Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based mental health practice in primary schools
-
摘要:
目的 探索实施学校循证心理健康服务的促进与阻碍因素, 为推动中国学校循证心理健康服务发展提供实践经验。 方法 在为河南省10所小学提供循证心理健康服务后, 对4名教育局领导、8名学校管理者、7名任课教师、7名服务实施者进行半结构式访谈。采用主题分析法对访谈资料进行类属分析。 结果 实施学校循证心理健康服务面临着宏观层面、学校层面、个体层面多重因素的影响。共提炼出8个促进因素和9个阻碍因素, 其中教师职称评价体系"排斥"心理健康服务、服务与学校教学存在时间冲突、心理健康服务污名化、感知到的服务效果与期望不匹配等因素的影响尤为突出。 结论 循证心理健康服务在中国学校实施是可行的, 实施过程中需要充分考虑宏观、学校、个人多层面的因素, 推动中国的循证心理健康服务从理论和数据走向实践。 -
关键词:
- 循证医学 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 卫生服务 /
- 中小学生卫生保健服务
Abstract:Objective To explore the facilitators and barriers of the implementation of evidence-based mental health practice, in order to provide practical experience for promoting the development of evidence-based mental health services in primary schools in China. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 4 education bureau managers, 8 school administrators, 7 classroom teachers, and 7 treatment providers after providing evidence-based practice in 10 primary schools in Henan Province, China.Data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Evidence-based practice in primary schools faced multiple factors at the macro level, school level, and individual level.A total of 8 facilitators and 9 barriers were extracted.Among these factors, some factors were particularly striking.These included the"exclusion"of teacher title evaluation system, time conflict between practice and school schedule, stigmatization of mental health and mismatch between perceived effectiveness of services and expectations. Conclusion Evidence-based mental health practice is feasible in Chinese schools.The implementation process needs to take full account of macro, school and individual multi-level factors to move evidence-based mental health services from theory and data to practice in China. -
Key words:
- Evidence-based medicine /
- Mental health /
- Health services /
- School health services
1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。 -
表 1 循证心理健康服务在学校实施的促进与阻碍因素
Table 1. Facilitators and barriers to evidence-based mental health practice in schools
类别 层次 因素 提及人数(受访者类型) 次数 促进因素 宏观层面 教育部门提供行政支持 12(1A;4M;7F) 17 学校层面 学校有心理健康服务需求 15(4A;4M;4T;3F) 32 服务与学校发展理念契合 6(3M;3F) 10 提前制定服务时间规划 6(2M;4F) 10 学校提供沟通协调保障 5(1T;4F) 9 个体层面 认为服务具有可接受性 13(1A;3M;3T;6F) 33 与学校教师建立互惠关系 9(4M;2T;3F) 11 服务介绍人的人情纽带 8(4M;4F) 9 阻碍因素 宏观层面 服务缺乏政策支撑 14(1A;6M;5T;2F) 17 教师职称评价体系“排斥”心理健康服务 10(1A;3M;3T;3F) 20 缺少心理健康服务的专项经费 13(4A;6M;1T;2F) 17 学校层面 重学习轻心理的观念占主导 13(5M;5T;3F) 19 学校心理健康服务需求感知不强 14(3M;5T;6F) 22 服务与学校教学存在时间冲突 13(5M;3T;5F) 23 心理健康服务污名化 14(1A;4M;2T;7F) 22 学校缺少不受干扰的服务场地 5(5F) 6 个体层面 服务感知效果与期望不匹配 10(1A;3M;5T;1F) 20 注: A为教育局领导,M为学校管理者,T为教师,F为服务实施者。 -
[1] LANGLEY A K, NADEEM E, KATAOKA S H, et al. Evidence-Based mental health programs in schools: barriers and facilitators of successful implementation[J]. Sch Ment Health, 2010, 2(3): 105-113. doi: 10.1007/s12310-010-9038-1 [2] FAZEL M, HOAGWOOD K, STEPHAN S, et al. Mental health interventions in schools in high-income countries[J]. Lancet Psychiat, 2014, 1(5): 377-387. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70312-8 [3] HOAGWOOD K E, OLIN S S, KERKER B D, et al. Empirically based school interventions targeted at academic and mental health functioning[J]. J Emot Behav Disord, 2007, 15(2): 66-92. doi: 10.1177/10634266070150020301 [4] ENNETT S T, RINGWALT C L, THORNE J, et al. A comparison of current practice in school-based substance use prevention programs with Meta-analysis findings[J]. Prev Sci, 2003, 4(1): 1-14. doi: 10.1023/A:1021777109369 [5] GOTTFREDSON D C, GOTTFREDSON G D. Quality of school-based prevention programs: results from a national survey[J]. J Res Crime Delinq, 2002, 39(1): 3-35. doi: 10.1177/002242780203900101 [6] KE X, ZHANG L, LI Z, et al. Inequality in health service utilization among migrant and local children: a cross-sectional survey of children aged 0-14 years in Shenzhen, China[J]. BMC Public Health, 2020, 20(1): 1-10. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7969-5 [7] 陶芳标. 推进学校心理卫生服务从数据和理论走向行动[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2021, 42(1): 1-4. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.01.001TAO F B. Promotion of mental health services in school from evidence, theory to action[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2021, 42(1): 1-4. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.01.001 [8] CRANE M E, PHILLIPS K E, MAXWELL C A, et al. A qualitative examination of a school-based implementation of computer-assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy for child anxiety[J]. Sch Ment Health, 2021, 13(2): 347-361. doi: 10.1007/s12310-021-09424-y [9] 屈智勇, 郭帅, 张维军, 等. 实施科学对我国心理健康服务体系建设的启示[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(2): 29-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJSF201702004.htmQU Z Y, GUO S, ZHANG W J, et al. Implementation science: what it means for mental health service in China?[J]. J Beijing Norm Univ(Soc Sci), 2017(2): 29-36. