中国学校生命安全及健康教育政策注意力演进研究

伊鲁波; 时维金

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.10.008

中国学校生命安全及健康教育政策注意力演进研究

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.10.008

伊鲁波¹,
时维金^2, ,

1.
上海市教育委员会教育技术装备中心, 200070
2.
上海师范大学体育学院

基金项目:

2018年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目 18YJC89003

详细信息

作者简介:
伊鲁波(1989-), 男, 山东淄博人, 硕士, 助理研究员, 主要从事学校卫生健康教育促进工作

通讯作者:
时维金, E-mail: shirun25@shnu.edu.cn

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: R179 G478 D92
计量
- 文章访问数: 541
- HTML全文浏览量: 214
- PDF下载量: 38
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-05-19
- 修回日期: 2022-06-30
- 网络出版日期: 2022-10-28
- 刊出日期: 2022-10-25

Evolution of attention of school life safety and health education policy in China

YI Lubo¹,
SHI Weijin^{2
, ,}

1.
Educational Technology Equipment Center, Shanghai Education Commission, Shanghai (200070), China

摘要

摘要: 目的研究1987—2022年《教育部工作要点》中生命安全及健康教育的政策注意力配置, 为优化生命安全及健康教育政策提供参考。方法运用内容分析法对1987—2022年《教育部工作要点》中生命安全及健康教育相关内容进行编码, 予以量化分析。结果中国学校生命安全及健康教育政策注意力可以分为巩固提高阶段(1987—2000年)、改革探索阶段(2001—2012年)、深化完善阶段(2013—2022年)3个阶段, 且注意力强度呈整体上升态势。政府对生命安全及健康教育的政策注意力配置方向偏重于健康行为与生活方式领域(39.5%)、安全应急与避险领域(36.2%)及心理健康领域(11.9%), 对生长发育与青春期保健(8.1%)、传染病预防与突发公共卫生事件应对(4.3%)两个领域的关注较少。政府关注了生命安全及健康教育领域20个核心要点, 仍有10个核心要点尚未关注。结论中国学校安全及健康教育政策注意力强度整体提升, 各阶段政策关注对象存在偏差; 政策注意力的均衡性、动态性不足及政策回应存在被动性; 生命安全及健康教育各领域内容及政策注意力配置指向不够全面。建议稳定生命安全及健康教育政策注意力配置总量, 确保配置均衡、动态调整及做好前期预判; 政策优化和调整注重各领域内容的全面性。
- 生命 /
- 安全 /
- 健康教育 /
- 卫生政策
Abstract: Objective To study the allocation of policy attention of life safety and health education in the Work Essentials of the Ministry of Education from 1987 to 2022 based on policy analysis, and to provide reference for the optimization of life safety and health education policy. Methods The contents related to life safety and health education in the Work Essentials of the Ministry of Education from 1987 to 2022 were coded by content analysis method and analyzed quantitatively. Results The attention of life safety and health education policies in schools in China could be divided into three stages: consolidation and improvement stage (1987-2000), reform and exploration stage (2001-2012), and deepening and improvement stage (2013-2022), with the attention intensity was rising as a whole. The government's policy on life safety and health education focused on health behavior and lifestyle (39.5% of the total reference point), safety emergency and risk avoidance (36.2% of the total reference point), mental health (11.9% of the total reference point).The two fields of growth and adolescent health (8.1% of the total reference point), infectious disease prevention and public health emergency response (4.3% of the total reference point) paid less attention. The government had paid attention to 20 core points in the field of life safety and health education, and there were still 10 core points that had not been paid attention to. Conclusion The attention intensity of school safety and health education policy in China has been improved as a whole, and there are deviations in the policy attention at each stage.Limitations also include the inbalance of policy attention, lack of dynamic policy and the passivity of policy response; Life safety and health education in various fields of content and policy attention allocation direction is not comprehensive.It is suggested to stabilize the total amount of attention allocation on life safety and health education policy, to ensure balanced allocation, dynamic adjustment and pre-judgment; More attention should paid on the comprehensiveness of contents in each aspects in policy optimization and adjustment.
- Life /
- Safety /
- Health education /
- Health policy
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

参考文献(13)

