父母婚姻质量与中小学生受欺凌及自伤行为的关系

郝义彬; 张恒榛; 吴柯; 田卓旸; 赵明扬; 张文森; 杨斌; 孙长青; 权菊青; 马婧

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.09.015

父母婚姻质量与中小学生受欺凌及自伤行为的关系

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.09.015

1.
郑州大学公共卫生学院, 河南 450001
2.
郑州大学护理与健康学院
3.
郑州大学第一附属中学
4.
郑州大学教育学院

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目 20BRK041

2022年度河南省高校哲学社会科学创新人才支持计划项目 2022-CXRC-10

详细信息

作者简介:
郝义彬(1971-), 男, 河南泌阳人, 博士, 副主任医师, 主要研究方向为医院管理、社会医学与卫生事业管理

通讯作者:
马婧, E-mail: jingma@zzu.edu.cn

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G78 G444 B844.2 G478
计量
- 文章访问数: 507
- HTML全文浏览量: 206
- PDF下载量: 87
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-03-21
- 修回日期: 2022-05-16
- 网络出版日期: 2022-09-23
- 刊出日期: 2022-09-25

Association between parental marital status with bullying and self-injurious behavior among primary and secondary school students

1.
School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou(450001), China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨父母婚姻状况与中小学生受欺凌情况及自伤行为的关系, 为预防中小学生的自伤行为提供干预支持。方法采用分层多阶段整群随机抽样的方法, 抽取南阳、安阳和新乡市11 107名中小学生, 采用自编中小学生欺凌状况调查问卷进行调查。结果中小学生中男生的受欺凌报告率(18.1%)高于女生(9.8%), 女生的自伤行为报告率(3.9%)高于男生(3.2%), 差异均有统计学意义(χ²值分别为155.56, 4.64, P值均 < 0.05);受欺凌程度(r=0.44)和受欺凌种类数(r=0.42)与自伤行为均呈正相关(P值均< 0.01), 父母婚姻关系与自伤行为呈负相关(r=-0.11, P< 0.01);父母婚姻状况对受欺凌程度(β=-0.01)、种类数(β=-0.05)与自伤行为水平之间的关系均有负向调节作用(P值均 < 0.01)。结论父母婚姻质量在中小学生受欺凌影响自伤行为中起调节作用, 父母婚姻质量越低, 受欺凌子女自伤行为风险越高。应关注受欺凌青少年的父母婚姻质量, 从而更好地避免受欺凌青少年自伤行为的发生。
- 婚姻状况 /
- 暴力 /
- 自我伤害行为 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To explore the associations between parental marital status with bullying and self-injurious behavior among primary and secondary school students, and to provide intervention support for the prevention of self-injurious behavior of primary and secondary school students. Methods A total of 11 107 primary and secondary school students in Nanyang, Anyang and Xinxiang city from central China were selected using multistage clustering sampling method. A questionnaire survey regarding bullying was administered. Results Report rate of bullying in boys (18.1%) was higher than that in girls (9.8%), while report rate of self-injurious behavior in girls (3.9%) was higher than that in boys(3.2%)(χ²=155.56, 4.64, P < 0.05). The severity of bullying (r=0.44) and types of bullying (r=0.42) were positively correlated with self-injurious behaviors(P < 0.01), while parental marital status was negatively correlated with self-injurious behavior(r=-0.11, P < 0.01). Parental marital status negatively moderated the relationship between severity of bullying(β=-0.01), types (β=-0.05) with self-injurious behavior(P < 0.01). Conclusion Parental marital status plays a moderating role in the association between bullying and self-injurious behavior among primary and middle school students.The lower parental marital status, the higher rate of self-injurious behavior among bullied children. Comparison of bullied rates among primary and secondary school students with different characteristics.
- Marital status /
- Violence /
- Self-injurious behavior /
- Mental health /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

图 1 父母婚姻状况在中小学生受欺凌程度对自伤行为影响中的调节作用

Figure 1. The moderating role of parents' marital status in the influence of bullying degree on self-injurious behavior of primary and secondary school students

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 父母婚姻状况在中小学生受欺凌种类数对自伤行为影响中的调节作用

Figure 2. The moderating role of parents' marital status in the influence of number of types of bullying on self-injurious behavior of primary and secondary school students

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同特征中小学生受欺凌报告率比较

Table 1. Comparison of reported rate of bullying of primary and secondary school students with different characteristics

人口统计学指标		人数	统计值	言语欺凌	关系欺凌	权利欺凌	躯体欺凌	网络欺凌	受欺凌	自伤行为
性别	男	5 933		750(12.6)	604(10.2)	420(7.1)	137(2.3)	123(2.1)	1 076(18.1)	189(3.2)
	女	5 174		298(5.8)	307(5.9)	202(3.9)	44(0.9)	47(0.9)	509(9.8)	204(3.9)
			χ²值	153.17	66.20	52.70	36.69	24.88	155.56	4.64
			P值	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	0.03
学段	小学	3 585		467(13.0)	367(10.2)	271(7.6)	78(2.2)	76(2.1)	646(18.0)	97(2.7)
	初中	3 794		290(7.6)	273(7.2)	175(4.6)	54(1.4)	43(1.1)	478(12.6)	146(3.8)
	高中	3 728		291(7.8)	271(7.3)	176(4.7)	49(1.3)	51(1.4)	461(12.4)	150(4.0)
			χ²值	79.94	29.13	38.48	9.99	12.89	60.91	10.92
			P值	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01
父母婚姻状况	和谐	9 034		719(8.0)	586(6.5)	386(4.3)	108(1.2)	96(1.1)	1 063(11.8)	232(2.6)
	一般	1 453		226(15.6)	216(14.9)	145(10.0)	32(2.2)	35(2.4)	360(24.8)	91(6.3)
	不和谐/离异/丧偶	620		103(16.6)	109(17.6)	91(14.7)	41(6.6)	39(6.3)	162(26.1)	70(11.3)
			χ²值	124.09	193.43	179.46	109.64	113.76	248.65	165.68
			P值	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01
合计		11 107		1 048(9.8)	911(8.2)	622(5.6)	181(1.6)	170(1.5)	1 585(14.3)	393(12.3)
注：()内数字为报告率/%。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(17)

