大学生风险感知自我效能和态度与新冠肺炎防护行为的关系

张璐明; 胡成洋; 黄凯; 丁坤; 张康娣; 程馨; 杨晓静; 张秀军

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.10.023

大学生风险感知自我效能和态度与新冠肺炎防护行为的关系

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.10.023

张璐明^{1, 2},
胡成洋³,
黄凯¹,
丁坤¹,
张康娣¹,
程馨¹,
杨晓静¹,
张秀军^1, ,

1.
安徽医科大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系，合肥 230032
2.
合肥市卫生健康委员会
3.
安徽医科大学人文医学学院人文医学系

基金项目:

安徽省自然科学基金项目 2008085MH263

安徽医科大学校基金项目 20149xkj019

详细信息

作者简介:
张璐明(1985-)，女，安徽阜阳人，在读硕士，四级主任科员，主要研究方向为心理行为流行病学

通讯作者:
张秀军，E-mail：zhangxiujun@ahmu.edu.cn

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G647.8 R193 R179
计量
- 文章访问数: 447
- HTML全文浏览量: 235
- PDF下载量: 32
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-06-14
- 修回日期: 2022-08-15
- 网络出版日期: 2022-10-28
- 刊出日期: 2022-10-25

Group risk perception and self-efficacy with individual prevention/control behaviors among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic

1.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei (230032), China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨大学生群体风险感知、自我效能和态度与新型冠状病毒肺炎个体防护行为的关系，为疫情防控干预措施提供参考依据。方法 2021年10—11月采用多阶段分层整群抽样方法，抽取安徽省8所高校大学生4 092名进行问卷调查，使用t检验和方差分析进行组间比较，采用多重线性回归分析探讨大学生群体风险感知、自我效能和态度与新型冠状病毒肺炎个体防护行为的关系。结果大学生情感风险感知(ARP)总分为(19.72±4.01)分，认知风险感知(CRP)总分为(14.56±3.64)分，距离感知(DIP)总分为(18.04±5.33)分，自我效能总分为(27.27±6.74)分，态度信念总分为(26.15±4.54)分，个体防护行为总分为(25.67±4.45)分。情感风险感知(β=0.16)、认知风险感知(β=0.08)、态度(β=0.23)和自我效能(β=0.13)均与大学生个体防护行为正向相关(P值均 < 0.01)，而距离感知作用无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论大学生群体风险感知、自我效能和态度与新型冠状病毒肺炎个体防护行为相关。高校应强化大学生的一般自我效能感和关注态度，提高学生风险认知水平，促进校园疫情的有效防控。
- 感知风险 /
- 自我效能 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 冠状病毒属 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship between group risk perception, self-efficacy and attitudes among college students, and its associations with individual prevention and control behaviors regarding COVID-19 pandemic. Methods From October to November 2021, data were collected among 4 092 undergraduate students from eight colleges and universities in Anhui Province, using a multi-stage stratified cluster sampling method. A t-test and analysis of variance were performed for comparison between groups, while multiple linear regression was employed to investigate group risk perception, self-efficacy and attitudes among college students in terms of individual COVID-19 prevention and control measures. Results The total scores of group emotional risk perception (ARP), cognitive risk perception (CRP), distance perception (DIP) and self-efficacy were (19.72±4.01)(14.56±3.64)(18.04±5.33) and (27.27±6.74), respectively. The total score of attitudes and beliefs was (26.15±4.54), while individual prevention and control behavior was (25.67±4.45). Emotional risk perception (β=0.16), cognitive risk perception (β=0.08), attitudes (β=0.23) and self-efficacy (β=0.13) were positively correlated with individual prevention and control behaviors of college students(P < 0.05). However, distance risk perception had no significant effect (P>0.05). Conclusion Risk perception, self-efficacy and attitude of college students are correlated with individual COVID-19 prevention and control behaviors. Therefore, colleges and universities should strengthen general self-efficacy and attitude, and improve risk awareness towards COVID-19 among college students, and promote the effective prevention and control of campus epidemic.
- Perceived risk /
- Self-efficacy /
- Mental health /
- Coronavirus /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 不同人口统计学特征大学生自我效能、态度和个体防控行为得分比较(x±s)

Table 1. Scores comparison of self-efficacy, attitude and individual prevention and control behavior among college students with different demographic characteristics(x±s)

