大学生攻击性行为潜在类别与家庭关怀度和生命意义感的相关性

闫纪霞; 刘玲霞; 史培培; 黄广; 曹坤明; 常红娟

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.014

大学生攻击性行为潜在类别与家庭关怀度和生命意义感的相关性

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.014

1.
新乡医学院护理学院，河南 453003
2.
新乡医学院图书馆
3.
新乡医学院生命科学学院

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 81803252

详细信息

作者简介:
闫纪霞(1998-), 女, 河南濮阳人, 在读硕士, 主要研究方向为儿童青少年卫生学

通讯作者:
常红娟，E-mail：changhj0812@126.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G444 B844.2 G647.8
计量
- 文章访问数: 513
- HTML全文浏览量: 205
- PDF下载量: 91
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-05-05
- 修回日期: 2022-07-27
- 网络出版日期: 2022-12-30
- 刊出日期: 2022-12-25

Correlation between latent classes of aggressive behavior and family care with meaning in life among college students

1.
Nursing College, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang(453003), Henan Province, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨大学生攻击性行为潜在类别及其与家庭关怀度和生命意义感的相关性，为预防大学生攻击性行为提供参考。方法于2021年12月对新乡市3所大学的5 094名学生进行横断面调查，采用一般资料问卷、攻击性行为量表(AQ)、家庭关怀度指数量表(APGAR)、生命意义感量表(MLQ)进行调查。结果大学生攻击性行为分为低攻击性行为组(26.4%)、中等攻击性行为组(48.5%)、高攻击性行为组(25.1%)3个潜在类别。不同性别、身体灵活性、运动频率、睡眠状况大学生攻击性行为的潜类别差异均有统计学意义(χ²值分别为63.95，169.86，125.76，325.24，P值均 < 0.01)。生命意义感和家庭关怀度在大学生攻击性行为3个潜在类别间差异有统计学意义(F值分别为113.47，231.82，P < 0.01)。多元有序Logistic回归分析显示，生命意义感(OR=0.96，95%CI=0.96~0.97)、家庭关怀度(OR=0.83，95%CI=0.81~0.84)对大学生攻击性行为的3个潜在类别影响均有统计学意义(P值均 < 0.01)。结论大学生攻击性行为与性别、运动频率、睡眠状况、身体柔韧性、生命意义感和家庭关怀度、身体灵活性相关。学校及家庭、社会均应积极关注大学生的心理状况并提供相应支持，从而减少其攻击性行为的发生。
- 攻击 /
- 行为 /
- 家庭 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 回归分析 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To explore latent classes of college students' aggressive behavior and its correlations with family care and the meaning of life among college students. Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted among 5 094 students from three universities in Xinxiang City in December 2021, using Aggression Questionnaire (AQ), Family APGAR Index (APGAR), and the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ). Results Aggressive behavior of college students was classifed into three potential categories: low aggressive behavior group (26.4%), moderate aggressive behavior group (48.5%), and high aggressive behavior group(25.1%). There were significant differences in latent classes of aggressive behavior among college students by gender, physical flexibility, exercise frequency, and sleep status (χ²=63.95, 169.86, 125.76, 325.24, P < 0.01). There were significant differences in the sense of life meaning and the degree of family care among the 3 potential categories of aggressive behavior (F=113.47, 231.82, P < 0.01). The multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the sense of meaning of life (OR=0.96, 95%CI=0.96-0.97) and family care (OR=0.83, 95%CI=0.81-0.84) were significantly associated with three classes of aggressive behavior (P < 0.01). Conclusion Aggressive behavior among college students is associated with gender, exercise frequency, sleep status, meaning of life, family care, and physical flexibility. School, family and society should actively pay attention to students psychological characteristics and to provide corresponding support for aggressive behavior prevention and intervention.
- Aggression /
- Behavior /
- Family /
- Mental health /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 大学生攻击性行为3个类别在5个条目上的条件均值

Table 1. Conditional mean of three categories of college students' aggressive behavior on five items

类别	身体攻击	言语攻击	间接攻击	愤怒	敌意
1	1.19	1.99	1.61	1.60	1.61
2	1.62	2.75	2.47	2.26	2.48
3	2.51	3.09	3.39	2.97	3.06

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同人口统计学特征大学生攻击性行为潜在类别分布比较

Table 2. Comparison of potential categories of college students' aggressive behavior with different demographic variables

