绘画艺术在多动症儿童课堂干扰行为干预中的应用

陈妍; 李勇

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.09.021

绘画艺术在多动症儿童课堂干扰行为干预中的应用

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.09.021

陈妍¹,
李勇^2, ,

1.
安阳师范学院教育学院, 河南 455000
2.
浙江农林大学暨阳学院

详细信息

作者简介:
陈妍(1982-)，女，河南安阳人，硕士，讲师，主要研究方向为人格心理学、发展与教育心理学

通讯作者:
李勇，E-mail：xljy@qq.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G627.8 R748 R179
计量
- 文章访问数: 901
- HTML全文浏览量: 517
- PDF下载量: 124
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-03-27
- 修回日期: 2022-06-03
- 网络出版日期: 2022-09-23
- 刊出日期: 2022-09-25

Art therapy based on painting for classroom interfering behaviors in ADHD intervention

CHEN Yan¹,
LI Yong^{2
, ,}

1.
Institute of Education, Anyang Normal University, Anyang (455000), Henan Province, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨绘画艺术对多动症儿童课堂干扰行为的干预效果, 为明确绘画艺术干预对多动症儿童治疗效果提供参考依据。方法采用分层随机抽样法, 从河南安阳市文峰区3所小学随机选取60名多动症儿童作为研究对象, 随机均分为两组, 对照组作为空白对照, 不接受任何干预, 观察组接受为期8周的绘画艺术干预。对比两组干预前后的课堂目标行为达成率及Conners儿童行为问卷评分。结果与干预前相比, 观察组儿童干预后各项课堂目标行为(上课不发出噪声、课堂上不重复老师讲话、遵守老师指令、上课不擅自离开座位、参与课堂活动)达成率均明显提高(χ²值分别为23.65, 30.54, 18.54, 16.98, 20.34, P值均 < 0.05), 并且均高于对照组(χ²值分别为16.22, 36.02, 24.43, 38.55, 16.95, P值均 < 0.05)。Conners儿童行为问卷(家长量表)结果显示, 观察组儿童干预后的学习问题、冲动/多动、多动指数评分明显降低(Z值分别为7.63, 8.42, 9.56, P值均 < 0.05), 并且均低于对照组(Z值分别为10.81, 11.25, 10.16, P值均 < 0.05)。Conners儿童行为问卷(教师量表)结果显示, 观察组儿童干预后的品行问题、多动、不注意-被动、多动指数评分均降低(Z值分别为6.32, 7.56, 10.03, 9.18, P值均 < 0.05), 并且均低于对照组(Z值分别为11.66, 19.22, 12.24, 9.01, P值均 < 0.05)。结论对多动症儿童实施绘画艺术干预, 能够有效减少其课堂干扰行为, 提升专注力, 改善多动症行为对多动症儿童有良好的干预效果。
- 绘画 /
- 注意力缺陷障碍伴多动 /
- 行为 /
- 干预性研究 /
- 儿童
Abstract: Objective To explore the effectiveness of art therapy based on painting in ADHD intervene for classroom interfering behaviors. Methods A total of 60 children with ADHD were randomly selected from three primary schools in Wenfeng District, Anyang City, Henan Province.All the children were randomly divided into two groups.The control group received no intervention.The observation group was intervened with painting art for 8 weeks.The achievement rate of classroom goal behavior and the scores of Conners children's behavior questionnaire were compared before and after the experiment. Results The achievement rate of all classroom target behaviors (no noise in class, no repetition of teacher's speech in class, obeying instructions, no leaving the seat without permission in class, participating in classroom activities) in the observation group was significantly higher after intervention (χ²=23.65, 30.54, 18.54, 16.98, 20.34, P < 0.05), and significantly higher than that in the control group (χ²=16.22, 36.02, 24.43, 38.55, 16.95, P < 0.05).The results of Conners children's behavior questionnaire showed that the scores of learning problems, impulse/hyperactivity and hyperactivity index in the observation group were significantly lower after intervention (Z=7.63, 8.42, 9.56, P < 0.05), and significantly lower than those in the control group (Z=10.81, 11.25, 10.16, P < 0.05).Teacher-rated Conners children's behavior questionnaire showed that the scores of behavior problems, hyperactivity, inattention passivity and hyperactivity index in the observation group were significantly lower (Z=6.32, 7.56, 10.03, 9.18, P < 0.05), and significantly lower than those in the control group (Z=11.66, 19.22, 12.24, 9.01, P < 0.05). Conclusion Art therapy based on painting in ADHD intervention can effectively reduce classroom interfering behaviors, promote concentration and improve ADHD symptoms.
- Paintings /
- Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity /
- Behavior /
- Intervention studies /
- Child
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 两组多动症儿童干预前后课堂目标行为达成率比较

Table 1. Comparison of classroom goal behavior achievement rate between the two groups of ADHD children before and after intervention

