初中生全面性教育综合水平与家庭和学校性教育的关联

朱璠; 朱桂因; 郭雪儿; 李远骋; 贾碧波; 汪培; 赵田杰; 马迎华

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.005

初中生全面性教育综合水平与家庭和学校性教育的关联

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.12.005

北京大学儿童青少年卫生研究所，北京 100191

详细信息

作者简介:
朱璠(1995-)，女，河南开封人，在读硕士，主要研究方向为儿童青少年生长发育及其影响因素

通讯作者:
马迎华，E-mail：yinghuama@bjmu.edu.cn

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G78 G627.8
计量
- 文章访问数: 579
- HTML全文浏览量: 204
- PDF下载量: 163
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-05-22
- 修回日期: 2022-10-24
- 网络出版日期: 2022-12-30
- 刊出日期: 2022-12-25

Relationship between comprehensive sexuality education competency among junior middle school students and sex education at home and school settings

Institute of Child and Adolescent Health, Peking University, Beijing(100191), China

摘要

摘要: 目的了解中国家庭性教育和学校性教育的实施现况，为开展更为有效的家庭性教育和学校性教育提供科学依据。方法 2021年9—12月，使用方便抽样法，在北京、辽宁、四川、重庆、云南、河南六地使用电子问卷对初一至初三年级4 109名学生展开横断面调查。问卷包含一般人口学信息、在家庭与学校接受性教育情况、全面性教育知信行现况等。结果没有接受过任何形式性教育的初中生共760名(18.50%)，仅接受过学校性教育的初中生923名(22.46%)，仅接受过家庭性教育的299名(7.28%)，同时接受家庭和学校性教育的2 127名(51.76%)。初中生全面性教育知识得分为(12.43±2.89)分，态度得分为(47.86±5.31)分，行为得分为(40.44±5.18)分，综合水平得分为(82.02±9.01)分。同时接受家庭和学校性教育的初中生，其全面性教育知信行以及综合水平均最高；仅接受过学校性教育的初中生，其全面性教育知识水平高于仅接受过家庭性教育的初中生；仅接受过家庭性教育的初中生，其全面性教育行为水平高于仅接受过学校性教育的初中生(P值均 < 0.01)。结论家庭性教育与学校性教育可有效提升初中生全面性教育综合水平。应进一步实施基于学校的性教育，并鼓励家庭开展性教育。
- 性教育 /
- 家庭 /
- 院校 /
- 回归分析 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To understand the current situation regarding sex education in home and school settings in China, and to provide a scientific basis for more effective family and school sex education. Methods Using a convenient sampling method, a cross-sectional survey of students from grade 7 to grade 9 in Beijing, Liaoning, Sichuan, Chongqing, Yunnan and Henan was carried out from September to December 2021. The questionnaire covered general demographic information, sex education at home and school, and the status of comprehensive sexuality education. Finally, 4 109 valid questionnaires were collected. Results A total of 760(18.50%) middle school students had not received any form of sex education, 923(22.46%) had only received sex education at school, 299(7.28%) had only received sex education at home, and 2 127 (51.76%) had received sex education at home and at school. The scores related to junior middle school students' knowledge of comprehensive sexuality education was (12.43±2.89) points, the attitude score was (47.86±5.31) points, the behavior score was (40.44±5.18) points, and the comprehensive level score was (82.02±9.01) points. Junior middle school students who received sex education at home and in school had the highest comprehensive level of sex education(P < 0.01). Junior middle school students who only received sex education at school had a higher comprehensive sexuality education knowledge level than those who only received sex education at home(P < 0.01). The level of comprehensive sexuality education behavior among junior middle school students who only received family sex education was significantly higher than among those who only received sex education at school(P < 0.01). Conclusion Receiving sex education in both home and school settings can effectively improve the comprehensive sexuality education competency among junior middle school students. School-based sex education should be further implemented in the future and family sex education should be encouraged.
- Sex education /
- Family /
- Schools /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 初中生全面性教育不同学习情况知信行水平比较(x±s)

Table 1. Comparison of CSE KAP level of sex education learning situation among middle school students(x±s)

组别	人数	知识	态度	行为	知信行综合水平
没有接受过任何性教育	760	11.26±3.03	46.79±5.33	39.14±5.45	79.34±8.72
仅接受过学校性教育	923	12.44±2.89	47.47±5.26	39.57±4.77	81.57±8.37
仅接受过家庭性教育	299	11.91±3.01	47.86±5.61	40.71±5.42	82.02±9.01
同时接受家庭性教育和学校性教育	2 127	12.91±2.68	48.40±5.21	41.24±5.06	83.98±8.23
F值		67.85	19.66	42.80	61.58
P值		< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 初中生全面性教育综合水平得分的多重线性回归分析(n=4 109)

Table 2. Multiple linear regression analysis of comprehensive level score of CSE among middle school students(n=4 109)