[1]	李柴全, 张京舒, 吕若然, 等. 北京市初中生自伤行为现状及其与受欺凌行为关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(6): 884-888. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGW202006009.htm LI C Q, ZHANG J S, LYU R R, et al. Self-harm and its association with bullying victimization among junior high school students in Beijing[J]. Chin J Public Health, 2020, 36(6): 884-888. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGW202006009.htm
[2]	唐寒梅, 陈小龙, 卢飞腾, 等. 欺凌行为与青少年非自杀性自伤关系的Meta分析[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018, 18(7): 707-714. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZXZ201807012.htm TANG H M, CHEN X L, LU F T, et al. Association between bullying behaviors and risk of non-suicidal self-injuries among adolescents: a Meta-analysis[J]. Chin J Evid Based Med, 2018, 18(7): 707-714. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZXZ201807012.htm
[3]	COX M J, PALEY B. Families as systems[J]. Ann Rev Psychol, 1997, 48(1): 243. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.243
[4]	唐寒梅, 傅燕艳, 陈小龙, 等. 欺凌与青少年非自杀性自伤关系的研究进展[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2018, 22(1): 89-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBKZ201801021.htm TANG H M, FU Y Y, CHEN X L, et al. Research progress on the relationship between bullying victimization and non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2018, 22(1): 89-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBKZ201801021.htm
[5]	张矗, 常树丽. 深圳市宝安区初中生受欺负现状及原因分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2016, 43(7): 1210-1212. ZHANG C, CHANG S L. The bullying prevalence, cause and influencing factors among junior high school students in Baoan District, Shenzhen City[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2016, 43(7): 1210-1212.
[6]	陈春蓉, 钟晓妮, 邓宇. 重庆市高职院校大学生非自杀性自我伤害行为现状及影响因素分析[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2021, 39(16): 147-148. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDYX202116072.htm CHEN C R, ZHONG X N, DENG Y. Status quo and influencing factors of non-suicidal self-injury behavior among college students in Chongqing Vocational colleges[J]. Health Vocat Educ, 2021, 39(16): 147-148. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDYX202116072.htm
[7]	张文新, 武建芬. Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1999(2): 8-12, 38. ZHANG W X, WU J F. Revision of chinese version of Olweus Child Bullying Questionnaire[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 1999(2): 8-12, 38.
[8]	HYMEL S, SWEARER S M. Four decades of research on school bullying: an introduction[J]. Am Psychol, 2015, 70(4): 293.
[9]	赵天新, 钟意娟, 魏莹娟, 等. 非自杀性自伤青少年的情绪调节策略和家庭功能研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(9): 946-950. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ERTO202109008.htm ZHAO T X, ZHONG Y J, WEI Y J, et al. Emotion regulation strategies and family function in non-suicidal self-injury adolescents[J]. Chin J Child Health Care, 2021, 29(9): 946-950. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ERTO202109008.htm
[10]	许燕, 翁穗芸, 刘松康, 等. 广东地区青少年自伤自杀行为的现状调查及影响因素分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2021, 33(7): 566-569. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYI202107003.htm XU Y, WENG S Y, LIU S K, et al. Current situation and influence factors of suicidal self-injurious behavior in teenagers in Guangdong[J]. Shanghai J Prev Med, 2021, 33(7): 566-569. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYI202107003.htm
[11]	徐涛, 张天成, 张福兰, 等. 中国青少年自伤行为影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2021, 48(4): 706-709, 713. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF202104030.htm XU T, ZHANG T C, ZHANG F L, et al. Influencing factors of self-injury behaviors among Chinese adolescents: a Meta-analysis[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2021, 48(4): 706-709, 713. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF202104030.htm
[12]	马静. 中小学校园欺凌问题现状及其干预研究[J]. 基础教育论坛, 2021(32): 10-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCLT202132007.htm MA J. Study on current situation and intervention of bullying in primary and secondary schools[J]. Foundament Educ Forum, 2021(32): 10-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCLT202132007.htm
[13]	LI D P, ZHANG W H, LI X, et al. Stressful life events and adolescent Internet addiction: the mediating role of psychological needs satisfaction and the moderating role of coping style[J]. Comput Human Behav, 2016, 63: 408-415. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563216303971
[14]	DIANA C, ISABEL N, CÍCERO R P, et al. Risk trajectories of self-destructiveness in adolescence: family core influences[J]. J Child Family Stud, 2014, 23(7): 1172-1181. doi: 10.1007/s10826-013-9777-3
[15]	BAETENS I, CLAES L, MARTIN G, et al. Is nonsuicidal self-injury associated with parenting and family factors?[J]. J Early Adolesc, 2014, 34(3): 387-405. doi: 10.1177/0272431613494006
[16]	BRASFIELD C R. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder[J]. Behav Res Therapy, 1994, 32(8): 899.
[17]	张英俊, 钟杰. 家庭无效环境在心理病理发展中的地位[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(2): 251-255, 243. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201302023.htm ZHANG Y J, ZHONG J. The role of family invalidation in the development of psychopathology[J]. Chin J Clinic Psychol, 2013, 21(2): 251-255, 243. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201302023.htm