留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

中小学生注意偏向和焦虑抑郁情绪与创伤后应激障碍症状的关系

刘俊巧 张雨青

刘俊巧, 张雨青. 中小学生注意偏向和焦虑抑郁情绪与创伤后应激障碍症状的关系[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2023, 44(1): 71-75. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.01.016
引用本文: 刘俊巧, 张雨青. 中小学生注意偏向和焦虑抑郁情绪与创伤后应激障碍症状的关系[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2023, 44(1): 71-75. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.01.016
LIU Junqiao, ZHANG Yuqing. Relationship between attentional bias, anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder in primary and middle school students[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2023, 44(1): 71-75. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.01.016
Citation: LIU Junqiao, ZHANG Yuqing. Relationship between attentional bias, anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder in primary and middle school students[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2023, 44(1): 71-75. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.01.016

中小学生注意偏向和焦虑抑郁情绪与创伤后应激障碍症状的关系

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.01.016
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金面上项目 71073156

详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘俊巧(1990-), 女, 北京市人, 在读硕士, 主要研究方向为发展与教育心理学

    通讯作者:

    张雨青, E-mail: zhangyq@psych.ac.cn

  • 利益冲突声明  所有作者声明无利益冲突。
  • 中图分类号: G444 R179 G478

Relationship between attentional bias, anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder in primary and middle school students

  • 摘要:   目的  考察新冠肺炎疫情暴发后消极注意偏向与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状在抑郁、焦虑负向情绪作用下的关系,为中小学校开展心理教育提供科学依据。  方法  2021年3—4月,采用方便整群方法抽取北京、山西、湖南、山东、河北、湖北省的小学六年级至初三708名学生,采用事件冲击量表(儿童版)、中文版积极/消极注意偏向量表、抑郁-焦虑-压力量表进行问卷调查。  结果  中小学生PTSD共检出242名,检出率为34.2%。男生在闯入、高唤醒维度上得分(7.92±5.33, 8.60±5.41)低于女生(8.72±4.85, 9.50±4.76),差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-2.04,-2.32,P值均 < 0.05);不同年级中小学生在消极注意偏向、事件冲动量表总分及闯入、回避、高唤醒维度得分差异均有统计学意义(F值分别为3.57,5.99,4.45,4.60,7.40,P值均<0.05);消极注意偏向、焦虑、抑郁与PTSD症状之间均呈正相关(r=0.27~0.84,P值均 < 0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,焦虑(OR=1.13,95%CI=1.06~1.20)和消极注意偏向(OR=1.10,95%CI=1.07~1.12)与中小学生的PTSD症状呈正相关(P值均<0.01)。  结论  中小学生负向情绪中的焦虑、抑郁影响消极注意偏向,同时加重创伤后应激障碍症状。调整好学生的情绪有助于减轻创伤后应激反应。
    1)  利益冲突声明  所有作者声明无利益冲突。
  • 表  1  不同性别不同年级PTSD学生CRIES总分及各维度得分比较(x±s)

    Table  1.   Comparison of CRIES scores and each dimension of students with PTSD in different gender and grade(x±s)

    性别与年级 选项 人数 统计值 CRIES总分 闯入 回避 高唤醒
    性别 111 39.24±7.65 12.81±4.23 12.87±4.27 13.56±4.53
    131 38.63±7.55 13.03±3.97 11.92±4.45 13.68±3.24
    t 0.62 -0.42 1.70 -0.24
    年级 小学六年级 31 36.81±7.72 11.99±4.36 12.83±4.01 11.99±4.98
    初一 103 40.96±8.04 14.32±4.00 13.08±4.27 13.56±3.67
    初二 24 38.92±7.83 11.83±3.67 11.88±5.05 15.21±4.82
    初三 84 37.16±6.25 11.88±3.75 11.43±4.35 13.85±3.14
    F 5.02** 7.51** 2.44 3.40*
    注: *P < 0.05,**P < 0.01。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  不同性别不同年级学生消极注意偏向与CRIES得分比较(x±s)

    Table  2.   Comparison of negative attention bias and CRIES scores in different gender and grade students(x±s)

    性别与年级 选项 人数 统计值 消极注意偏向 CRIES总分 闯入 回避 高唤醒
    性别 323 32.76±9.66 24.0±13.79 7.92±5.33 7.51±5.63 8.60±5.41
    385 33.38±8.39 25.3±12.46 8.72±4.85 7.10±5.23 9.50±4.76
    t -0.91 -1.29 -2.04 1.00 -2.32
    P 0.37 0.40 0.04 0.32 0.02
    年级 小学六年级 101 30.97±9.02 24.23±11.77 7.99±4.85 8.11±5.08 8.14±4.94
    初一 290 33.53±9.61 25.11±14.47 8.77±5.72 7.30±5.81 9.04±5.06
    初二 102 31.93±8.45 20.11±13.40 6.79±4.58 5.58±5.19 7.74±5.88
    初三 215 34.07±8.16 26.63±10.95 8.72±4.33 7.68±4.96 10.23±4.52
    F 3.57 5.99 4.45 4.60 7.40
    P 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
    合计 708 33.10±8.99 24.73±13.09 8.36±5.09 7.28±5.42 9.09±5.08
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  不同性别不同年级学生焦虑抑郁及PTSD检出率比较