人口统计学指标	选项	人数	低攻击性行为	中等攻击性行为	高攻击性行为	χ²值	P值
性别	男	1 416	347(24.5)	603(42.6)	466(32.9)	63.95	< 0.01
	女	3 678	998(27.1)	1 866(50.7)	814(22.1)
独生子女	是	533	147(27.6)	248(46.5)	138(25.9)	0.91	0.63
	否	4 561	1 198(26.3)	2 221(48.7)	1 142(25.0)
生源地	城镇	1 064	299(28.1)	496(46.6)	269(25.3)	2.43	0.30
	农村	4 030	1 046(26.0)	1 973(49.0)	1 011(25.1)
身体灵活性	非常好	657	274(41.7)	244(37.1)	139(21.2)	169.86	< 0.01
	好	1 626	494(30.4)	772(47.5)	360(22.1)
	一般	2 606	551(21.1)	1 354(52.0)	701(26.9)
	差	173	22(12.7)	89(51.5)	62(35.8)
	非常差	32	4(12.5)	10(31.3)	18(56.3)
运动频率	每天	1 048	354(33.8)	453(43.2)	241(23.0)	125.76	< 0.01
	经常	1 245	401(32.2)	580(46.6)	264(21.2)
	一般	1 785	417(23.4)	910(51.0)	458(25.7)
	偶尔	942	161(17.1)	499(53.0)	282(29.9)
	从不	74	12(16.2)	27(36.5)	35(47.3)
睡眠状况	非常好	918	377(41.1)	384(41.8)	157(17.1)	325.24	< 0.01
	好	1 997	595(29.8)	1 014(50.8)	388(19.4)
	一般	1 960	348(17.8)	992(50.6)	620(31.6)
	差	196	23(11.7)	69(35.2)	104(53.1)
	非常差	23	2(8.7)	10(43.5)	11(47.8)
注：()内数字为构成比/%。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 大学生攻击性行为潜在类别分组与生命意义感及家庭关怀度的Logistic回归分析(n=5 094)

Table 3. Logistic regression analysis of potential categories of aggressive behavior, meaning in life, and family care of college students (n=5 094)

自变量	β值	标准误	Wald χ²值	P值	OR值(OR值95%CI)
生命意义感量表总分	-0.04	0.00	103.86	< 0.01	0.96(0.96~0.97)
家庭关怀度指数总分	-0.19	0.01	302.65	< 0.01	0.83(0.81~0.84)

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(24)