人口统计学指标	选项	人数	统计值	自我效能	态度	个体防控行为
性别	男	1 990		28.32±6.91	26.05±4.90	25.34±4.81
	女	2 102		26.27±6.42	26.25±4.18	25.98±4.05
			t值	9.80	-1.46	-4.64
			P值	< 0.01	0.14	< 0.01
年龄/岁	15~20	3 234		27.23±6.72	26.11±4.60	25.74±4.38
	21~25	839		27.35±6.85	26.29±4.35	25.43±4.66
	26~33	19		30.00±5.49	27.11±2.38	24.58±5.98
			F值	-1.68	-0.96	2.18
			P值	0.19	0.38	0.11
家庭所在地	城镇	2 087		27.77±6.87	26.30±4.62	35.77±4.54
	农村	2 005		26.75±6.57	26.00±4.46	35.56±4.34
			t值	4.83	2.10	1.53
			P值	< 0.01	0.04	0.13
是否为医学类	否	2 009		27.44±7.09	26.29±4.51	35.78±4.54
	是	2 083		27.10±6.38	26.03±4.57	35.56±4.35
			t值	1.62	1.83	1.57
			P值	0.11	0.07	0.12
学历	本科	3 839		27.21±6.77	26.11±4.59	35.67±4.46
	硕士	253		28.17±6.19	26.81±3.77	35.73±4.26
			t值	-2.21	-2.83	-0.21
			P值	0.03	< 0.01	0.83
每月生活费/元	< 1 000	748		27.84±7.10	26.32±4.47	36.11±4.53
	1 000~ < 2 000	3 010		26.95±6.55	26.10±4.51	35.60±4.37
	≥2 000	334		28.83±7.28	26.32±5.03	35.34±4.90
			t值	15.10	0.95	4.96
			P值	< 0.01	0.39	< 0.01
是否独生子女	是	1 431		28.14±7.01	26.33±4.73	35.86±4.60
	否	2 661		26.80±6.54	26.06±4.44	35.57±4.36
			t值	5.98	1.80	1.97
			P值	< 0.01	0.72	< 0.05
是否单亲家庭	是	313		27.73±6.71	26.04±4.36	35.34±4.70
	否	3 779		27.23±6.74	26.16±4.56	35.70±4.42
			t值	1.27	-0.47	-1.39
			P值	0.21	0.64	0.17
参加新型冠病毒肺炎相关知识培训情况	有	2 525		27.86±6.85	26.22±4.76	36.09±4.34
参加新型冠病毒肺炎相关知识培训情况	无	1 567		26.32±6.46	26.04±4.11	34.99±4.53
			t值	7.22	1.31	7.70
			P值	< 0.01	0.19	< 0.01

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 大学生风险感知、自我效能、态度的相关性分析(r值，n=4 092)

Table 2. Correlation analysis of college students' perception, self-efficacy, attitude and individual prevention and control behavior(r, n=4 092)

变量	情感风险感知	认知风险感知	距离感知	自我效能	态度
认知风险感知	0.36
距离感知	0.53	0.14
自我效能	0.10	0.26	0.04
态度	0.17	0.15	0.10	0.13
个体防护行为	0.22	0.19	0.10	0.24	0.29
注：P值均 < 0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 大学生风险感知与自我效能、态度和新冠肺炎疫情个体防护行为多重线性回归分析(n=4 092)

Table 3. Multiple linear regression analysis of risk perception, self-efficacy, attitude and individual prevention and control behavior of college students(n=4 092)

常数与自变量	态度			自我效能			个体防护行为
常数与自变量	β值	t值	P值	β值	t值	P值	β值	t值	P值
常数	20.91	46.71	< 0.01	19.84	24.84	< 0.01	20.93	38.52	< 0.01
性别	0.23	1.62	0.11	-1.87	-9.26	< 0.01	0.88	6.77	< 0.01
情感风险感知	0.14	6.57	< 0.01	-0.01	-0.31	0.76	0.16	7.88	< 0.01
认知风险感知	0.13	6.19	< 0.01	0.03	14.46	< 0.01	0.08	3.90	< 0.01
距离感知	0.01	0.81	0.42	0.02	0.78	0.44	-0.02	-1.07	0.28
态度				0.15	6.56	0.02	0.23	15.77	< 0.01
自我效能							0.13	13.18	< 0.01
R²值	0.04			0.09			0.04
调整R²值	0.04			0.09			0.04
P值	< 0.01			< 0.01			< 0.01

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(21)