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJSF201702004.htm [10] DOMITROVICH C E, BRADSHAW C P, PODUSKA J M, et al. Maximizing the implementation quality of evidence-based preventive interventions in schools: a conceptual framework[J]. Adv Sch Ment Health Promot, 2008, 1(3): 6-28. doi: 10.1080/1754730X.2008.9715730 [11] VONA P, BAWEJA S, SANTIAGO C D, et al. A cross-site partnership to examine implementation and sustainability of a school-based trauma program[J]. Ethn Dis, 2018, 28(Suppl 2): 427-436. [12] GEE B, WILSON J, CLARKE T, et al. Review: delivering mental health support within schools and colleges: a thematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to implementation of indicated psychological interventions for adolescents[J]. Child Adoles Ment Health, 2021, 26(1): 34-46. doi: 10.1111/camh.12381 [13] FORMAN S G, OLIN S S, HOAGWOOD K E, et al. Evidence-based interventions in schools: developers' views of implementation barriers and facilitators[J]. Sch Ment Health, 2009, 1(1): 26-36. doi: 10.1007/s12310-008-9002-5 [14] ARNOLD K T, POLLACK PORTER K M, FRATTAROLI S, et al. Multilevel barriers and facilitators to sustainability of a universal trauma-informed school-based mental health intervention following an efficacy trial: a qualitative study[J]. Sch Ment Health, 2021, 13(1): 174-185. doi: 10.1007/s12310-020-09402-w [15] DATNOW A, CASTELLANO M. Teachers' responses to success for all: how beliefs, experiences, and adaptations shape implementation[J]. Am Educ Res J, 2000, 37(3): 775-799. doi: 10.3102/00028312037003775 [16] 杨文登. 循证心理健康教育视角下的心理健康教育[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 6(3): 132-135. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9272.2012.03.035YANG W D. How to practice mental health effectively: from the horizon of evidence-based mental health[J]. J Centr South Univ Forestry Technol (Soc Sci), 2012, 6(3): 132-135. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9272.2012.03.035 [17] 杜亚松, 吴增强, 马珍珍. 基于学校的儿童注意缺陷多动障碍综合干预[J]. 心理科学, 2011, 34(4): 974-980. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX201104037.htmDU Y S, WU Z Q, MA Z Z. A school-based study of comprehensive intervention for children with ADHD[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2011, 34(4): 974-980. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX201104037.htm [18] COHEN J A, MANNARINO A P. Trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for childhood traumatic separation[J]. Child Abuse Negl, 2019, 92(3): 179-195. [19] BRAUN V, CLARKE V. Using thematic analysis in psychology[J]. Q Res Psychol, 2006, 3(2): 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [20] 高丙中. 社会团体的合法性问题[J]. 中国社会科学, 2000(2): 100-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSHK200002009.htmGAO B Z. Problems related to the legitimization of associations in China[J]. Soc Sci China, 2000(2): 100-109. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSHK200002009.htm [21] 李晓凤, 林佳鹏, 张姣. 嵌入, 建构, 自主: 学校社会工作本土路径探究: 基于深圳的十年发展历程[J]. 社会工作, 2019(2): 18-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHGO201902002.htmLI X F, LIN J P, ZHANG J. Embedding, construction and autonomy: a study on the local path of school social work: based on the ten-year development course of Shenzhen[J]. J Soc Work, 2019(2): 18-29. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHGO201902002.htm [22] 江光荣, 李丹阳, 任志洪, 等. 中国国民心理健康素养的现状与特点[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(2): 182-198. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB202102006.htmJIANG G R, LI D Y, REN Z H, et al. The status quo and characteristics of Chinese mental health literacy[J]. Acta Psychol Sinica, 2021, 53(2): 182-198. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB202102006.htm [23] FAZEL M, PATEL V, THOMAS S, et al. Mental health interventions in schools in low-income and middle-income countries[J]. Lancet Psychiat, 2014, 1(5): 388-398. [24] HUANG D, YANG L H, PESCOSOLIDO B A. Understanding the public's profile of mental health literacy in China: a nationwide study[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2019, 19(1): 1-12. [25] 明志君, 陈祉妍. 心理健康素养: 概念, 评估, 干预与作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD202001001.htmMING Z J, CHEN Z Y. Mental health literacy: concept, measurement, intervention and effect[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2020, 28(1): 1-12. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD202001001.htm [26] 申继亮, 彭华茂. 当前学校心理健康教育的困境与出路[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2002(1): 14-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJSF200201001.htmSHEN J L, PENG H M. The current issues and trend of mental health education in primary and secondary schools[J]. J Beijing Norm Univ(Soc Sci), 2002(1): 14-20. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJSF200201001.htm -

表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 389
- HTML全文浏览量: 175
- PDF下载量: 41
- 被引次数: 0