[1]	王熠姝. 暴力电子游戏对大学生攻击性和情绪的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2014. WANG Y S. The effect of violent video games on university student's aggrsession and emotion[D]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2014. (in Chinese)
[2]	DA SILVA J L, DE OLIVEIRA W A, DE MALTA MELLO F C, et al. Prevalence of practice of bullying reported by Brazilian students: data from the National School Health Survey, 2015[J]. Epidemiol Serv Saude, 2019, 28(2): e2018178.
[3]	UNESCO. Behind the numbers: ending school violence and bullying[EB/OL]. (2019-04-13)[2022-03-24]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366483.
[4]	沈文丽, 王辉. 豫南农村地区青少年校园暴力状况及其与性取向的关联分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2021, 48(17): 3138-3140, 3145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF202117016.htm SHEN W L, WANG H. Adolescent school violence in rural areas of southern Henan and its association analysis with sexual orientation[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2021, 48(17): 3138-3140, 3145. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF202117016.htm
[5]	ESCOBAR D, JESUS T F, NOLL P, et al. Family and school context: effects on the mental health of Brazilian students[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(17): 6042. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176042
[6]	SITNIK-WARCHULSKA K, IZYDORCZYK B. Family patterns and suicidal and violent behavior among adolescent girls-genogram analysis[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018, 15(10): 2067. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102067
[7]	谭晓雪, 陈君. 不同家庭特征医学生攻击性、冲动性的比较[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(15): 2012-2016. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.15.021 TAN X X, CHEN J. Comparison of aggressiveness and impulsivity of medical student with different family characteristics[J]. J Pract Med, 2021, 37(15): 2012-2016. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.15.021
[8]	刘明娟, 曹峰瑞. 关于生命意义的研究综述[J]. 科技情报开发与经济, 2009, 19(9): 165-166. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6033.2009.09.079 LIU M J, CAO F R. A review of the research on life meaning[J]. J Library Inf Sci, 2009, 19(9): 165-166. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6033.2009.09.079
[9]	ZAWADZKA D, KORZYCKA M, MAZUR J. The sense of meaning of life as a factor protecting lower-secondary school youth against the fear of missing out[J]. Psychiatr Psychol Kliniczn, 2019, 19(4): 391-397. doi: 10.15557/PiPK.2019.0042
[10]	STEGER M F, FRAZIER P, OISHI S, et al. The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life[J]. J Couns Psychol, 2006, 53(1): 80-93. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
[11]	VAN TILBURG W A P, IGOU E R, MAHER P J, et al. Various forms of existential distress are associated with aggressive tendencies[J]. Person Individ Differ, 2019, 144: 111-119. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.032
[12]	何琪琪, 钟起, 徐雨洁, 等. 本科护生网络素养的潜在剖面分析及其在线学习效果比较[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(2): 62-67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL202202013.htm HE Q Q, ZHONG Q, XU Y J, et al. Latent profile analysis of network literacy and online learning effects of nursing undergraduates[J]. J Nurs, 2022, 29(2): 62-67. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL202202013.htm
[13]	ROOZEN M. Illinois agility test[J]. NSCA's Perform Train J, 2004, 3(5): 5-6.
[14]	BUSS A H, PERRY M. The aggression questionnaire[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1992, 63(3): 452-459. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452
[15]	SMILKSTEIN G. The family APGAR: a proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians[J]. J Fam Pract, 1978, 6(6): 1231-1239.
[16]	刘思斯, 甘怡群. 生命意义感量表中文版在大学生群体中的信效度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2010, 24(6): 478-482. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS201006029.htm LIU S S, GAN Y Q. Reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2010, 24(6): 478-482. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS201006029.htm
[17]	郑晓, 常韵琪, 肖淑娟, 等. 基于潜在剖面分析的老年人抑郁分型及相关因素[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2020, 34(5): 431-436. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS202005008.htm ZHENG X, CHANG Y Q, XIAO S J, et al. A latent profile analysis of depression and related factors among the elderly[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2020, 34(5): 431-436. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS202005008.htm
[18]	辛素飞, 郑阳. 中国大学生攻击性水平变迁的横断历史研究[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2019, 33(7): 550-555. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2019.07.016 XIN S F, ZHENG Y. A cross-temporal Meta-analysis of changes in Chinese college students' aggression level[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2019, 33(7): 550-555. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2019.07.016
[19]	柳建坤, 何晓斌, 张云亮. 体育锻炼、亲子关系与青少年心理健康: 来自中国教育追踪调查的证据[J]. 中国青年研究, 2021(5): 103-112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGQL202105014.htm LIU J K, HE X B, ZHANG Y L. Physical exercise, parent-teenager relationship and teenager's psychological health: evidence from China education panel survey[J]. China Youth Stud, 2021(5): 103-112. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGQL202105014.htm
[20]	吴慧攀. 中国心理亚健康青少年体质健康及其影响因素的研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2019. WU H P. Study on physical fitness and influencing factors of mental sub-health adolescents in China[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[21]	魏灵真, 刘衍玲, 刘传星, 等. 家庭亲密度对高中生心理健康的影响: 有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 361-367. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CLXW202103011.htm WEI L Z, LIU Y L, LIU C X, et al. The effect of family cohesion on mental health of high school students: a moderated mediation model[J]. Stud Psychol Behav, 2021, 19(3): 361-367. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CLXW202103011.htm
[22]	MERRIN G J, DAVIS J P, BERRY D, et al. Developmental changes in deviant and violent behaviors from early to late adolescence: associations with parental monitoring and peer deviance[J]. Psychol Viol, 2019, 9(2): 196-208.
[23]	王晶晶. 家庭关怀度对学龄期儿童自尊及攻击性行为的影响研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2018. WANG J J. Research on the effects of family care degree on self-esteem and aggressive behavior among school-age children[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[24]	PACLIKOVA K, DANKULINCOVA V Z, FILAKOVSKA B D, et al. What role do family composition and functioning play in emotional and behavioural problems among adolescent boys and girls?[J]. Int J Public Health, 2019, 64(2): 209-217. (in Chinese)