[1]	中华预防医学会新型冠状病毒肺炎防控专家组. 新型冠状病毒肺炎流行病学特征的最新认识[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2020, 41(2): 139-144. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2020.02.002 Special Expert Group for Control of the Epidemic of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia of the Chinese Preventive Medicine Association. An undate on the epidemiological characteristics of novel coronavirus pneumonia(COVID-19)[J]. Chin J epidemiol, 2020, 41(2): 139-144. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2020.02.002
[2]	毛文娟, 纪巍. 返校开学后学校疫情防控的对策研究[J]. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 22(2): 25-28. doi: 10.13763/j.cnki.jhebnu.ese.2020.02.006 MAO W J, JI W. Suggestions on prevention and control of epidemic on campus in back-to-school season[J]. J Hebei Norm Univ (Educ Sci), 2020, 22(2): 25-28. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13763/j.cnki.jhebnu.ese.2020.02.006
[3]	ZHE X, LEI S, YI J W, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2020, 8(4): 420-422. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X
[4]	SLOVIC P. Perception of risk[J]. Science, 1987, 236(4799): 280-285. doi: 10.1126/science.3563507
[5]	PETERS E, SLOVIC P. The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power[J]. Appl Soc Psychol, 1996, 26(16): 1427-1453. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00079.x
[6]	FINUCANE M L, ALHAKAMI A, SLOVIC P, et al. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits[J]. Behav Decis Mak, 2000, 13(1): 1-17. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S
[7]	LIMA M L. On the influence of risk perception on mental health: living near an incinerator[J]. Env Psychol, 2004, 24(1): 71-84. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00026-4
[8]	BREWER N T, WEINSTEIN N D, CUITE C L, et al. Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior[J]. Ann Behav Med, 2004, 27(2): 125. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_7
[9]	BANDURA A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change[J]. Psychol Rev, 1977, 84(2): 191-215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
[10]	DING Y B, XU J L, HUANG S S, et al. Risk perception and depression in public health crises: evidence from the COVID-19 crisis in China[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(16): 5728.
[11]	FERRER R A, KLEIN W M P, PERSOSKIE A, et al. The tripartite model of risk perception (TRIRISK): distinguishing deliberative, affective, and experiential components of perceived risk[J]. Ann Behav Med, 2016, 50: 653-663.
[12]	ZHANG J X, SCHWARZER R. Measuring optimistic self-beliefs: a Chinese adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale[J]. Psychologia, 1995, 38(3): 174-181.
[13]	AL-HANAWI M K, ANGAWI K, ALSHAREEF N, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice toward COVID-19 among the public in the kingdom of saudi arabia: a cross-sectional study[J]. Front Public Health, 2020, 8: 217.
[14]	张持晨, 吴一波, 郑晓, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情下公众的认知与行为: 疫情常态化防控中的自我健康管理[J]. 科学决策, 2020(10): 44-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJC202010004.htm ZHANG C C, WU Y B, ZHENG X, et al. Public awareness and behavior during the COVID-19 outbreak: effectiveness of self-health management in the context of regular epidemic prevention and control[J]. Sci Decis Mak, 2020(10): 44-59. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJC202010004.htm
[15]	黄梨煜, 王勇, 郝艳华, 等. 疫情防控常态化下北京市居民新冠肺炎防控知识和防护行为调查[J]. 中国健康教育, 2021, 37(7): 652-655. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJK202107019.htm HUANG L Y, WANG Y, HAO Y H, et al. Survey on COVID-19 knowledge and protective behaviors among residents in Beijing after COVID-19 outbreak[J]. Chin J Health Educ, 2021, 37(7): 652-655. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJK202107019.htm
[16]	张佳佳, 马迪, 陈露, 等. 14034名大学生对新冠肺炎知信行调查分析及对策建议[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2020, 26(15): 1133-1137. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYY202015004.htm ZHANG J J, MA D, CHEN L, et al. Investigation and analysis of 14034 college students on COVID-19 and its countermeasures and suggestions[J]. J Hainan Med Univ, 2020, 26(15): 1133-1137. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYY202015004.htm
[17]	张本钰, 叶源, 金君敏, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情防控不同阶段福建省大学生心理健康状况[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2020, 41(12): 1896-1899. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.12.033 ZHANG B Y, YE Y, JIN J M, et al. Mental health status of college students in fujian province at different stages of COVID-19 prevention and control[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2020, 41(12): 1896-1899. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.12.033
[18]	王玲莉, 王加好, 艾春燕, 等. 贵州大学生对新型冠状病毒风险感知与行为分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2021, 42(2): 211-214. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.02.013 WANG L L, WANG J H, AI C Y, et al. Risk perception and behavior analysis of Guizhou college students on COVID-19 epidemic[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2021, 42(2): 211-214. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.02.013
[19]	王龙, 关梦颖, 李梦龙, 等. 四城市中学生新冠肺炎疫苗接种意愿及相关因素分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(4): 536-544. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.04.013 WANG L, GUAN M Y, LI M L, et al. willingness and related factors of COVID-19 vaccination among middle school students in four cities of China[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(4): 536-544. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.04.013
[20]	王丹丹, 张磊, 刘锦昭, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情期间大学生自我效能与体力活动的特征及关系[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2021, 42(5): 697-701. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.05.014 WANG D D, ZHANG L, LIU J Z, et al. Characteristics and relationship between self-efficacy and physical activity among college students during COVID-19 epidemic[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2021, 42(5): 697-701. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.05.014
[21]	郑志龙. 浅析大学生参与社会实践活动的价值[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2010, 28(23): 26-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDYX201023015.htm ZHENG Z L. On the value of college students' participation in social practice[J]. Health Vocat Educ, 2010, 28(23): 26-27. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDYX201023015.htm