自变量	选项	β值(β值95%CI)	标准误	B值	P值
接受性教育情况	仅接受过学校性教育	2.12(1.32~2.92)	0.41	0.10	< 0.01
	仅接受过家庭性教育	2.16(1.07~3.25)	0.56	0.07	< 0.01
	同时接受家庭和学校性教育	4.11(3.40~4.82)	0.36	0.24	< 0.01
地区	北京	0.68(-0.33~1.69)	0.52	0.03	0.19
	四川	0.32(-0.70~1.35)	0.52	0.01	0.54
	河南	0.20(-0.67~1.07)	0.44	0.00	0.66
	辽宁	-1.34(-2.26~-0.42)	0.47	-0.06	< 0.01
	重庆	2.18(1.30~3.06)	0.45	0.10	< 0.01
性别	女	0.15(-0.35~0.66)	0.26	0.01	0.55
年级	初二	2.21(1.62~2.80)	0.30	0.12	< 0.01
	初三	3.06(2.37~3.75)	0.35	0.15	< 0.01
家庭社会经济地位		1.59(1.30~1.87)	0.15	0.19	< 0.01
父母陪同情况	几乎每天见不到父母	-0.22(-0.86~0.42)	0.33	-0.01	0.50
注：接受性教育情况以没有接受过任何性教育为参照组、地区以云南为参照组、性别以男性为参照组、年级以初一为参照组、父母陪同情况以每天至少能见到父母其中一人为参照组。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	UNESCO. International technical guidance on sexuality education[R]. Paris: UNESCO, 2018.
[2]	ROLLSTON R, WILKINSON E, ABOUELAZM R, et al. Comprehensive sexuality education to address gender-based violence[J]. Lancet, 2020, 396(10245): 148-150. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31477-X
[3]	GOLDFARB E S, LIEBERMAN L D. Three decades of research: the case for comprehensive sexuality education[J]. J Adolesc Health, 2021, 68(1): 13-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.036
[4]	教育部. 未成年人学校保护规定[EB/OL]. (2021-06-01)[2022-03-06]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A02/s5911/moe_621/202106/t20210601_534640.html. Ministry of Education of the PRC. Regulations on the protection of schools for minors[EB/OL]. (2021-06-01)[2022-03-06]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A02/s5911/moe_621/202106/t20210601_534640.html. (in Chinese)
[5]	教育部关于印发《生命安全与健康教育进中小学课程教材指南》的通知[EB/OL]. (2021-11-15)[2022-03-06]. https://hudong.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A26/s8001/202111/t20211115_579815.html. Circular of the Ministry of Education of the PRC on the issuance of "Life Safety and Health Education into Primary and Secondary School Curriculum Teaching Materials Guide"[EB/OL]. (2021-11-15)[2022-03-06]. https://hudong.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A26/s8001/202111/t20211115_579815.html. (in Chinese)
[6]	SAWYER S M, RANITI M, ASTON R. Making every school a health-promoting school[J]. Lancet Child Adolesc Health, 2021, 5(8): 539-540. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00190-5
[7]	The Lancet. COVID-19: the intersection of education and health[J]. Lancet, 2021, 397(10271): 253. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00142-2
[8]	BARNES M D, HANSON C L, NOVILLA L B, et al. Family-centered health promotion: perspectives for engaging families and achieving better health outcomes[J]. Inquiry, 2020, 57: 46958020923537.
[9]	张春江, 陈如婷, 江剑平. 中学生家长对家庭性教育的态度和行为调查分析[J]. 保健医学研究与实践, 2020, 17(6): 12-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXBJ202006003.htm ZHANG C J, CHEN R T, JIANG J P. A survey and analysis of the attitudes and behaviors towards sex education at home among parents of middle school students[J]. Health Med Res Pract, 2020, 17(6): 12-17. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXBJ202006003.htm
[10]	马迎华. 中国青少年学生艾滋病防控的关键要素[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2020, 41(12): 1761-1766, 1771. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.12.001 MA Y H. Key elements of HIV/AIDS prevention and control for young students in China[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2020, 41(12): 1761-1766, 1771. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.12.001
[11]	管凯. 家庭社会经济地位、家庭功能与父母教养方式对幼儿社会技能的影响[D]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2018. GUAN K. The influence of family socioeconomic status, family function and parenting style on children's social skills[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[12]	KRAUS. Macarthur scale of subjective social: status-youth version[EB/OL]. (2001)[2021-01-16]. https://sparqtools.org/mobility-measure/macarthur-scale-of-subjective-social-status-youth-version/.
[13]	KANTOR L M, LINDBERG L D, TASHKANDI Y, et al. Sexuality education: broadening the definition of relevant outcomes[J]. J Adolesc Health, 2021, 68(1): 7-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.09.031
[14]	聂慧敏, 余小鸣, 谭雪庆, 等. 中小学生性知识态度及相关影响因素分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2019, 40(4): 515-518, 522. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.04.011 NIE H M, YU X M, TAN X Q, et al. Sexual knowledge, attitude and associated factors among primary and middle school students[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2019, 40(4): 515-518, 522. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.04.011
[15]	GUZZO K B, LANG V W, HAYFORD S R. Do adolescent sexual and reproductive attitudes and knowledge predict men and women's adult sexual partnerships?[J]. J Adolesc Health, 2021, 68(1): 95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05.035
[16]	MANLOVE J, CIARAVINO S, WELTI K. Opportunities and challenges in implementing and evaluating school-based sexuality education programs[J]. J Adolesc Health, 2021, 68(4): 637-638. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.01.013
[17]	GUZZO K B, HAYFORD S R. Adolescent reproductive and contraceptive knowledge and attitudes and adult contraceptive behavior[J]. Matern Child Health J, 2018, 22(1): 32-40. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2351-7
[18]	HUGHES K, BELLIS M A, HARDCASTLE K A, et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Public Health, 2017, 2(8): e356-e366. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30118-4
[19]	KAUFMAN J. A child's right to family[J]. Lancet Psychiatry, 2020, 7(8): 652-653. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30139-5
[20]	梁杰, 夏莹. 未来我国学校性教育与家庭性教育的结合方式: 以学龄前儿童性教育为例[J]. 牡丹江大学学报, 2021, 30(6): 106-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MDJD202106017.htm LIANG J, XIA Y. Bonding modes of school sex education and family sex education in the future in China: a case study of preschool sex education[J]. J Mudanjiang Univ, 2021, 30(6): 106-111. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MDJD202106017.htm