干预前后	组别	人数	统计值	上课不发出噪音	上课不重复老师讲话	遵守老师指令	上课不擅自离开座位	参与课堂活动
干预前	观察组	30		9(30.00)	11(36.67)	14(46.67)	15(50.00)	12(40.00)
	对照组	30		8(26.67)	8(26.67)	16(53.33)	12(40.00)	10(33.33)
			χ²值	0.66	1.35	1.02	1.98	1.40
			P值	0.14	0.09	0.10	0.08	0.07
干预后	观察组	30		23(76.67)	27(90.00)	26(86.67)	30(100.00)	28(93.33)
	对照组	30		5(16.67)	7(23.33)	14(46.67)	11(36.67)	12(40.00)
			χ²值	16.22	36.02	24.43	38.55	16.95
			P值	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01
注：()内数字为达成率/%。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 两组多动症儿童Conners儿童行为问卷(家长量表)评分比较[M(Q)]

Table 2. Comparison of test results of Conners children's behavior questionnaire (parent scale) between the two groups[M(Q)]

干预前后	组别	人数	统计值	品行问题	学习问题	心身障碍	冲动/多动	焦虑	多动指数
干预前	观察组	30		1.02(0.05)	2.01(0.10)	0.17(0.15)	2.03(0.35)	0.23(0.08)	1.25(0.23)
	对照组	30		1.03(0.04)	1.98(0.14)	0.16(0.11)	2.10(0.41)	0.21(0.06)	1.20(0.34)
			Z值	0.71	0.57	0.26	0.37	0.46	0.77
			P值	0.20	0.10	0.12	0.36	0.46	0.23
干预后	观察组	30		1.03(0.04)	1.51(0.21)	0.16(0.06)	1.56(0.29)	0.22(0.11)	0.91(0.36)
	对照组	30		1.02(0.06)	2.00(0.17)	0.15(0.09)	2.04(0.37)	0.23(0.12)	1.22(0.37)
			Z值	0.74	10.81	1.25	11.25	0.24	10.16
			P值	0.18	0.01	0.07	0.01	0.62	0.01

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 两组多动症儿童Conners儿童行为问卷(教师量表)评分比较[M(Q)]

Table 3. Comparison of test results of Conners children's behavior questionnaire (teacher scale) between the two groups[M(Q)]