    Table  3.   Comparison of anxiety, depression and PTSD detection rate among different gender and grade students

    性别与年级 人数 统计值 焦虑 抑郁 PTSD
    性别 323 203(62.8) 183(56.7) 111(34.4)
    385 248(64.4) 155(40.3) 131(34.0)
    χ2 0.19 708.00** 0.37
    年级 小学六年级 101 65(64.4) 48(47.5) 31(30.7)
    初一 290 180(62.1) 135(46.6) 103(35.5)
    初二 102 44(43.1) 40(39.2) 24(23.5)
    初三 215 162(75.3) 115(53.5) 84(39.1)
    χ2 31.62** 5.98 8.20*
    注: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01;()内数字为检出率/%。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  中小学生注意偏向、焦虑、抑郁及PTSD症状的相关系数(r值,n=708)

    Table  4.   Correlation coefficent of attentional bias, anxiety depression and post-traumatic stress response among primary and middle primary school students(r, n=708)

    变量 PTSD症状 焦虑 抑郁 闯入 回避 高唤醒
    焦虑 0.49
    抑郁 0.44 0.82
    闯入 0.83 0.40 0.36
    回避 0.84 0.33 0.27 0.57
    高唤醒 0.83 0.51 0.48 0.58 0.53
    消极注意偏向 0.49 0.49 0.48 0.42 0.33 0.48
    注: P值均 < 0.01。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 李宪伟, 掌永莉, 刘金同. 城乡高中生睡眠质量及相关因素的对照研究[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2009, 18(9): 845-847. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2009.09.031

    LI X W, ZHANG Y L, LIU J T. A comparative study on related factors of sleep quality between urban and rural senior high school students[J]. Chin J Behav Med Brain Sci, 2009, 18(9): 845-847. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2009.09.031
    [2] NORTH C S, SURÍS A M, POLLIO D E. A nosological exploration of PTSD and trauma in disaster mental health and implications for the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Behav Sci, 2021, 11(1): 7. doi: 10.3390/bs11010007
    [3] STEIN D J, CRASKE M G, ROTHBAUM B O, et al. The clinical characterization of the adult patient with an anxiety or related disorder aimed at personalization of management[J]. World Psychiatry, 2021, 20(3): 336-356. doi: 10.1002/wps.20919
    [4] OAR E L, JOHNCO C J, WATERS A M, et al. Eye-tracking to assess anxiety-related attentional biases among a large sample of preadolescent children[J]. Behav Res Ther, 2022, 153: 104079. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104079
    [5] VAN KLEEF G A, CÔTÉ S. The social effects of emotions[J]. Annu Rev Psychol, 2022, 73: 629-658. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-010855
    [6] YANG X, XU Y, TAN R, et al. Event centrality and post-traumatic stress symptoms among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: the roles of attention to negative information, catastrophizing, and rumination[J]. Eur J Psychotraumatol, 2022, 13(1): 2078563. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2078563
    [7] 吕遥迪, 郭江, 张雨青. 中文版积极/消极注意偏向量表的初步修订[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24(5): 861-864. doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2016.05.021

    LYU Y D, GUO J, ZHANG Y Q. A revision of the Attention to Positive and Negative Information Scale(APNI) in Chinese children[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2016, 24(5): 861-864. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2016.05.021
    [8] FORTE G, FAVIERI F, OLIHA E O, et al. Anxiety and attentional processes: the role of resting heart rate variability[J]. Brain Sci, 2021, 11(4): 480. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11040480
    [9] HUANG F, LI X, YUAN C, et al. Attention-emotion-enhanced convolutional LSTM for sentiment analysis[J]. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2022, 33(9): 4332-4345. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3056664
    [10] NISHIGUCHI Y, TANNO Y. Decreased attentional allocation to centrally presented positive stimuli in individuals with depressive symptoms[J]. Curr Psychol, 2021, 19: 1-9.
    [11] 朱翠珍, 司徒明镜, 张毅, 等. 汶川地震后儿童青少年创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症状及影响因素[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2011, 45(6): 531-536. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2011.06.013

    ZHU C Z, SITU M J, ZHANG Y, et al. Influence factors of post-traumatic stress disorder(PTSD)and depression symptoms in children and adolescents after Wenchuan Earthquake in China[J]. Chin J Prev Med, 2011, 45(6): 531-536. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2011.06.013
    [12] PERRIN S, MEISER-STEDMAN R, SMITH P. The children's Revised Impact of Event Scale (CRIES): validity as a screening instrument for PTSD[J]. Behav Cogn Psychother, 2005, 33(4): 487-498. doi: 10.1017/S1352465805002419
    [13] 司徒明镜, 张伟, 黄颐, 等. 汶川地震灾区儿童青少年心理健康状况调查及儿童版事件影响量表测量[J]. 中华精神科杂志, 2009, 42(4): 235-239.