[1]	吴晶, 胡浩. 习近平出席全国教育大会并发表重要讲话[EB/OL]. (2018-09-10)[2021-11-16]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-09/10/content_5320835.htm. WU J, HU H. Xi Jinping delivers a speech at the National Education Conference[EB/OL]. (2018-09-10)[2021-11-16]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-09/10/content_5320835.htm. (in Chinese)
[2]	马军, 马迎华. 为生命安全与健康筑牢防线: 《生命安全与健康教育进中小学课程教材指南》解读[J]. 基础教育课程, 2021(23): 10-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6715.2021.23.003 MA J, MA Y H. Building a solid defense line for life safety and health: interpretation of "Life Safety and Health Education into Primary and Secondary School Curriculum Textbook Guide"[J]. Basic Educ Curricul, 2021(23): 10-13. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6715.2021.23.003
[3]	刘培俊. 青少年健康促进的国家战略及其政策着力点[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(1): 10-13. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.01.003 LIU P J. National strategy and policy focus of adolescent health promotion[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(1): 10-13. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.01.003
[4]	叶良海, 吴湘玲. 政策注意力争夺: 一种减少地方政府政策执行失效的分析思路[J]. 青海社会科学, 2017(2): 82-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHSH201702012.htm YE L H, WU X L. Policy attention competition: an analysis of reducing the failure of local government policy implementation[J]. Qinghai Soc Sci, 2017(2): 82-87. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHSH201702012.htm
[5]	王家峰. 认真对待民主治理中的注意力: 评《再思民主政治中的决策制定: 注意力、选择和公共政策》[J]. 公共行政评论, 2013, 6(5): 144-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGXZ201305009.htm WANG J F. Attention in democratic governance: Rethinking Decision-making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice and Public Policy[J]. Public Administr Rev, 2013, 6(5): 144-154. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGXZ201305009.htm
[6]	陈阳. 大众传播学研究方法导论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2007: 198-199. CHEN Y. Introduction to research methods of mass communication[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2007: 198-199. (in Chinese)
[7]	刘景江, 王文星. 管理者注意力研究: 一个最新综述[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2014, 44(2): 78-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJDX201402011.htm LIU J J, WANG W X. Research on managers' attention: a latest review[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Human Soc Sci), 2014, 44(2): 78-87. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJDX201402011.htm
[8]	沙勇忠, 牛春华. 信息分析[M]. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 127. SHA Y Z, NIU C H. Information analysis[M]. 2 ed. Beijing: Science Press, 2016: 127. (in Chinese)
[9]	翟海源, 毕恒达, 刘长萱. 社会及行为科学研究(二): 质性研究方法[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2013: 30-56. ZHAI H Y, BI H D, LIU C X. Social and behavioral science research(Ⅱ): qualitative research methods[M]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2013: 30-56. (in Chinese)
[10]	褚宏启. 教育政策学[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2017: 71. CHU H Q. Education policy science[M]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press, 2017: 71. (in Chinese)
[11]	徐心怡, 于琦, 王琪, 等. 近30年我国健康教育政策的计量分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2020, 47(18): 3343-3347. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF202018023.htm XU X Y, YU Q, WANG Q, et al. Econometric analysis of health education policy in China in recent 30 years[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2020, 47(18): 3343-3347. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF202018023.htm
[12]	王超. 我国学校安全政策注意力演进研究: 基于35年《教育部工作要点》的内容分析(1987—2021)[J]. 广州大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 21(2): 18-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZDX202202002.htm WANG C. Research on the evolution of attention of school safety policy in China: based on the content analysis of the Work Points of the Ministry of Education in 35 years (1987-2021)[J]. J Guangzhou Univ (Soc Sci), 2022, 21(2): 18-31. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZDX202202002.htm
[13]	周珂, 乔石磊. 我国学校体育政策注意力配置的现状与优化: 基于1987—2021《教育部工作要点》的文本分析[J]. 体育学刊, 2022, 29(1): 76-83. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYXK202201011.htm ZHOU K, QIAO S L. The present situation and optimization of attention allocation of school physical education policy in China: based on the text analysis of the Work Points of the Ministry of Education from 1987 to 2021[J]. J Phys Educ, 2022, 29(1): 76-83. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYXK202201011.htm