干预前后	组别	人数	统计值	品行问题	多动	不注意-被动	多动指数
干预前	观察组	30		1.78(0.42)	2.47(0.49)	2.30(0.45)	2.61(0.38)
	对照组	30		1.76(0.39)	2.50(0.53)	2.33(0.61)	2.59(0.71)
			Z值	0.22	0.41	0.87	0.99
			P值	0.31	0.15	0.42	0.21
干预后	观察组	30		1.34(0.38)	1.27(0.55)	1.52(0.54)	1.94(0.63)
	对照组	30		1.82(0.44)	2.48(0.56)	2.41(0.59)	2.60(0.87)
			Z值	11.66	19.22	12.24	9.01
			P值	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	汤中州, 刘秀勤. 注意力缺陷多动障碍患儿血清微量元素水平检测分析[J]. 青岛医药卫生, 2019, 51(4): 283-285. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5571.2019.04.011 TANG Z Z, LIU X Q. Detection and analysis of levels of serum trace element in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder[J]. Qingdao Med J, 2019, 51(4): 283-285. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5571.2019.04.011
[2]	安家盛, 景佳星, 孙鑫, 等. 注意力缺陷多动障碍的中西医治疗研究进展[J]. 河北中医药学报, 2020, 35(3): 58-61. https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10026-1018187291.htm AN J S, JING J X, SUN X, et al. Research progress in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with traditional Chinese and Western Medicine[J]. J Hebei Tradit Chin Med Pharmacol, 2020, 35(3): 58-61. https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10026-1018187291.htm
[3]	闫秀萍, 邹宇川, 崔永华, 等. 注意缺陷多动障碍对少年犯社会功能损害的影响[J]. 临床精神医学杂志, 2019, 29(3): 180-182. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3220.2019.03.012 YAN X P, ZOU Y C, CUI Y H, et al. Effects of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder on social function impairment of juvenile delinquents[J]. J Clin Psychiatry, 2019, 29(3): 180-182. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3220.2019.03.012
[4]	杜涵. 脑电生物反馈仪在ADHD儿童注意力治疗中的效果分析[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2020, 26(22): 12-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6586.2020.22.006 DU H. Effect Analysis of EEG biofeedback instrument in attention treatment of ADHD children[J]. China Med Devic Inf, 2020, 26(22): 12-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6586.2020.22.006
[5]	杨浩, 宋丽博, 王颖. 学前儿童心理画的个案评价及教育策略[J]. 现代教育论坛, 2020, 3(1): 12-14. YANG H, SONG L B, WANG Y. Case evaluation and educational strategy of preschool children's psychological painting[J]. Mod Educ Forum, 2020, 3(1): 12-14.
[6]	GLOW R A, GLOW P H, RUMP E E. The stability of child behavior disorders: a one year test-retest study of Adelaide versions of the Conners Teacher and Parent Rating Scales[J]. J Abn Child Psychol, 1982, 10(1): 33-60. doi: 10.1007/BF00915950
[7]	李功迎, 宋思佳, 曹龙飞. 精神障碍诊断与统计手册第5版解读[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2014, 2(4): 310-312. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDDZ201404017.htm LI G Y, SONG S J, CAO L F. Interpretation of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders[J]. Chin J Diagnost, 2014, 2(4): 310-312. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDDZ201404017.htm
[8]	龚耀先, 蔡太生. 中国修订韦氏儿童智力量表[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 1994, 2(1): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY401.000.htm GONG Y X, CAI T S. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Revised in China(C-WISC)[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 1994, 2(1): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY401.000.htm
[9]	刘倩然. 实习教师应对小学生课堂问题行为的调查研究[J]. 黑龙江教师发展学院学报, 2021, 40(2): 71-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLJB202102024.htm LIU Q R. Investigation and research on intern teachers' response to primary school students' classroom problems[J]. J Heilongjiang Inst Teacher Dev, 2021, 40(2): 71-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLJB202102024.htm
[10]	VIOLA A I, MARIA A D, CATERINA P, et al. Assessing ADHD through the multi-informant approach: the contribution of the Conners' 3 Scales[J]. J Atten Disord, 2019, 23(6): 641-650. doi: 10.1177/1087054718815581
[11]	范娟, 杜亚松. Conners教师评定量表的中国城市常模和信度研究[J]. 上海精神医学, 2004, 16(2): 69-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSYI200402001.htm FAN J, DU Y S. The norm and reliability of the Conners Teacher Rating Scale in Chinese urban children[J]. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry, 2004, 16(2): 69-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSYI200402001.htm
[12]	涂梦璐, 侯婷婷, 杨福义. 国外学龄前注意缺陷多动障碍儿童研究进展[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2020, 27(9): 53-59. TU M L, HOU T T, YANG F Y. A review of research on preschool children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder over the past decade[J]. Chin J Spec Educ, 2020, 27(9): 53-59.
[13]	张漫雪, 黄颐. 孤独症与多动症神经影像学比较研究进展[J]. 临床精神医学杂志, 2019, 29(3): 208-209. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3220.2019.03.022 ZHANG M X, HUANG Y. Progress in comparative neuroimaging studies of autism and ADHD[J]. J Clin Psych, 2019, 29(3): 208-209. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3220.2019.03.022
[14]	HAEYEN S, HOOREN S, VELD W M, et al. Measuring the contribution of art therapy in multidisciplinary treatment of personality disorders: the construction of the Self expression and Emotion Regulation in Art Therapy Scale (SERATS)[J]. Person Ment Health, 2017, 12(1): 3-14.
[15]	童捷, 孙喜蓉, 俞玮, 等. 团体绘画艺术治疗对慢性精神分裂症患者社会功能康复与生活质量的影响[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2019, 28(6): 532-537. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2019.06.010 TONG J, SUN X R, YU W, et al. Effect of group painting art therapy on social function rehabilitation and quality of life of chronic schizophrenia patients[J]. Chin J Behav Med Brain Sci, 2019, 28(6): 532-537. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2019.06.010
[16]	胡红梅, 薛秋. 感觉统合训练对注意力缺陷儿童干预实验的效果分析[J]. 科技风, 2021, 40(6): 2. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJFT202106067.htm HU H M, XUE Q. Analysis of the effect of intervention on children's attention deficit[J]. Sci Technol Style, 2021, 40(6): 2. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJFT202106067.htm
[17]	刘秋竹, 尹戈. 绘画治疗对情障儿童自我意识干预的个案研究[J]. 乐山师范学院学报, 2019, 34(2): 132-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LSSZ201902014.htm LIU Q Z, YIN G. A case study on the intervention of painting therapy on self-consciousness of children with emotional disabilities[J]. J Leshan Normal Univ, 2019, 34(2): 132-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LSSZ201902014.htm
[18]	李晶. 曼陀罗绘画疗法联合注射用鼠神经生长因子治疗自闭症患儿的临床观察[J]. 国际精神病学杂志, 2019, 46(3): 486-488, 505. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWYJ201903031.htm LI J. Clinical study of mandala painting therapy combined with injection of mouse nerve growth factor in the treatment of children with Autism[J]. J Inter Psych, 2019, 46(3): 486-488, 505. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWYJ201903031.htm
[19]	陈贵玲. 画出心声: 房树人绘画测验的内在作用机制探究[J]. 兰州教育学院学报, 2019, 35(8): 161-163. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LZJY201908061.htm CHEN G L. Draw your heart: a probe into the internal mechanism of Fang Shuren's painting test[J]. J Lanzhou Inst Educ, 2019, 5(8): 161-163. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LZJY201908061.htm
[20]	谯瑞. 沙盘游戏与绘画治疗在解决农村小学留守儿童心理问题中的个案研究[J]. 心理月刊, 2020, 15(4): 59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYJK201713015.htm QIAO R. A case study of sandplay and painting therapy in solving the psychological problems of left behind children in rural primary schools[J]. Psychol Monthly, 2020, 15(4): 59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYJK201713015.htm