    SITU M J, ZHANG W, HUANG Y, et al. Psychometric properties of the Children's Revised Impact of Event Scale in children from earthquake affected areas[J]. Chin J Psychiatry, 2009, 42(4): 235-239. (in Chinese)
    [14] NOGUCHI K, GOHM C L, DALSKY D J. Cognitive tendencies of focusing on positive and negative information[J]. J Res Pers, 2006, 40(6): 891-910. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.008
    [15] CHAN M W C, HO S M Y, TEDESCHI R G, et al. The valence of attentional bias and cancer-related rumination in posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth among women with breast cancer[J]. Psychooncology, 2011, 20(5): 544-552. doi: 10.1002/pon.1761
    [16] 于永菊. 焦虑和抑郁对正负性注意偏向的影响: 注意控制的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 121-127. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CLXW202001018.htm

    YU Y J. Effects of anxiety and depression on attentional bias: the mediating role of attentional control[J]. Stud Psychol Behav, 2020, 18(1): 121-127. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CLXW202001018.htm
    [17] 付琳, 程锦, 刘正奎. 芦山地震后儿童急性应激障碍症状、创伤后应激障碍症状与抑郁症状的交叉滞后分析[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2017, 31(7): 548-553. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS201707012.htm

    FU L, CHENG J, LIU Z K. Cross-lagged analysis of acute stress disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder and depressive symptoms among children after Lushan Earthquake[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2017, 31(7): 548-553. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS201707012.htm
    [18] 王孟成, 万娟, 隋双戈, 等. 初中生地震5个月后创伤后应激障碍症状发生率调查[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2009(8): 750-752.

    WANG M C, WAN J, SUI S G, et al. Estimating population prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder among 560 middle school students from Wenchuan Earthquake region five months later[J]. Chin J Behav Med Brain Sci, 2009(8): 750-752. (in Chinese)
    [19] 周宵, 伍新春, 袁晓娇, 等. 青少年的创伤暴露程度与创伤后应激障碍的关系: 核心信念挑战, 主观害怕程度和侵入性反刍的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(4): 455-465. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB201504003.htm

    ZHOU X, WU X C, YUAN X J, et al. The role of core beliefs challenge, subjective fear, and intrusive rumination in association between severity of traumatic exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder among adolescent survivors after the Yaan Earthquake[J]. Acta Psychol Sinica, 2015, 47(4): 455-465. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB201504003.htm
    [20] 孙香萍, 崔婧, 邓光辉, 等. 汶川地震4年后灾区中学生创伤后成长和创伤后应激障碍相关分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2013, 35(24): 2705-2708. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSDX201324023.htm

    SUN X P, CUI J, DENG G H, et al. Correlation of posttraumatic growth and stress disorder in middle school students in 4 years after Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. J Third Military Med Univ, 2013, 35(24): 2705-2708. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSDX201324023.htm
    [21] 魏青, 曹云飞, 廖彩之. 汶川地震后灾区学生创伤性应激障碍及情绪症状[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2016, 37(10): 1483-1486. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2016.10.013

    WEI Q, CAO Y F, LIAO C Z. Surveillance of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among students in quake-hit regions after Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2016, 37(10): 1483-1486. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2016.10.013
    [22] 张明亮. 情绪调节策略在芦山县初中生情绪调节自我效能感与创伤后应激障碍症状间的中介作用[J]. 医学与社会, 2020, 33(12): 70-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXSH202012014.htm

    ZHANG M L. Emotional regulation strategy as a mediator of the relationship between regulatory emotional self-efficacy and post traumatic stress disorder symptoms of junior high school students in Lushan County[J]. Med Soc, 2020, 33(12) : 70-75. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXSH202012014.htm
    [23] 薛辰霞, 张志强, 祁鸣, 等. 创伤后应激障碍患者症状与焦虑、抑郁情绪的关系[J]. 山东医药, 2015, 55(34): 78-80. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYY201534037.htm

    XUE C X, ZHANG Z Q, QI M, et al. The relationship between symptoms and anxiety and depression in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder[J]. Shandong Med J, 2015, 55(34): 78-80. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYY201534037.htm
    [24] GIUSTI L, SALZA A, MAMMARELLA S, et al. Duration of home confinement and all-or-nothing cognitive thinking style as predictors of traumatic distress in young university students on a digital platform during the COVID-19 Italian lockdown[J]. Front Psychiatry, 2020, 11: 574812.
    [25] CIANFARANI S, PAMPANINI V. The impact of stress on health in childhood and adolescence in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Horm Res Paediatr, 2021, 94(5/6): 345-349.
    [26] RASOOL L, TAHIR S L, JAN S. A review of the research on accompanying reasons for academic anxiety[J]. Int J Innovative Sci Eng Technol, 2022, 7(4): 568-572.
  • 加载中
表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  512
  • HTML全文浏览量:  216
  • PDF下载量:  60
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-08-17
  • 修回日期:  2022-11-25
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-02-06
  • 刊出日期:  2023-01-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回