	-3.14(-4.43~-1.85)^*	3.57(2.35~4.79)^*
种类数量	-0.74(-0.96~-0.52)^*	-0.53(-0.72~-0.35)^*	-0.16(-0.34~0.02)	-1.11(-1.33~-0.89)^*	1.56(1.36~1.77)^*
注：控制了性别、年级、家庭类型、自评家庭经济、与母亲关系、与父亲关系、朋友数量；自变量均以无童年期虐待为参照组；*P < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	STOLTENBORGH M, BAKERMANS-KRANENBURG M J, ALINK L R A, et al. The prevalence of child maltreatment across the globe: review of a series of Meta-analysis[J]. Child Abuse Rev, 2015, 24(1): 37-50. doi: 10.1002/car.2353
[2]	HUGHES K, BELLIS M A, HARDCASTLE K A, et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Public Health, 2017, 2(8): e356-e366. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30118-4
[3]	CAY M, GONZALEZ-HEYDRICH J, TEICHER M H, et al. Childhood maltreatment and its role in the development of pain and psychopathology[J]. Lancet Child Adolesc Health, 2022, 6(3): 195-206. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00339-4
[4]	CHOI J Y, PARK S H. Childhood maltreatment as predictor of pathological personality traits using PSY-5 in an adult psychiatric sample[J]. J Pers Disord, 2018, 32(1): 1-16. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2017_31_282
[5]	FLYNN T P, PARNES J E, CONNER B T. Personality disorders, risky behaviors, and adversity: the moderating role of resilience[J]. Psychol Rep, 2021. DOI: 10.1177/00332941211028998.
[6]	SHINER R L. A developmental perspective on personality disorders: lessons from research on normal personality development in childhood and adolescence[J]. J Person Disord, 2005, 19(2): 202-210. doi: 10.1521/pedi.19.2.202.62630
[7]	BERNSTEIN D P, STEIN J A, NEWCOMB M D, et al. Development and validation of a brief screening version of the childhood trauma Questionnaire[J]. Child Abuse Negl, 2003, 27(2): 169-190. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00541-0
[8]	赵幸福, 张亚林, 李龙飞, 等. 中文版儿童期虐待问卷的信度和效度[J]. 中国临床康复, 2005, 9(20): 105-107. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDKF200520049.htm ZHAO X F, ZHANG Y L, LI L F, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of Childhood Trauma Questionnaire[J]. Chin J Clin Rehabil, 2005, 9(20): 105-107. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDKF200520049.htm
[9]	聂衍刚, 林崇德, 郑雪, 等. 青少年社会适应行为与大五人格的关系[J]. 心理科学, 2008, 31(4): 774-779. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2008.04.002 NIE Y G, LIN C D, ZHENG X, et al. The relationship between social adaptation behavior and big five personality in adolescents[J]. Psychol Sci, 2008, 31(4): 774-779. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2008.04.002
[10]	TRULL T J, WIDIGER T A. Dimensional models of personality: the five-factor model and the DSM-5[J]. Dialog Clin Neuros, 2013, 15(2): 135-146. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2013.15.2/ttrull
[11]	顾寿全, 奚晓岚, 程灶火, 等. 大学生大五人格与心理健康的关系[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(2): 354-356. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201402038.htm GU S Q, XI X L, CHENG Z H, et al. Relationship between big five personality and mental health in college students[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2014, 22(2): 354-356. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201402038.htm
[12]	宋文婷. 初中生大五人格、自我控制与网络关系成瘾的关系研究[D]. 深圳: 深圳大学, 2018. SONG W T. Research on the relationship among middle school students' big five, self-control and cyber relational addiction[D]. Shenzhen: Shenzhen University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[13]	朱相华, 王成东, 周勤, 等. 儿童期受虐待大学生的大五人格特点[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2012, 20(7): 1083-1086. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201207053.htm ZHU X H, WANG C D, ZHOU Q, et al. Characteristics of big five personality in college students with childhood abuse[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2012, 20(7): 1083-1086. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201207053.htm
[14]	GRUSNICK J M, GARACCI E, EILER C, et al. The association between adverse childhood experiences and personality, emotions and affect: does number and type of experience matter?[J]. J Res Person, 2020, 85: 103908. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103908
[15]	FLETCHER J M, SCHURER S. Origins of adulthood personality: the role of adverse childhood experiences[J]. B E J Econom Anal Policy, 2017, 17(2): 10.
[16]	HOVENS J G F M, GILTAY E J, VAN HEMERT A M, et al. Childhood maltreatment and the course of depressive and anxiety disorders: the contribution of personality characteristics[J]. Dep Anx, 2016, 33(1): 27-34. doi: 10.1002/da.22429
[17]	MA Y, MA C, LAN X. Openness to experience moderates the association of warmth profiles and subjective well-being in left-behind and non-left-behind youth[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(7): 4103. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074103
[18]	KOMULAINEN E, MESKANEN K, LIPSANEN J, et al. The effect of personality on daily life emotional processes[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(10): E110907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110907
[19]	POS K, BOYETTE L L, MEIJER C J, et al. The effect of childhood trauma and Five-Factor Model personality traits on exposure to adult life events in patients with psychotic disorders[J]. Cogn Neuropsychiatry, 2016, 21(6): 462-474. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2016.1236014
[20]	HERZBERG M P, GUNNAR M R. Early life stress and brain function: activity and connectivity associated with processing emotion and reward[J]. Neuroimage, 2020, 209: 116493.